What other websites are appropriate for questions about TV or my Questions about Reading the Synopsis?( 50.173.3.170 ( talk) 11:30, 10 December 2014 (UTC)).
if possible, please give me atleast 5 website addresses?( 50.173.3.162 ( talk) 17:17, 10 December 2014 (UTC)).
Come on, I need more specific details than google. I'm already suspended from [tv.com]. What other websites accept any Kind of Questions for svu episodes, Please?( 50.173.3.170 ( talk) 11:19, 12 December 2014 (UTC)).
"Good Morning" Jayron32:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia!
13 December is the day when Swedes perplex the rest of the world by showing up way too early in the morning dressed in white tunics, candles in their hair, singing and bringing saffron buns and breakfast in bed to nice people. Hope you have a bright day!
–
w.carter
-Talk 00:17, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
<font>...</font>
tags which were deprecated in
HTML 4.0 Transitional, marked as invalid in 4.0 Strict, and are not part of
HTML5 at all. I'd love to help you update your signature to use newer code, and if you're interested, I suggest replacing:--[[User:Jayron32|<span style="color:#000099;">Jayron</span>]]'''''[[User talk:Jayron32|<span style="color:#009900;">32</span>]]'''''
--[[User:Jayron32|<span style="color:#009">Jayron</span>]][[User talk:Jayron32|<b style="color:#090">''32''</b>]]
A plate of
spaghetti and meatballs.
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: Game design • Mexico–United States border Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT ( talk) 00:22, 15 December 2014 (UTC) • |
---|
i've removed the ref desk talk page thread on whether telling the truth in eastern elections even matters that you kind of moved to the talk page. Feel free to restore it, but do not taunt Happy Fun Ball. μηδείς ( talk) 06:19, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
An
aurora is a
natural phenomenon.
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: Spaghetti • Game design Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT ( talk) 00:08, 22 December 2014 (UTC) • |
---|
Volume 7, Issue 4 • Fourth Quarter 2014 • About the Newsletter | ||
|
|
|
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS |
The
skyline of
Frankfurt, Germany
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: Natural phenomenon • Spaghetti Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT ( talk) 00:18, 29 December 2014 (UTC) • |
---|
Hi Jayron32! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to ping me with {{ping|DerHexer}}. Cheers, — DerHexer (Talk) 11:10, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Round one of the 2015 WikiCup has begun! So far we've had around 80 signups, which close on February 5. If you have not already signed up and want to do so, then you can add your name here. There have been changes to to several of the points scores for various categories, and the addition of Peer Reviews for the first time. These will work in the same manner as Good Article Reviews, and all of the changes are summarised here.
Remember that only the top 64 scoring competitors will make it through to the second round, and one of the new changes this year is that all scores must be claimed within two weeks of an article's promotion or appearance, so don't forget to add them to your submissions pages! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on
Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on
Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck!
Figureskatingfan (
talk ·
contribs),
Miyagawa (
talk ·
contribs) and
Sturmvogel 66 (
talk ·
contribs)
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from
the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all
massmessage mailings, you may add
Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 20:51, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Dishwashing liquid is a detergent used in dishwashing
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: Skyline • Natural phenomenon Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT ( talk) 00:18, 5 January 2015 (UTC) • |
---|
Actually, there was an edit conflict, but I did not receive any useful or informative message, and so had no idea your comment was being removed. That happens from time to time with the software. It would be simplest all around for you to restore your message exactly the way you want it... AnonMoos ( talk) 00:53, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Sorry. I had a bit of a brain fart. I said that Bakersfield was the largest city unserved by an interstate, but what I meant Fresno. Population 509,000 and about 50 miles from I-5. Just wanted to clarify. 71.194.214.138 ( talk) 02:09, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
The
history of Mongolia includes the foundation, expansion, and fragmentation of the
Mongol Empire in the 13th century
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: Dishwashing liquid • Skyline Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT ( talk) 00:09, 12 January 2015 (UTC) • |
---|
An example of
prose, a type of writing that simulates the natural flow of language
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: History of Mongolia • Dishwashing liquid Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT ( talk) 00:22, 19 January 2015 (UTC) • |
---|
As an uninvolved admin, could you look at Cogolese protests? There's been a lot of work done and seems to be almost if not unanimous support for posting. Thanks. μηδείς ( talk) 04:38, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
The opening of the Beethoven Symphony No. 5, a famous
symphony.
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: Prose • History of Mongolia Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT ( talk) 00:33, 26 January 2015 (UTC) • |
---|
Hate to be formal, but am very surprised by your action:
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
μηδείς ( talk) 01:51, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Freeze dried coffee, an example of the application of
food science
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: Symphony • Prose Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT ( talk) 00:29, 2 February 2015 (UTC) • |
---|
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Washington County, Rhode Island, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Algonquin, Niantic and Newport County. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:59, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi Jayron, I don't know if you've been following the recent threads on the ref desk talk page, but based on some review of that material, I have a simple proposal that I'd like your feedback on before I shop it to the whole group. It's very simple: For a trial period (1 month?), we agree to not remove or hat any questions for reasons of seeking medical/legal advice (and perhaps extend to include requests for opinion). Rather than a free-for-all, we first respond with boilerplate or a template, something along the lines of this:
“ | Hello, and welcome to the Wikipedia Reference desk. Your question seems to be seeking medical or legal advice [or perhaps a request for opinion]. We do not give this type of advice [links to disclaimer and guidelines, header, etc], but our users will be allowed to post citations/links to informational references. We hope this information might be useful to you. If you further pursue advice here, this question may be removed. | ” |
At that point, we can remove any responses that diagnose, proscribe, treat any illness or legal situation, but allow links to RS. Perhaps even demand that any responses include references, or risk removal. Would that seem ok to you? The thing is, we really don't get that many medical legal questions, and I like how this puts us in the position to police ourselves as respondents, rather than posters. As I see it, this proposal is consistent with our guidelines, and it might forestall some debates, because hopefully the use of a template will warn all our regulars (and irregulars) to be on their best behavior. On the upside, we can then provide useful information, such as links to other people's opinion pieces, links to WP pages that are about medical topics, peer-reviewed literature, etc. So, any thoughts? Would you support such an experiment? Thanks, SemanticMantis ( talk) 15:03, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Empire Field,
stadium made with temporary structures, cheaper than permanent.
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: Food science • Symphony Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT ( talk) 00:16, 9 February 2015 (UTC) • |
---|
A Sicilian
ice cream parlour
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: Stadium • Food science Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT ( talk) 00:27, 16 February 2015 (UTC) • |
---|
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alvin and the Chipmunks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jason Lee. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:56, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
The same vandal is at it again, just with a different IP. And yes, I'm aware that he's been blocked from causing trouble yet again, though I request if you can protect my userpage and user talkpage from the same (or different) IP users from causing mischief in the near future? Jon the VGN3rd ( talk) 21:58, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Trailer Trash is a US derogatory term for poor people living in
trailers or
caravans. It appears that these trailer trash happen to live on a
trailer park.
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: Ice cream parlour • Stadium Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT ( talk) 00:55, 23 February 2015 (UTC) • |
---|
I need to keep my fool mouth shut. You had a point. I did listen. I dont think poorly of you. Ceoil ( talk) 13:09, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Volume 8, Issue 1 • Winter 2015 • About the Newsletter | ||
|
|
|
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS |
That's it, the first round is done, sign-ups are closed and we're into round 2. 64 competitors made it into this round, and are now broken into eight groups of eight. The top two of each group will go through to round 3, and then the top scoring 16 "wildcards" across all groups. Round 1 saw some interesting work on some very important articles, with the round leader Freikorp ( submissions) owing most of his 622 points scored to a Featured Article on the 2001 film Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within which qualified for a times-two multiplier. This is a higher score than in previous years, as Godot13 ( submissions) had 500 points in 2014 at the end of round 1, and our very own judge, Sturmvogel_66 ( submissions) led round 1 with 601 points in 2013.
In addition to Freikorp's work, some other important articles and pictures were improved during round one, here's a snapshot of a few of them:
You may also wish to know that The Core Contest is running through the month of March. Head there for further details - they even have actual prizes!
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Figureskatingfan ( talk · contribs · email), Miyagawa ( talk · contribs · email) and Sturmvogel 66 ( talk · contribs · email)
Thanks for your assistance! Miyagawa ( talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiCup.
( Opt-out Instructions) This message was send by Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 04:54, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
That's it, the first round is done, sign-ups are closed and we're into round 2. 64 competitors made it into this round, and are now broken into eight groups of eight. The top two of each group will go through to round 3, and then the top scoring 16 "wildcards" across all groups. Round 1 saw some interesting work on some very important articles, with the round leader Freikorp ( submissions) owing most of his 622 points scored to a Featured Article on the 2001 film Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within which qualified for a times-two multiplier. This is a higher score than in previous years, as Godot13 ( submissions) had 500 points in 2014 at the end of round 1, and our very own judge, Sturmvogel_66 ( submissions) led round 1 with 601 points in 2013.
In addition to Freikorp's work, some other important articles and pictures were improved during round one, here's a snapshot of a few of them:
You may also wish to know that The Core Contest is running through the month of March. Head there for further details - they even have actual prizes!
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Figureskatingfan ( talk · contribs · email), Miyagawa ( talk · contribs · email) and Sturmvogel 66 ( talk · contribs · email)
Thanks for your assistance! Miyagawa ( talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiCup.
( Opt-out Instructions) This message was send by Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 05:55, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi Jayron, based on this, I take it that the Teahouse is one of the few places at Wikipedia where new queries go on top? Thanks, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 18:02, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Jayron! I don't think we have met; I am a brand-new admin here, and I may need some backup dealing with the user 108.25.60.172 who vandalized your talk page. I came across this while checking all the edits made by that user. They turned out to be a vandalism-only account on an active spree, so I blocked them for 48 hours and reverted the various vandalisms they had been scattering throughout Wikipedia. I don't know why they vandalized your page, but I suspect it might have to do with a previous account or user talk page they created, which got repeatedly deleted and finally salted. I don't rememer the name of that talk page, but it was close to one they were now trying to create, No.ob.11.11 or Noob 11 11, something like that. Ring any bells? Anyhow I blocked them for 48 hours; they then proceeded to disruptively edit their talk page so I blocked that too. Unless they get bored in the meantime and go away, I suspect they will come back like gangbusters when their 48 hours is over. So I would appreciate it if you would watchlist them, and take any additional admin action if it turns out to be needed. I am new to blocking so I'm on unfamiliar territory here. Thanks! -- MelanieN ( talk) 05:45, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Nicely put. (And somehow the third person worked well.) — Steve Summit ( talk) 20:46, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Hey, Jayron.
You were helpful putting a block on Héctor Camacho due to the edit warring.
I the meantime I have received verifiable information from the woman who was named in the article and who was making the edits. The bottom line is there is a verifiable (although not on line) notice of engagement, a lengthy interview with Salemassi and Camacho's son in Playboy, an article mentioning her at the funeral according to the New York Post viewable in google news, and plenty of photographs of him with her kissing, in those carnival and airport photo-booths together, and at large family gatherings, as well as photos of her grieving with his parents as part of the family. According to Playboy, she was present at Camacho's son's house and took part in the interview, where she provided plenty of evidence against interest that strengthens her story.
Given the documentation she's provided and the strength of the evidence, I added back a mention of her, in a more neutral way, which she accepts. She has also refrained from edit warring while the page has been protected, understands COI, and accepted at one point that we couldn't print her information without documentation, but then provided it in spades. (There seems to have been some miscommunication of how to get such material introduced.)
I am going to refrain from giving the playboy reference at this point, as a reserve in case the edits are challenged, but she seems to have been a "part of the family".
On this basis, I think the indef semi-protect can be lifted. I check the article regularly, and don't foresee any issues at this point.
Thanks. μηδείς ( talk) 04:51, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi there,
Can you please credit me for
Mohamed Nasheed ITN? Thanks..-
The Herald
the joy of the LORD
my strength 14:44, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Hey Jayron, just wanted to let you know that 68.102.58.146, the IP who you mentioned is dangerously close to being blocked again for creating distant sporting events per WP:TOOSOON, has most likely made a real account ( User:Big Steak ( talk)). Not sure if you're an admin or not but this message is more of an FYI for someone to keep an eye on. Thanks! Jrcla2 ( talk) 03:38, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
I remembered working on his posting two years ago. I was wondering if maybe I had gone mad. μηδείς ( talk) 20:55, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Weird that this has already been nominated once today, before your own nom. The Rambling Man ( talk) 21:44, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
You recently blocked User:Tim.Fosner, but he's talking rubbish at his userpage. Please could you revoke talkpage access? Joseph2302 ( talk) 00:26, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Moose hadley 02:45, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi Jayron, would you please consider adding some topic headings to your entry at Wikipedia:RD_regulars? I know you are quite expert at chemistry and some other areas of science, but there are probably lots of other things I haven't even guessed :) I'm hoping to get participation up, so that it can become a useful resource for all of us. Thanks, SemanticMantis ( talk) 14:37, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
Category:Al Kapone albums, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Wgolf ( talk) 19:33, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
Making personal attacks toward users on their talk page. - Amaury ( talk) 03:32, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Let's imagine a situation
Article says "The capital city of New Hampshire is Concord" and there is a source to back it up.
IP user comes in and changes it to "The capital city of New Hampshire is Manchester" and the source still says it's Concord. You try to undo it but he reverts and says "read the source". You check the source, nope it's still Concord.
How do you call this situation, and what do you do?-- Twofortnights ( talk) 16:32, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Just to let you know, in response to your comment here, you don't even need to be autoconfirmed - WP:ACTRIAL never went through. Mdann52 ( talk) 16:15, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
hello Mr. Jay (if i may call you that) this is Dfrr i know you have heard of me before. well lets cut to the chase this user name User:Trimethylxanthine has only been getting messages from me (which is no problem at all as i a happy to send him mesages) One user who welcomed him here when he first came here in 2007 and User:EpochFail who told him that i told him (Mr. Epoch) about him. User:Dennis Bratland User:Matty.077 User:StuRat User:Conifer and many other users have gotten this message and Mr. Epoch will be talking to Mr. Conifer about Mr, Trimet. so we should be sending him (Mr. Trimet) messages barnstars wikiloves anything to make him feel that people know about him. anyways you can discuss it with the users listed here and User:Conifer who will be happy to speak to you about it. thank you and have a very good year````
Any suggestions? My warning on her Talk page was simply cited on the MfD talk page as retaliation for her vote. Formerly 98 talk| contribs| COI statement 01:23, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
I only just now saw this edit summary: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:Medeis&diff=654725065&oldid=654724876 and wanted to let you know that I meant what I said sincerely, without sarcasm. μηδείς ( talk) 17:10, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
Cheers. I protected one of those refdesk pages 12hrs yesterday, but could have sworn Materialscientist was protecting a week. Now I see the logs are usually a day or less. I will follow suit.
I try to remember this saying: "Don't trust your memory.", but it always slips my mind. :)
Best, Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 23:31, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
May need semi-protection, or at least watchlisting. Abecedare ( talk) 20:58, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
I have placed on hold an unblock request at User talk:PartyPerson 880. I totally agree with your block, but the editor is now apologising and promising to edit constructively in future, in a way which seems to me sincere. In my experience, in this situation, if the editor is unblocked, the promise to edit constructively is kept, and we gain a constructive editor, while the worst that can happen is that the vandalism continues, and we block again very quickly, so little is lost. I am therefore very much inclined to make a WP:ROPE unblock, but I thought I would first ask you if you have any opinion on the matter. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 11:32, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
[Copied from help desk in [3]. I tried to copy the whole section, but got caught in the edit filter as a vandal]
So they can't check if users over a certain age are the same? Is that not a little pointless? Or is it in case they happened to have the same IP as someone else a while ago? 86.190.44.212 19:46 (UTC)
Didn't take long before the perennial pest found out that Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language had been unprotected, so I saw no alternative to reinstating the protection. Favonian ( talk) 20:33, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Teahouse Barnstar | |
Every answer you give is accurate and "on point". Thanks. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 06:09, 18 April 2015 (UTC) |
I saw your name on the volunteers list at WP:PR and it was suggested that I ping someone. So, can you review my article? Best, jona (talk) 03:08, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Jayron32. I'm not 100% certain of the wikipedia policies, but it doesn't seem right to me that a person's private mailing address is being posted, together with their name (and presumably without their knowledge) in these two threads: language desk, reference desk talk page. I mean, I have seen people redact phone numbers and addresses before. If this is correct, can you do the magic admin deletion on the relevant edits? Thank you. 184.147.117.34 ( talk) 00:53, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Did you intend the semi-protection on Wikipedia:Reference desk/Mathematics to be indefinite? I believe that the protection on the other parts of the ref desk has expired, though of course it may need to be reimposed if the vandal returns. The question was raised at WP:HD. -- David Biddulph ( talk) 13:02, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
This is a notification to let you know that there is a requested move discussion ongoing at Talk:Hillary_Rodham_Clinton/April_2015_move_request#Requested_move. You are receiving this notification because you have previously participated in some capacity in naming discussions related to the article in question.
Thanks. And have a nice day. NickCT ( talk) 18:42, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Jayron, I watch WP:ERRORS and didn't see anything ... also, that wasn't an error. What did I miss? - Dank ( push to talk) 00:15, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Also: I want to apologize for the "it's just obvious" tone I was taking on WT:MAIN, that wasn't helpful. Part of the problem is, I think, that the TFA process is missing something it needs. I'll work on that. - Dank ( push to talk) 13:34, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
I think it would have been more appropriate for you to alert me to any errors so that I could fix them and apologize rather than reporting what even you note as probably a mistake to AIV. Donner60 ( talk) 23:31, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
I have added this to the AIV page and leave it here in case you are not monitoring it and to keep all the comments in one place. :What I saw, and what I thought I was reverting, was removal of the redirects. Perhaps I made a mistake and misread those changes. I am sorry that you felt the need to chastise me. I have made a few mistakes over the years but I have made many proper edits and almost 250 reports to AIV which have resulted in blocks.
Please know that I have no intention of being critical or argumentative. I simply felt I needed to explain myself. I know administrators have a hard job and you are not mind readers. I also know you need to act quickly on what you see when there is a backlog. So I apologize if I have seemed petulant. Donner60 ( talk) 23:40, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
I placed no warnings on the user's page. Nonetheless, I have apologized for any trouble or inconvenience caused by my reversion. My report followed warnings by another user. I checked back again and found the user left no edit summaries on the removal of the redirects. On the other hand, I realize that the one sentence substituted for the redirect may have been intended as the beginning of a substantive article or could even be considered a stub. Again, I only note this as explanation and clarification, not to be argumentative. I have changed a few redirects to articles myself. Thank you for your work on these problems and mistakes. Donner60 ( talk) 00:56, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
The IP is correct, the riots were only one night, the protests and curfew have been week-long, the blurb shouldn't imply the riots themselves were a week long. Thanks for posting, in any case. μηδείς ( talk) 03:19, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Quoting you: "If it brings you joy to add them where needed ...", talking about infoboxes, - I would like to express that it would bring me joy to have one for Ray Barra, an article I expanded yesterday (and linked to on the Main page). I may not add one by the power of the holy arbcom, because I didn't turn a red link blue, - I have to carefully watch that or will be taken to arbitration enforcement. If this makes as much sense to you as to me, feel free to add one, - a small one is fine, - I may add. Also I like them small, some idea of place and time at a glance is all I want ;) -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 12:31, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Why did you close the discussion and write 'has no one ever learned ANYTHING around here. Seriously. Just no' - what do you mean? AusLondonder ( talk) 01:46, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I've been working on a page on "The Bible and rape." I just saw the AfD and wanted to ask you whether I've adequately addressed your points. If you would like, I could copy-paste what I have below. I think I've found a great deal of reliable sources on the topic, and I am very careful to have a high quality of referencing, no OR and adhere to NPOV. I still discuss some of the passages you flagged, BUT only if they have been interpreted as such in reliable sources. What do you think? Once again, I can show you what I have so far if you want. Thanks. BenLinus 1214 talk 18:09, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Following the closure of a recent RfC you participated in, I have started an RfC on the separate but related issue of commas after Jr. and Sr.. Please see Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) § RfC: Guidance on commas after Jr. and Sr. and feel free to comment there. Thanks! — sroc 💬 06:03, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
Samuel L. Jackson, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.
Your comment is not true.
How could this be in good faith?-- Zoupan 19:45, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
You seem to love football. That probably means that you have a lot of personal experience in following american football and conversations people have about the history of the nfl, players, games etc. I want your opinion on a few things. (if you would be so kind mein furor) People talk about certain superbowls or regular games that involve conpiracies. (by conspiracy I mean the text book definition/ CA penal code 182-185). How probable is it that refs, players, coaches, owners etc conspire to change variables to alter a game to favor one or more people? It is interesting to think about all the money involved in that industry. I dont't follow football enough to see if there's any evidence or not. I've also heard that teams hire people who try and read lips to see what the coach is saying to a quarterback, and that other people are hired to try and see if anyone on the other team has lip read their coach based on behavior analysis. Even water boys who spike gatorade and water.. If you know anything mind blowing about the nfl I would love to hear it. Agent of the nine ( talk) 19:17, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi Jayron,
Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Joined moths.JPG is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on June 11, 2015. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2015-06-11. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich ( talk) 00:25, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
If a user does original research from different IPs and doesn't want to learn, then what should i do?. Where to report such users?. There is no use discussion with IPs of old editors as they know what they are doing. Should i correct the edit again and again and not report him.-- C E ( talk) 02:22, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
fine we'll close however if I notice myself or anyone else on the talk page get what I consider harassment from this individual ill come back nere, thank you-- Ozzie10aaaa ( talk) 12:55, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Or is it Dan9122? Anyways, this user has been reported to AN/I, but hasn't been dealt with yet. Could you please handle him, he is causing problematic issues. TheGracefulSlick ( talk) 13:21, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
[4] before things spun out of control, though many doubtless are saddened at the loss of opportunity for further drama. Short Brigade Harvester Boris ( talk) 03:34, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Sorry to bother you with this issue of questionable importance, but could you check what a deleted page said -- apparently Special:Contributions/Donovan_delaney made a "legal threat" on a page that got deleted, it may have been their sandbox -- he seems to have forgotten what he said on that page and I can't comment on it since I can't see what the page said. See also: the bottom of this section. — Jeraphine Gryphon ( talk) 15:45, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
This is not WP:ANI -- Jayron 32 20:15, 26 May 2015 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Why do you allow this? 125.209.88.46 ( talk) 18:26, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
This too removing others edits, is not right is it? 125.209.88.46 ( talk) 18:35, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
I like how jay fails to address the context of the claims made against him. I have no idea if those claims are valid or not but it is worrying that jay acts so sophomoric JAY Agent of the nine ( talk) 19:22, 26 May 2015 (UTC) I would like for Jayron to explain why this does not constitute an IBAN violation. ← Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 19:57, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
|
Hi Jayron. I moved the request for an edit filter regarding sections removed from the reference desk to the denied requests section to keep the page tidy. If the filter ( 683) becomes necessary again feel free to re-request :) Sam Walton ( talk) 11:30, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
I noticed that a message you recently left to Stockst may have been unduly harsh for a newcomer. Please remember not to bite the newcomers. If you see someone make a common mistake, try to politely point out what they did wrong and how to correct it. I know you are experienced here, but I think that was a bit harsh don't you? EoRdE6( Come Talk to Me!) 16:56, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
I just wanted to give you a heads up that I am planning on unblocking this user per this here [5] unless you have any serious objections to this. You blocked User:Donovan delaney for making legal threats (and rightfully so). He has apologized and taken them back [6] at the guidance of some other editors. Chris lk02 Chris Kreider 18:47, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I am just here to ask about the Hat/Hab template you added on Ani/I against SandyGeorgia. What is the purpose of the template? The first template begins with hat then it ends with hab. I was about to fix it when I realized that it was used to hide content and the t standed for top and b standed for bottom. Am I wrong? Callmemirela ( Talk) 01:00, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
I'm all for educating new users about copyright, but they ignored the warning I gave them. The user first added copyrighted text at 14:45 PDT on May 27 ( Special:Diff/664338297). I put a notice on their talk page at 15:59 PDT on May 27 ( Special:Diff/664344349), and then they reinserted the material at 11:54 PDT on May 28 ( Special:Diff/664462578). Conifer ( talk) 03:10, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Volume 8, Issue 2 • Spring 2015 • About the Newsletter | ||
|
|
|
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS |
Newest reappearance of the troll that keeps calling people judeophobes, Eurotraśh, etc. Have not warned, because I don't think warning an "editor" that has been blocked across several accounts and a dozen or so IPs in the past week alone is particularly useful. [7]. AddWittyNameHere ( talk) 16:52, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
This edit summary is wonderful. Thanks for the chuckle. MarnetteD| Talk 21:15, 1 June 2015 (UTC) |
Trans Integrity Award | |
For your edits on Talk:Caitlyn Jenner, swiftly dealing with transphobia on Wikipedia, and upholding Wikipedia's policies and guidelines with respect to trans folks. Trans folks and allies thank you for your efforts. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{ re}} 03:18, 2 June 2015 (UTC) |
Hey, since I see you're active at the moment and you're an admin, I submitted Talk:Caitlyn Jenner to WP:RPP asking for it to be set to autoconfirmed for a week. Would you kindly consider the request? Thank you! EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{ re}} 05:50, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
this is not a productive discussion |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
I notice that you are an admin. Can you G7 delete the Daniel Fields re-direct as the re-direct is no longer necessary.-- Yankees10 04:16, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
|
Thank you. Even though you didn't have to or want to delete it, I appreciate that you did. I apologize if you feel I was badgering you, this was not my intention at all when I came to you with this request. Hopefully if we happen to have future interactions they end better than this one. Anyways, Thanks again.-- Yankees10 05:30, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
For User:Gyotu. There doesn't seem to be a way to "thank" blocks, although there should be. Almost makes up for the Phillies' loss. I just got home from. μηδείς ( talk) 04:05, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello,
Jayron32,
The discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Numerous problems with EllenCT has gone on for weeks without any consensus being reached. You were one of the few admins voicing an opinion about a proposal so would you be willing to close this case? I was going to archive it as stale but this act might be frustrating for the involved editors, to not have some resolution to this case. Thank you.
Liz
Read!
Talk! 20:27, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
If you remember, a while ago I asked you about a "The Bible and rape" page I was working on. Well, I worked on it a bunch more, and I would be very grateful if you could look at it again and tell me what you think. Thanks. BenLinus 1214 talk 03:14, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi Jayron32, I have been editing on Wiki for a while now (since 2007) and my current account has been in use since July 2014. I wanted to know (as I could not find any reading for the same) on what are the requirements to upgrade my account to administrator status on Wikipedia - if that is possible at all? Thanks in advance yanka AD =Talk= 05:54, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
Jayron, i apologize, i can't believe at the time i thought i was acting maturely just because i didn't get real mad. What I actually did was sanctimonious and nosy, getting involved in the "flaw" debate. Where i suggested you "relax" probably was very condescending and controlling, and quite annoying. I should have known better because when i long ago would protest about being bullied, the bully would cut me off with "relax!" What makes this much worse is recollecting a time i was very rude to you on science ref desk a few years ago,, something about astronomy. Anyway, I hope the fact that at the time, yesterday, I really thought I was doing right, (acting "maturely" just because I didnt blow up) will help you forgive the passive agressive condescension. Also, thanks for all of your many many terrific contributions to wikipedia. Oh, I forgot to say, it's to your credit that though you were very annoyed, you never were insulting. Rich ( talk) 09:26, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi Jayron. Just wanted to let you know that I've unblocked Donovan delaney, who you blocked per NLT, as they've retracted their legal threat. Sam Walton ( talk) 09:42, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
I loved your recent schooling in the science reference desk. I know I am guilty of "casual talk" but I believe in an appropriate mixture of reliable sources and "casual talk". I do try to find sources but I am a noob. I know I'll get better with time. I was starting to get frustrated with the taste bud post and my radiation post. I worked off of Nimur's response to my radiation post (most helpful as always). It seems that the "no chat no soapbox" rules arn't really enforced (how would you enforce those rules?) keep it up grand master! Agent of the nine ( talk) 20:53, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Can you re-add one or two oldest stories? Another set of DYK queue will be posted soon. -- George Ho ( talk) 03:11, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
By motion, the Arbitration Committee authorises the following injunction effective immediately:
You are receiving this message because you have commented about this matter on the
AN page, the
AE page or the
Case Requests page
and are therefore restricted as specified in (2). For the Arbitration Committee,
L235 (
t /
c /
ping in reply) via
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:30, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
You are receiving this message either because you are a party to the Arbitration enforcement arbitration case, because you have commented in the case request, or the AN or AE discussions leading to this arbitration case, or because you have specifically opted in to receiving these messages. Unless you are a party to this arbitration case, you may opt out of receiving further messages at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Arbitration enforcement/Notification list. The drafters of the Arbitration enforcement arbitration case have published a revised timetable for the case, which changes what you may have been told when the case was opened. The dates have been revised as follows: the Evidence phase will close 5 July 2015, one week earlier than originally scheduled; the Workshop phase will close 26 July 2015, one week later than originally scheduled; the Proposed decision is scheduled to be posted 9 August 2015, two weeks later than originally scheduled. Thank you. On behalf of the arbitration clerks, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 07:58, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
This message is sent at 12:53, 5 July 2015 (UTC) by Arbitration Clerk User:Penwhale via MassMessage on behalf of the Arbitration Committee. You are receiving this message because your name appears on this list and have not elected to opt-out of being notified of development in the arbitration case.
On 5 July, 2015, the following motion was passed and enacted:
You left the threatening message on my talk page. I am very aware of this policy and the other discussions of MOS:Identity. What exactly are you implying? That I did something wrong? Who is the judge of this? Trackinfo ( talk) 04:25, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Looking at the user compare report at the current SPI /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Bowei_Huang_2 I see you blocked User:123.100.149.51 for vandalism in April. You may be interested to know that he and the new user Uesr:Nineguy appear to be the same person, with IP 123 posting this question at the ref desk then subsequently erasing his own address and overwriting it with the signature of registered user Nineguy. Given the current blizzard of random posts by Nineguy, maybe you could consider doing something? Thanks. μηδείς ( talk) 16:42, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
I see you removed [8] a post just as I was posting some references. Is it so strange to think that someone would ask us a good faith question about nude modeling? Here's what I was posting when your removal caused an edit conflict.
Honestly, what problem would that question and response cause? If OP was trolling, I don't think my response will be much fun. Whatever, SemanticMantis ( talk) 21:37, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi Jayron32,
Despite your warning the page has been revert back by IP 173.71.50.211 again, what should be the next step in this case, I dont really want to get into edit war, but would likely to know from you, if i want to update something on that page what should i do ? Kulvinder Singh 19:40, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
I posted a question on nude modeling on the Miscellaneous Reference Desk and this happened. I'm pretty sure just that first redacted message was mine (I might have had a second correcting a spelling error or something, I can't recall the circumstances of posting exactly.) I just checked in to see if there were any replies, and saw the history of the page and your edit description: "Owned by the self-admitted troll. Nice...".
Did my question violate some rule? Am I considered a troll because of my question? I'm just confused what rules I broke that were so bad the entire question needed to be unpersoned. I just moved to a new city so I've never used this IP Address before. 2605:6000:EA01:7E00:F998:C192:853C:97E2 ( talk) 09:05, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Would you reinsert the oldest blurb? The current MP is outbalanced by lengthy left side. Also, the next DYK queue will be just as lengthy. -- George Ho ( talk) 17:38, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Would you reinsert oldest blurb, discovery of planet Kepler-452b. The next queue will outbalance the right column more than current state. I previewed the Main Page with the next set. -- George Ho ( talk) 06:58, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
Currently, it's outbalanced. Also, the next DYK queue will outbalance the ITN. -- George Ho ( talk) 02:09, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I see that your active at ITN, and I was wondering if you could you please post Roddy Piper to the RD ticker at ITN? I'd rather not have a repeat of the Dusty Rhodes fiasco where it had consensus for several days but was ignored by admins then rejected for being too old. It's been several days and the discussion has stalled. There is overwhelming consensus to post, and the article has improved markedly. ITN is not GAC, and while the article is far from perfect, I think 134 references is more than enough. -- Scorpion 0422 12:40, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for posting it. I'll fix any citation tags either tonight or tomorrow. -- Scorpion 0422 20:52, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hampton Beach, New Hampshire, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Spit and Rye Beach. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:48, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
What other websites are appropriate for questions about TV or my Questions about Reading the Synopsis?( 50.173.3.170 ( talk) 11:30, 10 December 2014 (UTC)).
if possible, please give me atleast 5 website addresses?( 50.173.3.162 ( talk) 17:17, 10 December 2014 (UTC)).
Come on, I need more specific details than google. I'm already suspended from [tv.com]. What other websites accept any Kind of Questions for svu episodes, Please?( 50.173.3.170 ( talk) 11:19, 12 December 2014 (UTC)).
"Good Morning" Jayron32:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia!
13 December is the day when Swedes perplex the rest of the world by showing up way too early in the morning dressed in white tunics, candles in their hair, singing and bringing saffron buns and breakfast in bed to nice people. Hope you have a bright day!
–
w.carter
-Talk 00:17, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
<font>...</font>
tags which were deprecated in
HTML 4.0 Transitional, marked as invalid in 4.0 Strict, and are not part of
HTML5 at all. I'd love to help you update your signature to use newer code, and if you're interested, I suggest replacing:--[[User:Jayron32|<span style="color:#000099;">Jayron</span>]]'''''[[User talk:Jayron32|<span style="color:#009900;">32</span>]]'''''
--[[User:Jayron32|<span style="color:#009">Jayron</span>]][[User talk:Jayron32|<b style="color:#090">''32''</b>]]
A plate of
spaghetti and meatballs.
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: Game design • Mexico–United States border Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT ( talk) 00:22, 15 December 2014 (UTC) • |
---|
i've removed the ref desk talk page thread on whether telling the truth in eastern elections even matters that you kind of moved to the talk page. Feel free to restore it, but do not taunt Happy Fun Ball. μηδείς ( talk) 06:19, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
An
aurora is a
natural phenomenon.
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: Spaghetti • Game design Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT ( talk) 00:08, 22 December 2014 (UTC) • |
---|
Volume 7, Issue 4 • Fourth Quarter 2014 • About the Newsletter | ||
|
|
|
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS |
The
skyline of
Frankfurt, Germany
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: Natural phenomenon • Spaghetti Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT ( talk) 00:18, 29 December 2014 (UTC) • |
---|
Hi Jayron32! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to ping me with {{ping|DerHexer}}. Cheers, — DerHexer (Talk) 11:10, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Round one of the 2015 WikiCup has begun! So far we've had around 80 signups, which close on February 5. If you have not already signed up and want to do so, then you can add your name here. There have been changes to to several of the points scores for various categories, and the addition of Peer Reviews for the first time. These will work in the same manner as Good Article Reviews, and all of the changes are summarised here.
Remember that only the top 64 scoring competitors will make it through to the second round, and one of the new changes this year is that all scores must be claimed within two weeks of an article's promotion or appearance, so don't forget to add them to your submissions pages! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on
Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on
Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck!
Figureskatingfan (
talk ·
contribs),
Miyagawa (
talk ·
contribs) and
Sturmvogel 66 (
talk ·
contribs)
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from
the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all
massmessage mailings, you may add
Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 20:51, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Dishwashing liquid is a detergent used in dishwashing
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: Skyline • Natural phenomenon Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT ( talk) 00:18, 5 January 2015 (UTC) • |
---|
Actually, there was an edit conflict, but I did not receive any useful or informative message, and so had no idea your comment was being removed. That happens from time to time with the software. It would be simplest all around for you to restore your message exactly the way you want it... AnonMoos ( talk) 00:53, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Sorry. I had a bit of a brain fart. I said that Bakersfield was the largest city unserved by an interstate, but what I meant Fresno. Population 509,000 and about 50 miles from I-5. Just wanted to clarify. 71.194.214.138 ( talk) 02:09, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
The
history of Mongolia includes the foundation, expansion, and fragmentation of the
Mongol Empire in the 13th century
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: Dishwashing liquid • Skyline Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT ( talk) 00:09, 12 January 2015 (UTC) • |
---|
An example of
prose, a type of writing that simulates the natural flow of language
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: History of Mongolia • Dishwashing liquid Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT ( talk) 00:22, 19 January 2015 (UTC) • |
---|
As an uninvolved admin, could you look at Cogolese protests? There's been a lot of work done and seems to be almost if not unanimous support for posting. Thanks. μηδείς ( talk) 04:38, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
The opening of the Beethoven Symphony No. 5, a famous
symphony.
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: Prose • History of Mongolia Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT ( talk) 00:33, 26 January 2015 (UTC) • |
---|
Hate to be formal, but am very surprised by your action:
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
μηδείς ( talk) 01:51, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Freeze dried coffee, an example of the application of
food science
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: Symphony • Prose Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT ( talk) 00:29, 2 February 2015 (UTC) • |
---|
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Washington County, Rhode Island, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Algonquin, Niantic and Newport County. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:59, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi Jayron, I don't know if you've been following the recent threads on the ref desk talk page, but based on some review of that material, I have a simple proposal that I'd like your feedback on before I shop it to the whole group. It's very simple: For a trial period (1 month?), we agree to not remove or hat any questions for reasons of seeking medical/legal advice (and perhaps extend to include requests for opinion). Rather than a free-for-all, we first respond with boilerplate or a template, something along the lines of this:
“ | Hello, and welcome to the Wikipedia Reference desk. Your question seems to be seeking medical or legal advice [or perhaps a request for opinion]. We do not give this type of advice [links to disclaimer and guidelines, header, etc], but our users will be allowed to post citations/links to informational references. We hope this information might be useful to you. If you further pursue advice here, this question may be removed. | ” |
At that point, we can remove any responses that diagnose, proscribe, treat any illness or legal situation, but allow links to RS. Perhaps even demand that any responses include references, or risk removal. Would that seem ok to you? The thing is, we really don't get that many medical legal questions, and I like how this puts us in the position to police ourselves as respondents, rather than posters. As I see it, this proposal is consistent with our guidelines, and it might forestall some debates, because hopefully the use of a template will warn all our regulars (and irregulars) to be on their best behavior. On the upside, we can then provide useful information, such as links to other people's opinion pieces, links to WP pages that are about medical topics, peer-reviewed literature, etc. So, any thoughts? Would you support such an experiment? Thanks, SemanticMantis ( talk) 15:03, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Empire Field,
stadium made with temporary structures, cheaper than permanent.
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: Food science • Symphony Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT ( talk) 00:16, 9 February 2015 (UTC) • |
---|
A Sicilian
ice cream parlour
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: Stadium • Food science Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT ( talk) 00:27, 16 February 2015 (UTC) • |
---|
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alvin and the Chipmunks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jason Lee. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:56, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
The same vandal is at it again, just with a different IP. And yes, I'm aware that he's been blocked from causing trouble yet again, though I request if you can protect my userpage and user talkpage from the same (or different) IP users from causing mischief in the near future? Jon the VGN3rd ( talk) 21:58, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Trailer Trash is a US derogatory term for poor people living in
trailers or
caravans. It appears that these trailer trash happen to live on a
trailer park.
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: Ice cream parlour • Stadium Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT ( talk) 00:55, 23 February 2015 (UTC) • |
---|
I need to keep my fool mouth shut. You had a point. I did listen. I dont think poorly of you. Ceoil ( talk) 13:09, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Volume 8, Issue 1 • Winter 2015 • About the Newsletter | ||
|
|
|
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS |
That's it, the first round is done, sign-ups are closed and we're into round 2. 64 competitors made it into this round, and are now broken into eight groups of eight. The top two of each group will go through to round 3, and then the top scoring 16 "wildcards" across all groups. Round 1 saw some interesting work on some very important articles, with the round leader Freikorp ( submissions) owing most of his 622 points scored to a Featured Article on the 2001 film Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within which qualified for a times-two multiplier. This is a higher score than in previous years, as Godot13 ( submissions) had 500 points in 2014 at the end of round 1, and our very own judge, Sturmvogel_66 ( submissions) led round 1 with 601 points in 2013.
In addition to Freikorp's work, some other important articles and pictures were improved during round one, here's a snapshot of a few of them:
You may also wish to know that The Core Contest is running through the month of March. Head there for further details - they even have actual prizes!
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Figureskatingfan ( talk · contribs · email), Miyagawa ( talk · contribs · email) and Sturmvogel 66 ( talk · contribs · email)
Thanks for your assistance! Miyagawa ( talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiCup.
( Opt-out Instructions) This message was send by Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 04:54, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
That's it, the first round is done, sign-ups are closed and we're into round 2. 64 competitors made it into this round, and are now broken into eight groups of eight. The top two of each group will go through to round 3, and then the top scoring 16 "wildcards" across all groups. Round 1 saw some interesting work on some very important articles, with the round leader Freikorp ( submissions) owing most of his 622 points scored to a Featured Article on the 2001 film Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within which qualified for a times-two multiplier. This is a higher score than in previous years, as Godot13 ( submissions) had 500 points in 2014 at the end of round 1, and our very own judge, Sturmvogel_66 ( submissions) led round 1 with 601 points in 2013.
In addition to Freikorp's work, some other important articles and pictures were improved during round one, here's a snapshot of a few of them:
You may also wish to know that The Core Contest is running through the month of March. Head there for further details - they even have actual prizes!
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Figureskatingfan ( talk · contribs · email), Miyagawa ( talk · contribs · email) and Sturmvogel 66 ( talk · contribs · email)
Thanks for your assistance! Miyagawa ( talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiCup.
( Opt-out Instructions) This message was send by Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 05:55, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi Jayron, based on this, I take it that the Teahouse is one of the few places at Wikipedia where new queries go on top? Thanks, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 18:02, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Jayron! I don't think we have met; I am a brand-new admin here, and I may need some backup dealing with the user 108.25.60.172 who vandalized your talk page. I came across this while checking all the edits made by that user. They turned out to be a vandalism-only account on an active spree, so I blocked them for 48 hours and reverted the various vandalisms they had been scattering throughout Wikipedia. I don't know why they vandalized your page, but I suspect it might have to do with a previous account or user talk page they created, which got repeatedly deleted and finally salted. I don't rememer the name of that talk page, but it was close to one they were now trying to create, No.ob.11.11 or Noob 11 11, something like that. Ring any bells? Anyhow I blocked them for 48 hours; they then proceeded to disruptively edit their talk page so I blocked that too. Unless they get bored in the meantime and go away, I suspect they will come back like gangbusters when their 48 hours is over. So I would appreciate it if you would watchlist them, and take any additional admin action if it turns out to be needed. I am new to blocking so I'm on unfamiliar territory here. Thanks! -- MelanieN ( talk) 05:45, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Nicely put. (And somehow the third person worked well.) — Steve Summit ( talk) 20:46, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Hey, Jayron.
You were helpful putting a block on Héctor Camacho due to the edit warring.
I the meantime I have received verifiable information from the woman who was named in the article and who was making the edits. The bottom line is there is a verifiable (although not on line) notice of engagement, a lengthy interview with Salemassi and Camacho's son in Playboy, an article mentioning her at the funeral according to the New York Post viewable in google news, and plenty of photographs of him with her kissing, in those carnival and airport photo-booths together, and at large family gatherings, as well as photos of her grieving with his parents as part of the family. According to Playboy, she was present at Camacho's son's house and took part in the interview, where she provided plenty of evidence against interest that strengthens her story.
Given the documentation she's provided and the strength of the evidence, I added back a mention of her, in a more neutral way, which she accepts. She has also refrained from edit warring while the page has been protected, understands COI, and accepted at one point that we couldn't print her information without documentation, but then provided it in spades. (There seems to have been some miscommunication of how to get such material introduced.)
I am going to refrain from giving the playboy reference at this point, as a reserve in case the edits are challenged, but she seems to have been a "part of the family".
On this basis, I think the indef semi-protect can be lifted. I check the article regularly, and don't foresee any issues at this point.
Thanks. μηδείς ( talk) 04:51, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi there,
Can you please credit me for
Mohamed Nasheed ITN? Thanks..-
The Herald
the joy of the LORD
my strength 14:44, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Hey Jayron, just wanted to let you know that 68.102.58.146, the IP who you mentioned is dangerously close to being blocked again for creating distant sporting events per WP:TOOSOON, has most likely made a real account ( User:Big Steak ( talk)). Not sure if you're an admin or not but this message is more of an FYI for someone to keep an eye on. Thanks! Jrcla2 ( talk) 03:38, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
I remembered working on his posting two years ago. I was wondering if maybe I had gone mad. μηδείς ( talk) 20:55, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Weird that this has already been nominated once today, before your own nom. The Rambling Man ( talk) 21:44, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
You recently blocked User:Tim.Fosner, but he's talking rubbish at his userpage. Please could you revoke talkpage access? Joseph2302 ( talk) 00:26, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Moose hadley 02:45, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi Jayron, would you please consider adding some topic headings to your entry at Wikipedia:RD_regulars? I know you are quite expert at chemistry and some other areas of science, but there are probably lots of other things I haven't even guessed :) I'm hoping to get participation up, so that it can become a useful resource for all of us. Thanks, SemanticMantis ( talk) 14:37, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
Category:Al Kapone albums, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Wgolf ( talk) 19:33, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
Making personal attacks toward users on their talk page. - Amaury ( talk) 03:32, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Let's imagine a situation
Article says "The capital city of New Hampshire is Concord" and there is a source to back it up.
IP user comes in and changes it to "The capital city of New Hampshire is Manchester" and the source still says it's Concord. You try to undo it but he reverts and says "read the source". You check the source, nope it's still Concord.
How do you call this situation, and what do you do?-- Twofortnights ( talk) 16:32, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Just to let you know, in response to your comment here, you don't even need to be autoconfirmed - WP:ACTRIAL never went through. Mdann52 ( talk) 16:15, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
hello Mr. Jay (if i may call you that) this is Dfrr i know you have heard of me before. well lets cut to the chase this user name User:Trimethylxanthine has only been getting messages from me (which is no problem at all as i a happy to send him mesages) One user who welcomed him here when he first came here in 2007 and User:EpochFail who told him that i told him (Mr. Epoch) about him. User:Dennis Bratland User:Matty.077 User:StuRat User:Conifer and many other users have gotten this message and Mr. Epoch will be talking to Mr. Conifer about Mr, Trimet. so we should be sending him (Mr. Trimet) messages barnstars wikiloves anything to make him feel that people know about him. anyways you can discuss it with the users listed here and User:Conifer who will be happy to speak to you about it. thank you and have a very good year````
Any suggestions? My warning on her Talk page was simply cited on the MfD talk page as retaliation for her vote. Formerly 98 talk| contribs| COI statement 01:23, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
I only just now saw this edit summary: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:Medeis&diff=654725065&oldid=654724876 and wanted to let you know that I meant what I said sincerely, without sarcasm. μηδείς ( talk) 17:10, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
Cheers. I protected one of those refdesk pages 12hrs yesterday, but could have sworn Materialscientist was protecting a week. Now I see the logs are usually a day or less. I will follow suit.
I try to remember this saying: "Don't trust your memory.", but it always slips my mind. :)
Best, Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 23:31, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
May need semi-protection, or at least watchlisting. Abecedare ( talk) 20:58, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
I have placed on hold an unblock request at User talk:PartyPerson 880. I totally agree with your block, but the editor is now apologising and promising to edit constructively in future, in a way which seems to me sincere. In my experience, in this situation, if the editor is unblocked, the promise to edit constructively is kept, and we gain a constructive editor, while the worst that can happen is that the vandalism continues, and we block again very quickly, so little is lost. I am therefore very much inclined to make a WP:ROPE unblock, but I thought I would first ask you if you have any opinion on the matter. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 11:32, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
[Copied from help desk in [3]. I tried to copy the whole section, but got caught in the edit filter as a vandal]
So they can't check if users over a certain age are the same? Is that not a little pointless? Or is it in case they happened to have the same IP as someone else a while ago? 86.190.44.212 19:46 (UTC)
Didn't take long before the perennial pest found out that Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language had been unprotected, so I saw no alternative to reinstating the protection. Favonian ( talk) 20:33, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Teahouse Barnstar | |
Every answer you give is accurate and "on point". Thanks. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 06:09, 18 April 2015 (UTC) |
I saw your name on the volunteers list at WP:PR and it was suggested that I ping someone. So, can you review my article? Best, jona (talk) 03:08, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Jayron32. I'm not 100% certain of the wikipedia policies, but it doesn't seem right to me that a person's private mailing address is being posted, together with their name (and presumably without their knowledge) in these two threads: language desk, reference desk talk page. I mean, I have seen people redact phone numbers and addresses before. If this is correct, can you do the magic admin deletion on the relevant edits? Thank you. 184.147.117.34 ( talk) 00:53, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Did you intend the semi-protection on Wikipedia:Reference desk/Mathematics to be indefinite? I believe that the protection on the other parts of the ref desk has expired, though of course it may need to be reimposed if the vandal returns. The question was raised at WP:HD. -- David Biddulph ( talk) 13:02, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
This is a notification to let you know that there is a requested move discussion ongoing at Talk:Hillary_Rodham_Clinton/April_2015_move_request#Requested_move. You are receiving this notification because you have previously participated in some capacity in naming discussions related to the article in question.
Thanks. And have a nice day. NickCT ( talk) 18:42, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Jayron, I watch WP:ERRORS and didn't see anything ... also, that wasn't an error. What did I miss? - Dank ( push to talk) 00:15, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Also: I want to apologize for the "it's just obvious" tone I was taking on WT:MAIN, that wasn't helpful. Part of the problem is, I think, that the TFA process is missing something it needs. I'll work on that. - Dank ( push to talk) 13:34, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
I think it would have been more appropriate for you to alert me to any errors so that I could fix them and apologize rather than reporting what even you note as probably a mistake to AIV. Donner60 ( talk) 23:31, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
I have added this to the AIV page and leave it here in case you are not monitoring it and to keep all the comments in one place. :What I saw, and what I thought I was reverting, was removal of the redirects. Perhaps I made a mistake and misread those changes. I am sorry that you felt the need to chastise me. I have made a few mistakes over the years but I have made many proper edits and almost 250 reports to AIV which have resulted in blocks.
Please know that I have no intention of being critical or argumentative. I simply felt I needed to explain myself. I know administrators have a hard job and you are not mind readers. I also know you need to act quickly on what you see when there is a backlog. So I apologize if I have seemed petulant. Donner60 ( talk) 23:40, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
I placed no warnings on the user's page. Nonetheless, I have apologized for any trouble or inconvenience caused by my reversion. My report followed warnings by another user. I checked back again and found the user left no edit summaries on the removal of the redirects. On the other hand, I realize that the one sentence substituted for the redirect may have been intended as the beginning of a substantive article or could even be considered a stub. Again, I only note this as explanation and clarification, not to be argumentative. I have changed a few redirects to articles myself. Thank you for your work on these problems and mistakes. Donner60 ( talk) 00:56, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
The IP is correct, the riots were only one night, the protests and curfew have been week-long, the blurb shouldn't imply the riots themselves were a week long. Thanks for posting, in any case. μηδείς ( talk) 03:19, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Quoting you: "If it brings you joy to add them where needed ...", talking about infoboxes, - I would like to express that it would bring me joy to have one for Ray Barra, an article I expanded yesterday (and linked to on the Main page). I may not add one by the power of the holy arbcom, because I didn't turn a red link blue, - I have to carefully watch that or will be taken to arbitration enforcement. If this makes as much sense to you as to me, feel free to add one, - a small one is fine, - I may add. Also I like them small, some idea of place and time at a glance is all I want ;) -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 12:31, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Why did you close the discussion and write 'has no one ever learned ANYTHING around here. Seriously. Just no' - what do you mean? AusLondonder ( talk) 01:46, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I've been working on a page on "The Bible and rape." I just saw the AfD and wanted to ask you whether I've adequately addressed your points. If you would like, I could copy-paste what I have below. I think I've found a great deal of reliable sources on the topic, and I am very careful to have a high quality of referencing, no OR and adhere to NPOV. I still discuss some of the passages you flagged, BUT only if they have been interpreted as such in reliable sources. What do you think? Once again, I can show you what I have so far if you want. Thanks. BenLinus 1214 talk 18:09, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Following the closure of a recent RfC you participated in, I have started an RfC on the separate but related issue of commas after Jr. and Sr.. Please see Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) § RfC: Guidance on commas after Jr. and Sr. and feel free to comment there. Thanks! — sroc 💬 06:03, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
Samuel L. Jackson, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.
Your comment is not true.
How could this be in good faith?-- Zoupan 19:45, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
You seem to love football. That probably means that you have a lot of personal experience in following american football and conversations people have about the history of the nfl, players, games etc. I want your opinion on a few things. (if you would be so kind mein furor) People talk about certain superbowls or regular games that involve conpiracies. (by conspiracy I mean the text book definition/ CA penal code 182-185). How probable is it that refs, players, coaches, owners etc conspire to change variables to alter a game to favor one or more people? It is interesting to think about all the money involved in that industry. I dont't follow football enough to see if there's any evidence or not. I've also heard that teams hire people who try and read lips to see what the coach is saying to a quarterback, and that other people are hired to try and see if anyone on the other team has lip read their coach based on behavior analysis. Even water boys who spike gatorade and water.. If you know anything mind blowing about the nfl I would love to hear it. Agent of the nine ( talk) 19:17, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi Jayron,
Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Joined moths.JPG is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on June 11, 2015. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2015-06-11. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich ( talk) 00:25, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
If a user does original research from different IPs and doesn't want to learn, then what should i do?. Where to report such users?. There is no use discussion with IPs of old editors as they know what they are doing. Should i correct the edit again and again and not report him.-- C E ( talk) 02:22, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
fine we'll close however if I notice myself or anyone else on the talk page get what I consider harassment from this individual ill come back nere, thank you-- Ozzie10aaaa ( talk) 12:55, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Or is it Dan9122? Anyways, this user has been reported to AN/I, but hasn't been dealt with yet. Could you please handle him, he is causing problematic issues. TheGracefulSlick ( talk) 13:21, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
[4] before things spun out of control, though many doubtless are saddened at the loss of opportunity for further drama. Short Brigade Harvester Boris ( talk) 03:34, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Sorry to bother you with this issue of questionable importance, but could you check what a deleted page said -- apparently Special:Contributions/Donovan_delaney made a "legal threat" on a page that got deleted, it may have been their sandbox -- he seems to have forgotten what he said on that page and I can't comment on it since I can't see what the page said. See also: the bottom of this section. — Jeraphine Gryphon ( talk) 15:45, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
This is not WP:ANI -- Jayron 32 20:15, 26 May 2015 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Why do you allow this? 125.209.88.46 ( talk) 18:26, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
This too removing others edits, is not right is it? 125.209.88.46 ( talk) 18:35, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
I like how jay fails to address the context of the claims made against him. I have no idea if those claims are valid or not but it is worrying that jay acts so sophomoric JAY Agent of the nine ( talk) 19:22, 26 May 2015 (UTC) I would like for Jayron to explain why this does not constitute an IBAN violation. ← Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 19:57, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
|
Hi Jayron. I moved the request for an edit filter regarding sections removed from the reference desk to the denied requests section to keep the page tidy. If the filter ( 683) becomes necessary again feel free to re-request :) Sam Walton ( talk) 11:30, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
I noticed that a message you recently left to Stockst may have been unduly harsh for a newcomer. Please remember not to bite the newcomers. If you see someone make a common mistake, try to politely point out what they did wrong and how to correct it. I know you are experienced here, but I think that was a bit harsh don't you? EoRdE6( Come Talk to Me!) 16:56, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
I just wanted to give you a heads up that I am planning on unblocking this user per this here [5] unless you have any serious objections to this. You blocked User:Donovan delaney for making legal threats (and rightfully so). He has apologized and taken them back [6] at the guidance of some other editors. Chris lk02 Chris Kreider 18:47, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I am just here to ask about the Hat/Hab template you added on Ani/I against SandyGeorgia. What is the purpose of the template? The first template begins with hat then it ends with hab. I was about to fix it when I realized that it was used to hide content and the t standed for top and b standed for bottom. Am I wrong? Callmemirela ( Talk) 01:00, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
I'm all for educating new users about copyright, but they ignored the warning I gave them. The user first added copyrighted text at 14:45 PDT on May 27 ( Special:Diff/664338297). I put a notice on their talk page at 15:59 PDT on May 27 ( Special:Diff/664344349), and then they reinserted the material at 11:54 PDT on May 28 ( Special:Diff/664462578). Conifer ( talk) 03:10, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Volume 8, Issue 2 • Spring 2015 • About the Newsletter | ||
|
|
|
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS |
Newest reappearance of the troll that keeps calling people judeophobes, Eurotraśh, etc. Have not warned, because I don't think warning an "editor" that has been blocked across several accounts and a dozen or so IPs in the past week alone is particularly useful. [7]. AddWittyNameHere ( talk) 16:52, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
This edit summary is wonderful. Thanks for the chuckle. MarnetteD| Talk 21:15, 1 June 2015 (UTC) |
Trans Integrity Award | |
For your edits on Talk:Caitlyn Jenner, swiftly dealing with transphobia on Wikipedia, and upholding Wikipedia's policies and guidelines with respect to trans folks. Trans folks and allies thank you for your efforts. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{ re}} 03:18, 2 June 2015 (UTC) |
Hey, since I see you're active at the moment and you're an admin, I submitted Talk:Caitlyn Jenner to WP:RPP asking for it to be set to autoconfirmed for a week. Would you kindly consider the request? Thank you! EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{ re}} 05:50, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
this is not a productive discussion |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
I notice that you are an admin. Can you G7 delete the Daniel Fields re-direct as the re-direct is no longer necessary.-- Yankees10 04:16, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
|
Thank you. Even though you didn't have to or want to delete it, I appreciate that you did. I apologize if you feel I was badgering you, this was not my intention at all when I came to you with this request. Hopefully if we happen to have future interactions they end better than this one. Anyways, Thanks again.-- Yankees10 05:30, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
For User:Gyotu. There doesn't seem to be a way to "thank" blocks, although there should be. Almost makes up for the Phillies' loss. I just got home from. μηδείς ( talk) 04:05, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello,
Jayron32,
The discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Numerous problems with EllenCT has gone on for weeks without any consensus being reached. You were one of the few admins voicing an opinion about a proposal so would you be willing to close this case? I was going to archive it as stale but this act might be frustrating for the involved editors, to not have some resolution to this case. Thank you.
Liz
Read!
Talk! 20:27, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
If you remember, a while ago I asked you about a "The Bible and rape" page I was working on. Well, I worked on it a bunch more, and I would be very grateful if you could look at it again and tell me what you think. Thanks. BenLinus 1214 talk 03:14, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi Jayron32, I have been editing on Wiki for a while now (since 2007) and my current account has been in use since July 2014. I wanted to know (as I could not find any reading for the same) on what are the requirements to upgrade my account to administrator status on Wikipedia - if that is possible at all? Thanks in advance yanka AD =Talk= 05:54, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
Jayron, i apologize, i can't believe at the time i thought i was acting maturely just because i didn't get real mad. What I actually did was sanctimonious and nosy, getting involved in the "flaw" debate. Where i suggested you "relax" probably was very condescending and controlling, and quite annoying. I should have known better because when i long ago would protest about being bullied, the bully would cut me off with "relax!" What makes this much worse is recollecting a time i was very rude to you on science ref desk a few years ago,, something about astronomy. Anyway, I hope the fact that at the time, yesterday, I really thought I was doing right, (acting "maturely" just because I didnt blow up) will help you forgive the passive agressive condescension. Also, thanks for all of your many many terrific contributions to wikipedia. Oh, I forgot to say, it's to your credit that though you were very annoyed, you never were insulting. Rich ( talk) 09:26, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi Jayron. Just wanted to let you know that I've unblocked Donovan delaney, who you blocked per NLT, as they've retracted their legal threat. Sam Walton ( talk) 09:42, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
I loved your recent schooling in the science reference desk. I know I am guilty of "casual talk" but I believe in an appropriate mixture of reliable sources and "casual talk". I do try to find sources but I am a noob. I know I'll get better with time. I was starting to get frustrated with the taste bud post and my radiation post. I worked off of Nimur's response to my radiation post (most helpful as always). It seems that the "no chat no soapbox" rules arn't really enforced (how would you enforce those rules?) keep it up grand master! Agent of the nine ( talk) 20:53, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Can you re-add one or two oldest stories? Another set of DYK queue will be posted soon. -- George Ho ( talk) 03:11, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
By motion, the Arbitration Committee authorises the following injunction effective immediately:
You are receiving this message because you have commented about this matter on the
AN page, the
AE page or the
Case Requests page
and are therefore restricted as specified in (2). For the Arbitration Committee,
L235 (
t /
c /
ping in reply) via
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:30, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
You are receiving this message either because you are a party to the Arbitration enforcement arbitration case, because you have commented in the case request, or the AN or AE discussions leading to this arbitration case, or because you have specifically opted in to receiving these messages. Unless you are a party to this arbitration case, you may opt out of receiving further messages at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Arbitration enforcement/Notification list. The drafters of the Arbitration enforcement arbitration case have published a revised timetable for the case, which changes what you may have been told when the case was opened. The dates have been revised as follows: the Evidence phase will close 5 July 2015, one week earlier than originally scheduled; the Workshop phase will close 26 July 2015, one week later than originally scheduled; the Proposed decision is scheduled to be posted 9 August 2015, two weeks later than originally scheduled. Thank you. On behalf of the arbitration clerks, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 07:58, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
This message is sent at 12:53, 5 July 2015 (UTC) by Arbitration Clerk User:Penwhale via MassMessage on behalf of the Arbitration Committee. You are receiving this message because your name appears on this list and have not elected to opt-out of being notified of development in the arbitration case.
On 5 July, 2015, the following motion was passed and enacted:
You left the threatening message on my talk page. I am very aware of this policy and the other discussions of MOS:Identity. What exactly are you implying? That I did something wrong? Who is the judge of this? Trackinfo ( talk) 04:25, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Looking at the user compare report at the current SPI /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Bowei_Huang_2 I see you blocked User:123.100.149.51 for vandalism in April. You may be interested to know that he and the new user Uesr:Nineguy appear to be the same person, with IP 123 posting this question at the ref desk then subsequently erasing his own address and overwriting it with the signature of registered user Nineguy. Given the current blizzard of random posts by Nineguy, maybe you could consider doing something? Thanks. μηδείς ( talk) 16:42, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
I see you removed [8] a post just as I was posting some references. Is it so strange to think that someone would ask us a good faith question about nude modeling? Here's what I was posting when your removal caused an edit conflict.
Honestly, what problem would that question and response cause? If OP was trolling, I don't think my response will be much fun. Whatever, SemanticMantis ( talk) 21:37, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi Jayron32,
Despite your warning the page has been revert back by IP 173.71.50.211 again, what should be the next step in this case, I dont really want to get into edit war, but would likely to know from you, if i want to update something on that page what should i do ? Kulvinder Singh 19:40, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
I posted a question on nude modeling on the Miscellaneous Reference Desk and this happened. I'm pretty sure just that first redacted message was mine (I might have had a second correcting a spelling error or something, I can't recall the circumstances of posting exactly.) I just checked in to see if there were any replies, and saw the history of the page and your edit description: "Owned by the self-admitted troll. Nice...".
Did my question violate some rule? Am I considered a troll because of my question? I'm just confused what rules I broke that were so bad the entire question needed to be unpersoned. I just moved to a new city so I've never used this IP Address before. 2605:6000:EA01:7E00:F998:C192:853C:97E2 ( talk) 09:05, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Would you reinsert the oldest blurb? The current MP is outbalanced by lengthy left side. Also, the next DYK queue will be just as lengthy. -- George Ho ( talk) 17:38, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Would you reinsert oldest blurb, discovery of planet Kepler-452b. The next queue will outbalance the right column more than current state. I previewed the Main Page with the next set. -- George Ho ( talk) 06:58, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
Currently, it's outbalanced. Also, the next DYK queue will outbalance the ITN. -- George Ho ( talk) 02:09, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I see that your active at ITN, and I was wondering if you could you please post Roddy Piper to the RD ticker at ITN? I'd rather not have a repeat of the Dusty Rhodes fiasco where it had consensus for several days but was ignored by admins then rejected for being too old. It's been several days and the discussion has stalled. There is overwhelming consensus to post, and the article has improved markedly. ITN is not GAC, and while the article is far from perfect, I think 134 references is more than enough. -- Scorpion 0422 12:40, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for posting it. I'll fix any citation tags either tonight or tomorrow. -- Scorpion 0422 20:52, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hampton Beach, New Hampshire, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Spit and Rye Beach. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:48, 7 August 2015 (UTC)