This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi Jayen466. We may disagree over your proposal at MEDRS but I know your intentions are good. I had a look at the discussion at WP:V. It is over-long so I skimmed it. I'm impressed by your contributions there. However, for various reasons, I won't be joining in that discussion. Cheers, Colin° Talk 20:14, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
I just Created the Article and was Unsure how to cover the Contents section, Whether I should just list the Chapter and Authors or do a short summary of Each? The Resident Anthropologist ( talk) 18:17, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
A request for mediation has been filed concerning a matter in which you have participated.
The operative page is at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Creampie (sexual act). Please go there and indicate your acceptance of mediation at the Parties' agreement to mediation section (or you can decline to accept mediation, if for some reason you want to.) If you have any questions about mediation, see Wikipedia:Requests for mediation or message me. Thank you for your time and consideration. Herostratus ( talk) 16:02, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your comments at RSN regarding the book Integrative Cardiology as a source. TimidGuy ( talk) 12:24, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Jayen, I appreciate that you feel strongly about the issues we've recently been discussing, but please be careful not to canvass. This looks very much like votestacking, whereas your note here is clearly biased and therefore a problem of campaigning. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:18, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
I am unfamiliar with the tags and templates used here and I was wondering if you could help me understand what this entry is all about? http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Werner_Erhard&diff=389602695&oldid=389602275 —Preceding unsigned comment added by MLKLewis ( talk • contribs) 16:15, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
I request your comments about the notability of Religious typification section on Jehovah's Witness talk page. Thank you-- Logical Thinker: talk 14:17, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
It seems like wherever Cirt goes, you're there too. You appear to be following him to articles, such as Daryl Wine Bar and Restaurant, and to be appearing anytime there's a post by or about him, like these recent noticeboard threads: [1] [2] [3] [4]. If I were him I'd be feeling harassed. "Wiki-hounding is the singling out of one or more editors, and joining discussions on pages or topics they may edit or debates where they contribute, in order to repeatedly confront or inhibit their work... " WP:WIKIHOUNDING. I suggest that you give him more space in the future. Will Beback talk 01:34, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi Jayen466. We may disagree over your proposal at MEDRS but I know your intentions are good. I had a look at the discussion at WP:V. It is over-long so I skimmed it. I'm impressed by your contributions there. However, for various reasons, I won't be joining in that discussion. Cheers, Colin° Talk 20:14, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
I just Created the Article and was Unsure how to cover the Contents section, Whether I should just list the Chapter and Authors or do a short summary of Each? The Resident Anthropologist ( talk) 18:17, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
A request for mediation has been filed concerning a matter in which you have participated.
The operative page is at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Creampie (sexual act). Please go there and indicate your acceptance of mediation at the Parties' agreement to mediation section (or you can decline to accept mediation, if for some reason you want to.) If you have any questions about mediation, see Wikipedia:Requests for mediation or message me. Thank you for your time and consideration. Herostratus ( talk) 16:02, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your comments at RSN regarding the book Integrative Cardiology as a source. TimidGuy ( talk) 12:24, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Jayen, I appreciate that you feel strongly about the issues we've recently been discussing, but please be careful not to canvass. This looks very much like votestacking, whereas your note here is clearly biased and therefore a problem of campaigning. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:18, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
I am unfamiliar with the tags and templates used here and I was wondering if you could help me understand what this entry is all about? http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Werner_Erhard&diff=389602695&oldid=389602275 —Preceding unsigned comment added by MLKLewis ( talk • contribs) 16:15, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
I request your comments about the notability of Religious typification section on Jehovah's Witness talk page. Thank you-- Logical Thinker: talk 14:17, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
It seems like wherever Cirt goes, you're there too. You appear to be following him to articles, such as Daryl Wine Bar and Restaurant, and to be appearing anytime there's a post by or about him, like these recent noticeboard threads: [1] [2] [3] [4]. If I were him I'd be feeling harassed. "Wiki-hounding is the singling out of one or more editors, and joining discussions on pages or topics they may edit or debates where they contribute, in order to repeatedly confront or inhibit their work... " WP:WIKIHOUNDING. I suggest that you give him more space in the future. Will Beback talk 01:34, 16 November 2010 (UTC)