This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
<font=3> Thanks for all your help with War of Bavarian Succession and the Battle of Dürenstein and many others.:) Auntieruth55 ( talk) |
---|
Hi, I have easy access to Swedish newspaper databases. There are many reviews in different local newspapers. There is also a two-page article in the weekly magazine Focus. I could try to send the pdf to you. Or maybe it is easier if I put it on my own site, and I would mail you the url. Yea, that is what I will do, I see that you have your wikimail enabled. Regards, / Pieter Kuiper ( talk) 08:04, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
This is at FAC, and it's run into some opposition based on the prose. Apparently it's too snobby. (Referred to as the "nob-squad"). I've denobbed (simplified), but if you have time it could use another set of eyes, and/or a comment. Auntieruth55 ( talk) 23:20, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
Jayen, I sent you an amusing mail, where is my amusing reply? Off2riorob ( talk) 19:17, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
An image created by you has been promoted to
valued picture status Your image,
File:PetitPiton.JPG, was nominated on
Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution!
Elekhh (
talk) 07:08, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
|
Hope you had a good trip. Do you have time to chime in on War of the Bavarian Succession FAC? Auntieruth55 ( talk) 16:11, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi Jayen. An SPA editor named Sailpra has become active at the above page. We were struggling towards a scholarly neutrality and hopefully some stabilty, when Sailpra introduced him/herself by saying: I don't think scholars can speak or even judge a spiritual person. So quoting scholars for spiritual matters is not an expected format. If wikipedia wants only scholars to write articles then I think wikipedia should contain no material on spirituality and devtion because they cannot be understood by scholars. He/she has made bulk edits from promotional primary sources, while ignoring talk page protestations. Care to hop in? Rumiton ( talk) 13:53, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
Hello Jayen,
As I recall, your work on the Rawat article was always fair and, IMHO, unbiased. Would you please give me some help with the Reid Stowe article. [ [1]] An IP regularly inserts OR laced with a hyperbolic tabloid quote and will not enter into discussion. Many of the sources are problematic.[ [2]] Some good advice re editing this article would be greatly appreciated. -- Zanthorp ( talk) 15:31, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
<font=3> Thanks for all your help with War of Bavarian Succession and the Battle of Dürenstein and many others.:) Auntieruth55 ( talk) |
---|
Hi, I have easy access to Swedish newspaper databases. There are many reviews in different local newspapers. There is also a two-page article in the weekly magazine Focus. I could try to send the pdf to you. Or maybe it is easier if I put it on my own site, and I would mail you the url. Yea, that is what I will do, I see that you have your wikimail enabled. Regards, / Pieter Kuiper ( talk) 08:04, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
This is at FAC, and it's run into some opposition based on the prose. Apparently it's too snobby. (Referred to as the "nob-squad"). I've denobbed (simplified), but if you have time it could use another set of eyes, and/or a comment. Auntieruth55 ( talk) 23:20, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
Jayen, I sent you an amusing mail, where is my amusing reply? Off2riorob ( talk) 19:17, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
An image created by you has been promoted to
valued picture status Your image,
File:PetitPiton.JPG, was nominated on
Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution!
Elekhh (
talk) 07:08, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
|
Hope you had a good trip. Do you have time to chime in on War of the Bavarian Succession FAC? Auntieruth55 ( talk) 16:11, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi Jayen. An SPA editor named Sailpra has become active at the above page. We were struggling towards a scholarly neutrality and hopefully some stabilty, when Sailpra introduced him/herself by saying: I don't think scholars can speak or even judge a spiritual person. So quoting scholars for spiritual matters is not an expected format. If wikipedia wants only scholars to write articles then I think wikipedia should contain no material on spirituality and devtion because they cannot be understood by scholars. He/she has made bulk edits from promotional primary sources, while ignoring talk page protestations. Care to hop in? Rumiton ( talk) 13:53, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
Hello Jayen,
As I recall, your work on the Rawat article was always fair and, IMHO, unbiased. Would you please give me some help with the Reid Stowe article. [ [1]] An IP regularly inserts OR laced with a hyperbolic tabloid quote and will not enter into discussion. Many of the sources are problematic.[ [2]] Some good advice re editing this article would be greatly appreciated. -- Zanthorp ( talk) 15:31, 25 April 2010 (UTC)