Jane, ik zag dat je foto's had geüpload op commons van het Zuiderzeemuseum in Enkhuizen. Weet je toevallig ook of jij een foto hebt van een visserstrui (voor het artikel visserstrui op nl:wiki?) Ecritures ( talk) 23:05, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Ha nee, maar de IJmuider Zee- en Havenmuseum heeft een visserij gedeelte met vele mannekins met klederdracht enz. Je kan een keertje daar heen gaan (ook leuk als de stoom motoren draaien!). Of stuur ze een mailtje. Jane ( talk) 09:35, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Volume 6 | Issue 11 | December 2017
This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!
Hoi Jane, how does one convert this Draft:Night Mayor of Amsterdam into an article? I fixed a few details. As an article it can link to the Dutch version. -- VanBuren ( talk) 19:45, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- Geen idee. Ik zou het gewoon met een "Move" naar "namespace 0" zetten, maar tegenwoordig met het huidige proces rondom de "draft namespace" weet ik niet (nooit gebruikt). Probeer het eens, zou ik zeggen. De link naar Wikidata kan je met behulp van de nlwiki item in de gewone manier doen. Groet,
Jane (
talk) 20:01, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- Helaas weigert Move Draft:Night Mayor of Amsterdam de titelverandering near (Article). Nou ja, misschien komt er een oplossing langs, geen haast. (Het origineel is trouwens niet door mij gemaakt, ik kwam deze draft tegen omdat ik aan de NL versie werkte.) -- VanBuren ( talk) 20:47, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Facto Post – Issue 8 – 15 January 2018
 Metadata on the MarchFrom the days of hard-copy liner notes on music albums, metadata have stood outside a piece or file, while adding to understanding of where it comes from, and some of what needs to be appreciated about its content. In the GLAM sector, the accumulation of accurate metadata for objects is key to the mission of an institution, and its presentation in cataloguing. Today Wikipedia turns 17, with worlds still to conquer. Zooming out from the individual GLAM object to the ontology in which it is set, one such world becomes apparent: GLAMs use custom ontologies, and those introduce massive incompatibilities. From a recent article by sadads, we quote the observation that "vocabularies needed for many collections, topics and intellectual spaces defy the expectations of the larger professional communities." A job for the encyclopedist, certainly. But the data-minded Wikimedian has the advantages of Wikidata, starting with its multilingual data, and facility with aliases. The controlled vocabulary — sometimes referred to as a "thesaurus" as term of art — simplifies search: if a "spade" must be called that, rather than "shovel", it is easier to find all spade references. That control comes at a cost.   Case studies in that article show what can lie ahead. The schema crosswalk, in jargon, is a potential answer to the GLAM Babel of proliferating and expanding vocabularies. Even if you have no interest in Wikidata as such, simply vocabularies V and W, if both V and W are matched to Wikidata, then a "crosswalk" arises from term v in V to w in W, whenever v and w both match to the same item d in Wikidata. For metadata mobility, match to Wikidata. It's apparently that simple: infrastructure requirements have turned out, so far, to be challenges that can be met. Links
Editor Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him. Back numbers are here. Reminder: WikiFactMine pages on Wikidata are at WD:WFM. If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from
our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all
massmessage mailings, you may add
Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 12:38, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- News and notes: Communication is key
- In the media: The Paris Review, British Crown and British Media
- Featured content: History, gaming and multifarious topics
- Interview: Interview with Ser Amantio di Nicolao, the top contributor to English Wikipedia by edit count
- Technology report: Dedicated Wikidata database servers
- Arbitration report: Mister Wiki is first arbitration committee decision of 2018
- Traffic report: The best and worst of 2017
 .jpg)   New:
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 14:32, 28 January 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Deletion for Template:Mbabel/RKD?
Hi. I see you created Template:Mbabel/RKD a while ago, but it seems to be incomplete and unused. It's throwing a citation error. Can we delete this page?
Thanks. -- Mathieu ottawa ( talk) 01:59, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
- Well I might use it at some point, since we have potentially thousands of paintings with the proper properties now. What citation error is it throwing? It seems more sensible to fix it, not delete it. Jane ( talk) 03:35, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Volume 7 | Issue 1 | January 2018
This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!
- Featured content: Wars, sieges, disasters and everything black possible
- Traffic report: TV, death, sports, and doodles
- Special report: Cochrane–Wikipedia Initiative
- Arbitration report: New cases requested for inter-editor hostility and other collaboration issues
- In the media: Solving crime; editing out violence allegations
- Humour: You really are in Wonderland
Facto Post – Issue 9 – 5 February 2018
Wikidata as HubOne way of looking at Wikidata relates it to the semantic web concept, around for about as long as Wikipedia, and realised in dozens of distributed Web institutions. It sees Wikidata as supplying central, encyclopedic coverage of linked structured data, and looks ahead to greater support for "federated queries" that draw together information from all parts of the emerging network of websites.  Another perspective might be likened to a photographic negative of that one: Wikidata as an already-functioning Web hub. Over half of its properties are identifiers on other websites. These are Wikidata's "external links", to use Wikipedia terminology: one type for the DOI of a publication, another for the VIAF page of an author, with thousands more such. Wikidata links out to sites that are not nominally part of the semantic web, effectively drawing them into a larger system. The crosswalk possibilities of the systematic construction of these links was covered in Issue 8. Wikipedia:External links speaks of them as kept "minimal, meritable, and directly relevant to the article." Here Wikidata finds more of a function. On viaf.org one can type a VIAF author identifier into the search box, and find the author page. The Wikidata Resolver tool, these days including Open Street Map, Scholia etc., allows this kind of lookup. The hub tool by maxlath takes a major step further, allowing both lookup and crosswalk to be encoded in a single URL. Links
Editor Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him. Back numbers are here. Reminder: WikiFactMine pages on Wikidata are at WD:WFM. If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from
our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all
massmessage mailings, you may add
Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 11:50, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 16:09, 20 February 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
- News and notes: The future is Swedish with a lack of administrators
- Recent research: Politically diverse editors write better articles; Reddit and Stack Overflow benefit from Wikipedia but don't give back
- Arbitration report: Arbitration committee prepares to examine two new cases
- Traffic report: Addicted to sports and pain
- Featured content: Entertainment, sports and history
- Technology report: Paragraph-based edit conflict screen; broken thanks
Hi Jane. The list is now too long and is not updating. Could you shorten it by specifying only articles in the EN Wikipedia and no species. You could also change the dates to cover only the last two weeks. Thanks for your trouble.-- Ipigott ( talk) 17:21, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
- OK I got a message that it times out and so I upped the Q nr. Then it told me there were too many, so I put a limit of 7500 on it. The sitelink count doesn't work at all anymore, so I took that out too. It runs now again. Jane ( talk) 18:37, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Volume 7 | Issue 2 | February 2018
This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!
Facto Post – Issue 10 – 12 March 2018
Milestone for mix'n'matchAround the time in February when Wikidata clicked past item Q50000000, another milestone was reached: the mix'n'match tool uploaded its 1000th dataset. Concisely defined by its author, Magnus Manske, it works "to match entries in external catalogs to Wikidata". The total number of entries is now well into eight figures, and more are constantly being added: a couple of new catalogs each day is normal. Since the end of 2013, mix'n'match has gradually come to play a significant part in adding statements to Wikidata. Particularly in areas with the flavour of digital humanities, but datasets can of course be about practically anything. There is a catalog on skyscrapers, and two on spiders. These days mix'n'match can be used in numerous modes, from the relaxed gamified click through a catalog looking for matches, with prompts, to the fantastically useful and often demanding search across all catalogs. I'll type that again: you can search 1000+ datasets from the simple box at the top right. The drop-down menu top left offers "creation candidates", Magnus's personal favourite. m:Mix'n'match/Manual for more. For the Wikidatan, a key point is that these matches, however carried out, add statements to Wikidata if, and naturally only if, there is a Wikidata property associated with the catalog. For everyone, however, the hands-on experience of deciding of what is a good match is an education, in a scholarly area, biographical catalogs being particularly fraught. Underpinning recent rapid progress is an open infrastructure for scraping and uploading. Congratulations to Magnus, our data Stakhanovite! Links
Editor Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him. Back numbers are here. Reminder: WikiFactMine pages on Wikidata are at WD:WFM. If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from
our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all
massmessage mailings, you may add
Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 12:26, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
| ||
|
To subscribe:
Women in Red/English language mailing list or
Women in Red/international list. To unsubscribe:
Women in Red/Opt-out list. Follow us on Twitter: |
- News and notes: Wiki Conference roundup and new appointments.
- Arbitration report: Ironing out issues in infoboxes; not sure yet about New Jersey; and an administrator who probably wasn't uncivil to a sockpuppet.
- Traffic report: Real sports, real women and an imaginary country: what's on top for Wikipedia readers
- Featured content: Animals, Ships, and Songs
- Technology report: Timeless skin review by Force Radical.
- Special report: ACTRIAL wrap-up.
- Humour: WikiWorld Reruns
Welcome to the newsletter for Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons! You can update your subscription to the newsletter and contribute to the next issue. Do inform others who you think will want to be involved in the project!
- Community updates
- Our dedicated IRC channel: wikimedia-commons-sd webchat
- Several Commons community members are working on ways to integrate Wikidata in Wikimedia Commons. While this is not full-fledged structured data yet, this work helps to prepare for future conversion of data, and helps to understand how Wikidata and Commons can work better together.
- Thanks to Jarekt and other contributors, some Commons templates can now be filled via Wikidata: {{ Creator}} ( Phabricator) and {{ Institution}} ( Phabricator). Work is ongoing on the {{ Artwork}} template ( Phabricator).
- Thanks to Mike Peel and others, Wikidata-powered infoboxes can now be added to Commons categories, with the template {{ Wikidata Infobox}}. ( Example)
- Multichill is working on an experimental workflow to upload images to Commons via Wikidata (and using metadata from Wikidata). See a part of it here.
- Join the community focus group!
- Do you want to help out translating messages about Structured Data on Commons from English to your own language? Sign up on the translators page.
- Contribute to the next newsletter.
- Discussions held
- Conversation about licensing and copyright modeling.
- High-level discussion on ontology for Commons.
- Review first designs for multilingual captions.
- IRC office hour, 13 February
- Events
- Wikimedia Conference, Berlin, 20-22 April (+ Learning Days 18-19 April): several sessions and workshops around Structured Commons
- EuropeanaTech Conference, Rotterdam, 15-16 May: several presentations + a full workshop day on Monday 14 May about Wikidata and Structured Commons
- Wikimedia Hackathon, Barcelona, 18-20 May: Structured Commons as a focus area.
- Partners and allies
- We are still welcoming (more) staff from GLAMs (Galleries, Libraries, Archives and Museums) to become part of our long-term focus group ( phabricator task T174134). You will be kept in the loop of the project, and receive regular small surveys and requests for feedback. Get in touch with Sandra if you're interested - your input in helping to shape this project is highly valued!
- Research
- The research about GLAM contributions to Wikimedia Commons is concluded. A blog post on the Wikimedia blog provides a summary, and you can read the full results on meta.wikimedia.org.
- Prototypes will be available for Multilingual Captions soon.
- Stay up to date!
- Follow the Structured Data on Commons project on Phabricator: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/project/profile/34/
- Subscribe to this newsletter to receive it on a talk page of your own choice.
- Join the next IRC office hour and ask questions to the team! The date for next quarter will be announced soon.
-- Keegan (WMF) ( talk)
Message sent by MediaWiki message delivery - 19:48, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Volume 7 | Issue 3 | March 2018
This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!
Facto Post – Issue 11 – 9 April 2018
The 100 Skins of the OnionOpen Citations Month, with its eminently guessable hashtag, is upon us. We should be utterly grateful that in the past 12 months, so much data on which papers cite which other papers has been made open, and that Wikidata is playing its part in hosting it as "cites" statements. At the time of writing, there are 15.3M Wikidata items that can do that. Pulling back to look at open access papers in the large, though, there is is less reason for celebration. Access in theory does not yet equate to practical access. A recent LSE IMPACT blogpost puts that issue down to "heterogeneity". A useful euphemism to save us from thinking that the whole concept doesn't fall into the realm of the oxymoron. Some home truths: aggregation is not content management, if it falls short on reusability. The PDF file format is wedded to how humans read documents, not how machines ingest them. The salami-slicer is our friend in the current downloading of open access papers, but for a better metaphor, think about skinning an onion, laboriously, 100 times with diminishing returns. There are of the order of 100 major publisher sites hosting open access papers, and the predominant offer there is still a PDF.  From the discoverability angle, Wikidata's bibliographic resources combined with the SPARQL query are superior in principle, by far, to existing keyword searches run over papers. Open access content should be managed into consistent HTML, something that is currently strenuous. The good news, such as it is, would be that much of it is already in XML. The organisational problem of removing further skins from the onion, with sensible prioritisation, is certainly not insuperable. The CORE group (the bloggers in the LSE posting) has some answers, but actually not all that is needed for the text and data mining purposes they highlight. The long tail, or in other words the onion heart when it has become fiddly beyond patience to skin, does call for a pis aller. But the real knack is to do more between the XML and the heart. Links
Editor Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him. Back numbers are here. Reminder: WikiFactMine pages on Wikidata are at WD:WFM. If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from
our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all
massmessage mailings, you may add
Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:25, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- From the editors: The Signpost's presses roll again
- Signpost: Future directions for The Signpost
- In the media: The rise of Wikipedia as a disinformation mop
- In focus: Admin reports board under criticism
- Special report: ACTRIAL results adopted by landslide
- Community view: It's time we look past Women in Red to counter systemic bias
- Discussion report: The future of portals
- Arbitration report: No new cases, and one motion on administrative misconduct
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Military History
- Traffic report: A quiet place to wrestle with the articles of March
- Technology report: Coming soon: Books-to-PDF, interactive maps, rollback confirmation
- Featured content: Featured content selected by the community
  
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 23:11, 29 April 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Beste Jane, de Engelstalige pagina over Jan Hope meldt dat Hope een volgeling van de Schotse Verlichting was en lid werd van genootschappen die de Schotse Verlichting propageerden. Kunt u mij vertellen waar deze informatie op gebaseerd is? Ik ben hier erg benieuwd naar omdat ik een artikel schrijf over Hope. Is het na te gaan wie deze informatie heeft toegevoegd aan de pagina (ik ben nog niet zo bekend met Wikipedia-achter-de-schermen)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jhengstmengel ( talk • contribs) 18:14, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- Het is lang geleden maar ik denk de meest informatie over deze tak van de oorspronkelijke Schotse familie staat uitgebreid beschrijven in Buist. Hij is lid van diverse herenclubs die bezig waren met allerlei experimenten waarvan Teylers nu als tegenhanger daarvan overgebleven is. Zijn clubs waren in Haarlem en Rotterdam en de Haarlemse club is later opgegaan in Felix Meritus. Om te zien wie allemaal geschreven heeft op de paginas kan je op de geschiedenis tab klikken en scrollen langs alle edits. Best en succes met het artikel. Jane ( talk) 20:59, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- Bedankt voor de informatie! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.211.23.163 ( talk) 08:25, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
Volume 7 | Issue 4 | April 2018
This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!
Hi, just left a request to be added to cultural-partnerships-l mailing list Thanks! MassiveEartha ( talk) 23:31, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello MassiveEartha, I'm sorry to bump in, what are the cultural partnerships about? Who is eligible? Danidamiobi ( talk) 08:34, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
- @ Danidamiobi: hi, it's a GLAM-Wiki community mailing list, since I'm not a member I don't know much more than what's on the site. In answer to your second question, I'm not even sure if I'm eligible, haven't been accepted yet! MassiveEartha ( talk) 08:48, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your warm response. MassiveEartha. Keep up the good work. Would you be probably interested in Wiki Loves Food 2018? Danidamiobi ( talk) 08:55, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello! After the successful pilot program by Wikimedia India in 2015, Wiki Loves Food (WLF) is happening again in 2018 and this year, it's going International. To make this event a grand success, your direction is key. Please sign up here as a volunteer to bring all the world's food to Wikimedia. Danidamiobi ( talk) 08:28, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Hoi Jane!
Zou jij eens naar deze draft van Daphne willen kijken? Zij heeft het gisteren geschreven op de wiki-a-thon in Amsterdam, maar het is nog niet goed genoeg, begrijp ik uit het commentaar. Ik heb zoals gesuggereerd een bericht achtergelaten op de talkpage van het Guatemale Wikiproject, maar de activiteit is daar niet heel hoog, vandaar dat ik hoop dat jij ook even tijd hebt om haar te helpen.
Vriendelijke groet, Ciell ( talk) 15:20, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
- Ja ik heb net gekeken. Jammer maar in deze staat bijna kansloos, schat ik. Ik ben vooral bezig met vrouwen die al eeuwen dood zijn en je hebt zowiezo problemen met engelstalige bronnen voor niet US-UK vrouwen, maar deze is voornamelijk gebaseerd op een organisatie die nog niet bestaat in de Wikiverse. Ik roep al jaren dat om één vrouw toe te voegen moet ik minstens 5 mannen toevoegen, en dit is een prima voorbeeld. Dus eerst een lemma voor "Unidad de Protección a Defensoras y Defensores de Derechos Humanos" volgens mij voordat deze aangemaakt kan worden. Ik zal een bericht achterlaten op de WiR overleg pagina. gr,
Jane (
talk) 15:46, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
- Jammer dat het zo moeilijk is!
Draft:Maudilia López is ook ingediend en afgelopen zaterdag geschreven: zou je er een blik op willen werpen? Je hulp wordt op prijs gesteld!
Ciell (
talk) 11:59, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
- En Draft:Manya Riche. Ciell ( talk) 12:02, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
- Jammer dat het zo moeilijk is!
Draft:Maudilia López is ook ingediend en afgelopen zaterdag geschreven: zou je er een blik op willen werpen? Je hulp wordt op prijs gesteld!
Ciell (
talk) 11:59, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Tja, je moet kennelijk een soort cursus volgen om iets uit "Draft" daadwerkelijk gepubliceerd te krijgen op enwiki. Ik ga het niet eens proberen, maar nogmaals, levende lui is niet mijn ding. Ik ben trouwens verbaasd dat er kennelijk geen enwiki pagina was voor deze (internationale) edit-a-thon! Jane ( talk) 12:22, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
- Er is een overzichtspagina op meta: hier, maar die is heel slecht gecommuniceerd. Ciell ( talk) 16:33, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
- From the editor: Another issue meets the deadline
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Portals
- Discussion report: User rights, infoboxes, and more discussion on portals
- Featured content: Featured content selected by the community
- Arbitration report: Managing difficult topics
- News and notes: Lots of Wikimedia
- Traffic report: We love our superheroes
- Technology report: A trove of contributor and developer goodies
- Recent research: Why people don't contribute to Wikipedia; using Wikipedia to teach statistics, technical writing, and controversial issues
- Humour: Play with your food
- Gallery: Wine not?
- From the archives: The Signpost scoops The Signpost
Facto Post – Issue 12 – 28 May 2018
ScienceSource fundedThe Wikimedia Foundation announced full funding of the ScienceSource grant proposal from ContentMine on May 18. See the ScienceSource Twitter announcement and 60 second video.
The proposal includes downloading 30,000 open access papers, aiming (roughly speaking) to create a baseline for medical referencing on Wikipedia. It leaves open the question of how these are to be chosen. The basic criteria of WP:MEDRS include a concentration on secondary literature. Attention has to be given to the long tail of diseases that receive less current research. The MEDRS guideline supposes that edge cases will have to be handled, and the premature exclusion of publications that would be in those marginal positions would reduce the value of the collection. Prophylaxis misses the point that gate-keeping will be done by an algorithm. Two well-known but rather different areas where such considerations apply are tropical diseases and alternative medicine. There are also a number of potential downloading troubles, and these were mentioned in Issue 11. There is likely to be a gap, even with the guideline, between conditions taken to be necessary but not sufficient, and conditions sufficient but not necessary, for candidate papers to be included. With around 10,000 recognised medical conditions in standard lists, being comprehensive is demanding. With all of these aspects of the task, ScienceSource will seek community help. Links
Editor Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him. Back numbers are here. Reminder: WikiFactMine pages on Wikidata are at WD:WFM. ScienceSource pages will be announced there, and in this mass message. If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from
our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all
massmessage mailings, you may add
Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 10:16, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 17:15, 29 May 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Volume 4 | Issue 5 | May 2018
This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!
As you know, we are preparing a list of tools and techncial support for Women in Red. I have tentatively added your name as you have provided a range of assistance, especially in connection with Wikidata. Please let me know whether you agree to be listed. You are of course welcome to make any additions or corrections.-- Ipigott ( talk) 07:16, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
I’ve been working to sort out various redlists for Women in Red, and I had a couple of questions about Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Newest items about women writers from some language Wikipedia, which you set up last year. First of all, was this set up for a certain use? The columns are not congruent with other WiR redlists, nor are the links actually red. I don’t want to modify it if it should be kept the way it is.
Also, in the introduction, it says “This is a list of 1000 most recently created human women writer items on Wikidata who have an article in English Wikipedia on Wikidata....” But there are women both with and without English articles in the list...?
And I have a technical question, which I hope you have time to answer. I’m new to SPARQL, and I’ve been trying to puzzle out the statement BIND (xsd:integer(STRAFTER(str(?item), "Q")) AS ?qid), with no luck. What is it doing and why is it there?
Thanks, NotARabbit ( talk) 20:31, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking an interest in the redlists! The sparql query in this list basically takes the Q number and strips off the Q in order to be able to list the number in descending order. The logic is that only high Q numbers will be for recently created articles. If the Q number is recent and sparql thinks there is a corresponding article in English Wikipedia and there isn't, then that article may have been renamed or even deleted, I suppose. So long story short, the variable "?qid" is filled with the result of the value of "?item" (which is the Q number), but instead of using the whole Q number, only the "string after" (STRAFTER) the letter "Q" is stuffed in there. Hope it helps, Jane ( talk) 21:02, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks, Jane, that’s a clever method! I love learning new ways to sift through the data.
- I take it that the list is okay to be modified? I especially want to make it red-links-only for any editors that want to pounce on new writers.
NotARabbit (
talk) 22:48, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for the compliment, but I didn't figure this out, someone else did! You are welcome to modify away. I noticed that I took out the restriction for english Wikipedia and it only checks for any project. You can copy paste the raw query into the listeria template in your own user space of course. I am not a sparql specialist - I am just really good at copy/pasting the ideas of others. Also, if you have a specific query you would like to run, you can always post a question at the "request a query" page d:Wikidata:Request a query. Jane ( talk) 11:03, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- I take it that the list is okay to be modified? I especially want to make it red-links-only for any editors that want to pounce on new writers.
NotARabbit (
talk) 22:48, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for creating De Vriendt, Jane023!
Wikipedia editor Innisfree987 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thanks for your addition!
To reply, leave a comment on Innisfree987's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Innisfree987 ( talk) 02:39, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Yesterday, following a redlink from Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Missing articles by occupation/Songwriters, I created Dorothy Ann Thrupp ( Q4982698) as a translation from the Swedish article. Today, I found this article, Dorothea Ann Thrupp, which is the same person ( Q18527806). I successfully merged the Wikipedia articles, but could not merge the Wikidata items. Help? Thanks. -- Rosiestep ( talk) 17:00, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
- Done. The problem is you need to actively delete the redirect from the item on Wikidata, since Wikidata can't tell the difference between a redirect and an article. Once I removed the sitelink, I could merge the items. Happy editing! Jane ( talk) 17:13, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 14:04, 28 June 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Facto Post – Issue 13 – 29 May 2018
 The Editor is
Charles Matthews, for
ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page.
To subscribe to Facto Post go to
Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer.
Facto Post enters its second year, with a Cambridge Blue (OK, Aquamarine) background, a new logo, but no Cambridge blues. On-topic for the ScienceSource project is a project page here. It contains some case studies on how the WP:MEDRS guideline, for the referencing of articles at all related to human health, is applied in typical discussions. Close to home also, a template, called {{ medrs}} for short, is used to express dissatisfaction with particular references. Technology can help with patrolling, and this Petscan query finds over 450 articles where there is at least one use of the template. Of course the template is merely suggesting there is a possible issue with the reliability of a reference. Deciding the truth of the allegation is another matter. This maintenance issue is one example of where ScienceSource aims to help. Where the reference is to a scientific paper, its type of algorithm could give a pass/fail opinion on such references. It could assist patrollers of medical articles, therefore, with the templated references and more generally. There may be more to proper referencing than that, indeed: context, quite what the statement supported by the reference expresses, prominence and weight. For that kind of consideration, case studies can help. But an algorithm might help to clear the backlog. 
If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from
our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all
massmessage mailings, you may add
Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:19, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
- Special report: NPR and AfC – The Marshall Plan: an engagement and a marriage?
- Op-ed: What do admins do?
- News and notes: Money, milestones, and Wikimania
- In the media: Much wikilove from the Mayor of London, less from Paekākāriki or a certain candidate for U.S. Congress
- Discussion report: Deletion, page moves, and an update to the main page
- Featured content: New promotions
- Arbitration report: WWII, UK politics, and a user deCrat'ed
- Traffic report: Endgame
- Technology report: Improvements piled on more improvements
- Gallery: Wiki Loves Africa
- Recent research: How censorship can backfire and conversations can go awry
- Humour: Television plot lines
- Wikipedia essays: This month's pick by The Signpost editors
- From the archives: Wolves nip at Wikipedia's heels: A perspective on the cost of paid editing
Volume 4 | Issue 6 | June 2018
This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!
Welcome to the newsletter for Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons! You can update your subscription to the newsletter and contribute to the next issue. Do inform others who you think will want to be involved in the project!
- Community updates
- Our dedicated IRC channel: wikimedia-commons-sd webchat
- Since our last newsletter, the Structured Data team has moved into designing and building prototypes for various features. The use of multilingual captions in the UploadWizard and on the file page has been researched, designed, discussed, and built out for use. Behind the scenes, back-end work on search is taking place and designs are being drawn up for the front-end. There will soon be specifications published for the use of the first Wikidata property on Commons, " Depicts," and a prototype is to be released to go along with that.
- A workshop on what Wikidata properties Commons will need. This workshop will be open for the entire month of July 2018 at minimum.
- Join the community focus group!
- Do you want to help out translating messages about Structured Data on Commons from English to your own language? Sign up on the translators page.
- Contribute to the next newsletter.
- Discussions held
- In late February there was a discussion around how Commons generally sees data being modeled.
- The first discussion on copyright and licensing with Commons was held in March. This was a "high level" discussion, there will be a consultation later this summer about the deeper mapping of copyright and licensing in a structured way.
- In April there was an exercise for GLAM partners in metadata and ontology mapping.
- A discussion about the design for Multilingual Captions on the file page took place in May. You can still review the designs and leave feedback.
- There was an IRC office hour in June to discuss progress so far and future plans.
- Wikimania 2018
- Three sessions about Structured Commons are officially scheduled for Wikimania 2018 - Cape Town, South Africa - July 2018.
- Wikimedia Commons and GLAM needs around the world (Friday 20 July, 10:30 local time)
- Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons and knowledge equity (Friday 20 July, 14:00 local time)
- Design challenge workshop: How can multilingual structured metadata bring knowledge equity to Commons? (Friday 20 July, 14:30 local time)
- Structured Data on Commons is also a focus area during the Wikimania 2018 Hackathon. We will, among other things, do 'live' modelling of Wikidata properties for Commons - an offline spin-off of the community consultation taking place on wiki.
- Partners and allies
- We are still welcoming (more) staff from GLAMs (Galleries, Libraries, Archives and Museums) to become part of our long-term focus group ( phabricator task T174134). You will be kept in the loop of the project, and receive regular small surveys and requests for feedback. Get in touch with Sandra if you're interested - your input in helping to shape this project is highly valued!
- Structured Data on Commons was presented to GLAM audiences during EuropeanaTech 2018 in Rotterdam (15 May 2018) and at the Deutsche Digitale Bibliothek Forum in Berlin (4 June 2018).
- Research
Two research projects about Wikimedia Commons are currently ongoing, or in the process of being finished:
- Research:Curation workflows on Wikimedia Commons—a project that seeks to understand the current workflows of Commons contributors who curate media (categorize it, delete it, link to it from other projects, etc.).
- Research:Technical needs of external re-users of Commons media—soliciting feedback from individuals and organizations that re-use Commons content outside of Wikimedia projects, in order to understand their current painpoints and unmet needs.
- Prototypes will be available for Depicts soon.
- Stay up to date!
- Follow the Structured Data on Commons project on Phabricator: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/project/profile/34/
- Subscribe to this newsletter to receive it on a talk page of your own choice.
- Join the next IRC office hour and ask questions to the team! The date for next quarter will be announced soon.
-- Keegan (WMF) ( talk)
Message sent by MediaWiki message delivery - 21:07, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Greetings,
The newsletter omitted two interwiki prefixes, breaking the links on non-meta wikis as you might see above. Here are the correct links:
- m:Research:Curation workflows on Wikimedia Commons—a project that seeks to understand the current workflows of Commons contributors who curate media (categorize it, delete it, link to it from other projects, etc.).
- m:Research:Technical needs of external re-users of Commons media—soliciting feedback from individuals and organizations that re-use Commons content outside of Wikimedia projects, in order to understand their current painpoints and unmet needs.
My apologies, I hope you find the corrected links helpful.
- Keegan (WMF) ( talk) 21:21, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi Jane,
Rosiestep recommended that I contact you when I mentioned that I would be happy to help (with our new project-- its not public yet) with Wikidata, tools, coding, etc. I joined Wikipedia in January 2017, and I have been working only on content. I would like to learn more about Structured Data for Commons, tools and anything else you think I should look at. I know nothing about these technical areas on Wiki as the subject has rarely been brought up in discussion.
I would like to see this group build out a presence over other projects though, since there is so much happening right now with Structured Data for Commons. I would also like to see a WiR presence in some sort of tooling workgroup. (your talk comments on our project page)
My background is a BS in Business/Economics (1976) and a Post Baccalaureate BS in Information Systems (1991). I worked for Philip Morris Inc (4 years) , Microsoft (1 year), and a few smaller companies. I had responsibilities in the areas of systems analysis, database management, database design, software development and design and user testing. Please point me in the direction of where I can learn more to be able to assist our new project. thanks MauraWen ( talk) 12:30, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
thanks MauraWen ( talk) 12:30, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
- Wow that's a lot of credentials. You are more than welcome to work on this stuff. So to start getting a feel for the type of tooling I am talking about, it helps to orient yourself with our pain points. First of all, it is hard to run a project when the only thing you can measure is "number of articles created" against a running total of articles created randomly through organic growth. Also, once you have poked around at the types of articles that are created, you start to realize that quality is all over the map and it would be nice to be able to capture and highlight the hidden gems in all the stuff that comes streaming in. On the other hand, it would also be nice to be able to highlight the weaker articles for people to work on before they get nominated for deletion or merged into something else. Next, since creating an article these days involves more that one project, and references and images tend to come from elsewhere (Wikidata and Commons), it is handy to get familiar with how Wikidata fits into the mix. You can learn all about Structured Data on Commons here:
c:Commons:Structured data. To start lending a hand with tooling, you can take a look at the Wikidata and
Sparql presentations created by
User:Ijon. I started a
d:Wikidata:WikiProject Women project to help try to better define the items for the articles created (in any language) so that we can better show our progress by birth period, occupation, citizenship, etc. If there is anything specific you would like to work on, let me know. If I can't answer your questions I may know someone who can.
Jane (
talk) 14:19, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks Jane!. I am going to be exploring these pages later this week. I am correcting my 2nd BS in Info Systems to 1991 instead of 1994. It was all so long ago, that I forget my dates. It has been suggested that our user group also create a web page. I have not stayed current on web development, leaving the profession in 2003. My webpage design skills are still current--those guidelines are still the same. Is web page development an area of skill or interest for you? MauraWen ( talk) 14:57, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
| Facto Post – Issue 14 – 21 July 2018
The Editor is
Charles Matthews, for
ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page.
To subscribe to Facto Post go to
Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer.
Officially it is "bridging the gaps in knowledge", with Wikimania 2018 in Cape Town paying tribute to the southern African concept of ubuntu to implement it. Besides face-to-face interactions, Wikimedians do need their power sources.  Facto Post interviewed Jdforrester, who has attended every Wikimania, and now works as Senior Product Manager for the Wikimedia Foundation. His take on tackling the gaps in the Wikimedia movement is that "if we were an army, we could march in a column and close up all the gaps". In his view though, that is a faulty metaphor, and it leads to a completely false misunderstanding of the movement, its diversity and different aspirations, and the nature of the work as "fighting" to be done in the open sector. There are many fronts, and as an eventualist he feels the gaps experienced both by editors and by users of Wikimedia content are inevitable. He would like to see a greater emphasis on reuse of content, not simply its volume. If that may not sound like radicalism, the Decolonizing the Internet conference here organized jointly with Whose Knowledge? can redress the picture. It comes with the claim to be "the first ever conference about centering marginalized knowledge online". 
If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from
our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all
massmessage mailings, you may add
Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:10, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
| ||
|
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 11:22, 23 July 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
- From the editor: If only if
- Opinion: Wrestling with Wikipedia reality
- Discussion report: Wikipedias take action against EU copyright proposal, plus new user right proposals
- Featured content: Wikipedia's best content in images and prose
- Arbitration report: Status quo processes retained in two disputes
- Traffic report: Soccer, football, call it what you like – that and summer movies leave room for little else
- Technology report: New bots, new prefs
- Recent research: Different Wikipedias use different images; editing contests more successful than edit-a-thons
- Humour: It's all the same
- Essay: Wikipedia does not need you
Volume 4 | Issue 7 | July 2018
This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!
| Facto Post – Issue 15 – 21 August 2018
The Editor is
Charles Matthews, for
ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page.
To subscribe to Facto Post go to
Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer.
.jpg) To grasp the nettle, there are rare diseases, there are tropical diseases and then there are "neglected diseases". Evidently a rare enough disease is likely to be neglected, but neglected disease these days means a disease not rare, but tropical, and most often infectious or parasitic. Rare diseases as a group are dominated, in contrast, by genetic diseases. A major aspect of neglect is found in tracking drug discovery. Orphan drugs are those developed to treat rare diseases (rare enough not to have market-driven research), but there is some overlap in practice with the WHO's neglected diseases, where snakebite, a "neglected public health issue", is on the list. From an encyclopedic point of view, lack of research also may mean lack of high-quality references: the core medical literature differs from primary research, since it operates by aggregating trials. This bibliographic deficit clearly hinders Wikipedia's mission. The ScienceSource project is currently addressing this issue, on Wikidata. Its Wikidata focus list at WD:SSFL is trying to ensure that neglect does not turn into bias in its selection of science papers.
If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from
our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all
massmessage mailings, you may add
Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 13:23, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
| ||
|
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!):
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 01:55, 26 August 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Wikidata
Hi Jane,
Klaas `Z4␟`
V who started to work on the Lebanese-Belgian
singer
Lara Chedraoui;
do you know somebody who may assist to make her blue on enwiki since I'm not a native speaker of English?
It would be fun to start here as happened to some other previously missing females. 08:50, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
- I am not sure what you mean. There are no links on Wikidata, so I don't think you can start a community of contributors there along the lines of Category:WikiProject_Women_in_Red_members. Maybe you meant to do it on the Dutch wiki? In that case I would give the category a Dutch name, however. Good luck with the article! Jane ( talk) 18:37, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
- From the editor: Today's young adults don't know a world without Wikipedia
- News and notes: Flying high; low practice from Wikipedia 'cleansing' agency; where do our donations go? RfA sees a new trend
- In the media: Quicksilver AI writes articles
- Discussion report: Drafting an interface administrator policy
- Featured content: Featured content selected by the community
- Special report: Wikimania 2018
- Traffic report: Aretha dies – getting just 2,000 short of 5 million hits
- Technology report: Technical enhancements and a request to prioritize upcoming work
- Recent research: Wehrmacht on Wikipedia, neural networks writing biographies
- Humour: Signpost editor censors herself
- From the archives: Playing with Wikipedia words
Volume 4 | Issue 8 | August 2018
This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 14:46, 28 September 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
| Facto Post – Issue 16 – 30 September 2018
The Editor is
Charles Matthews, for
ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page.
To subscribe to Facto Post go to
Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer.
 In an ideal world ... no, bear with your editor for just a minute ... there would be a format for scientific publishing online that was as much a standard as SI units are for the content. Likewise cataloguing publications would not be onerous, because part of the process would be to generate uniform metadata. Without claiming it could be the mythical free lunch, it might be reasonably be argued that sandwiches can be packaged much alike and have barcodes, whatever the fillings. The best on offer, to stretch the metaphor, is the meal kit option, in the form of XML. Where scientific papers are delivered as XML downloads, you get all the ingredients ready to cook. But have to prepare the actual meal of slow food yourself. See Scholarly HTML for a recent pass at heading off XML with HTML, in other words in the native language of the Web. The argument from real life is a traditional mixture of frictional forces, vested interests, and the classic irony of the principle of unripe time. On the other hand, discoverability actually diminishes with the prolific progress of science publishing. No, it really doesn't scale. Wikimedia as movement can do something in such cases. We know from open access, we grok the Web, we have our own horse in the HTML race, we have Wikidata and WikiJournal, and we have the chops to act. 
If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from
our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all
massmessage mailings, you may add
Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 17:57, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
- From the editor: Is this the new normal?
- News and notes: European copyright law moves forward
- In the media: Knowledge under fire
- Discussion report: Interface Admin policy proposal, part 2
- Arbitration report: A quiet month for Arbcom
- Technology report: Paying attention to your mobile
- Gallery: A pat on the back
- Recent research: How talk page use has changed since 2005; censorship shocks lead to centralization; is vandalism caused by workplace boredom?
- Humour: Signpost Crossword Puzzle
- Essay: Expressing thanks
Volume 4 | Issue 9 | September 2018
This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!
Continuing: | ||
|
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 18:40, 14 October 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging
- From the editors: The Signpost is still afloat, just barely
- News and notes: WMF gets a million bucks
- In the media: Bans, celebs, and bias
- Discussion report: Mediation Committee and proposed deletion reform
- Traffic report: Unsurprisingly, sport leads the field – or the ring
- Technology report: Bots galore!
- Special report: NPP needs you
- Special report 2: Now Wikidata is six
- In focus: Alexa
- Gallery: Out of this world!
- Recent research: Wikimedia Commons worth $28.9 billion
- Humour: Talk page humour
- Opinion: Strickland incident
- From the archives: The Gardner Interview
| Facto Post – Issue 17 – 29 October 2018
The Editor is
Charles Matthews, for
ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page.
To subscribe to Facto Post go to
Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer.
Around 2.7 million Wikidata items have an illustrative image. These files, you might say, are Wikimedia's stock images, and if the number is large, it is still only 5% or so of items that have one. All such images are taken from Wikimedia Commons, which has 50 million media files. One key issue is how to expand the stock. Indeed, there is a tool. WD-FIST exploits the fact that each Wikipedia is differently illustrated, mostly with images from Commons but also with fair use images. An item that has sitelinks but no illustrative image can be tested to see if the linked wikis have a suitable one. This works well for a volunteer who wants to add images at a reasonable scale, and a small amount of SPARQL knowledge goes a long way in producing checklists.  It should be noted, though, that there are currently 53 Wikidata properties that link to Commons, of which P18 for the basic image is just one. WD-FIST prompts the user to add signatures, plaques, pictures of graves and so on. There are a couple of hundred monograms, mostly of historical figures, and this query allows you to view all of them. commons:Category:Monograms and its subcategories provide rich scope for adding more. And so it is generally. The list of properties linking to Commons does contain a few that concern video and audio files, and rather more for maps. But it contains gems such as P3451 for "nighttime view". Over 1000 of those on Wikidata, but as for so much else, there could be yet more. Go on. Today is Wikidata's birthday. An illustrative image is always an acceptable gift, so why not add one? You can follow these easy steps: (i) log in at https://tools.wmflabs.org/widar/, (ii) paste the Petscan ID 6263583 into https://tools.wmflabs.org/fist/wdfist/ and click run, and (iii) just add cake. 
If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from
our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all
massmessage mailings, you may add
Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 15:01, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Frans van Schooten, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NRC ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:27, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Volume 4 | Issue 10 | October 2018
This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!
Hello, Jane023. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Continuing: | ||
|
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe:
Women in Red/English language mailing list and
Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe:
Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
| Facto Post – Issue 18 – 30 November 2018
The Editor is
Charles Matthews, for
ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page.
To subscribe to Facto Post go to
Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer.
GLAM ♥ data — what is a gallery, library, archive or museum without a catalogue? It follows that Wikidata must love librarians. Bibliography supports students and researchers in any topic, but open and machine-readable bibliographic data even more so, outside the silo. Cue the WikiCite initiative, which was meeting in conference this week, in the Bay Area of California.  In fact there is a broad scope: "Open Knowledge Maps via SPARQL" and the "Sum of All Welsh Literature", identification of research outputs, Library.Link Network and Bibframe 2.0, OSCAR and LUCINDA (who they?), OCLC and Scholia, all these co-exist on the agenda. Certainly more library science is coming Wikidata's way. That poses the question about the other direction: is more Wikimedia technology advancing on libraries? Good point. Wikimedians generally are not aware of the tech background that can be assumed, unless they are close to current training for librarians. A baseline definition is useful here: " bash, git and OpenRefine". Compare and contrast with pywikibot, GitHub and mix'n'match. Translation: scripting for automation, version control, data set matching and wrangling in the large, are on the agenda also for contemporary library work. Certainly there is some possible common ground here. Time to understand rather more about the motivations that operate in the library sector.
Account creation is now open on the
ScienceSource wiki, where you can see SPARQL visualisations of
text mining.
If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from
our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all
massmessage mailings, you may add
Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 11:20, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
- From the editor: Time for a truce
- Special report: The Christmas wishlist
- Discussion report: Farewell, Mediation Committee
- Arbitration report: A long break ends
- Traffic report: Queen reigns for four weeks straight
- Gallery: Intersections
- From the archives: Ars longa, vita brevis
Welcome to the newsletter for Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons! You can update your subscription to the newsletter. Do inform others who you think will want to be involved in the project!
- Community updates
- Multilingual Captions, the first feature release for Structured Data, is coming in January of 2019
- Be on the lookout for the beta testing announcement
- Help using captions has been set up, if you'd like to go ahead and see the workflow
- Two IRC office hours were held since the last newsletter
- Our dedicated IRC channel: wikimedia-commons-sd webchat
Current:
- Help determine and propose properties on Wikidata for Commons
- Review designs for structured licensing and copyright
- Join the community focus group!
Since the last newsletter:
- Review a prototype for searching structured Commons (October 2018)
- "Good coverage" for depicts tagging (Sept. 2018)
- Review and discuss mockups for displaying the new metadata section of the file page (18 September - 9 October 2018)
- Depicts statements draft requirements (14 August - 31 August 2018)
- Identify Wikidata properties that Commons will need (26 June - 14 August 2018)
- Presentation by Keegan on the first features to be released for Structured Data, presented at Wikiconference North America, Columbus, Ohio, October 2018.
- Sandra presented a project update at the GLAM-Wiki conference in Tel Aviv, Israel, November 2018, as part of an update and panel discussion.
- Structured Data on Commons was the subject of a keynote presentation by Sandra ( see slides) at the Baltic Audiovisual Archives Council conference in Tallinn, Estonia, November 2018.
- Partners and allies
- The info portal on Structured Commons now includes a section on GLAM (Galleries, Libraries, Archives and Museums).
- We are currently planning the first GLAM pilot projects that will use structured data on Wikimedia Commons. One project has already started: the Swedish Heritage Board researches and develops a prototype tool to provide improved metadata (translations, data additions...) from Wikimedia Commons back to the source institution. Read the project brief.
- The documentation for batch uploads of files to Wikimedia Commons will be improved in 2019, as part of preparing for Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons. To prepare, the GLAM team at the Wikimedia Foundation wants to understand better which types of documentation you already use, and how you like to learn new GLAM-Wiki skills and knowledge. Fill in a short survey to provide input!
- Stay up to date!
- Follow the Structured Data on Commons project on Phabricator: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/project/profile/34/
- Subscribe to this newsletter to receive it on a talk page of your own choice.
-- Keegan (WMF) ( talk)
Message sent by MediaWiki message delivery - 17:58, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
 January events:
|
- From the editors: Where to draw the line in reporting?
- News and notes: Some wishes do come true
- In the media: Political hijinks
- Discussion report: A new record low for RfA
- WikiProject report: Articlegenesis
- Arbitration report: Year ends with one active case
- Traffic report: Queen dethroned by U.S. presidents
- Gallery: Sun and Moon, water and stone
- Blog: News from the WMF
- Humour: I believe in Bigfoot
- Essay: Requests for medication
- From the archives: Compromised admin accounts – again
Newsletter Nr 6, 2018-12-25, for
WikiProject Genealogy (and
Wikimedia genealogy project on Meta)
 Participation: This is the sixth newsletter sent by mass mail to members in Wikipedia:WikiProject Genealogy, to everyone who voted a support for establishing a potential Wikimedia genealogy project on meta, and anyone who during the years showed an interest in genealogy on talk pages and likewise. (To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please see below) Now 100 supportersAt 3 December 2018, the list of users who support the potential Wikimedia genealogy project, reached 100! A demo wiki is up and running!You can already now try out the demo for a genealogy wiki at https://tools.wmflabs.org/genealogy/wiki/Main_Page and try out the functions. You will find parts of the 18th Pharao dynasty and other records submitted by the 7 first users, and it would be great if you would add some records. And with those great news we want to wish you a creative New Year 2019!
Cheers from your WikiProject Genealogy coordinator Dan Koehl. To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name from
our mailing list.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery |
| Facto Post – Issue 19 – 27 December 2018
The Editor is
Charles Matthews, for
ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page.
To subscribe to Facto Post go to
Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer.
Zotero is free software for reference management by the Center for History and New Media: see Wikipedia:Citing sources with Zotero. It is also an active user community, and has broad-based language support.  Besides the handiness of Zotero's warehousing of personal citation collections, the Zotero translator underlies the citoid service, at work behind the VisualEditor. Metadata from Wikidata can be imported into Zotero; and in the other direction the zotkat tool from the University of Mannheim allows Zotero bibliographies to be exported to Wikidata, by item creation. With an extra feature to add statements, that route could lead to much development of the focus list (P5008) tagging on Wikidata, by WikiProjects. There is also a large-scale encyclopedic dimension here. The construction of Zotero translators is one facet of Web scraping that has a strong community and open source basis. In that it resembles the less formal mix'n'match import community, and growing networks around other approaches that can integrate datasets into Wikidata, such as the use of OpenRefine. Looking ahead, the thirtieth birthday of the World Wide Web falls in 2019, and yet the ambition to make webpages routinely readable by machines can still seem an ever-retreating mirage. Wikidata should not only be helping Wikimedia integrate its projects, an ongoing process represented by Structured Data on Commons and lexemes. It should also be acting as a catalyst to bring scraping in from the cold, with institutional strengths as well as resourceful code.
Diversitech, the latest ContentMine grant application to the Wikimedia Foundation, is in its community review stage until January 2.
If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from
our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all
massmessage mailings, you may add
Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 19:08, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Template:Mbabel/RKD has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Pkbwcgs (
talk) 12:08, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Jane, ik zag dat je foto's had geüpload op commons van het Zuiderzeemuseum in Enkhuizen. Weet je toevallig ook of jij een foto hebt van een visserstrui (voor het artikel visserstrui op nl:wiki?) Ecritures ( talk) 23:05, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Ha nee, maar de IJmuider Zee- en Havenmuseum heeft een visserij gedeelte met vele mannekins met klederdracht enz. Je kan een keertje daar heen gaan (ook leuk als de stoom motoren draaien!). Of stuur ze een mailtje. Jane ( talk) 09:35, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Volume 6 | Issue 11 | December 2017
This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!
Hoi Jane, how does one convert this Draft:Night Mayor of Amsterdam into an article? I fixed a few details. As an article it can link to the Dutch version. -- VanBuren ( talk) 19:45, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- Geen idee. Ik zou het gewoon met een "Move" naar "namespace 0" zetten, maar tegenwoordig met het huidige proces rondom de "draft namespace" weet ik niet (nooit gebruikt). Probeer het eens, zou ik zeggen. De link naar Wikidata kan je met behulp van de nlwiki item in de gewone manier doen. Groet,
Jane (
talk) 20:01, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- Helaas weigert Move Draft:Night Mayor of Amsterdam de titelverandering near (Article). Nou ja, misschien komt er een oplossing langs, geen haast. (Het origineel is trouwens niet door mij gemaakt, ik kwam deze draft tegen omdat ik aan de NL versie werkte.) -- VanBuren ( talk) 20:47, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Facto Post – Issue 8 – 15 January 2018
Metadata on the MarchFrom the days of hard-copy liner notes on music albums, metadata have stood outside a piece or file, while adding to understanding of where it comes from, and some of what needs to be appreciated about its content. In the GLAM sector, the accumulation of accurate metadata for objects is key to the mission of an institution, and its presentation in cataloguing. Today Wikipedia turns 17, with worlds still to conquer. Zooming out from the individual GLAM object to the ontology in which it is set, one such world becomes apparent: GLAMs use custom ontologies, and those introduce massive incompatibilities. From a recent article by sadads, we quote the observation that "vocabularies needed for many collections, topics and intellectual spaces defy the expectations of the larger professional communities." A job for the encyclopedist, certainly. But the data-minded Wikimedian has the advantages of Wikidata, starting with its multilingual data, and facility with aliases. The controlled vocabulary — sometimes referred to as a "thesaurus" as term of art — simplifies search: if a "spade" must be called that, rather than "shovel", it is easier to find all spade references. That control comes at a cost. Case studies in that article show what can lie ahead. The schema crosswalk, in jargon, is a potential answer to the GLAM Babel of proliferating and expanding vocabularies. Even if you have no interest in Wikidata as such, simply vocabularies V and W, if both V and W are matched to Wikidata, then a "crosswalk" arises from term v in V to w in W, whenever v and w both match to the same item d in Wikidata. For metadata mobility, match to Wikidata. It's apparently that simple: infrastructure requirements have turned out, so far, to be challenges that can be met. Links
Editor Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him. Back numbers are here. Reminder: WikiFactMine pages on Wikidata are at WD:WFM. If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from
our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all
massmessage mailings, you may add
Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 12:38, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- News and notes: Communication is key
- In the media: The Paris Review, British Crown and British Media
- Featured content: History, gaming and multifarious topics
- Interview: Interview with Ser Amantio di Nicolao, the top contributor to English Wikipedia by edit count
- Technology report: Dedicated Wikidata database servers
- Arbitration report: Mister Wiki is first arbitration committee decision of 2018
- Traffic report: The best and worst of 2017
New:
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 14:32, 28 January 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Deletion for Template:Mbabel/RKD?
Hi. I see you created Template:Mbabel/RKD a while ago, but it seems to be incomplete and unused. It's throwing a citation error. Can we delete this page?
Thanks. -- Mathieu ottawa ( talk) 01:59, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
- Well I might use it at some point, since we have potentially thousands of paintings with the proper properties now. What citation error is it throwing? It seems more sensible to fix it, not delete it. Jane ( talk) 03:35, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Volume 7 | Issue 1 | January 2018
This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!
- Featured content: Wars, sieges, disasters and everything black possible
- Traffic report: TV, death, sports, and doodles
- Special report: Cochrane–Wikipedia Initiative
- Arbitration report: New cases requested for inter-editor hostility and other collaboration issues
- In the media: Solving crime; editing out violence allegations
- Humour: You really are in Wonderland
Facto Post – Issue 9 – 5 February 2018
Wikidata as HubOne way of looking at Wikidata relates it to the semantic web concept, around for about as long as Wikipedia, and realised in dozens of distributed Web institutions. It sees Wikidata as supplying central, encyclopedic coverage of linked structured data, and looks ahead to greater support for "federated queries" that draw together information from all parts of the emerging network of websites. Another perspective might be likened to a photographic negative of that one: Wikidata as an already-functioning Web hub. Over half of its properties are identifiers on other websites. These are Wikidata's "external links", to use Wikipedia terminology: one type for the DOI of a publication, another for the VIAF page of an author, with thousands more such. Wikidata links out to sites that are not nominally part of the semantic web, effectively drawing them into a larger system. The crosswalk possibilities of the systematic construction of these links was covered in Issue 8. Wikipedia:External links speaks of them as kept "minimal, meritable, and directly relevant to the article." Here Wikidata finds more of a function. On viaf.org one can type a VIAF author identifier into the search box, and find the author page. The Wikidata Resolver tool, these days including Open Street Map, Scholia etc., allows this kind of lookup. The hub tool by maxlath takes a major step further, allowing both lookup and crosswalk to be encoded in a single URL. Links
Editor Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him. Back numbers are here. Reminder: WikiFactMine pages on Wikidata are at WD:WFM. If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from
our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all
massmessage mailings, you may add
Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 11:50, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 16:09, 20 February 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
- News and notes: The future is Swedish with a lack of administrators
- Recent research: Politically diverse editors write better articles; Reddit and Stack Overflow benefit from Wikipedia but don't give back
- Arbitration report: Arbitration committee prepares to examine two new cases
- Traffic report: Addicted to sports and pain
- Featured content: Entertainment, sports and history
- Technology report: Paragraph-based edit conflict screen; broken thanks
Hi Jane. The list is now too long and is not updating. Could you shorten it by specifying only articles in the EN Wikipedia and no species. You could also change the dates to cover only the last two weeks. Thanks for your trouble.-- Ipigott ( talk) 17:21, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
- OK I got a message that it times out and so I upped the Q nr. Then it told me there were too many, so I put a limit of 7500 on it. The sitelink count doesn't work at all anymore, so I took that out too. It runs now again. Jane ( talk) 18:37, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Volume 7 | Issue 2 | February 2018
This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!
Facto Post – Issue 10 – 12 March 2018
Milestone for mix'n'matchAround the time in February when Wikidata clicked past item Q50000000, another milestone was reached: the mix'n'match tool uploaded its 1000th dataset. Concisely defined by its author, Magnus Manske, it works "to match entries in external catalogs to Wikidata". The total number of entries is now well into eight figures, and more are constantly being added: a couple of new catalogs each day is normal. Since the end of 2013, mix'n'match has gradually come to play a significant part in adding statements to Wikidata. Particularly in areas with the flavour of digital humanities, but datasets can of course be about practically anything. There is a catalog on skyscrapers, and two on spiders. These days mix'n'match can be used in numerous modes, from the relaxed gamified click through a catalog looking for matches, with prompts, to the fantastically useful and often demanding search across all catalogs. I'll type that again: you can search 1000+ datasets from the simple box at the top right. The drop-down menu top left offers "creation candidates", Magnus's personal favourite. m:Mix'n'match/Manual for more. For the Wikidatan, a key point is that these matches, however carried out, add statements to Wikidata if, and naturally only if, there is a Wikidata property associated with the catalog. For everyone, however, the hands-on experience of deciding of what is a good match is an education, in a scholarly area, biographical catalogs being particularly fraught. Underpinning recent rapid progress is an open infrastructure for scraping and uploading. Congratulations to Magnus, our data Stakhanovite! Links
Editor Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him. Back numbers are here. Reminder: WikiFactMine pages on Wikidata are at WD:WFM. If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from
our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all
massmessage mailings, you may add
Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 12:26, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
| ||
|
To subscribe:
Women in Red/English language mailing list or
Women in Red/international list. To unsubscribe:
Women in Red/Opt-out list. Follow us on Twitter: |
- News and notes: Wiki Conference roundup and new appointments.
- Arbitration report: Ironing out issues in infoboxes; not sure yet about New Jersey; and an administrator who probably wasn't uncivil to a sockpuppet.
- Traffic report: Real sports, real women and an imaginary country: what's on top for Wikipedia readers
- Featured content: Animals, Ships, and Songs
- Technology report: Timeless skin review by Force Radical.
- Special report: ACTRIAL wrap-up.
- Humour: WikiWorld Reruns
Welcome to the newsletter for Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons! You can update your subscription to the newsletter and contribute to the next issue. Do inform others who you think will want to be involved in the project!
- Community updates
- Our dedicated IRC channel: wikimedia-commons-sd webchat
- Several Commons community members are working on ways to integrate Wikidata in Wikimedia Commons. While this is not full-fledged structured data yet, this work helps to prepare for future conversion of data, and helps to understand how Wikidata and Commons can work better together.
- Thanks to Jarekt and other contributors, some Commons templates can now be filled via Wikidata: {{ Creator}} ( Phabricator) and {{ Institution}} ( Phabricator). Work is ongoing on the {{ Artwork}} template ( Phabricator).
- Thanks to Mike Peel and others, Wikidata-powered infoboxes can now be added to Commons categories, with the template {{ Wikidata Infobox}}. ( Example)
- Multichill is working on an experimental workflow to upload images to Commons via Wikidata (and using metadata from Wikidata). See a part of it here.
- Join the community focus group!
- Do you want to help out translating messages about Structured Data on Commons from English to your own language? Sign up on the translators page.
- Contribute to the next newsletter.
- Discussions held
- Conversation about licensing and copyright modeling.
- High-level discussion on ontology for Commons.
- Review first designs for multilingual captions.
- IRC office hour, 13 February
- Events
- Wikimedia Conference, Berlin, 20-22 April (+ Learning Days 18-19 April): several sessions and workshops around Structured Commons
- EuropeanaTech Conference, Rotterdam, 15-16 May: several presentations + a full workshop day on Monday 14 May about Wikidata and Structured Commons
- Wikimedia Hackathon, Barcelona, 18-20 May: Structured Commons as a focus area.
- Partners and allies
- We are still welcoming (more) staff from GLAMs (Galleries, Libraries, Archives and Museums) to become part of our long-term focus group ( phabricator task T174134). You will be kept in the loop of the project, and receive regular small surveys and requests for feedback. Get in touch with Sandra if you're interested - your input in helping to shape this project is highly valued!
- Research
- The research about GLAM contributions to Wikimedia Commons is concluded. A blog post on the Wikimedia blog provides a summary, and you can read the full results on meta.wikimedia.org.
- Prototypes will be available for Multilingual Captions soon.
- Stay up to date!
- Follow the Structured Data on Commons project on Phabricator: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/project/profile/34/
- Subscribe to this newsletter to receive it on a talk page of your own choice.
- Join the next IRC office hour and ask questions to the team! The date for next quarter will be announced soon.
-- Keegan (WMF) ( talk)
Message sent by MediaWiki message delivery - 19:48, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Volume 7 | Issue 3 | March 2018
This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!
Facto Post – Issue 11 – 9 April 2018
The 100 Skins of the OnionOpen Citations Month, with its eminently guessable hashtag, is upon us. We should be utterly grateful that in the past 12 months, so much data on which papers cite which other papers has been made open, and that Wikidata is playing its part in hosting it as "cites" statements. At the time of writing, there are 15.3M Wikidata items that can do that. Pulling back to look at open access papers in the large, though, there is is less reason for celebration. Access in theory does not yet equate to practical access. A recent LSE IMPACT blogpost puts that issue down to "heterogeneity". A useful euphemism to save us from thinking that the whole concept doesn't fall into the realm of the oxymoron. Some home truths: aggregation is not content management, if it falls short on reusability. The PDF file format is wedded to how humans read documents, not how machines ingest them. The salami-slicer is our friend in the current downloading of open access papers, but for a better metaphor, think about skinning an onion, laboriously, 100 times with diminishing returns. There are of the order of 100 major publisher sites hosting open access papers, and the predominant offer there is still a PDF. From the discoverability angle, Wikidata's bibliographic resources combined with the SPARQL query are superior in principle, by far, to existing keyword searches run over papers. Open access content should be managed into consistent HTML, something that is currently strenuous. The good news, such as it is, would be that much of it is already in XML. The organisational problem of removing further skins from the onion, with sensible prioritisation, is certainly not insuperable. The CORE group (the bloggers in the LSE posting) has some answers, but actually not all that is needed for the text and data mining purposes they highlight. The long tail, or in other words the onion heart when it has become fiddly beyond patience to skin, does call for a pis aller. But the real knack is to do more between the XML and the heart. Links
Editor Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him. Back numbers are here. Reminder: WikiFactMine pages on Wikidata are at WD:WFM. If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from
our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all
massmessage mailings, you may add
Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:25, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- From the editors: The Signpost's presses roll again
- Signpost: Future directions for The Signpost
- In the media: The rise of Wikipedia as a disinformation mop
- In focus: Admin reports board under criticism
- Special report: ACTRIAL results adopted by landslide
- Community view: It's time we look past Women in Red to counter systemic bias
- Discussion report: The future of portals
- Arbitration report: No new cases, and one motion on administrative misconduct
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Military History
- Traffic report: A quiet place to wrestle with the articles of March
- Technology report: Coming soon: Books-to-PDF, interactive maps, rollback confirmation
- Featured content: Featured content selected by the community
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 23:11, 29 April 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Beste Jane, de Engelstalige pagina over Jan Hope meldt dat Hope een volgeling van de Schotse Verlichting was en lid werd van genootschappen die de Schotse Verlichting propageerden. Kunt u mij vertellen waar deze informatie op gebaseerd is? Ik ben hier erg benieuwd naar omdat ik een artikel schrijf over Hope. Is het na te gaan wie deze informatie heeft toegevoegd aan de pagina (ik ben nog niet zo bekend met Wikipedia-achter-de-schermen)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jhengstmengel ( talk • contribs) 18:14, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- Het is lang geleden maar ik denk de meest informatie over deze tak van de oorspronkelijke Schotse familie staat uitgebreid beschrijven in Buist. Hij is lid van diverse herenclubs die bezig waren met allerlei experimenten waarvan Teylers nu als tegenhanger daarvan overgebleven is. Zijn clubs waren in Haarlem en Rotterdam en de Haarlemse club is later opgegaan in Felix Meritus. Om te zien wie allemaal geschreven heeft op de paginas kan je op de geschiedenis tab klikken en scrollen langs alle edits. Best en succes met het artikel. Jane ( talk) 20:59, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- Bedankt voor de informatie! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.211.23.163 ( talk) 08:25, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
Volume 7 | Issue 4 | April 2018
This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!
Hi, just left a request to be added to cultural-partnerships-l mailing list Thanks! MassiveEartha ( talk) 23:31, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello MassiveEartha, I'm sorry to bump in, what are the cultural partnerships about? Who is eligible? Danidamiobi ( talk) 08:34, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
- @ Danidamiobi: hi, it's a GLAM-Wiki community mailing list, since I'm not a member I don't know much more than what's on the site. In answer to your second question, I'm not even sure if I'm eligible, haven't been accepted yet! MassiveEartha ( talk) 08:48, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your warm response. MassiveEartha. Keep up the good work. Would you be probably interested in Wiki Loves Food 2018? Danidamiobi ( talk) 08:55, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello! After the successful pilot program by Wikimedia India in 2015, Wiki Loves Food (WLF) is happening again in 2018 and this year, it's going International. To make this event a grand success, your direction is key. Please sign up here as a volunteer to bring all the world's food to Wikimedia. Danidamiobi ( talk) 08:28, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Hoi Jane!
Zou jij eens naar deze draft van Daphne willen kijken? Zij heeft het gisteren geschreven op de wiki-a-thon in Amsterdam, maar het is nog niet goed genoeg, begrijp ik uit het commentaar. Ik heb zoals gesuggereerd een bericht achtergelaten op de talkpage van het Guatemale Wikiproject, maar de activiteit is daar niet heel hoog, vandaar dat ik hoop dat jij ook even tijd hebt om haar te helpen.
Vriendelijke groet, Ciell ( talk) 15:20, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
- Ja ik heb net gekeken. Jammer maar in deze staat bijna kansloos, schat ik. Ik ben vooral bezig met vrouwen die al eeuwen dood zijn en je hebt zowiezo problemen met engelstalige bronnen voor niet US-UK vrouwen, maar deze is voornamelijk gebaseerd op een organisatie die nog niet bestaat in de Wikiverse. Ik roep al jaren dat om één vrouw toe te voegen moet ik minstens 5 mannen toevoegen, en dit is een prima voorbeeld. Dus eerst een lemma voor "Unidad de Protección a Defensoras y Defensores de Derechos Humanos" volgens mij voordat deze aangemaakt kan worden. Ik zal een bericht achterlaten op de WiR overleg pagina. gr,
Jane (
talk) 15:46, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
- Jammer dat het zo moeilijk is!
Draft:Maudilia López is ook ingediend en afgelopen zaterdag geschreven: zou je er een blik op willen werpen? Je hulp wordt op prijs gesteld!
Ciell (
talk) 11:59, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
- En Draft:Manya Riche. Ciell ( talk) 12:02, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
- Jammer dat het zo moeilijk is!
Draft:Maudilia López is ook ingediend en afgelopen zaterdag geschreven: zou je er een blik op willen werpen? Je hulp wordt op prijs gesteld!
Ciell (
talk) 11:59, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Tja, je moet kennelijk een soort cursus volgen om iets uit "Draft" daadwerkelijk gepubliceerd te krijgen op enwiki. Ik ga het niet eens proberen, maar nogmaals, levende lui is niet mijn ding. Ik ben trouwens verbaasd dat er kennelijk geen enwiki pagina was voor deze (internationale) edit-a-thon! Jane ( talk) 12:22, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
- Er is een overzichtspagina op meta: hier, maar die is heel slecht gecommuniceerd. Ciell ( talk) 16:33, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
- From the editor: Another issue meets the deadline
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Portals
- Discussion report: User rights, infoboxes, and more discussion on portals
- Featured content: Featured content selected by the community
- Arbitration report: Managing difficult topics
- News and notes: Lots of Wikimedia
- Traffic report: We love our superheroes
- Technology report: A trove of contributor and developer goodies
- Recent research: Why people don't contribute to Wikipedia; using Wikipedia to teach statistics, technical writing, and controversial issues
- Humour: Play with your food
- Gallery: Wine not?
- From the archives: The Signpost scoops The Signpost
Facto Post – Issue 12 – 28 May 2018
ScienceSource fundedThe Wikimedia Foundation announced full funding of the ScienceSource grant proposal from ContentMine on May 18. See the ScienceSource Twitter announcement and 60 second video.
The proposal includes downloading 30,000 open access papers, aiming (roughly speaking) to create a baseline for medical referencing on Wikipedia. It leaves open the question of how these are to be chosen. The basic criteria of WP:MEDRS include a concentration on secondary literature. Attention has to be given to the long tail of diseases that receive less current research. The MEDRS guideline supposes that edge cases will have to be handled, and the premature exclusion of publications that would be in those marginal positions would reduce the value of the collection. Prophylaxis misses the point that gate-keeping will be done by an algorithm. Two well-known but rather different areas where such considerations apply are tropical diseases and alternative medicine. There are also a number of potential downloading troubles, and these were mentioned in Issue 11. There is likely to be a gap, even with the guideline, between conditions taken to be necessary but not sufficient, and conditions sufficient but not necessary, for candidate papers to be included. With around 10,000 recognised medical conditions in standard lists, being comprehensive is demanding. With all of these aspects of the task, ScienceSource will seek community help. Links
Editor Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him. Back numbers are here. Reminder: WikiFactMine pages on Wikidata are at WD:WFM. ScienceSource pages will be announced there, and in this mass message. If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from
our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all
massmessage mailings, you may add
Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 10:16, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 17:15, 29 May 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Volume 4 | Issue 5 | May 2018
This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!
As you know, we are preparing a list of tools and techncial support for Women in Red. I have tentatively added your name as you have provided a range of assistance, especially in connection with Wikidata. Please let me know whether you agree to be listed. You are of course welcome to make any additions or corrections.-- Ipigott ( talk) 07:16, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
I’ve been working to sort out various redlists for Women in Red, and I had a couple of questions about Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Newest items about women writers from some language Wikipedia, which you set up last year. First of all, was this set up for a certain use? The columns are not congruent with other WiR redlists, nor are the links actually red. I don’t want to modify it if it should be kept the way it is.
Also, in the introduction, it says “This is a list of 1000 most recently created human women writer items on Wikidata who have an article in English Wikipedia on Wikidata....” But there are women both with and without English articles in the list...?
And I have a technical question, which I hope you have time to answer. I’m new to SPARQL, and I’ve been trying to puzzle out the statement BIND (xsd:integer(STRAFTER(str(?item), "Q")) AS ?qid), with no luck. What is it doing and why is it there?
Thanks, NotARabbit ( talk) 20:31, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking an interest in the redlists! The sparql query in this list basically takes the Q number and strips off the Q in order to be able to list the number in descending order. The logic is that only high Q numbers will be for recently created articles. If the Q number is recent and sparql thinks there is a corresponding article in English Wikipedia and there isn't, then that article may have been renamed or even deleted, I suppose. So long story short, the variable "?qid" is filled with the result of the value of "?item" (which is the Q number), but instead of using the whole Q number, only the "string after" (STRAFTER) the letter "Q" is stuffed in there. Hope it helps, Jane ( talk) 21:02, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks, Jane, that’s a clever method! I love learning new ways to sift through the data.
- I take it that the list is okay to be modified? I especially want to make it red-links-only for any editors that want to pounce on new writers.
NotARabbit (
talk) 22:48, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for the compliment, but I didn't figure this out, someone else did! You are welcome to modify away. I noticed that I took out the restriction for english Wikipedia and it only checks for any project. You can copy paste the raw query into the listeria template in your own user space of course. I am not a sparql specialist - I am just really good at copy/pasting the ideas of others. Also, if you have a specific query you would like to run, you can always post a question at the "request a query" page d:Wikidata:Request a query. Jane ( talk) 11:03, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- I take it that the list is okay to be modified? I especially want to make it red-links-only for any editors that want to pounce on new writers.
NotARabbit (
talk) 22:48, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for creating De Vriendt, Jane023!
Wikipedia editor Innisfree987 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thanks for your addition!
To reply, leave a comment on Innisfree987's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Innisfree987 ( talk) 02:39, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Yesterday, following a redlink from Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Missing articles by occupation/Songwriters, I created Dorothy Ann Thrupp ( Q4982698) as a translation from the Swedish article. Today, I found this article, Dorothea Ann Thrupp, which is the same person ( Q18527806). I successfully merged the Wikipedia articles, but could not merge the Wikidata items. Help? Thanks. -- Rosiestep ( talk) 17:00, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
- Done. The problem is you need to actively delete the redirect from the item on Wikidata, since Wikidata can't tell the difference between a redirect and an article. Once I removed the sitelink, I could merge the items. Happy editing! Jane ( talk) 17:13, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 14:04, 28 June 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
| Facto Post – Issue 13 – 29 May 2018
The Editor is
Charles Matthews, for
ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page.
To subscribe to Facto Post go to
Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer.
Facto Post enters its second year, with a Cambridge Blue (OK, Aquamarine) background, a new logo, but no Cambridge blues. On-topic for the ScienceSource project is a project page here. It contains some case studies on how the WP:MEDRS guideline, for the referencing of articles at all related to human health, is applied in typical discussions. Close to home also, a template, called {{ medrs}} for short, is used to express dissatisfaction with particular references. Technology can help with patrolling, and this Petscan query finds over 450 articles where there is at least one use of the template. Of course the template is merely suggesting there is a possible issue with the reliability of a reference. Deciding the truth of the allegation is another matter. This maintenance issue is one example of where ScienceSource aims to help. Where the reference is to a scientific paper, its type of algorithm could give a pass/fail opinion on such references. It could assist patrollers of medical articles, therefore, with the templated references and more generally. There may be more to proper referencing than that, indeed: context, quite what the statement supported by the reference expresses, prominence and weight. For that kind of consideration, case studies can help. But an algorithm might help to clear the backlog.
If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from
our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all
massmessage mailings, you may add
Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:19, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
- Special report: NPR and AfC – The Marshall Plan: an engagement and a marriage?
- Op-ed: What do admins do?
- News and notes: Money, milestones, and Wikimania
- In the media: Much wikilove from the Mayor of London, less from Paekākāriki or a certain candidate for U.S. Congress
- Discussion report: Deletion, page moves, and an update to the main page
- Featured content: New promotions
- Arbitration report: WWII, UK politics, and a user deCrat'ed
- Traffic report: Endgame
- Technology report: Improvements piled on more improvements
- Gallery: Wiki Loves Africa
- Recent research: How censorship can backfire and conversations can go awry
- Humour: Television plot lines
- Wikipedia essays: This month's pick by The Signpost editors
- From the archives: Wolves nip at Wikipedia's heels: A perspective on the cost of paid editing
Volume 4 | Issue 6 | June 2018
This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!
Welcome to the newsletter for Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons! You can update your subscription to the newsletter and contribute to the next issue. Do inform others who you think will want to be involved in the project!
- Community updates
- Our dedicated IRC channel: wikimedia-commons-sd webchat
- Since our last newsletter, the Structured Data team has moved into designing and building prototypes for various features. The use of multilingual captions in the UploadWizard and on the file page has been researched, designed, discussed, and built out for use. Behind the scenes, back-end work on search is taking place and designs are being drawn up for the front-end. There will soon be specifications published for the use of the first Wikidata property on Commons, " Depicts," and a prototype is to be released to go along with that.
- A workshop on what Wikidata properties Commons will need. This workshop will be open for the entire month of July 2018 at minimum.
- Join the community focus group!
- Do you want to help out translating messages about Structured Data on Commons from English to your own language? Sign up on the translators page.
- Contribute to the next newsletter.
- Discussions held
- In late February there was a discussion around how Commons generally sees data being modeled.
- The first discussion on copyright and licensing with Commons was held in March. This was a "high level" discussion, there will be a consultation later this summer about the deeper mapping of copyright and licensing in a structured way.
- In April there was an exercise for GLAM partners in metadata and ontology mapping.
- A discussion about the design for Multilingual Captions on the file page took place in May. You can still review the designs and leave feedback.
- There was an IRC office hour in June to discuss progress so far and future plans.
- Wikimania 2018
- Three sessions about Structured Commons are officially scheduled for Wikimania 2018 - Cape Town, South Africa - July 2018.
- Wikimedia Commons and GLAM needs around the world (Friday 20 July, 10:30 local time)
- Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons and knowledge equity (Friday 20 July, 14:00 local time)
- Design challenge workshop: How can multilingual structured metadata bring knowledge equity to Commons? (Friday 20 July, 14:30 local time)
- Structured Data on Commons is also a focus area during the Wikimania 2018 Hackathon. We will, among other things, do 'live' modelling of Wikidata properties for Commons - an offline spin-off of the community consultation taking place on wiki.
- Partners and allies
- We are still welcoming (more) staff from GLAMs (Galleries, Libraries, Archives and Museums) to become part of our long-term focus group ( phabricator task T174134). You will be kept in the loop of the project, and receive regular small surveys and requests for feedback. Get in touch with Sandra if you're interested - your input in helping to shape this project is highly valued!
- Structured Data on Commons was presented to GLAM audiences during EuropeanaTech 2018 in Rotterdam (15 May 2018) and at the Deutsche Digitale Bibliothek Forum in Berlin (4 June 2018).
- Research
Two research projects about Wikimedia Commons are currently ongoing, or in the process of being finished:
- Research:Curation workflows on Wikimedia Commons—a project that seeks to understand the current workflows of Commons contributors who curate media (categorize it, delete it, link to it from other projects, etc.).
- Research:Technical needs of external re-users of Commons media—soliciting feedback from individuals and organizations that re-use Commons content outside of Wikimedia projects, in order to understand their current painpoints and unmet needs.
- Prototypes will be available for Depicts soon.
- Stay up to date!
- Follow the Structured Data on Commons project on Phabricator: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/project/profile/34/
- Subscribe to this newsletter to receive it on a talk page of your own choice.
- Join the next IRC office hour and ask questions to the team! The date for next quarter will be announced soon.
-- Keegan (WMF) ( talk)
Message sent by MediaWiki message delivery - 21:07, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Greetings,
The newsletter omitted two interwiki prefixes, breaking the links on non-meta wikis as you might see above. Here are the correct links:
- m:Research:Curation workflows on Wikimedia Commons—a project that seeks to understand the current workflows of Commons contributors who curate media (categorize it, delete it, link to it from other projects, etc.).
- m:Research:Technical needs of external re-users of Commons media—soliciting feedback from individuals and organizations that re-use Commons content outside of Wikimedia projects, in order to understand their current painpoints and unmet needs.
My apologies, I hope you find the corrected links helpful.
- Keegan (WMF) ( talk) 21:21, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi Jane,
Rosiestep recommended that I contact you when I mentioned that I would be happy to help (with our new project-- its not public yet) with Wikidata, tools, coding, etc. I joined Wikipedia in January 2017, and I have been working only on content. I would like to learn more about Structured Data for Commons, tools and anything else you think I should look at. I know nothing about these technical areas on Wiki as the subject has rarely been brought up in discussion.
I would like to see this group build out a presence over other projects though, since there is so much happening right now with Structured Data for Commons. I would also like to see a WiR presence in some sort of tooling workgroup. (your talk comments on our project page)
My background is a BS in Business/Economics (1976) and a Post Baccalaureate BS in Information Systems (1991). I worked for Philip Morris Inc (4 years) , Microsoft (1 year), and a few smaller companies. I had responsibilities in the areas of systems analysis, database management, database design, software development and design and user testing. Please point me in the direction of where I can learn more to be able to assist our new project. thanks MauraWen ( talk) 12:30, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
thanks MauraWen ( talk) 12:30, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
- Wow that's a lot of credentials. You are more than welcome to work on this stuff. So to start getting a feel for the type of tooling I am talking about, it helps to orient yourself with our pain points. First of all, it is hard to run a project when the only thing you can measure is "number of articles created" against a running total of articles created randomly through organic growth. Also, once you have poked around at the types of articles that are created, you start to realize that quality is all over the map and it would be nice to be able to capture and highlight the hidden gems in all the stuff that comes streaming in. On the other hand, it would also be nice to be able to highlight the weaker articles for people to work on before they get nominated for deletion or merged into something else. Next, since creating an article these days involves more that one project, and references and images tend to come from elsewhere (Wikidata and Commons), it is handy to get familiar with how Wikidata fits into the mix. You can learn all about Structured Data on Commons here:
c:Commons:Structured data. To start lending a hand with tooling, you can take a look at the Wikidata and
Sparql presentations created by
User:Ijon. I started a
d:Wikidata:WikiProject Women project to help try to better define the items for the articles created (in any language) so that we can better show our progress by birth period, occupation, citizenship, etc. If there is anything specific you would like to work on, let me know. If I can't answer your questions I may know someone who can.
Jane (
talk) 14:19, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks Jane!. I am going to be exploring these pages later this week. I am correcting my 2nd BS in Info Systems to 1991 instead of 1994. It was all so long ago, that I forget my dates. It has been suggested that our user group also create a web page. I have not stayed current on web development, leaving the profession in 2003. My webpage design skills are still current--those guidelines are still the same. Is web page development an area of skill or interest for you? MauraWen ( talk) 14:57, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
| Facto Post – Issue 14 – 21 July 2018
The Editor is
Charles Matthews, for
ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page.
To subscribe to Facto Post go to
Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer.
Officially it is "bridging the gaps in knowledge", with Wikimania 2018 in Cape Town paying tribute to the southern African concept of ubuntu to implement it. Besides face-to-face interactions, Wikimedians do need their power sources. Facto Post interviewed Jdforrester, who has attended every Wikimania, and now works as Senior Product Manager for the Wikimedia Foundation. His take on tackling the gaps in the Wikimedia movement is that "if we were an army, we could march in a column and close up all the gaps". In his view though, that is a faulty metaphor, and it leads to a completely false misunderstanding of the movement, its diversity and different aspirations, and the nature of the work as "fighting" to be done in the open sector. There are many fronts, and as an eventualist he feels the gaps experienced both by editors and by users of Wikimedia content are inevitable. He would like to see a greater emphasis on reuse of content, not simply its volume. If that may not sound like radicalism, the Decolonizing the Internet conference here organized jointly with Whose Knowledge? can redress the picture. It comes with the claim to be "the first ever conference about centering marginalized knowledge online".
If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from
our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all
massmessage mailings, you may add
Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:10, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
| ||
|
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 11:22, 23 July 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
- From the editor: If only if
- Opinion: Wrestling with Wikipedia reality
- Discussion report: Wikipedias take action against EU copyright proposal, plus new user right proposals
- Featured content: Wikipedia's best content in images and prose
- Arbitration report: Status quo processes retained in two disputes
- Traffic report: Soccer, football, call it what you like – that and summer movies leave room for little else
- Technology report: New bots, new prefs
- Recent research: Different Wikipedias use different images; editing contests more successful than edit-a-thons
- Humour: It's all the same
- Essay: Wikipedia does not need you
Volume 4 | Issue 7 | July 2018
This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!
| Facto Post – Issue 15 – 21 August 2018
The Editor is
Charles Matthews, for
ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page.
To subscribe to Facto Post go to
Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer.
To grasp the nettle, there are rare diseases, there are tropical diseases and then there are "neglected diseases". Evidently a rare enough disease is likely to be neglected, but neglected disease these days means a disease not rare, but tropical, and most often infectious or parasitic. Rare diseases as a group are dominated, in contrast, by genetic diseases. A major aspect of neglect is found in tracking drug discovery. Orphan drugs are those developed to treat rare diseases (rare enough not to have market-driven research), but there is some overlap in practice with the WHO's neglected diseases, where snakebite, a "neglected public health issue", is on the list. From an encyclopedic point of view, lack of research also may mean lack of high-quality references: the core medical literature differs from primary research, since it operates by aggregating trials. This bibliographic deficit clearly hinders Wikipedia's mission. The ScienceSource project is currently addressing this issue, on Wikidata. Its Wikidata focus list at WD:SSFL is trying to ensure that neglect does not turn into bias in its selection of science papers.
If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from
our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all
massmessage mailings, you may add
Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 13:23, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
| ||
|
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!):
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 01:55, 26 August 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Wikidata
Hi Jane,
Klaas `Z4␟`
V who started to work on the Lebanese-Belgian
singer
Lara Chedraoui;
do you know somebody who may assist to make her blue on enwiki since I'm not a native speaker of English?
It would be fun to start here as happened to some other previously missing females. 08:50, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
- I am not sure what you mean. There are no links on Wikidata, so I don't think you can start a community of contributors there along the lines of Category:WikiProject_Women_in_Red_members. Maybe you meant to do it on the Dutch wiki? In that case I would give the category a Dutch name, however. Good luck with the article! Jane ( talk) 18:37, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
- From the editor: Today's young adults don't know a world without Wikipedia
- News and notes: Flying high; low practice from Wikipedia 'cleansing' agency; where do our donations go? RfA sees a new trend
- In the media: Quicksilver AI writes articles
- Discussion report: Drafting an interface administrator policy
- Featured content: Featured content selected by the community
- Special report: Wikimania 2018
- Traffic report: Aretha dies – getting just 2,000 short of 5 million hits
- Technology report: Technical enhancements and a request to prioritize upcoming work
- Recent research: Wehrmacht on Wikipedia, neural networks writing biographies
- Humour: Signpost editor censors herself
- From the archives: Playing with Wikipedia words
Volume 4 | Issue 8 | August 2018
This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 14:46, 28 September 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
| Facto Post – Issue 16 – 30 September 2018
The Editor is
Charles Matthews, for
ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page.
To subscribe to Facto Post go to
Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer.
In an ideal world ... no, bear with your editor for just a minute ... there would be a format for scientific publishing online that was as much a standard as SI units are for the content. Likewise cataloguing publications would not be onerous, because part of the process would be to generate uniform metadata. Without claiming it could be the mythical free lunch, it might be reasonably be argued that sandwiches can be packaged much alike and have barcodes, whatever the fillings. The best on offer, to stretch the metaphor, is the meal kit option, in the form of XML. Where scientific papers are delivered as XML downloads, you get all the ingredients ready to cook. But have to prepare the actual meal of slow food yourself. See Scholarly HTML for a recent pass at heading off XML with HTML, in other words in the native language of the Web. The argument from real life is a traditional mixture of frictional forces, vested interests, and the classic irony of the principle of unripe time. On the other hand, discoverability actually diminishes with the prolific progress of science publishing. No, it really doesn't scale. Wikimedia as movement can do something in such cases. We know from open access, we grok the Web, we have our own horse in the HTML race, we have Wikidata and WikiJournal, and we have the chops to act.
If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from
our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all
massmessage mailings, you may add
Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 17:57, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
- From the editor: Is this the new normal?
- News and notes: European copyright law moves forward
- In the media: Knowledge under fire
- Discussion report: Interface Admin policy proposal, part 2
- Arbitration report: A quiet month for Arbcom
- Technology report: Paying attention to your mobile
- Gallery: A pat on the back
- Recent research: How talk page use has changed since 2005; censorship shocks lead to centralization; is vandalism caused by workplace boredom?
- Humour: Signpost Crossword Puzzle
- Essay: Expressing thanks
Volume 4 | Issue 9 | September 2018
This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!
Continuing: | ||
|
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 18:40, 14 October 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging
- From the editors: The Signpost is still afloat, just barely
- News and notes: WMF gets a million bucks
- In the media: Bans, celebs, and bias
- Discussion report: Mediation Committee and proposed deletion reform
- Traffic report: Unsurprisingly, sport leads the field – or the ring
- Technology report: Bots galore!
- Special report: NPP needs you
- Special report 2: Now Wikidata is six
- In focus: Alexa
- Gallery: Out of this world!
- Recent research: Wikimedia Commons worth $28.9 billion
- Humour: Talk page humour
- Opinion: Strickland incident
- From the archives: The Gardner Interview
| Facto Post – Issue 17 – 29 October 2018
The Editor is
Charles Matthews, for
ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page.
To subscribe to Facto Post go to
Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer.
Around 2.7 million Wikidata items have an illustrative image. These files, you might say, are Wikimedia's stock images, and if the number is large, it is still only 5% or so of items that have one. All such images are taken from Wikimedia Commons, which has 50 million media files. One key issue is how to expand the stock. Indeed, there is a tool. WD-FIST exploits the fact that each Wikipedia is differently illustrated, mostly with images from Commons but also with fair use images. An item that has sitelinks but no illustrative image can be tested to see if the linked wikis have a suitable one. This works well for a volunteer who wants to add images at a reasonable scale, and a small amount of SPARQL knowledge goes a long way in producing checklists. It should be noted, though, that there are currently 53 Wikidata properties that link to Commons, of which P18 for the basic image is just one. WD-FIST prompts the user to add signatures, plaques, pictures of graves and so on. There are a couple of hundred monograms, mostly of historical figures, and this query allows you to view all of them. commons:Category:Monograms and its subcategories provide rich scope for adding more. And so it is generally. The list of properties linking to Commons does contain a few that concern video and audio files, and rather more for maps. But it contains gems such as P3451 for "nighttime view". Over 1000 of those on Wikidata, but as for so much else, there could be yet more. Go on. Today is Wikidata's birthday. An illustrative image is always an acceptable gift, so why not add one? You can follow these easy steps: (i) log in at https://tools.wmflabs.org/widar/, (ii) paste the Petscan ID 6263583 into https://tools.wmflabs.org/fist/wdfist/ and click run, and (iii) just add cake.
If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from
our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all
massmessage mailings, you may add
Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 15:01, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Frans van Schooten, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NRC ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:27, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Volume 4 | Issue 10 | October 2018
This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!
Hello, Jane023. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Continuing: | ||
|
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe:
Women in Red/English language mailing list and
Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe:
Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
| Facto Post – Issue 18 – 30 November 2018
The Editor is
Charles Matthews, for
ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page.
To subscribe to Facto Post go to
Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer.
GLAM ♥ data — what is a gallery, library, archive or museum without a catalogue? It follows that Wikidata must love librarians. Bibliography supports students and researchers in any topic, but open and machine-readable bibliographic data even more so, outside the silo. Cue the WikiCite initiative, which was meeting in conference this week, in the Bay Area of California. In fact there is a broad scope: "Open Knowledge Maps via SPARQL" and the "Sum of All Welsh Literature", identification of research outputs, Library.Link Network and Bibframe 2.0, OSCAR and LUCINDA (who they?), OCLC and Scholia, all these co-exist on the agenda. Certainly more library science is coming Wikidata's way. That poses the question about the other direction: is more Wikimedia technology advancing on libraries? Good point. Wikimedians generally are not aware of the tech background that can be assumed, unless they are close to current training for librarians. A baseline definition is useful here: " bash, git and OpenRefine". Compare and contrast with pywikibot, GitHub and mix'n'match. Translation: scripting for automation, version control, data set matching and wrangling in the large, are on the agenda also for contemporary library work. Certainly there is some possible common ground here. Time to understand rather more about the motivations that operate in the library sector.
Account creation is now open on the
ScienceSource wiki, where you can see SPARQL visualisations of
text mining.
If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from
our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all
massmessage mailings, you may add
Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 11:20, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
- From the editor: Time for a truce
- Special report: The Christmas wishlist
- Discussion report: Farewell, Mediation Committee
- Arbitration report: A long break ends
- Traffic report: Queen reigns for four weeks straight
- Gallery: Intersections
- From the archives: Ars longa, vita brevis
Welcome to the newsletter for Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons! You can update your subscription to the newsletter. Do inform others who you think will want to be involved in the project!
- Community updates
- Multilingual Captions, the first feature release for Structured Data, is coming in January of 2019
- Be on the lookout for the beta testing announcement
- Help using captions has been set up, if you'd like to go ahead and see the workflow
- Two IRC office hours were held since the last newsletter
- Our dedicated IRC channel: wikimedia-commons-sd webchat
Current:
- Help determine and propose properties on Wikidata for Commons
- Review designs for structured licensing and copyright
- Join the community focus group!
Since the last newsletter:
- Review a prototype for searching structured Commons (October 2018)
- "Good coverage" for depicts tagging (Sept. 2018)
- Review and discuss mockups for displaying the new metadata section of the file page (18 September - 9 October 2018)
- Depicts statements draft requirements (14 August - 31 August 2018)
- Identify Wikidata properties that Commons will need (26 June - 14 August 2018)
- Presentation by Keegan on the first features to be released for Structured Data, presented at Wikiconference North America, Columbus, Ohio, October 2018.
- Sandra presented a project update at the GLAM-Wiki conference in Tel Aviv, Israel, November 2018, as part of an update and panel discussion.
- Structured Data on Commons was the subject of a keynote presentation by Sandra ( see slides) at the Baltic Audiovisual Archives Council conference in Tallinn, Estonia, November 2018.
- Partners and allies
- The info portal on Structured Commons now includes a section on GLAM (Galleries, Libraries, Archives and Museums).
- We are currently planning the first GLAM pilot projects that will use structured data on Wikimedia Commons. One project has already started: the Swedish Heritage Board researches and develops a prototype tool to provide improved metadata (translations, data additions...) from Wikimedia Commons back to the source institution. Read the project brief.
- The documentation for batch uploads of files to Wikimedia Commons will be improved in 2019, as part of preparing for Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons. To prepare, the GLAM team at the Wikimedia Foundation wants to understand better which types of documentation you already use, and how you like to learn new GLAM-Wiki skills and knowledge. Fill in a short survey to provide input!
- Stay up to date!
- Follow the Structured Data on Commons project on Phabricator: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/project/profile/34/
- Subscribe to this newsletter to receive it on a talk page of your own choice.
-- Keegan (WMF) ( talk)
Message sent by MediaWiki message delivery - 17:58, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
January events:
|
- From the editors: Where to draw the line in reporting?
- News and notes: Some wishes do come true
- In the media: Political hijinks
- Discussion report: A new record low for RfA
- WikiProject report: Articlegenesis
- Arbitration report: Year ends with one active case
- Traffic report: Queen dethroned by U.S. presidents
- Gallery: Sun and Moon, water and stone
- Blog: News from the WMF
- Humour: I believe in Bigfoot
- Essay: Requests for medication
- From the archives: Compromised admin accounts – again
| Newsletter Nr 6, 2018-12-25, for
WikiProject Genealogy (and
Wikimedia genealogy project on Meta)
Participation: This is the sixth newsletter sent by mass mail to members in Wikipedia:WikiProject Genealogy, to everyone who voted a support for establishing a potential Wikimedia genealogy project on meta, and anyone who during the years showed an interest in genealogy on talk pages and likewise. (To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please see below) Now 100 supportersAt 3 December 2018, the list of users who support the potential Wikimedia genealogy project, reached 100! A demo wiki is up and running!You can already now try out the demo for a genealogy wiki at https://tools.wmflabs.org/genealogy/wiki/Main_Page and try out the functions. You will find parts of the 18th Pharao dynasty and other records submitted by the 7 first users, and it would be great if you would add some records. And with those great news we want to wish you a creative New Year 2019!
Cheers from your WikiProject Genealogy coordinator Dan Koehl. To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name from
our mailing list.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery |
| Facto Post – Issue 19 – 27 December 2018
The Editor is
Charles Matthews, for
ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him, on his User talk page.
To subscribe to Facto Post go to
Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see the footer.
Zotero is free software for reference management by the Center for History and New Media: see Wikipedia:Citing sources with Zotero. It is also an active user community, and has broad-based language support. Besides the handiness of Zotero's warehousing of personal citation collections, the Zotero translator underlies the citoid service, at work behind the VisualEditor. Metadata from Wikidata can be imported into Zotero; and in the other direction the zotkat tool from the University of Mannheim allows Zotero bibliographies to be exported to Wikidata, by item creation. With an extra feature to add statements, that route could lead to much development of the focus list (P5008) tagging on Wikidata, by WikiProjects. There is also a large-scale encyclopedic dimension here. The construction of Zotero translators is one facet of Web scraping that has a strong community and open source basis. In that it resembles the less formal mix'n'match import community, and growing networks around other approaches that can integrate datasets into Wikidata, such as the use of OpenRefine. Looking ahead, the thirtieth birthday of the World Wide Web falls in 2019, and yet the ambition to make webpages routinely readable by machines can still seem an ever-retreating mirage. Wikidata should not only be helping Wikimedia integrate its projects, an ongoing process represented by Structured Data on Commons and lexemes. It should also be acting as a catalyst to bring scraping in from the cold, with institutional strengths as well as resourceful code.
Diversitech, the latest ContentMine grant application to the Wikimedia Foundation, is in its community review stage until January 2.
If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from
our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all
massmessage mailings, you may add
Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 19:08, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Template:Mbabel/RKD has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Pkbwcgs (
talk) 12:08, 2 January 2019 (UTC)