This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
GeneralNotability (
talk) 16:47, 17 October 2021 (UTC)James Cantor ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Decline reason:
Per Crossroads below, this may not need to be an indefinite block, but per the other people in the discussion, it should not be lifted so quickly, and it might be better to do it through ArbCom rather than just some random admin reviewing CAT:RFU. Daniel Case ( talk) 18:00, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
The article List of technical terms for nonparaphilic sexual interests has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unnecessary list, not notable - redundant to links in articles like human sexuality, navboxes, and categories
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Crossroads
-talk- 22:42, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feminine essence concept of transsexuality until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Your Friendly Neighborhood Sociologist ⚧ Ⓐ ( talk) 20:19, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journal of Sex Education and Therapy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.ASUKITE 19:44, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sexual and Gender Diversity in Social Services until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.MaterialsPsych ( talk) 08:02, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
GeneralNotability (
talk) 16:47, 17 October 2021 (UTC)James Cantor ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Decline reason:
Per Crossroads below, this may not need to be an indefinite block, but per the other people in the discussion, it should not be lifted so quickly, and it might be better to do it through ArbCom rather than just some random admin reviewing CAT:RFU. Daniel Case ( talk) 18:00, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
The article List of technical terms for nonparaphilic sexual interests has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unnecessary list, not notable - redundant to links in articles like human sexuality, navboxes, and categories
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Crossroads
-talk- 22:42, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feminine essence concept of transsexuality until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Your Friendly Neighborhood Sociologist ⚧ Ⓐ ( talk) 20:19, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journal of Sex Education and Therapy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.ASUKITE 19:44, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sexual and Gender Diversity in Social Services until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.MaterialsPsych ( talk) 08:02, 18 February 2024 (UTC)