Hi JUMPp1harm! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as
typo corrections or reverting obvious
vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see
Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you.
Alexeyevitch
(talk) 10:19, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Please see:
There is an opening for you to respond to the complaint. Edit warring is against Wikipedia policy. Thank you, EdJohnston ( talk) 03:20, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- The person lacks knowledge. Shouldn't I correct it when someone adds false or unreliable information? JUMPp1harm ( talk) 03:50, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
harassment policy, as you did at
Najashi, you may be
blocked from editing. Specifically in
this edit summary
EvergreenFir (talk) 20:55, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- So should I not fix incorrect information? JUMPp1harm ( talk) 21:08, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes), a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
Daniel Case ( talk) 18:13, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Please do not
attack other editors, as you did at
Najashi. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please
stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.
Socialwave597 (
talk) 18:24, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Regarding this edit, it's not enough that a quote is referenced in another Wikipedia article. If you want to add the quote, you need to check it against the source and cite that source where you're adding the quote. See WP:BURDEN on this. Cordless Larry ( talk) 20:19, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Cordless Larry (
talk) 08:15, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Sumanuil. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Zara Yaqob have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use
your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse or the
Help desk. Thanks. -
Sumanuil.
(talk to me) 23:46, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Amhara people shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Gyrofrog (talk) 02:14, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Zara Yacob.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.
If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.
Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Gyrofrog (talk) 01:11, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
- P.S. I can't tell for sure because the Commons image is already deleted, but if this is the same image as commons:File:Zara Yacob.jpg, then uploading it here constitutes disruptive editing. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 01:11, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you upload files in violation of
copyright. It's the same image that was already deleted at Commons, and it's the same image as
https://shewa.org/index/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Zere-Yacob-275x300.jpg (& the website doesn't clarify who made it, nor where they got it, etc.). You cannot keep adding it to Wikipedia (or for that matter, uploading it to Commons). --
Gyrofrog
(talk) 17:08, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Acroterion
(talk) 04:10, 7 March 2024 (UTC)- I apologize but I would appreciate it if I could be informed about which specific image is considered to have violated copyright laws. If it's the latest one I uploaded, I've already discussed it with another administrator. Furthermore, all these images are already available in the Wikipedia image database, I just put them together so I'm confused about how they could be in violation of copyright laws.
JUMPp1harm (
talk) 04:38, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- I just saw that I've been banned due to repeated copyright violations, not specifically for the most recent one. I acknowledge my mistakes with the previous violations, as I'm relatively new to this. However, I'm confused about how the most recent upload could breach copyright laws, as all the images used are already available on the Wikipedia image database. I just combined them and added it because I believed it would fit the page better. I discussed this with another administrator, who advised me to indicate their source image exactly despite the fact that the images are already present in the pages of the respective depictions, which I promptly did. Therefore, I'm unclear on why these actions were deemed as copyright violations and why the edits were reverted.
JUMPp1harm (
talk) 05:06, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- One of those images is marked as copyrighted at the source
[1]. You're not banned, but you are blocked until this is sorted out.
Acroterion
(talk) 05:28, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't personally upload the image. As I mentioned earlier, all these images were already accessible on the Wikipedia image database. I found the photographer's name and searched for the link, so I shared it. However, the source linked from the image on the Wikipedia database is different. Should I have posted the same source as in the database? I assumed it didn't matter since I shared the photographer. Hence, I'm puzzled about why my edit was reverted. I understand facing a block for previous images.
-
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Emperor_Haile_Selassie_I_Official_Photographic_portrait.png
JUMPp1harm (
talk) 05:59, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- I think you made a mistake in good faith. But don’t restore the image, and you were edit=warring to keep it in. Don’t do that. I will unblock, on the condition that you reconsider your approach to images and repeated reversions.
Acroterion
(talk) 12:25, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- Is it not possible for me to correct the copyright violation on the image and add it? I was discussing about it with the user on his page. Overall, I feel like it enhances the page's coherence and relevance. I would at least ask you to look at the reasoning
JUMPp1harm (
talk) 12:39, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- It's copyrighted from the source, there is no "correcting." Whether museums have the right to copyright their own derivative works (which is what that is) is a separate matter that the WMF and others are arguing with museums about, but until that is legally settled, we can't upload or use any images that have a clear copyright notice, like that one has.
Acroterion
(talk) 13:06, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- I just meant replacing it with a different picture that's not copyrighted
JUMPp1harm (
talk) 21:34, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- Not if you're going to edit-war for its inclusion. Get consensus first.
Acroterion
(talk) 23:57, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- I am discussing it with the user but he hasn't replied since my last message. I think its okay if I change it. Have you seen my reasoning for changing the image? What are your personal thoughts. Which image is better for the page
JUMPp1harm (
talk) 00:33, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- No, it is not OK. If you revert without gaining consensus (whether the images contain a copyright violation or not), I will block you for edit-warring. I am not going to comment on the image change, administrators are not arbiters of content. Get agreement.
Acroterion
(talk) 01:00, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, as I mentioned, I've been in discussion with the user, but it's been some time since I received a response. How long am I supposed to wait? Honestly, this situation is becoming frustrating. Does coherence and relevance not hold importance in Wikipedia? Here I thought the goal of Wikipedia was to enhance pages to the best of our ability. Yet here I am, facing scrutiny for trying to improve pages. Is it all about ensuring editors don't exceed a certain number of reverts, even if one of those changes improves the page? Absurd
JUMPp1harm (
talk) 01:32, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- Here's a bold suggestion, other editors aren't at your beck and call. People have lives. If an individual editor isn't responding on their talk page, seek consensus on the article talk page.
TarnishedPath
talk 02:17, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- I already responded to him. Some time ago in fact.
Abrasax123 (
talk) 03:02, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- No comment on you. I only came here because of the copyright issues that I noticed elsewhere. TarnishedPath talk 03:11, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- No, you haven't responded to my message JUMPp1harm ( talk) 03:54, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- I already responded to him. Some time ago in fact.
Abrasax123 (
talk) 03:02, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- Here's a bold suggestion, other editors aren't at your beck and call. People have lives. If an individual editor isn't responding on their talk page, seek consensus on the article talk page.
TarnishedPath
talk 02:17, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- That account is not mine. How am I able to prove that it isn't mine? JUMPp1harm ( talk) 04:25, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, as I mentioned, I've been in discussion with the user, but it's been some time since I received a response. How long am I supposed to wait? Honestly, this situation is becoming frustrating. Does coherence and relevance not hold importance in Wikipedia? Here I thought the goal of Wikipedia was to enhance pages to the best of our ability. Yet here I am, facing scrutiny for trying to improve pages. Is it all about ensuring editors don't exceed a certain number of reverts, even if one of those changes improves the page? Absurd
JUMPp1harm (
talk) 01:32, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- No, it is not OK. If you revert without gaining consensus (whether the images contain a copyright violation or not), I will block you for edit-warring. I am not going to comment on the image change, administrators are not arbiters of content. Get agreement.
Acroterion
(talk) 01:00, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- I am discussing it with the user but he hasn't replied since my last message. I think its okay if I change it. Have you seen my reasoning for changing the image? What are your personal thoughts. Which image is better for the page
JUMPp1harm (
talk) 00:33, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- Not if you're going to edit-war for its inclusion. Get consensus first.
Acroterion
(talk) 23:57, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- I just meant replacing it with a different picture that's not copyrighted
JUMPp1harm (
talk) 21:34, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- There is no way to correct the copyright violation. Per https://www.slam.org/collection/objects/19235/ there is an unambiguous copyright attribution on that image. TarnishedPath talk 00:52, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- It's copyrighted from the source, there is no "correcting." Whether museums have the right to copyright their own derivative works (which is what that is) is a separate matter that the WMF and others are arguing with museums about, but until that is legally settled, we can't upload or use any images that have a clear copyright notice, like that one has.
Acroterion
(talk) 13:06, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- Is it not possible for me to correct the copyright violation on the image and add it? I was discussing about it with the user on his page. Overall, I feel like it enhances the page's coherence and relevance. I would at least ask you to look at the reasoning
JUMPp1harm (
talk) 12:39, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- I think you made a mistake in good faith. But don’t restore the image, and you were edit=warring to keep it in. Don’t do that. I will unblock, on the condition that you reconsider your approach to images and repeated reversions.
Acroterion
(talk) 12:25, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- One of those images is marked as copyrighted at the source
[1]. You're not banned, but you are blocked until this is sorted out.
Acroterion
(talk) 05:28, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- I just saw that I've been banned due to repeated copyright violations, not specifically for the most recent one. I acknowledge my mistakes with the previous violations, as I'm relatively new to this. However, I'm confused about how the most recent upload could breach copyright laws, as all the images used are already available on the Wikipedia image database. I just combined them and added it because I believed it would fit the page better. I discussed this with another administrator, who advised me to indicate their source image exactly despite the fact that the images are already present in the pages of the respective depictions, which I promptly did. Therefore, I'm unclear on why these actions were deemed as copyright violations and why the edits were reverted.
JUMPp1harm (
talk) 05:06, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
 | This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban
may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
Drmies (
talk) 02:25, 8 March 2024 (UTC) |
JUMPp1harm ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I want to address the accusations of puppetry that have been leveled against me. No one responded to my previous unban request I made a few days ago, so I decided to submit another one. I don't want to come across as overly persistent or annoying, but I sincerely hope you can recognize that this situation is a misunderstanding, and I am innocent. I want to emphasize that I have no involvement in any type of puppetry, whether it be sock puppetry or meat puppetry. I have never engaged in any form of coordinated editing or collaboration with other users. My sole intention as a independent contributor on Wikipedia has always been to improve pages and contribute positively to the platform. I understand that there have been some misunderstandings and issues regarding my edits, particularly concerning copyright issues. However, I want to clarify that any mistakes I have made were not indicative of any malicious intent or involvement in puppetry of any kind. I have previously requested to have my IP checked in an effort to prove my truthfulness, but apparently that's not possible. Nevertheless, I am willing to cooperate fully with any measures that can help establish my innocence. I don't know what else I can say or do. I have explained my perspective thoroughly in my previous unban requests, and I hope that you can see that I am merely an innocent individual caught up in this situation. I sincerely apologize for any disruption my actions may have caused and assure you that I am committed to adhering to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines [[User:JUMPp1harm|JUMPp1harm]] ([[User talk:JUMPp1harm#top|talk]]) 04:53, 14 March 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a
default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I want to address the accusations of puppetry that have been leveled against me. No one responded to my previous unban request I made a few days ago, so I decided to submit another one. I don't want to come across as overly persistent or annoying, but I sincerely hope you can recognize that this situation is a misunderstanding, and I am innocent. I want to emphasize that I have no involvement in any type of puppetry, whether it be sock puppetry or meat puppetry. I have never engaged in any form of coordinated editing or collaboration with other users. My sole intention as a independent contributor on Wikipedia has always been to improve pages and contribute positively to the platform. I understand that there have been some misunderstandings and issues regarding my edits, particularly concerning copyright issues. However, I want to clarify that any mistakes I have made were not indicative of any malicious intent or involvement in puppetry of any kind. I have previously requested to have my IP checked in an effort to prove my truthfulness, but apparently that's not possible. Nevertheless, I am willing to cooperate fully with any measures that can help establish my innocence. I don't know what else I can say or do. I have explained my perspective thoroughly in my previous unban requests, and I hope that you can see that I am merely an innocent individual caught up in this situation. I sincerely apologize for any disruption my actions may have caused and assure you that I am committed to adhering to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines [[User:JUMPp1harm|JUMPp1harm]] ([[User talk:JUMPp1harm#top|talk]]) 04:53, 14 March 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I want to address the accusations of puppetry that have been leveled against me. No one responded to my previous unban request I made a few days ago, so I decided to submit another one. I don't want to come across as overly persistent or annoying, but I sincerely hope you can recognize that this situation is a misunderstanding, and I am innocent. I want to emphasize that I have no involvement in any type of puppetry, whether it be sock puppetry or meat puppetry. I have never engaged in any form of coordinated editing or collaboration with other users. My sole intention as a independent contributor on Wikipedia has always been to improve pages and contribute positively to the platform. I understand that there have been some misunderstandings and issues regarding my edits, particularly concerning copyright issues. However, I want to clarify that any mistakes I have made were not indicative of any malicious intent or involvement in puppetry of any kind. I have previously requested to have my IP checked in an effort to prove my truthfulness, but apparently that's not possible. Nevertheless, I am willing to cooperate fully with any measures that can help establish my innocence. I don't know what else I can say or do. I have explained my perspective thoroughly in my previous unban requests, and I hope that you can see that I am merely an innocent individual caught up in this situation. I sincerely apologize for any disruption my actions may have caused and assure you that I am committed to adhering to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines [[User:JUMPp1harm|JUMPp1harm]] ([[User talk:JUMPp1harm#top|talk]]) 04:53, 14 March 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
JUMPp1harm ( talk) 04:53, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
JUMPp1harm ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have no association with the User:BasedHistorian PHD. /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/BasedHistorian_PHD I initially replaced Zara Yaqob's image from this one ( https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Zara_Yacob.png) with one that was later deleted, as it was being used on his pages in other languages. You can google lens the image and see for yourself as it shows the image being used before it was later deleted. I believed they should all match. I've mentioned this before—I'm relatively new to Wikipedia and didn't fully understand the guidelines at the time. I haven't reuploaded it since realizing my mistake. This is a coincidence. That account does not belong to me. JUMPp1harm (talk) 03:44, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply] :
Decline reason:
The behavioral evidence is convincing. This is not a coincidence. Acroterion (talk) 04:16, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
How can I prove that this account isn't mine?
JUMPp1harm ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I swear I have no association with the user I am accused of. Any similarity in behavior is coincidental. This is a mistake. I am committed to upholding Wikipedia's principles. How can I prove that this account is not mine? :.
Decline reason:
That's up to you to figure out. You need to start by addressing the findings at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/BasedHistorian_PHD. Yamla ( talk) 10:54, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
@ Yamla:I initially replaced Zara Yaqob's image from this one ( https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Zara_Yacob.png) with one that was later deleted, as it was being used on his pages in other languages. You can google lens the image and see for yourself as it shows the image being used before it was later deleted ( https://kids.kiddle.co/Image:Zara_Yacob.jpg). I believed they should all match. I've mentioned this before I'm relatively new to Wikipedia and didn't fully understand the guidelines at the time. I haven't reuploaded it since realizing my mistake. Again, I swear this is a pure coincidence. That account does not belong to me nor have I ever heard of such a user.
JUMPp1harm ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I initially replaced Zara Yaqob's image from this one ( https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Zara_Yacob.png) with one that was later deleted, because it was being used on his pages in other languages. You can google lens the image and see for yourself as it shows the image being used before it was later deleted ( https://kids.kiddle.co/Image:Zara_Yacob.jpg). I believed all pages should match. I've mentioned this before I'm relatively new to Wikipedia and didn't fully read and understand the guidelines at the time with copyright. I acknowledge that this was my mistake, and I now have a better understanding of these guidelines. I haven't reuploaded it since realizing my mistake. Once more, I would like to stress any similarity in behavior is purely coincidental. I have no affiliation with that account, nor am I familiar with its user. I assure you that I am committed to adhering to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines moving forward. My intentions have always been to contribute positively JUMPp1harm ( talk) 04:02, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Even if I believed this was a coincidence, that would only make this meat puppetry. 331dot ( talk) 09:52, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
-
[2] I blocked this IP range for block evasion 15 minutes before this request was posted.
Acroterion
(talk) 04:08, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- Okay? Im confused what this has to do with my request. If you're assuming that's me, you're mistaken. That IP address and account doesn't belong to me. I understand why it might seem that way, and honestly I don't even blame you. I think god must be against me at this point cause this is just ridiculous. I swear on my life this is a pure coincidence. Can't administrators check users' IP addresses? You can confirm that's not me. I haven't attempted to circumvent my ban. I wouldn't engage in such an obviously foolish act. Do you honestly believe that while earnestly seeking to be get unbanned, I would simultaneously try to evade the ban and promptly make another request right after my supposed account was banned? Seriously? Believe me, if I were attempting to circumvent my ban, which I'm not, I certainly wouldn't do it in such a blatant and foolish manner. And the fact that this user isn't even registered and is editing. I would never engage in such behavior and expose my IP address to the public eye. You just banned an innocent man
JUMPp1harm (
talk) 05:43, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- Admins cannot check IP addresses. Checkusers can, but per policy do not do so at the request of a user(see
WP:CHECKUSER). And yes, people do attempt to evade blocks while blocked and asking to be unblocked.
331dot (
talk) 09:49, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oh please, I'm not a moron. I am genuinely being sincere. I wouldn't do something that stupid. I didn't want make too many unblock requests in a day so I waited till the next day. I was out and I just got home and was watching the Lakers vs Bucks game and I decided to make my request. And it is not meat puppetry. Dude I had no idea what the hell that even was before you linked it. I have absolutely zero association with the user I am being accused of. What can I do for someone to believe me? JUMPp1harm ( talk) 10:02, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- What's the resolution then? Why can't I have it checked? It seems like that's the only way to get anyone to believe me. I'm telling you, man, those accounts aren't mine. I've never even heard of them or reached out to them. What else can I do to convince you? If I can't get my IP checked to back up my words, then what am I supposed to do to prove my truthfulness. I've already clarified the situation regarding Zara Yaqob situation, but this latest one with all due respect is just absurd. Is anyone that edits the Amhara people page my account? I haven't done any sock puppeting, meat puppeting or any time of puppeting JUMPp1harm ( talk) 10:21, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- Admins cannot check IP addresses. Checkusers can, but per policy do not do so at the request of a user(see
WP:CHECKUSER). And yes, people do attempt to evade blocks while blocked and asking to be unblocked.
331dot (
talk) 09:49, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- Okay? Im confused what this has to do with my request. If you're assuming that's me, you're mistaken. That IP address and account doesn't belong to me. I understand why it might seem that way, and honestly I don't even blame you. I think god must be against me at this point cause this is just ridiculous. I swear on my life this is a pure coincidence. Can't administrators check users' IP addresses? You can confirm that's not me. I haven't attempted to circumvent my ban. I wouldn't engage in such an obviously foolish act. Do you honestly believe that while earnestly seeking to be get unbanned, I would simultaneously try to evade the ban and promptly make another request right after my supposed account was banned? Seriously? Believe me, if I were attempting to circumvent my ban, which I'm not, I certainly wouldn't do it in such a blatant and foolish manner. And the fact that this user isn't even registered and is editing. I would never engage in such behavior and expose my IP address to the public eye. You just banned an innocent man
JUMPp1harm (
talk) 05:43, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
JUMPp1harm ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I want to address the accusations of puppetry that have been leveled against me. I want to emphasize that I have no involvement in any type of puppetry, whether it be sock puppetry or meat puppetry. I have never engaged in any form of coordinated editing or collaboration with other users. My sole intention as a independent contributor on Wikipedia has always been to improve pages and contribute positively to the platform. I understand that there have been some misunderstandings and issues regarding my edits, particularly concerning copyright issues. However, I want to clarify that any mistakes I have made were not indicative of any malicious intent or involvement in puppetry of any kind. I have previously requested to have my IP checked in an effort to prove my truthfulness, but apparently that's not possible. Nevertheless, I am willing to cooperate fully with any measures that can help establish my innocence. I don't know what else I can say or do. I have explained my perspective thoroughly in my previous unban requests, and I hope that you can see that I am merely an innocent individual caught up in this situation. I sincerely apologize for any disruption my actions may have caused and assure you that I am committed to adhering to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. [[User:JUMPp1harm|JUMPp1harm]] ([[User talk:JUMPp1harm#top|talk]]) 00:20, 10 March 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a
default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I want to address the accusations of puppetry that have been leveled against me. I want to emphasize that I have no involvement in any type of puppetry, whether it be sock puppetry or meat puppetry. I have never engaged in any form of coordinated editing or collaboration with other users. My sole intention as a independent contributor on Wikipedia has always been to improve pages and contribute positively to the platform. I understand that there have been some misunderstandings and issues regarding my edits, particularly concerning copyright issues. However, I want to clarify that any mistakes I have made were not indicative of any malicious intent or involvement in puppetry of any kind. I have previously requested to have my IP checked in an effort to prove my truthfulness, but apparently that's not possible. Nevertheless, I am willing to cooperate fully with any measures that can help establish my innocence. I don't know what else I can say or do. I have explained my perspective thoroughly in my previous unban requests, and I hope that you can see that I am merely an innocent individual caught up in this situation. I sincerely apologize for any disruption my actions may have caused and assure you that I am committed to adhering to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. [[User:JUMPp1harm|JUMPp1harm]] ([[User talk:JUMPp1harm#top|talk]]) 00:20, 10 March 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I want to address the accusations of puppetry that have been leveled against me. I want to emphasize that I have no involvement in any type of puppetry, whether it be sock puppetry or meat puppetry. I have never engaged in any form of coordinated editing or collaboration with other users. My sole intention as a independent contributor on Wikipedia has always been to improve pages and contribute positively to the platform. I understand that there have been some misunderstandings and issues regarding my edits, particularly concerning copyright issues. However, I want to clarify that any mistakes I have made were not indicative of any malicious intent or involvement in puppetry of any kind. I have previously requested to have my IP checked in an effort to prove my truthfulness, but apparently that's not possible. Nevertheless, I am willing to cooperate fully with any measures that can help establish my innocence. I don't know what else I can say or do. I have explained my perspective thoroughly in my previous unban requests, and I hope that you can see that I am merely an innocent individual caught up in this situation. I sincerely apologize for any disruption my actions may have caused and assure you that I am committed to adhering to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. [[User:JUMPp1harm|JUMPp1harm]] ([[User talk:JUMPp1harm#top|talk]]) 00:20, 10 March 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
@ Acroterion: I'm writing to address the ban placed on my account and the accusations of puppetry that have been leveled against me. I submitted an unban request a few days ago but have not received a response yet. I would greatly appreciate it if an administrator could review my case and provide guidance on how I can resolve this issue. I sincerely hope you can see i am an innocent individual. JUMPp1harm ( talk) 03:49, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- I’ve already reviewed once before. We don’t do multiple reviews of a single user’s request.
Acroterion
(talk) 11:16, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- So is that just it then? I can't get unbanned? I've provided a thorough explanation, I hope you realize this is a mistake
JUMPp1harm (
talk) 11:57, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- A given administrator should only review once, then leav3 it to another admin.
Acroterion
(talk) 11:02, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Alright. I pinged you because it's been a few days since someone responded to my unban request, and I wasn't sure who else to reach out to for assistance JUMPp1harm ( talk) 11:12, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- A given administrator should only review once, then leav3 it to another admin.
Acroterion
(talk) 11:02, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- So is that just it then? I can't get unbanned? I've provided a thorough explanation, I hope you realize this is a mistake
JUMPp1harm (
talk) 11:57, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
فيس بوك تم ح 178.77.140.148 ( talk) 22:24, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- فك حاضر 178.77.140.148 ( talk) 22:26, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- ? JUMPp1harm ( talk) 01:32, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi JUMPp1harm! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as
typo corrections or reverting obvious
vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see
Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you.
Alexeyevitch
(talk) 10:19, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Please see:
There is an opening for you to respond to the complaint. Edit warring is against Wikipedia policy. Thank you, EdJohnston ( talk) 03:20, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- The person lacks knowledge. Shouldn't I correct it when someone adds false or unreliable information? JUMPp1harm ( talk) 03:50, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
harassment policy, as you did at
Najashi, you may be
blocked from editing. Specifically in
this edit summary
EvergreenFir (talk) 20:55, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- So should I not fix incorrect information? JUMPp1harm ( talk) 21:08, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes), a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
Daniel Case ( talk) 18:13, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Please do not
attack other editors, as you did at
Najashi. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please
stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.
Socialwave597 (
talk) 18:24, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Regarding this edit, it's not enough that a quote is referenced in another Wikipedia article. If you want to add the quote, you need to check it against the source and cite that source where you're adding the quote. See WP:BURDEN on this. Cordless Larry ( talk) 20:19, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Cordless Larry (
talk) 08:15, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Sumanuil. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Zara Yaqob have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use
your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse or the
Help desk. Thanks. -
Sumanuil.
(talk to me) 23:46, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Amhara people shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Gyrofrog (talk) 02:14, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Zara Yacob.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.
If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.
Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Gyrofrog (talk) 01:11, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
- P.S. I can't tell for sure because the Commons image is already deleted, but if this is the same image as commons:File:Zara Yacob.jpg, then uploading it here constitutes disruptive editing. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 01:11, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you upload files in violation of
copyright. It's the same image that was already deleted at Commons, and it's the same image as
https://shewa.org/index/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Zere-Yacob-275x300.jpg (& the website doesn't clarify who made it, nor where they got it, etc.). You cannot keep adding it to Wikipedia (or for that matter, uploading it to Commons). --
Gyrofrog
(talk) 17:08, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Acroterion
(talk) 04:10, 7 March 2024 (UTC)- I apologize but I would appreciate it if I could be informed about which specific image is considered to have violated copyright laws. If it's the latest one I uploaded, I've already discussed it with another administrator. Furthermore, all these images are already available in the Wikipedia image database, I just put them together so I'm confused about how they could be in violation of copyright laws.
JUMPp1harm (
talk) 04:38, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- I just saw that I've been banned due to repeated copyright violations, not specifically for the most recent one. I acknowledge my mistakes with the previous violations, as I'm relatively new to this. However, I'm confused about how the most recent upload could breach copyright laws, as all the images used are already available on the Wikipedia image database. I just combined them and added it because I believed it would fit the page better. I discussed this with another administrator, who advised me to indicate their source image exactly despite the fact that the images are already present in the pages of the respective depictions, which I promptly did. Therefore, I'm unclear on why these actions were deemed as copyright violations and why the edits were reverted.
JUMPp1harm (
talk) 05:06, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- One of those images is marked as copyrighted at the source
[1]. You're not banned, but you are blocked until this is sorted out.
Acroterion
(talk) 05:28, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't personally upload the image. As I mentioned earlier, all these images were already accessible on the Wikipedia image database. I found the photographer's name and searched for the link, so I shared it. However, the source linked from the image on the Wikipedia database is different. Should I have posted the same source as in the database? I assumed it didn't matter since I shared the photographer. Hence, I'm puzzled about why my edit was reverted. I understand facing a block for previous images.
-
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Emperor_Haile_Selassie_I_Official_Photographic_portrait.png
JUMPp1harm (
talk) 05:59, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- I think you made a mistake in good faith. But don’t restore the image, and you were edit=warring to keep it in. Don’t do that. I will unblock, on the condition that you reconsider your approach to images and repeated reversions.
Acroterion
(talk) 12:25, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- Is it not possible for me to correct the copyright violation on the image and add it? I was discussing about it with the user on his page. Overall, I feel like it enhances the page's coherence and relevance. I would at least ask you to look at the reasoning
JUMPp1harm (
talk) 12:39, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- It's copyrighted from the source, there is no "correcting." Whether museums have the right to copyright their own derivative works (which is what that is) is a separate matter that the WMF and others are arguing with museums about, but until that is legally settled, we can't upload or use any images that have a clear copyright notice, like that one has.
Acroterion
(talk) 13:06, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- I just meant replacing it with a different picture that's not copyrighted
JUMPp1harm (
talk) 21:34, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- Not if you're going to edit-war for its inclusion. Get consensus first.
Acroterion
(talk) 23:57, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- I am discussing it with the user but he hasn't replied since my last message. I think its okay if I change it. Have you seen my reasoning for changing the image? What are your personal thoughts. Which image is better for the page
JUMPp1harm (
talk) 00:33, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- No, it is not OK. If you revert without gaining consensus (whether the images contain a copyright violation or not), I will block you for edit-warring. I am not going to comment on the image change, administrators are not arbiters of content. Get agreement.
Acroterion
(talk) 01:00, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, as I mentioned, I've been in discussion with the user, but it's been some time since I received a response. How long am I supposed to wait? Honestly, this situation is becoming frustrating. Does coherence and relevance not hold importance in Wikipedia? Here I thought the goal of Wikipedia was to enhance pages to the best of our ability. Yet here I am, facing scrutiny for trying to improve pages. Is it all about ensuring editors don't exceed a certain number of reverts, even if one of those changes improves the page? Absurd
JUMPp1harm (
talk) 01:32, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- Here's a bold suggestion, other editors aren't at your beck and call. People have lives. If an individual editor isn't responding on their talk page, seek consensus on the article talk page.
TarnishedPath
talk 02:17, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- I already responded to him. Some time ago in fact.
Abrasax123 (
talk) 03:02, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- No comment on you. I only came here because of the copyright issues that I noticed elsewhere. TarnishedPath talk 03:11, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- No, you haven't responded to my message JUMPp1harm ( talk) 03:54, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- I already responded to him. Some time ago in fact.
Abrasax123 (
talk) 03:02, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- Here's a bold suggestion, other editors aren't at your beck and call. People have lives. If an individual editor isn't responding on their talk page, seek consensus on the article talk page.
TarnishedPath
talk 02:17, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- That account is not mine. How am I able to prove that it isn't mine? JUMPp1harm ( talk) 04:25, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, as I mentioned, I've been in discussion with the user, but it's been some time since I received a response. How long am I supposed to wait? Honestly, this situation is becoming frustrating. Does coherence and relevance not hold importance in Wikipedia? Here I thought the goal of Wikipedia was to enhance pages to the best of our ability. Yet here I am, facing scrutiny for trying to improve pages. Is it all about ensuring editors don't exceed a certain number of reverts, even if one of those changes improves the page? Absurd
JUMPp1harm (
talk) 01:32, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- No, it is not OK. If you revert without gaining consensus (whether the images contain a copyright violation or not), I will block you for edit-warring. I am not going to comment on the image change, administrators are not arbiters of content. Get agreement.
Acroterion
(talk) 01:00, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- I am discussing it with the user but he hasn't replied since my last message. I think its okay if I change it. Have you seen my reasoning for changing the image? What are your personal thoughts. Which image is better for the page
JUMPp1harm (
talk) 00:33, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- Not if you're going to edit-war for its inclusion. Get consensus first.
Acroterion
(talk) 23:57, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- I just meant replacing it with a different picture that's not copyrighted
JUMPp1harm (
talk) 21:34, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- There is no way to correct the copyright violation. Per https://www.slam.org/collection/objects/19235/ there is an unambiguous copyright attribution on that image. TarnishedPath talk 00:52, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- It's copyrighted from the source, there is no "correcting." Whether museums have the right to copyright their own derivative works (which is what that is) is a separate matter that the WMF and others are arguing with museums about, but until that is legally settled, we can't upload or use any images that have a clear copyright notice, like that one has.
Acroterion
(talk) 13:06, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- Is it not possible for me to correct the copyright violation on the image and add it? I was discussing about it with the user on his page. Overall, I feel like it enhances the page's coherence and relevance. I would at least ask you to look at the reasoning
JUMPp1harm (
talk) 12:39, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- I think you made a mistake in good faith. But don’t restore the image, and you were edit=warring to keep it in. Don’t do that. I will unblock, on the condition that you reconsider your approach to images and repeated reversions.
Acroterion
(talk) 12:25, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- One of those images is marked as copyrighted at the source
[1]. You're not banned, but you are blocked until this is sorted out.
Acroterion
(talk) 05:28, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- I just saw that I've been banned due to repeated copyright violations, not specifically for the most recent one. I acknowledge my mistakes with the previous violations, as I'm relatively new to this. However, I'm confused about how the most recent upload could breach copyright laws, as all the images used are already available on the Wikipedia image database. I just combined them and added it because I believed it would fit the page better. I discussed this with another administrator, who advised me to indicate their source image exactly despite the fact that the images are already present in the pages of the respective depictions, which I promptly did. Therefore, I'm unclear on why these actions were deemed as copyright violations and why the edits were reverted.
JUMPp1harm (
talk) 05:06, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
|
| This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban
may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
Drmies (
talk) 02:25, 8 March 2024 (UTC) |
JUMPp1harm ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I want to address the accusations of puppetry that have been leveled against me. No one responded to my previous unban request I made a few days ago, so I decided to submit another one. I don't want to come across as overly persistent or annoying, but I sincerely hope you can recognize that this situation is a misunderstanding, and I am innocent. I want to emphasize that I have no involvement in any type of puppetry, whether it be sock puppetry or meat puppetry. I have never engaged in any form of coordinated editing or collaboration with other users. My sole intention as a independent contributor on Wikipedia has always been to improve pages and contribute positively to the platform. I understand that there have been some misunderstandings and issues regarding my edits, particularly concerning copyright issues. However, I want to clarify that any mistakes I have made were not indicative of any malicious intent or involvement in puppetry of any kind. I have previously requested to have my IP checked in an effort to prove my truthfulness, but apparently that's not possible. Nevertheless, I am willing to cooperate fully with any measures that can help establish my innocence. I don't know what else I can say or do. I have explained my perspective thoroughly in my previous unban requests, and I hope that you can see that I am merely an innocent individual caught up in this situation. I sincerely apologize for any disruption my actions may have caused and assure you that I am committed to adhering to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines [[User:JUMPp1harm|JUMPp1harm]] ([[User talk:JUMPp1harm#top|talk]]) 04:53, 14 March 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a
default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I want to address the accusations of puppetry that have been leveled against me. No one responded to my previous unban request I made a few days ago, so I decided to submit another one. I don't want to come across as overly persistent or annoying, but I sincerely hope you can recognize that this situation is a misunderstanding, and I am innocent. I want to emphasize that I have no involvement in any type of puppetry, whether it be sock puppetry or meat puppetry. I have never engaged in any form of coordinated editing or collaboration with other users. My sole intention as a independent contributor on Wikipedia has always been to improve pages and contribute positively to the platform. I understand that there have been some misunderstandings and issues regarding my edits, particularly concerning copyright issues. However, I want to clarify that any mistakes I have made were not indicative of any malicious intent or involvement in puppetry of any kind. I have previously requested to have my IP checked in an effort to prove my truthfulness, but apparently that's not possible. Nevertheless, I am willing to cooperate fully with any measures that can help establish my innocence. I don't know what else I can say or do. I have explained my perspective thoroughly in my previous unban requests, and I hope that you can see that I am merely an innocent individual caught up in this situation. I sincerely apologize for any disruption my actions may have caused and assure you that I am committed to adhering to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines [[User:JUMPp1harm|JUMPp1harm]] ([[User talk:JUMPp1harm#top|talk]]) 04:53, 14 March 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I want to address the accusations of puppetry that have been leveled against me. No one responded to my previous unban request I made a few days ago, so I decided to submit another one. I don't want to come across as overly persistent or annoying, but I sincerely hope you can recognize that this situation is a misunderstanding, and I am innocent. I want to emphasize that I have no involvement in any type of puppetry, whether it be sock puppetry or meat puppetry. I have never engaged in any form of coordinated editing or collaboration with other users. My sole intention as a independent contributor on Wikipedia has always been to improve pages and contribute positively to the platform. I understand that there have been some misunderstandings and issues regarding my edits, particularly concerning copyright issues. However, I want to clarify that any mistakes I have made were not indicative of any malicious intent or involvement in puppetry of any kind. I have previously requested to have my IP checked in an effort to prove my truthfulness, but apparently that's not possible. Nevertheless, I am willing to cooperate fully with any measures that can help establish my innocence. I don't know what else I can say or do. I have explained my perspective thoroughly in my previous unban requests, and I hope that you can see that I am merely an innocent individual caught up in this situation. I sincerely apologize for any disruption my actions may have caused and assure you that I am committed to adhering to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines [[User:JUMPp1harm|JUMPp1harm]] ([[User talk:JUMPp1harm#top|talk]]) 04:53, 14 March 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
JUMPp1harm ( talk) 04:53, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
JUMPp1harm ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have no association with the User:BasedHistorian PHD. /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/BasedHistorian_PHD I initially replaced Zara Yaqob's image from this one ( https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Zara_Yacob.png) with one that was later deleted, as it was being used on his pages in other languages. You can google lens the image and see for yourself as it shows the image being used before it was later deleted. I believed they should all match. I've mentioned this before—I'm relatively new to Wikipedia and didn't fully understand the guidelines at the time. I haven't reuploaded it since realizing my mistake. This is a coincidence. That account does not belong to me. JUMPp1harm (talk) 03:44, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply] :
Decline reason:
The behavioral evidence is convincing. This is not a coincidence. Acroterion (talk) 04:16, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
How can I prove that this account isn't mine?
JUMPp1harm ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I swear I have no association with the user I am accused of. Any similarity in behavior is coincidental. This is a mistake. I am committed to upholding Wikipedia's principles. How can I prove that this account is not mine? :.
Decline reason:
That's up to you to figure out. You need to start by addressing the findings at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/BasedHistorian_PHD. Yamla ( talk) 10:54, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
@ Yamla:I initially replaced Zara Yaqob's image from this one ( https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Zara_Yacob.png) with one that was later deleted, as it was being used on his pages in other languages. You can google lens the image and see for yourself as it shows the image being used before it was later deleted ( https://kids.kiddle.co/Image:Zara_Yacob.jpg). I believed they should all match. I've mentioned this before I'm relatively new to Wikipedia and didn't fully understand the guidelines at the time. I haven't reuploaded it since realizing my mistake. Again, I swear this is a pure coincidence. That account does not belong to me nor have I ever heard of such a user.
JUMPp1harm ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I initially replaced Zara Yaqob's image from this one ( https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Zara_Yacob.png) with one that was later deleted, because it was being used on his pages in other languages. You can google lens the image and see for yourself as it shows the image being used before it was later deleted ( https://kids.kiddle.co/Image:Zara_Yacob.jpg). I believed all pages should match. I've mentioned this before I'm relatively new to Wikipedia and didn't fully read and understand the guidelines at the time with copyright. I acknowledge that this was my mistake, and I now have a better understanding of these guidelines. I haven't reuploaded it since realizing my mistake. Once more, I would like to stress any similarity in behavior is purely coincidental. I have no affiliation with that account, nor am I familiar with its user. I assure you that I am committed to adhering to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines moving forward. My intentions have always been to contribute positively JUMPp1harm ( talk) 04:02, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Even if I believed this was a coincidence, that would only make this meat puppetry. 331dot ( talk) 09:52, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
-
[2] I blocked this IP range for block evasion 15 minutes before this request was posted.
Acroterion
(talk) 04:08, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- Okay? Im confused what this has to do with my request. If you're assuming that's me, you're mistaken. That IP address and account doesn't belong to me. I understand why it might seem that way, and honestly I don't even blame you. I think god must be against me at this point cause this is just ridiculous. I swear on my life this is a pure coincidence. Can't administrators check users' IP addresses? You can confirm that's not me. I haven't attempted to circumvent my ban. I wouldn't engage in such an obviously foolish act. Do you honestly believe that while earnestly seeking to be get unbanned, I would simultaneously try to evade the ban and promptly make another request right after my supposed account was banned? Seriously? Believe me, if I were attempting to circumvent my ban, which I'm not, I certainly wouldn't do it in such a blatant and foolish manner. And the fact that this user isn't even registered and is editing. I would never engage in such behavior and expose my IP address to the public eye. You just banned an innocent man
JUMPp1harm (
talk) 05:43, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- Admins cannot check IP addresses. Checkusers can, but per policy do not do so at the request of a user(see
WP:CHECKUSER). And yes, people do attempt to evade blocks while blocked and asking to be unblocked.
331dot (
talk) 09:49, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oh please, I'm not a moron. I am genuinely being sincere. I wouldn't do something that stupid. I didn't want make too many unblock requests in a day so I waited till the next day. I was out and I just got home and was watching the Lakers vs Bucks game and I decided to make my request. And it is not meat puppetry. Dude I had no idea what the hell that even was before you linked it. I have absolutely zero association with the user I am being accused of. What can I do for someone to believe me? JUMPp1harm ( talk) 10:02, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- What's the resolution then? Why can't I have it checked? It seems like that's the only way to get anyone to believe me. I'm telling you, man, those accounts aren't mine. I've never even heard of them or reached out to them. What else can I do to convince you? If I can't get my IP checked to back up my words, then what am I supposed to do to prove my truthfulness. I've already clarified the situation regarding Zara Yaqob situation, but this latest one with all due respect is just absurd. Is anyone that edits the Amhara people page my account? I haven't done any sock puppeting, meat puppeting or any time of puppeting JUMPp1harm ( talk) 10:21, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- Admins cannot check IP addresses. Checkusers can, but per policy do not do so at the request of a user(see
WP:CHECKUSER). And yes, people do attempt to evade blocks while blocked and asking to be unblocked.
331dot (
talk) 09:49, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- Okay? Im confused what this has to do with my request. If you're assuming that's me, you're mistaken. That IP address and account doesn't belong to me. I understand why it might seem that way, and honestly I don't even blame you. I think god must be against me at this point cause this is just ridiculous. I swear on my life this is a pure coincidence. Can't administrators check users' IP addresses? You can confirm that's not me. I haven't attempted to circumvent my ban. I wouldn't engage in such an obviously foolish act. Do you honestly believe that while earnestly seeking to be get unbanned, I would simultaneously try to evade the ban and promptly make another request right after my supposed account was banned? Seriously? Believe me, if I were attempting to circumvent my ban, which I'm not, I certainly wouldn't do it in such a blatant and foolish manner. And the fact that this user isn't even registered and is editing. I would never engage in such behavior and expose my IP address to the public eye. You just banned an innocent man
JUMPp1harm (
talk) 05:43, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
JUMPp1harm ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I want to address the accusations of puppetry that have been leveled against me. I want to emphasize that I have no involvement in any type of puppetry, whether it be sock puppetry or meat puppetry. I have never engaged in any form of coordinated editing or collaboration with other users. My sole intention as a independent contributor on Wikipedia has always been to improve pages and contribute positively to the platform. I understand that there have been some misunderstandings and issues regarding my edits, particularly concerning copyright issues. However, I want to clarify that any mistakes I have made were not indicative of any malicious intent or involvement in puppetry of any kind. I have previously requested to have my IP checked in an effort to prove my truthfulness, but apparently that's not possible. Nevertheless, I am willing to cooperate fully with any measures that can help establish my innocence. I don't know what else I can say or do. I have explained my perspective thoroughly in my previous unban requests, and I hope that you can see that I am merely an innocent individual caught up in this situation. I sincerely apologize for any disruption my actions may have caused and assure you that I am committed to adhering to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. [[User:JUMPp1harm|JUMPp1harm]] ([[User talk:JUMPp1harm#top|talk]]) 00:20, 10 March 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a
default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I want to address the accusations of puppetry that have been leveled against me. I want to emphasize that I have no involvement in any type of puppetry, whether it be sock puppetry or meat puppetry. I have never engaged in any form of coordinated editing or collaboration with other users. My sole intention as a independent contributor on Wikipedia has always been to improve pages and contribute positively to the platform. I understand that there have been some misunderstandings and issues regarding my edits, particularly concerning copyright issues. However, I want to clarify that any mistakes I have made were not indicative of any malicious intent or involvement in puppetry of any kind. I have previously requested to have my IP checked in an effort to prove my truthfulness, but apparently that's not possible. Nevertheless, I am willing to cooperate fully with any measures that can help establish my innocence. I don't know what else I can say or do. I have explained my perspective thoroughly in my previous unban requests, and I hope that you can see that I am merely an innocent individual caught up in this situation. I sincerely apologize for any disruption my actions may have caused and assure you that I am committed to adhering to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. [[User:JUMPp1harm|JUMPp1harm]] ([[User talk:JUMPp1harm#top|talk]]) 00:20, 10 March 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I want to address the accusations of puppetry that have been leveled against me. I want to emphasize that I have no involvement in any type of puppetry, whether it be sock puppetry or meat puppetry. I have never engaged in any form of coordinated editing or collaboration with other users. My sole intention as a independent contributor on Wikipedia has always been to improve pages and contribute positively to the platform. I understand that there have been some misunderstandings and issues regarding my edits, particularly concerning copyright issues. However, I want to clarify that any mistakes I have made were not indicative of any malicious intent or involvement in puppetry of any kind. I have previously requested to have my IP checked in an effort to prove my truthfulness, but apparently that's not possible. Nevertheless, I am willing to cooperate fully with any measures that can help establish my innocence. I don't know what else I can say or do. I have explained my perspective thoroughly in my previous unban requests, and I hope that you can see that I am merely an innocent individual caught up in this situation. I sincerely apologize for any disruption my actions may have caused and assure you that I am committed to adhering to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. [[User:JUMPp1harm|JUMPp1harm]] ([[User talk:JUMPp1harm#top|talk]]) 00:20, 10 March 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
@ Acroterion: I'm writing to address the ban placed on my account and the accusations of puppetry that have been leveled against me. I submitted an unban request a few days ago but have not received a response yet. I would greatly appreciate it if an administrator could review my case and provide guidance on how I can resolve this issue. I sincerely hope you can see i am an innocent individual. JUMPp1harm ( talk) 03:49, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- I’ve already reviewed once before. We don’t do multiple reviews of a single user’s request.
Acroterion
(talk) 11:16, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- So is that just it then? I can't get unbanned? I've provided a thorough explanation, I hope you realize this is a mistake
JUMPp1harm (
talk) 11:57, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- A given administrator should only review once, then leav3 it to another admin.
Acroterion
(talk) 11:02, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Alright. I pinged you because it's been a few days since someone responded to my unban request, and I wasn't sure who else to reach out to for assistance JUMPp1harm ( talk) 11:12, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- A given administrator should only review once, then leav3 it to another admin.
Acroterion
(talk) 11:02, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- So is that just it then? I can't get unbanned? I've provided a thorough explanation, I hope you realize this is a mistake
JUMPp1harm (
talk) 11:57, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
فيس بوك تم ح 178.77.140.148 ( talk) 22:24, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- فك حاضر 178.77.140.148 ( talk) 22:26, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- ? JUMPp1harm ( talk) 01:32, 19 March 2024 (UTC)