Vive la révolution! _sdda ^sbag yonaled.J 17:08, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Hey, I see you're an OTRS volunteer here and on commons. I'm doing a GA review at the minute and I just wondered if you wouldn't mind checking the ticket for File:PaulAnka07.jpg to make sure it's legit- it's tagged a s "noncommercial" on Flickr which raises an eyebrow. Thanks for your time (I know you're busy!). HJ Mitchell | April Fool! 15:00, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

The ticket seems to be in order, nothing odd with it. _sdda ^sbag yonaled.J 17:06, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Much obliged. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:17, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

WalkerWon ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)(his new sock)

Remember your indef block of this user? Well, they've came back during their indef block as a sock, and their fifth contribution is doing the exact same thing that you blocked them for in the first place. I would recommend that the WP:SO be retracted from this user, as they are obviously not able to stop the behavior that got them blocked in the first place.— Dæ dαlus ^Contribs 22:16, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Um, the standard offer is not an official thing. It is just a semi-standardized offer extended to anyone, no matter what they have done. It is not a binding offer; there is no way to remove something that is not required to be extended. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 02:11, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

You have tagged a large number of accounts as Runtshit socks. I think this is mistaken. Runtshit is characterised by personal attacks on me personally, and focusses on articles related to the Middle East and socialism, or other articles I edit. There is no sign of this in the accounts you recently tagged. They may indeed be socks, but certainly not of Runtshit, so I am removing all of these misplaced tags. RolandR ( talk) 19:29, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

In addition, the account names, while clearly related, are entirely unlike the names used by Runtshit. It is worth noting that, when not editing from the University of Haifa, Runtshit generally uses open proxies, and this vandal has probably chanced on an IP previously used by him. These proxies should be blocked. RolandR ( talk) 19:51, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Some of the accounts I blocked triggered edit filters designed to prevent his standard attack patterns. Indeed, that is how I was alerted to the presence of his sockfarm. If it is not him, it is an imitator. In any case, there were other accounts on the IP address that had previously been blocked for vandalizing in his standard pattern. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 22:41, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello! A few ACC templates have been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the templates' entry on the Templates for discussion page. This notice is because you are an ACC admin. Thanks! ^Avic enna _sis @ 04:33, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Hi! You have frequently sorted out some persistant vandals for me with blocks after I have reverted their handiwork. I am currently doing a lot of patrolling on the same set of articles for vvandalism / disruptive edits by sockpuppets of banned user Gameboy1947. As he is doing the same edits to the articles in quick succession and now reverting my corrections of his vandalism I wondered if it would be possible to allow me to have access to the rollback feature? Richard Harvey ( talk) 14:56, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

please block his e-mail. He's a sock of SGF. Thanks :)-- White Shadows ^{you're breaking up} 18:53, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

I did -

* (del/undel) 17:05, 5 April 2010 J.delanoy (talk | contribs | block) blocked Hofbrincl Hhlbbcnofm (talk | contribs) (account creation blocked, e-mail blocked, cannot edit own talk page) with an expiry time of indefinite ‎ (Long-term abuse) (unblock | change block).

Thanks for the heads up, though. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 18:54, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Oh, I'm sorry, I did'nt read it correctly :) Thanks tough.-- White Shadows ^{you're breaking up} 19:33, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

just being picky, but when fixing the DLNA client lists I was checking outbound links and came to SimpleCenter whose page was gone: you deleted the page "SimpleCenter" but didn't delete the inbound link. Speculatrix ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 07:39, 7 April 2010 (UTC).

I tagged a page for speedy deletion, The Serenaders. The user who created the page left me a message saying that he didn't realize the notability standards that had to be met, but that he was just trying to start a page for them since they will be recording an EP soon. I suggested that he have an admin userfy the page so he could continue to update it and move it to article space when appropriate. When I gave him the list of admins who could perform this action, he left a message for an admin that hasn't edited in two years. Could you please restore the article to his userspace? Thank you. HarlandQPitt ( talk) 17:10, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Done. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 21:26, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank you! Much appreciated :) HarlandQPitt ( talk) 04:43, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Can somebody fix Poke so that it makes sense?

I'm not sure if the page was vandalized or not. User:Deskana apparently reverted a bit. In any case, I attempted to make the page easier to understand. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 21:23, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Someone apparently created an article with this, including the two templates below exactly as coded (without tlx):

{{ db-hoax}} {{ hoax}} Sonic the Hedgehog: Guitar Hero is a video game in the Guitar Hero and Sonic the Hedgehog series released in 2010 by Activision and SEGA, it features Sonic, Tails and Knuckles together.

That's right, the user also included the Speedy Deletion and Hoax templates in their own article. mechamind 9 0 19:28, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, it's not uncommon for new users to save a copy of their articles immediately before they are deleted, and then paste the contents back in another place. The function of templates is not always obvious, so it is likely that he did not know what purpose that text serves. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 21:25, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the help with the Serenaders page...greatly appreciated. :) -- Ecogeek ( talk) 14:26, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Hey J. I was recently involved (provided evidence) in a sockpupper investigation of Kia86khan. I've never been involved in one before and wanted to know if there was anything I needed to do to follow up on the verdict (the user was found to be socking). I've seen a tag on some user's pages that indicates that they're a sock and who the master is but I didn't know if that was something I should do or not. Basically, I want to follow through with the issue if needed. OlYeller ^Talktome 00:57, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

You don't necessarily have to if you don't want to. SPI clerks and/or admins will normally take care of it. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 01:05, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Ok. I just don't like shoveling work off on others but I think WP might be better served if I leave it to those with more experience in such matters. OlYeller ^Talktome 01:07, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

I tried to add User:OverG to the report just now but Twinkle choked up and didn't know how to proceed. They returned from a long absence today to request lifting of an autoblock from this case, edit history suggest possible linkage with this case and possibly other sleepers. Beeblebrox ( talk) 21:48, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Hey J! How you been? Long time, no talk! How you been buddy! Don't be a stranger! :) -- A3RO (mailbox) 23:29, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

He email bombed me with 50 blank Wikipedia-mail messages. It appears to be a sock puppet of User:ScienceGolfFanatic. ~ NERDYSCIENCEDUDE ( ✉ message • changes) 22:25, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Done. Tan | 39 22:26, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello J.delanoy. The above is a school IP (of Gilman School). I'm not sure how to tag it. May you please show me how or tag it? Thanks, Airplaneman ✈ 22:37, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

You can use {{ sharedipedu|info about school; name, address, etc.}}. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 02:18, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, Airplaneman ✈ 02:46, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Could you please give me back my ACC status as I have been inactive for 45 days and would like start creating accounts. Andrewmc 123 21:18, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:24.190.129.18 No evidence it's shared. You've tagged it yourself. Vandal-only. Nobody does anything about it. How about you blocking it for awhile? S B H arris 19:43, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

I was bored and was looking for mentions of my screenname on userpages and found this. I know that nothing serious became of this, but may I ask what was going on? I don't recognize the page creator nor do I understand how I seemed "involved" with it. O_o - Warthog Demon 05:49, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Grawp is/was one of the most prolific vandals in the history of Wikipedia. It looks like he created a SPI about a bunch of editors, it also references Bambifan101, another banned user.-- SKATER ^Speak. 13:37, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

An IP has requested an unblock, but your block message says to check with you first before unblocking. Could you drop by the IP's talk page? Thanks! TN X Man 23:12, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

That's a /19 rangeblock, just FYI. Tan | 39 23:18, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

I'm not sure on this one, and I don't really have enough time to look really closely. Sorry. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 23:36, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Well, with all due respect, J, you can't rangeblock, say that we can't unblock without consulting you, and then say you don't have the time to respond to requests. Can we interpret this as a de facto assent to lift the rangeblock? Tan | 39 23:58, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Here is the entry for the /19 block. It was done on 26 January, and it was anon-only, so I'm guessing that the problem must reside somewhere in this list of anonymous edits. However, I could not spot anything from this /19 IP range prior to 26 January that looks like it would be the occasion for a block. EdJohnston ( talk) 01:46, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

If you want to unblock, be my guest. I have only three weeks left before classes are out, and I'm pretty much swamped. Sorry again, but yeah... J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 04:36, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Done. If you come back after finals and remember why you implemented the block, feel free to re-block. Good luck with classes. Tan | 39 05:05, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

You may want to go to my talk page to get most of the information. A new user, User:WCKingier made two strange edits, [1] and this. The first on is adding "confirmed" on the sockpuppet template and the second is Identifying himself to be a sock of User:Wikinger. I asked him if he really was a sockpuppet, and he responded with a list of User's he says he is connected to on my talk page. The last one on the list is his. Imperial Monarch ( D• R) 13:04, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

TNXMan resolved the problem. Imperial Monarch ( D• R) 07:35, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Hi - can you have a quick look at this ACC request - there is a CU rangeblock on the IP. Thanks.  7  23:19, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

 Done thanks.  7  02:56, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Hi J.delanoy, I have left you a message in your meta user talkpage on something urgent about Sinhala Wikipedia. I'll be so grateful if you could leave a reply there. Cheers-- Chanaka L ( talk) 02:38, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Could you drop by User talk:Xeno#New user on the JP Talk Page and let me know if I've represented checkuser policy correctly? – xeno ^talk 13:08, 27 April 2010 (UTC)