Archive of old talk for User:Infrogmation

Next older talk archive: User talk:Infrogmation/Archive January April 08

Next more recent talk archive: User talk:Infrogmation/Archive July 08 - Feb 09

Current talk: User talk:Infrogmation

Thanks for uploading Image:OrrinHIngramII.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{ di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rettetast ( talk) 14:53, 1 May 2008 (UTC) reply

Hello Infrogmation. Sorry if it seemed like I was understating the toll of Katrina. I, like you, am painfully aware of the storm's consequences. My edit summary (in which is used the term "exaggeration") was in reference to the concern that human corpses were a source of pollution in Lake Pontchartrain (principally as a biohazard). This same misconception was common following the Indian Ocean tsunami of 2004. Further, the citation does not support the claim. Thanks for the note. Kindest regards, AlphaEta 02:29, 3 May 2008 (UTC) reply

Hi Infrogmation, I was wondering if you could help User:Dumarest with an image issue. In February, I deleted Image:Bridget moynahan int.jpg from here because I was (now I'm not so sure) a copy of commons:Image:Bridget Moynahan.jpg. You deleted that image from commons a few days ago. Since you can see both images, could you (a) verify that I didn't mess up in my deletion here and (b) help Dumarest if it is what I think that his attempts at Image:Bridgetmoynahan.jpg are. Thanks for much! -- Ricky81682 ( talk) 09:08, 4 May 2008 (UTC) reply

Okay, I checked and the three deleted images are identical. The one I deleted on Commons said "she has informed me that the image may be freely used on Wikipedia provided that copyright is indicated and her site is identified." This seems Wikipedia specific permission, not a free license as is required for Wikimedia Commons. (Eg, the attribution requirement would be fine, but if there is no permission for reuse under the same terms outside of Wikipedia, it is not free licensed.) If the copyright holder gives permision for it to free licensed (see Commons:Licensing for details of acceptable licenses), a permission email may be sent via Commons:OTRS. Does this answer the question? Cheers, -- Infrogmation ( talk) 18:04, 4 May 2008 (UTC) reply

I see you reverted five edits regarding "speedy deletion" and other deletion notices. Whenever such a notice is put up, you're not supposed to just revert the edits especially when there are legitimate notability questions. 92.0.34.8 ( talk) 19:45, 6 May 2008 (UTC) reply

From spot checking, I saw you put speedy deletion notices on articles which had been in existance for years and which have numerous other articles linking to them. The additional fact that you were an anon ip with no other edits suggested to me your speedy deletion requests were frivolous. In any case, I saw nothing about the articles to make them obvious speedy candidates. If you seriously think the articles should be deleted, I suggest you list them at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion with an explanation of why you think they should be deleted. Hope this helps, -- Infrogmation ( talk) 23:17, 6 May 2008 (UTC) reply

An explanation isn't needed, they're obvious speedy delete candidates due to them not specifying anything that satisfied notability criteria for bands. May I ask to assume good faith also rather then shrugging them off as "frivolous". Thanks. 92.0.34.8 ( talk) 17:18, 7 May 2008 (UTC) reply

I was working on this around the time of the great debate over the article title. On glancing over it now, it seems to me to be a good example of an article that has gotten lower in quality over time. It seems to have an awful lot of soft spots. Is that just me? Dpbsmith (talk) 18:14, 7 May 2008 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Image:PhilaTownHallSmall.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:PhilaTownHallSmall.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BlueAzure ( talk) 22:51, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply

Delete away. The smaller upload version was a remenant from the early years of Wikipedia before we had any code for sizing image display in articles! I'm surpised any of those survived so long. Cheers, -- Infrogmation ( talk) 01:13, 15 May 2008 (UTC) reply

There is actually a fairly large amount of old orphaned images still around. Also, the following images are up for deletion:

• Image:Tudor-styleSmall.jpg
• Image:ZonophoneLabelSmall.png
• Image:SFQuakeRefugeesSmall.jpg BlueAzure ( talk) 04:49, 16 May 2008 (UTC) reply

Two more images are up for deletion:

• Image:ImpecuniousDavis1899.jpg
• Image:CopanNSouthCatherwoodSmall.jpg BlueAzure ( talk) 22:43, 17 May 2008 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Image:NicoyaCeramicsSmall.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:NicoyaCeramicsSmall.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BlueAzure ( talk) 22:55, 14 May 2008 (UTC) reply

See note at above entry. -- Infrogmation ( talk) 01:13, 15 May 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for protecting it. The article was mentioned on tv?! Where? Thingg ^{⊕ ⊗} 01:41, 16 May 2008 (UTC) reply

10 minutes ago they replayed the clip on MSNBC and the host said something like "they've already added this to his Wikipedia article". -- Infrogmation ( talk) 01:45, 16 May 2008 (UTC) reply

Hi. I find the SFTVLGUY2 talk page useful, because he uploaded lots and lots of images, and there is no fair use summary for some of them. So I have been watching the page and adding fair use summaries as delete warnings come up there. Can you put it back just for this purpose? I usually address the image issues pretty promptly. Thanks! -- Ssilvers ( talk) 23:05, 16 May 2008 (UTC) reply

Okay. I have no objection. I will undelete; you might wish to make a note on that page explaining its use to you and other users so another admin doesn't delete it again promptly. Cheers, -- Infrogmation ( talk) 23:08, 16 May 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for blocking that guy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Halosean ( talk • contribs) 02:37, 20 May 2008 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Image:CharnayYaxchilan2Small.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:CharnayYaxchilan2Small.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BlueAzure ( talk) 02:38, 20 May 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:BellRecord2.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 01:18, 22 May 2008 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Image:GeorgeWashingtonGoethals.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:GeorgeWashingtonGoethals.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. « Milk's Favorite Cøøkie ^{( talk / contribs)} 01:43, 22 May 2008 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Image:GeorgeWashingtonGoethals.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:GeorgeWashingtonGoethals.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. « Milk's Favorite Cøøkie ^{( talk / contribs)} 01:47, 22 May 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:BiltmoreMorton.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 05:33, 22 May 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:BroadcastTwelveRecord.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 16:21, 22 May 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:BroadwayMelodyAd.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 16:25, 22 May 2008 (UTC) reply

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:MLQuezon.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BlueAzure ( talk) 22:14, 24 May 2008 (UTC) reply

Hello Infrogmation, I'm writting to you because you reverted my user page the last time that user 64.94.199.9 edited my my page calling me a "tool". He's been doing so for 3 years using various accounts and he's just added it back on again. He's using the new IP 70.139.8.255. I don't know how else to report this kind of harrasment. Any help would be much appreciated. Thank you.

p.s. He's also vandalized the user page of N. Caligon since 2005. Just check the history.-- Timrock ( talk) 12:57, 27 May 2008 (UTC) reply

Some of your images or media files have been listed for deletion. Please see Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion if you are interested in preserving them.

• Image:IzamalConventSmall.jpg
• Image:IzamalArcadeSmall.jpg

Thank you. BlueAzure ( talk) 04:11, 29 May 2008 (UTC) reply

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:ToursCathedral1922NatGeoSmall.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BlueAzure ( talk) 19:10, 31 May 2008 (UTC) reply

Another obsolete old "thumbnail" image; delete away. -- Infrogmation ( talk) 03:46, 2 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Cool score for the Mississippi Aerial River Transit image. Thanks! Patriarca12 ( talk) 20:39, 1 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Hello, Infrogmation. I was wondering if you wanted to join this project? I've seen your work at 1906 San Francisco Earthquake, and I would like to have you for help. ~ Me ldshal 42 21:45, 1 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks. I happen to have been in a few earthquakes (including in San Francisco for the Loma Prieta quake) and have had a small collection of original period images of the 1906 S.F. Quake (most of the ones I still have I think I've uploaded). That said, I don't consider myself knowlegable about the subject in general. I'd be happy to help as I can however. Cheers, -- Infrogmation ( talk) 03:45, 2 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Hi. Hey, I noticed u visited Gallier House and some others listed on List of National Historic Landmarks in Louisiana. I wonder if you could take and add pics for Gallier House and the few other New Orleans ones? Cheers, doncram ( talk) 03:11, 2 June 2008 (UTC) reply

I'm happy to take photo requests in New Orleans. Time of fullfillment will vary, and I'm afraid I haven't been able to take leasurely walks around the Quarter much recently. Still, I hope I can swing by the Gallier House briefly to take a few exerior shots soon. Yes, that's an important gap in our illustrations! Feel free to give me a list of things you'd like a pic of around New Orleans. Cheers, -- Infrogmation ( talk) 03:45, 2 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Well, in addition to Gallier House the Orleans parish locations on List of National Historic Landmarks in Louisiana that totally lack photos are:

• Deluge (firefighting tug)
• James H. Dillard House
• Hermann-Grima House

Also, covered only in historical black and white photos are:

• Louisiana State Bank Building
• New Orleans Cotton Exchange Building

It would be great if you could photograph any of those and upload to those articles and the overall list-article. Cheers, doncram ( talk) 00:02, 3 June 2008 (UTC) reply

I was able to take and upload a few pix of Gallier House, I just added a link from the article to the Commons category. I can't always promise such quick service, but things worked out for me to stop by briefly with my camera today. Please note I DID take pics of the Cotton Exchange; the one illustrating the article is mine, and there is a link to a few others at Commons. If there is some aspect of the building I missed which you think I could take a useful photo of on a return visit, let me know. I'm not sure how I missed getting pix of the Louisiana State Bank when I was taking other photos on that block of Royal! I should be able to get pix of at least some of that list within the next couple weeks at most. (I'm not quite sure about the tugboat, but the rest shouldn't be too hard to get by.) Cheers, -- Infrogmation ( talk) 00:20, 3 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks the Gallier House pic looks great. And it was my mistake about New Orleans Cotton Exchange Building, i see it is your color pic in place, just with somewhat muted tones as the building looks like. Look forward to noting your future edits to List of NHLs in LA about the others, whenever convenient.... Thanks, doncram ( talk) 02:21, 4 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Hello there. I am so delighted to see that you are taking requests for New Orleans photos. I understand that you may not have the time to do this, but hey, it can’t hurt to ask. I have written an article about a performer, Andy Offutt Irwin whose quote, “Don’t be afraid to be amazing” is the message of a mural by artist Susan Guevara at the Children’s Resource Center branch library. Well, I talk about it in the article, [1] but I would like to include a picture of the mural and/or any thing that shows his quote but I’m several hundred miles away. The branch is in uptown New Orleans; link to address and hours. I found a photo of the work here [2], (if you look closely, you see the quote in the mural with the cat playing a trumpet) but it is not free use, of course. Thanks,

A Softer Answer ( talk) 19:58, 10 July 2008 (UTC) reply

• Hi. I know where that library is (I already have a couple of photos of the exterior in the NOPL gallery on Commons), and could probably stop by there sometime before the end of next week if you ask. However any photo I'd take showing a recent artwork of a living artist like this would be a "derivative work", as the artist still holds copyright to the work, not me as a photographer. If the work of art is being discussed in an article, I believe you can make a "fair use rationale" to use an image to illustrate that article (see Wikipedia:Non-free content for details). If you ask, I can take a photo of the mural, but understand unfortunately it can't be free licensed without the consent of the artist, who remains the copyright holder. Thanks, -- Infrogmation ( talk) 20:43, 10 July 2008 (UTC) reply

MBisanz ^talk has noticed you do not have your e-mail currently set up and is requesting you enable your EmailUser function. Thanks!

Thanks for uploading Image:DorothyLamour2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 07:06, 2 June 2008 (UTC) reply

I just deleted this one myself. Great to see a good public domain alternative was found. -- Infrogmation ( talk) 00:22, 3 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Hi. I wanted to direct you to some information about NOPL, some of which might be useful for the New Orleans Public Library article, but which I won't use on Wikipedia because it's original research of mine. The history page on the Hubbell Library support Web site is mostly about the Hubbell Branch, of course, but there's a little bit about racial segregation in the library system and a mention of low funding. Help yourself, and I'll let you know when there's a longer downloadable pdf version with endnotes.

On a minor note, the Cita Dennis Hubbell Branch paragraph in the Wikipedia article says that the branch was "closed by Hurricane Betsy in 1965". In fact I wrote that myself, incorrectly. The above-mentioned history argues otherwise, but again I won't edit that myself because of WP:NOR. Thanks!

Muffuletta ( talk) 09:09, 11 June 2008 (UTC) reply

• Just got a reply from a lady at NOPL's African American Resource Center. She says the original Dryades building is still standing, but does not belong to NOPL. And you're absolutely right: I wrote that the Royal branch was in the Quarter, but that's not correct! When I have time I'll delete that reference, but I don't know exactly where the branch was. - Muffuletta ( talk) 23:57, 12 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the reply. Sorry, I forgot you're not here in town! I corrected the location of the old "downtown" branch. I already have an old photo of it in the NOPL category on Commons. I might have taken a photo of the Dryades Branch building on an earlier Central City photo trip, but I'm not sure. I didn't find the address with a quick google search. If you have it handy, tell it to me. If not, I'm sure I can find it in old city directories next time I'm doing some reasearch with them. Cheers, -- Infrogmation ( talk) 00:12, 13 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Can I assume you've already got an eye on this vandal? J293339 ( talk) 16:03, 12 June 2008 (UTC) reply

• Blocked. An alert to such things is always appreciated. Cheers, -- Infrogmation ( talk) 22:06, 12 June 2008 (UTC) reply

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria and I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I have reviewed Effects of Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans and believe the article currently meets the majority of the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, and I'll leave the article on hold for seven days for them to be fixed. I have left this message on your talk page since you have significantly edited the article (based on using this article history tool). Please consider helping address the several points that I listed on the talk page of the article, which shouldn't take too long to fix with the assistance of multiple editors. I have also left messages on the talk pages for other editors and related WikiProjects to spread the workload around some. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. -- Nehrams2020 ( talk) 21:04, 12 June 2008 (UTC) reply

My message concerns the vandal called 193.170.244.3 ( talk · contribs) has vandalized 3 times after you told him he would be blocked with out further warning. I just wanted to report him. I found him vanalizing Jesus Christ Superstar (film). This is what he did -- Angel David ^{Commune with Heaven.} My Angelic Gifts 23:55, 12 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the note. I gave them a 2 week block; more of this sort of thing after this block expires can earn them a longer term block. Cheers, -- Infrogmation ( talk) 00:07, 13 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Greetings Infrogmation. I happened to wander over this here Rob Couhig page just by following articles written by User:Billy Hathorn (whom I encountered on the Mel and Norma Gabler page whilst looking up textbook-controversies and saw had been prompted re NPOV several times). Anyway, having read the Couhig article and immediately thought it was somewhat of a fan's eye view, I saw on the talkpage that you had posted an NPOV concern. I've added my own opinion re that and requested that perhaps someone with a more than minimal knowledge of LA politics may wish to go over it (but, failing that, yes, I'll have a go). So you seemed the ideal editor to contact re. it all. If it does come down to me cleaning it up, what would be the best places to start looking for background info/citations etc - a newspaper like the Times-Picayune maybe? Local news afiliates? Thanks and all the best. Plutonium27 ( talk) 17:27, 21 June 2008 (UTC) reply

I haven't been following Couhig closely; I'd be happy to look things over but don't know if I'd be of very much help. The Picayune and Gambit Weekly are good sources for local political coverage. Cheers, -- Infrogmation ( talk) 02:11, 30 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Oops! I must have made the mistake cobbling the article together from different sources. Anyway, I've now checked and corrected it - Columbia Records, 1920. Thanks. Ghmyrtle ( talk) 09:10, 22 June 2008 (UTC) reply

I got the references to show here. The last ref, which called an earlier one, wasn't closed. Lvklock ( talk) 13:56, 26 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Great, thanks. -- Infrogmation ( talk) 05:16, 29 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Image link: [3] Hoping you can clear this up. Wikiwatcher1 ( talk) 01:44, 29 June 2008 (UTC) reply

I think Wikipedia:Image use policy and Wikipedia:Non-free content are pretty clear. Non-free images are only to be used sparingly and in limited circumstances when no free alternative images are availible. Please keep this in mind. Don't take it personally. Cheers, -- Infrogmation ( talk) 05:27, 29 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Thank you for your speedy response. However, your response failed to deal with any of the issues brought up in the dispute box, as you clearly felt comfortable simply brushing them aside as "not relevent to this discussion, not relevent to correct here." You brushed them aside even after I rewrote my original comments as you requested and despite a very factual list of questionable activities by you.

You might want to reconsider whether the activities of an administrator like yourself, suggestive of "bad faith," is enough to warrant an honest reply to a list of specific facts. Wikiwatcher1 ( talk) 19:00, 30 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Anything you think I might not be impartial about, I encourage you to get third party opinions about (and 4th, 5th, and 6th if you wish). I confined my reply on the image discussion to questions relevent to the image use. The parts of what you wrote that seemed to be about me rather than about the image I replied to on your talk page. I've pointed out Wikipedia image use policies to you already; trying to improve Wikipedia in line with those policies was my motivation. It seems to me you have misinterpreteted as some sort of personal attack. I have zero interest in getting into any sort of grudge match with you. Check out Wikipedia:Dispute resolution and related pages linked there if you think appropriate (though I think it would waste the time of both of us that would be better spend improving Wikipedia content in line with Wikipedia policies). Thanks. -- Infrogmation ( talk) 19:48, 30 June 2008 (UTC) reply

• I never said or implied you were not being "impartial." If you think that was the message please point it out and I'll modify my post;
• You ignored all of the listed issues on the dispute form;
• There was no mention anywhere of your "personal attack," so I'm not sure what you're referring to. If you assume that anyone questioning your reasons for a speedy deletion of an image as a "personal attack" on them, then I disagree with the logic;
• I agree it would be counter-productive to take something this minor to Dispute Resolution. I'm sure your intentions are fair and that of all the thousands of contributions you've made, this is one of many that are similar. Maybe you can list some more "speedy deletion" notices you've posted for similar reasons, since images seems to be one of your focuses as administrator.

That would certainly go a long way to showing fair and impartial behavior. Thanks in advance. Wikiwatcher1 ( talk) 20:22, 30 June 2008 (UTC) reply

• • I replied on your talk page. I hope we can both get back to spending our typing time improving Wikimedia content soon. Thanks. -- Infrogmation ( talk) 00:31, 1 July 2008 (UTC) reply
• I received your reply and have responded. Wikiwatcher1 ( talk) 01:30, 1 July 2008 (UTC) reply

Hi Infrogmation, hope u r well. i have enjoyed seeing ur occasional additions of pics to List of NHLs in LA. There is a National Park Service photo competition, with submission deadline Monday for postmark or for email submission, which i just learned about yesterday. See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places#June 30 email deadline for 2008 NPS NHL photo contest. Submit a pic or two by email! And, i would appreciate it greatly if you could identify your own pics, at Wikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/PhotoCreditsForNHLsByState, in the right-most column. It would be most helpful, ASAP, if you could i.d. which pics are yours. Also, by the way, if you are not already a member of wp:NRHP, you oughta join! doncram ( talk) 01:22, 30 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for letting me know about the project. Looks like 16 photos I've taken illustrating the Louisiana list at present. I think I'm a little late to apply to the contest, but I'll be looking over the project page in more detail later. Cheers, -- Infrogmation ( talk) 02:07, 30 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the info about Wiki Commons. I just ran a test for Gasoline (song) which is does not ever seemed to have been recorded. But still the sentiments are current. Thanks again. SpaceFace32 ( talk) 18:49, 30 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Next older talk archive: User talk:Infrogmation/Archive January April 08

Next more recent talk archive: User talk:Infrogmation/Archive July 08 - Feb 09

Current talk: User talk:Infrogmation