|
Hi House of Nobles! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 22 August 2021 (UTC) |
House of Nobles, I (mostly) blanked your talk page, because this material is not talk page material. You can do this kind of stuff in a sandbox, as you already know. But here is the thing: with 5 (five) article edits, you appear not to be here for editing our project, but rather to use it as a web server. Please show us that all this is actually going to be used in article space. Thank you. Drmies ( talk) 21:00, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of life peerages (1958–1979), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Coombe and Broomfield. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 05:57, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public. You may instead email the
Arbitration Committee at arbcom-en
wikimedia.org with your username and appeal.Administrators: CheckUsers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. Therefore, a Checkuser must be consulted before this block can be removed. Administrators undoing checkuser blocks without permission or the prior approval from a checkuser risk having their administrator rights removed by the Arbitration Committee (per this announcement).
House of Nobles ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am not Mr Hall of England, I am my own account, IP addresses change from time to time, but I am no way this account, if you see my edits and Mr Hall of Englands edits there is a difference, I have been away for a while. House of Nobles ( talk) 21:44, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
The checkuser evidence is strong, and your denial is not sufficient to overturn the block. PhilKnight ( talk) 05:34, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
|
|
Hi House of Nobles! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 22 August 2021 (UTC) |
House of Nobles, I (mostly) blanked your talk page, because this material is not talk page material. You can do this kind of stuff in a sandbox, as you already know. But here is the thing: with 5 (five) article edits, you appear not to be here for editing our project, but rather to use it as a web server. Please show us that all this is actually going to be used in article space. Thank you. Drmies ( talk) 21:00, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of life peerages (1958–1979), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Coombe and Broomfield. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 05:57, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public. You may instead email the
Arbitration Committee at arbcom-enwikimedia.org with your username and appeal.Administrators: CheckUsers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. Therefore, a Checkuser must be consulted before this block can be removed. Administrators undoing checkuser blocks without permission or the prior approval from a checkuser risk having their administrator rights removed by the Arbitration Committee (per this announcement).
House of Nobles ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am not Mr Hall of England, I am my own account, IP addresses change from time to time, but I am no way this account, if you see my edits and Mr Hall of Englands edits there is a difference, I have been away for a while. House of Nobles ( talk) 21:44, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
The checkuser evidence is strong, and your denial is not sufficient to overturn the block. PhilKnight ( talk) 05:34, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.