This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
[ [1]] This article is horrible. I was checking out the support links and found blogs, spam to buy a book and articles that have to be purchased to even read them. I didn't even get through them all. I made some remarks on the talk page but would appreciate your opinions. Thanks, -- Crohnie 13:05, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello. I am somewhat unsure about how to hold discussion on the MDS America merge. I want there to be a clear consensus of non-MDSA affiliated editors before I go ahead with it, since I know the company guys will object vocally. I've set up a section for the debate at MVDDS dispute#Straw pole on merging MDS America. I'd appreciate any help you could give, since it seems you also have experience in dealing with COI issues. Thanks, nadav 22:45, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for tagging Invasion: How America Still Welcomes Terrorists, Criminals, and Other Foreign Menaces with {{ advert}}. You prompted me to do a quick edit to remove some of the POV. Could you please take a look at the result? Feel free to put the {{advert}} tag back if you think more work is need. Cheers, CWC 05:29, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
I haven't spoken to you since I left to Freeport. I hope things are going well. -- Crohnie 13:02, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Could I suggest that mundane editorial disagreements are most likely to resolve quickly and productively when editors observe the following:
I hope you find this reminder helpful. -- Ronz 17:49, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Learn to assume good faith, behave in a civil manner, and take some responsibility for your actions. Thanks. -- Ronz 18:58, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
I replied on my talk page to your statment. Don't know if you wanted him or me to reply to it. Regardless I am with you. Something needs to be done. The person who removes the tag should show how the article is NPOV not just removing it because they don't want it. -- Xiahou 01:33, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Do you think we should nominate Movement_to_impeach_George_W._Bush for deletion? You stated on the article talk page that it violates WP:NOT#SOAP, WP:WEASEL, WP:OR, and WP:NPOV. I think the article has a better chance of getting a wider consensus now then did it in October... -- T Talk to me 02:12, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello Ronz. I saw this [2] dingotel.com link addition today. I don't know what to make of User:Rearden9's fascination [3] [4] [5] with that link so I thought I'd send you a note because of the User_talk:Ronz/Archive_4#Voice_Over_IP thread. I removed the link but I didn't give a warning. I Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars unless it is required. (: Since I'm not sure what is going on, do whatever you see fit warning-wise. ( Requestion 21:31, 9 May 2007 (UTC))
I came to Wikipedia for a new good experience. I took your advice and went to an article that is not political nor medical only to be attacked and accused of being a sock puppet and single purpose account. This I don't need in my life. If you check out Wikipedia community you will see what I am talking about. I took my concerns to two administrators so I'll see how that works out. Thanks again for being so much help to me, good bye,-- Crohnie 12:33, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Nescio purposely distorted what I was saying and keeps on doing it. He refers to me in a derogatory fashion by saying "only right wing people like Arnabdas" or something to that nature. I called him a liar for purposely libeling me. He refuses to answer the question and instead just labels me as "right wing" just because I want fair reportage. I consider the label right wing as offensive to me because I am not that at all. Arnabdas 21:48, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Why have you deleted all external links ?
This way the world will see only NS which is extremely difficult to use. The world's top 4 / 5 network simulators should be shown.
Durnitz
Those are the 3 best network simulation softwares in the world today (NS and OMNET++ and hardly used) There are lots of articles on all sites. Opnet is simply the worlds best in this field. And NetSim - well thats used for education, which benefits a lot of people. If you look at the history you would see that I have removed most external links. But I feel these three should be there especially considering I have been in this field for a long time now.
Let me know your views
Mr Ronz if "the fate of Illyrians" lies in the hands of the people who incorporate sentences lik this "A hypothesis that the modern Albanian language is a surviving Illyrian language remains very controversial among linguists [6]" while respected sources like Britanica are very clear on the subjekt "The origins of the Albanian people are not definitely known, but data drawn from history and from linguistic, archaeological, and anthropological studies have led to the conclusion that Albanians are the direct descendants of the ancient Illyrians and that the latter were natives of the lands they inhabited. Similarly, the Albanian language derives from the language of the Illyrians", my question to you is do i ingage i a dabate with people who simply dissregard all sources that link Albanians with Illyrians? A quick example in the discussion page of Origin of Albanians [7] I mentioned a monental anthropological resarch by Carlton Coon, this user Chlemäns made this comment about my effort " Interesting, racial theorists from the 1930's are evidently the ultimate authorities on this subject;-) Now don't even think about trying to mention a word about this in the article" [8]. The same user turns a blind eye in this article "According to the anthropological studies of Theodoros K. Pitsios, Arvanites in the Peloponnese in the 1970s were physically indistinguishable from other Greek inhabitants of the same region. This may indicate that either the Arvanites shared extant physical similarities with other Greek populations or that early Arvanite groups extensively incorporated parts of the autochthonous Greek population" [9]. Mr Ronz if u let Albanian history in the fate of this members than most of us Albanians (i am by the way Arvanite)are simply left with very little choice but to edit.Regards Trojani 14:03, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
What particular edits do you reference? 76.109.17.236 21:46, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
You send to the server adress of MDSi France: [edit] Your recent edits to Talk:MDS America Please read and follow WP:TALK. Your recent comments on Talk:MDS America are often incomprehensible, incivil, and disruptive. Please stop. --Ronz 17:08, 9 May 2007 (UTC) Some employees are unhappy by the lies and by what do one of the shareHolder of MDSi Mr Fabrice Ducasse under various names and IP adreses from Stuart or Palm city in Florida or from France read the last said by this guy for Ed or Nadav. but I CEO of MDSi apologise for our peoples making answers against MDS America and we need that the sound of the bell stop on our side any answers to the various MDS America lies.. MDS America can still print lies on Wikipedia this are the problem of the lawyers and of the Judge and the court to make the right. Probabely a link to the last judgements and copy of the fine against Fav=brice and sons. 83.206.63.250 06:46, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
Answered on article page. Cheers. Nomen Nescio Gnothi seauton 10:35, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi Ronz. You and I know we are right about Verio :-). However the multiple reverts make me nervous. Someone is counting on no-one else being patient enough to do proper sourcing. According to WP:V he has a point. We could ask for some amount of time to leave the 'sources' banner up before digging up the references. Or, I suppose we could accept the stubbified article. EdJohnston 03:03, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
These negative personal attacks need to stop. This is not about POINT or OWN. This is about either source the article or remove the un-sourced material. WP:V is very clear about this. The burden of proof is on those who want to include the material. I don't need to start an RfC in oder to remove un-sourced material. If it is common knowledge, than you should have no trouble providing a source. -- Stbalbach 03:50, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
The case was brought to AN/I. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up® 12:21, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Am sorry. I was not actively involved in edits on that page. I was just surprised by the amount of criticism those amateur archaeologists were facing. And I dint know the link was on the external links section. Dilip rajeev 07:58, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Earlier today, I added the top 2 organizations (UPA and SIGCHI) that cater to people involved in user interface and design - along with a leading independent community site (Catalyze). And you promptly removed them.
I think it is important to provide readers with links to sources outside wikipedia where they can get more information and get involved at a local level.
Should they appear under an External Links section? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thumbarger ( talk • contribs)
(Erroneous warning removed). No edit warring here. I've followed WP:DR. -- Ronz 14:40, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks! -- Ronz 23:02, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
You have allredy given this member a warning (some days ago) Edrigu,I strongly advice you to take more aggressive measures otherwise he will continue with his vandalism. Thanx Trojani 22:34, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
I just want to let you know that I have been watching the ongoing at Talk Stephan Barrett. I totally understand now why OR is not permitted by the last day's conversations there. It actually finally make sense to me. I just want to let you know because you have taken so much time to help me understand policies here. You were right and I thank you with all your help again. I actually understanding a lot of the reasons for the policies you have been helping me with and mostly from just lurking for the past few days on this specific talk page. Thanks, -- Crohnie 13:18, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi Ronz,
Thanks for your comment - I should have added the book into a 'further reading' section rather than into the references section. Also I read the spam etc. pages you referred to, and I will remove external links.
Best, Bookuser 21:01, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
I would appreciate it if you would quit spamming my talk page with countless warnings. None of the abuses you attribute to me occured. You first accused me of breaking the 3 RR. I had made an average of one edit per day in the article you warned me of being in danger of violating the 3RR in, which doesn't come even close to breaking any rule. Besides, most of my edits in that article weren't reverts but addition of sources. You have also accused me of vandalism for refusing to participate in the discussion before editting. Not only is that not vandalism, but I have made every effort to explain my point of view on the talk page, and have only editted AFTER receiving consensus from the majority of other people on the talk page, for example Fut.Perf, User:Miskin, User:Ploutarchos all agreed. Edrigu 00:30, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
I think it's spam but I am not sure at the Crohn's article [ [13]] and the link in question is [14] which is located as the last on the list of organizations. Thanks, ---- CrohnieGal Talk/ Contribs 13:58, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Perhaps just one introductory qualifier at the beginning of each section? I agree the prose is rather clunky with every sentence padded like that... -- Fire Star 火星 02:51, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
How much more is this guy ~(Edrigu)tolerated to vandalize the Illyrian article??????? Trojani 18:03, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
This is an issue which ther is nothing to talk about, he is a serb and I am Albanian, he is manipulating my history and i am defendin it. He knows that if he continues in this fashion you people will make a comprommise, that is his objektive. Take action. Trojani 05:53, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Please check my response to both you and Levine there. I am gathering information and if given the time I will have my opinions on the matter of Stephen Barrett hopefully within the next couple of days. Also, it is my talk page and I found no problem with what you struck out, to me it was not necessary. Anyways, I am reading and talking to others to get a grasp of Point, Not and Weight. I think I understand them but I want to be sure. Any suggestion you have in explaining these are most welcomed. I am going to Levine's talk page too with this same kind of note. I hope you are having a good day. Let's all try to keep good faith and try to work things out. I asked our mediator via email if he could ask for another mediator to take over this case. I haven't heard back from him though. ---- CrohnieGal Talk/ Contribs 20:07, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Thank you a lot for tour message. Why a link to a governmental, non-profit institution with a history closely linked to the Greek Foundation for Basic Biological Research "Alexander Fleming" can be considered spam? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.251.21.1 ( talk • contribs) 06:37, 25 May 2007
Hi Ronz, Regarding your previous comment to IP 195.251.21.1 which is an IP from the Biomedical Sciences Research Center "Alexander Fleming", I believe that a research institution which is takes its name from the Alexander Fleming should be mentioned at Fleming’s biography listing in wikipedi as an external link at least, thanks Afantitis
Dear Ronz. I would like to provide more information regarding MUGEN NoE:
MUGEN Network of Excellence The MUGEN network of Excellence aims to structure and shape a world-class framework of European scientific and technological excellence in the field of “murine models for immunological disease”, to advance understanding of the genetic basis of disease and to enhance innovation and translatability of research efforts. MUGEN’s specific mission is to bring together different expertise from academic and industrial laboratories in order to study human immunological disease by integrating the participant institutions’ strengths in immunological knowledge with new approaches in functional genomics. By removing barriers to progress and promoting the synergistic interaction of scientists from various disciplines integrated, MUGEN expects to bring Europe a competitive advantage in the development of new diagnostic and therapeutic tools.
Through its Joint Programme of Activities, MUGEN aims to: 1. Systematically study animal models for immune diseases and processes through the application of functional genomic platforms (transgenesis, targeted and random mutagenesis, expression profiling and bioinformatics). 2. Integrate the outstanding research experience and capacities of each network participant to allow the efficient application of post-genomic approaches to generate new knowledge in immunological diseases and processes. Such knowledge is expected to lead to novel diagnostic and therapeutic tools. 3. Ensure spreading of excellence, optimal use and dissemination of the knowledge generated through the network beyond the boundaries of MUGEN, by integrating competencies to train researchers, to encourage knowledge transfer, to address innovation related aspects of research and to raise the public awareness of scientific research issues. To achieve this goal, MUGEN is bringing together expertise from 14 leading research institutes, 5 major universities and 5 biotechnology companies from seven E.U. member states as well as Switzerland and the US. MUGEN will be co-funded by the EU with 11 M€ over a five year period (2005-2009). MUGEN participants will share information and technology platforms and will develop a coordinated agenda of scientific events in order to communicate their scientific achievements to a wider scientific audience as well as to the general public
Please study the description carefully and ask for evaluation from a wikipedia user with strong academic background especially in biology. Thank you in advance. Afantitis
Here is a custom made signature. Click on preferences and add this to your signature box and click, check. Next, click on save. Its easy. I hope you like it! :) - Mr.Gurü ( talk/ contribs) 19:56, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Ronz thanks for the email - my intention was not self-promote. I have a full description of who I am unlike the following entry for Knowledge management software whereby you can see that the originator of this topic registers as a no name and is able to self-promote a company (can you guess where the IP leads to - same state as TheBrain.. hmmmm). Nevertheless, I will abide however I cannot prevent other KM/self-service related professionals and customers in this industry from adding vendors to this arena or setting up a new link to a topic called List of Self-Service software vendors (like you can find in Content management system) Still thanks for the input User:Topiarydan 06:43, 28 May 2007
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
[ [1]] This article is horrible. I was checking out the support links and found blogs, spam to buy a book and articles that have to be purchased to even read them. I didn't even get through them all. I made some remarks on the talk page but would appreciate your opinions. Thanks, -- Crohnie 13:05, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello. I am somewhat unsure about how to hold discussion on the MDS America merge. I want there to be a clear consensus of non-MDSA affiliated editors before I go ahead with it, since I know the company guys will object vocally. I've set up a section for the debate at MVDDS dispute#Straw pole on merging MDS America. I'd appreciate any help you could give, since it seems you also have experience in dealing with COI issues. Thanks, nadav 22:45, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for tagging Invasion: How America Still Welcomes Terrorists, Criminals, and Other Foreign Menaces with {{ advert}}. You prompted me to do a quick edit to remove some of the POV. Could you please take a look at the result? Feel free to put the {{advert}} tag back if you think more work is need. Cheers, CWC 05:29, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
I haven't spoken to you since I left to Freeport. I hope things are going well. -- Crohnie 13:02, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Could I suggest that mundane editorial disagreements are most likely to resolve quickly and productively when editors observe the following:
I hope you find this reminder helpful. -- Ronz 17:49, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Learn to assume good faith, behave in a civil manner, and take some responsibility for your actions. Thanks. -- Ronz 18:58, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
I replied on my talk page to your statment. Don't know if you wanted him or me to reply to it. Regardless I am with you. Something needs to be done. The person who removes the tag should show how the article is NPOV not just removing it because they don't want it. -- Xiahou 01:33, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Do you think we should nominate Movement_to_impeach_George_W._Bush for deletion? You stated on the article talk page that it violates WP:NOT#SOAP, WP:WEASEL, WP:OR, and WP:NPOV. I think the article has a better chance of getting a wider consensus now then did it in October... -- T Talk to me 02:12, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello Ronz. I saw this [2] dingotel.com link addition today. I don't know what to make of User:Rearden9's fascination [3] [4] [5] with that link so I thought I'd send you a note because of the User_talk:Ronz/Archive_4#Voice_Over_IP thread. I removed the link but I didn't give a warning. I Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars unless it is required. (: Since I'm not sure what is going on, do whatever you see fit warning-wise. ( Requestion 21:31, 9 May 2007 (UTC))
I came to Wikipedia for a new good experience. I took your advice and went to an article that is not political nor medical only to be attacked and accused of being a sock puppet and single purpose account. This I don't need in my life. If you check out Wikipedia community you will see what I am talking about. I took my concerns to two administrators so I'll see how that works out. Thanks again for being so much help to me, good bye,-- Crohnie 12:33, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Nescio purposely distorted what I was saying and keeps on doing it. He refers to me in a derogatory fashion by saying "only right wing people like Arnabdas" or something to that nature. I called him a liar for purposely libeling me. He refuses to answer the question and instead just labels me as "right wing" just because I want fair reportage. I consider the label right wing as offensive to me because I am not that at all. Arnabdas 21:48, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Why have you deleted all external links ?
This way the world will see only NS which is extremely difficult to use. The world's top 4 / 5 network simulators should be shown.
Durnitz
Those are the 3 best network simulation softwares in the world today (NS and OMNET++ and hardly used) There are lots of articles on all sites. Opnet is simply the worlds best in this field. And NetSim - well thats used for education, which benefits a lot of people. If you look at the history you would see that I have removed most external links. But I feel these three should be there especially considering I have been in this field for a long time now.
Let me know your views
Mr Ronz if "the fate of Illyrians" lies in the hands of the people who incorporate sentences lik this "A hypothesis that the modern Albanian language is a surviving Illyrian language remains very controversial among linguists [6]" while respected sources like Britanica are very clear on the subjekt "The origins of the Albanian people are not definitely known, but data drawn from history and from linguistic, archaeological, and anthropological studies have led to the conclusion that Albanians are the direct descendants of the ancient Illyrians and that the latter were natives of the lands they inhabited. Similarly, the Albanian language derives from the language of the Illyrians", my question to you is do i ingage i a dabate with people who simply dissregard all sources that link Albanians with Illyrians? A quick example in the discussion page of Origin of Albanians [7] I mentioned a monental anthropological resarch by Carlton Coon, this user Chlemäns made this comment about my effort " Interesting, racial theorists from the 1930's are evidently the ultimate authorities on this subject;-) Now don't even think about trying to mention a word about this in the article" [8]. The same user turns a blind eye in this article "According to the anthropological studies of Theodoros K. Pitsios, Arvanites in the Peloponnese in the 1970s were physically indistinguishable from other Greek inhabitants of the same region. This may indicate that either the Arvanites shared extant physical similarities with other Greek populations or that early Arvanite groups extensively incorporated parts of the autochthonous Greek population" [9]. Mr Ronz if u let Albanian history in the fate of this members than most of us Albanians (i am by the way Arvanite)are simply left with very little choice but to edit.Regards Trojani 14:03, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
What particular edits do you reference? 76.109.17.236 21:46, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
You send to the server adress of MDSi France: [edit] Your recent edits to Talk:MDS America Please read and follow WP:TALK. Your recent comments on Talk:MDS America are often incomprehensible, incivil, and disruptive. Please stop. --Ronz 17:08, 9 May 2007 (UTC) Some employees are unhappy by the lies and by what do one of the shareHolder of MDSi Mr Fabrice Ducasse under various names and IP adreses from Stuart or Palm city in Florida or from France read the last said by this guy for Ed or Nadav. but I CEO of MDSi apologise for our peoples making answers against MDS America and we need that the sound of the bell stop on our side any answers to the various MDS America lies.. MDS America can still print lies on Wikipedia this are the problem of the lawyers and of the Judge and the court to make the right. Probabely a link to the last judgements and copy of the fine against Fav=brice and sons. 83.206.63.250 06:46, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
Answered on article page. Cheers. Nomen Nescio Gnothi seauton 10:35, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi Ronz. You and I know we are right about Verio :-). However the multiple reverts make me nervous. Someone is counting on no-one else being patient enough to do proper sourcing. According to WP:V he has a point. We could ask for some amount of time to leave the 'sources' banner up before digging up the references. Or, I suppose we could accept the stubbified article. EdJohnston 03:03, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
These negative personal attacks need to stop. This is not about POINT or OWN. This is about either source the article or remove the un-sourced material. WP:V is very clear about this. The burden of proof is on those who want to include the material. I don't need to start an RfC in oder to remove un-sourced material. If it is common knowledge, than you should have no trouble providing a source. -- Stbalbach 03:50, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
The case was brought to AN/I. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up® 12:21, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Am sorry. I was not actively involved in edits on that page. I was just surprised by the amount of criticism those amateur archaeologists were facing. And I dint know the link was on the external links section. Dilip rajeev 07:58, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Earlier today, I added the top 2 organizations (UPA and SIGCHI) that cater to people involved in user interface and design - along with a leading independent community site (Catalyze). And you promptly removed them.
I think it is important to provide readers with links to sources outside wikipedia where they can get more information and get involved at a local level.
Should they appear under an External Links section? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thumbarger ( talk • contribs)
(Erroneous warning removed). No edit warring here. I've followed WP:DR. -- Ronz 14:40, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks! -- Ronz 23:02, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
You have allredy given this member a warning (some days ago) Edrigu,I strongly advice you to take more aggressive measures otherwise he will continue with his vandalism. Thanx Trojani 22:34, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
I just want to let you know that I have been watching the ongoing at Talk Stephan Barrett. I totally understand now why OR is not permitted by the last day's conversations there. It actually finally make sense to me. I just want to let you know because you have taken so much time to help me understand policies here. You were right and I thank you with all your help again. I actually understanding a lot of the reasons for the policies you have been helping me with and mostly from just lurking for the past few days on this specific talk page. Thanks, -- Crohnie 13:18, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi Ronz,
Thanks for your comment - I should have added the book into a 'further reading' section rather than into the references section. Also I read the spam etc. pages you referred to, and I will remove external links.
Best, Bookuser 21:01, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
I would appreciate it if you would quit spamming my talk page with countless warnings. None of the abuses you attribute to me occured. You first accused me of breaking the 3 RR. I had made an average of one edit per day in the article you warned me of being in danger of violating the 3RR in, which doesn't come even close to breaking any rule. Besides, most of my edits in that article weren't reverts but addition of sources. You have also accused me of vandalism for refusing to participate in the discussion before editting. Not only is that not vandalism, but I have made every effort to explain my point of view on the talk page, and have only editted AFTER receiving consensus from the majority of other people on the talk page, for example Fut.Perf, User:Miskin, User:Ploutarchos all agreed. Edrigu 00:30, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
I think it's spam but I am not sure at the Crohn's article [ [13]] and the link in question is [14] which is located as the last on the list of organizations. Thanks, ---- CrohnieGal Talk/ Contribs 13:58, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Perhaps just one introductory qualifier at the beginning of each section? I agree the prose is rather clunky with every sentence padded like that... -- Fire Star 火星 02:51, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
How much more is this guy ~(Edrigu)tolerated to vandalize the Illyrian article??????? Trojani 18:03, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
This is an issue which ther is nothing to talk about, he is a serb and I am Albanian, he is manipulating my history and i am defendin it. He knows that if he continues in this fashion you people will make a comprommise, that is his objektive. Take action. Trojani 05:53, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Please check my response to both you and Levine there. I am gathering information and if given the time I will have my opinions on the matter of Stephen Barrett hopefully within the next couple of days. Also, it is my talk page and I found no problem with what you struck out, to me it was not necessary. Anyways, I am reading and talking to others to get a grasp of Point, Not and Weight. I think I understand them but I want to be sure. Any suggestion you have in explaining these are most welcomed. I am going to Levine's talk page too with this same kind of note. I hope you are having a good day. Let's all try to keep good faith and try to work things out. I asked our mediator via email if he could ask for another mediator to take over this case. I haven't heard back from him though. ---- CrohnieGal Talk/ Contribs 20:07, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Thank you a lot for tour message. Why a link to a governmental, non-profit institution with a history closely linked to the Greek Foundation for Basic Biological Research "Alexander Fleming" can be considered spam? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.251.21.1 ( talk • contribs) 06:37, 25 May 2007
Hi Ronz, Regarding your previous comment to IP 195.251.21.1 which is an IP from the Biomedical Sciences Research Center "Alexander Fleming", I believe that a research institution which is takes its name from the Alexander Fleming should be mentioned at Fleming’s biography listing in wikipedi as an external link at least, thanks Afantitis
Dear Ronz. I would like to provide more information regarding MUGEN NoE:
MUGEN Network of Excellence The MUGEN network of Excellence aims to structure and shape a world-class framework of European scientific and technological excellence in the field of “murine models for immunological disease”, to advance understanding of the genetic basis of disease and to enhance innovation and translatability of research efforts. MUGEN’s specific mission is to bring together different expertise from academic and industrial laboratories in order to study human immunological disease by integrating the participant institutions’ strengths in immunological knowledge with new approaches in functional genomics. By removing barriers to progress and promoting the synergistic interaction of scientists from various disciplines integrated, MUGEN expects to bring Europe a competitive advantage in the development of new diagnostic and therapeutic tools.
Through its Joint Programme of Activities, MUGEN aims to: 1. Systematically study animal models for immune diseases and processes through the application of functional genomic platforms (transgenesis, targeted and random mutagenesis, expression profiling and bioinformatics). 2. Integrate the outstanding research experience and capacities of each network participant to allow the efficient application of post-genomic approaches to generate new knowledge in immunological diseases and processes. Such knowledge is expected to lead to novel diagnostic and therapeutic tools. 3. Ensure spreading of excellence, optimal use and dissemination of the knowledge generated through the network beyond the boundaries of MUGEN, by integrating competencies to train researchers, to encourage knowledge transfer, to address innovation related aspects of research and to raise the public awareness of scientific research issues. To achieve this goal, MUGEN is bringing together expertise from 14 leading research institutes, 5 major universities and 5 biotechnology companies from seven E.U. member states as well as Switzerland and the US. MUGEN will be co-funded by the EU with 11 M€ over a five year period (2005-2009). MUGEN participants will share information and technology platforms and will develop a coordinated agenda of scientific events in order to communicate their scientific achievements to a wider scientific audience as well as to the general public
Please study the description carefully and ask for evaluation from a wikipedia user with strong academic background especially in biology. Thank you in advance. Afantitis
Here is a custom made signature. Click on preferences and add this to your signature box and click, check. Next, click on save. Its easy. I hope you like it! :) - Mr.Gurü ( talk/ contribs) 19:56, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Ronz thanks for the email - my intention was not self-promote. I have a full description of who I am unlike the following entry for Knowledge management software whereby you can see that the originator of this topic registers as a no name and is able to self-promote a company (can you guess where the IP leads to - same state as TheBrain.. hmmmm). Nevertheless, I will abide however I cannot prevent other KM/self-service related professionals and customers in this industry from adding vendors to this arena or setting up a new link to a topic called List of Self-Service software vendors (like you can find in Content management system) Still thanks for the input User:Topiarydan 06:43, 28 May 2007