I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:List of crab species. Thanks! Fermiboson ( talk) 12:46, 22 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:

According to the crab Wikipedia article: "The infraorder Brachyura contains approximately 7,000 species in 98 families". That's way too much for a single list.

I recommend making more focused lists first, (such as genuses/families) then making this a list of lists.

Also this list needs a leading paragraph to explain what this list is about.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of crab species and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 16:14, 22 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Gcenty! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ca talk to me! 16:14, 22 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Gcenty, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! ForsythiaJo ( talk) 02:54, 23 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Hi Gcenty! I noticed your draft, Draft:Aroflux, and wanted to say I'm always excited to see people trying to expand coverage of aromantic and asexual concepts/topics/people on Wikipedia. However, I did want to let you know that this current draft will likely be declined due to sourcing. Wikipedia is very particular about ensuring that information is sourced to reliable sources, and Fandom wikis are considered unreliable because they can be edited by anyone at any time. To improve your draft, I'd suggest checking out WP:Notability to ensure the subject qualifies, and WP:Reliable sources for specific guidance on how to figure out if a source should be used in an article or not. Generally, I'd suggest looking for articles from established news sources, magazines, or academic journals, and try to avoid company websites, blogs, or social media sites. Even if this draft ultimately isn't able to be published at this time, I hope you stick around. You can also check out Wikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studies if you're interested in helping to improve LGBT articles more broadly. Let me know if you have any questions, and best of luck! :) ForsythiaJo ( talk) 03:03, 23 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cerebellum was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at List of mental disorders instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of all mental disorders described in the DSM-5 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cerebellum ( talk) 12:06, 23 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bilorv was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:MEDRS: there's a very high standard of sourcing for anything medical-related, like psychological conditions or phenomena. A TED talk and some news pieces that don't use the term "glass children" do not form a solid basis for a Wikipedia article. What does the medical literature say on this? Is there some alternate phrase more widely in use amongst experts?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Glass children and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Bilorv ( talk) 17:21, 23 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aroflux and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic ( talk) 19:41, 23 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Armenian Soviet Socialist Republic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 127th Motor Rifle Division. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, -- DPL bot ( talk) 13:37, 25 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Be careful not to wp:overlink. Examples of unnecessary links: epithet and LGBT. Malignancy links to an article about cancer, not malignant language. Thank you Adakiko ( talk) 21:34, 9 February 2024 (UTC) reply

• Article is Dehumanization. Adakiko ( talk) 21:35, 9 February 2024 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Vidkun Quisling

added a link pointing to Orthodox Christianity

Wenceslas Cobergher

added a link pointing to Musée des Beaux-Arts

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:08, 13 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi, I noticed that quite a few of your recent edits are removing redlinks (wikilinks to articles that don't currently exist). Those links aren't "broken". Please read WP:REDDEAL to learn when it is and isn't appropriate to remove a redlink. Hope that helps! Schazjmd  (talk) 17:30, 19 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Thank you! My bad! Gcenty ( talk) 01:16, 20 February 2024 (UTC) reply