From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Aidan MacLean, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Gscshoyru ( talk) 15:34, 31 March 2011 (UTC) reply

March 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Eiffel Tower, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Gscshoyru ( talk) 15:19, 31 March 2011 (UTC) reply

Actually, I just removed "&nspb" which was in between a word. How was the vandalism? -- Aidan MacLean ( talk) 15:21, 31 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Take a look at the diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Eiffel_Tower&diff=prev&oldid=421659800 . That was not all that was changed, though your other changes may have been unintentional. Sorry if they were -- I just saw the weird symbols and hit the revert button. Gscshoyru ( talk) 15:26, 31 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Alright. How did that happen? XD 'm new to wikipedia, how long have you been here? -- Aidan MacLean ( talk) 15:28, 31 March 2011 (UTC) reply
I have no idea how that happened. Somethings things mess up, albeit very rarely. I fixed it the way you wanted it, anyways -- I think. As for me, been here on and off for a while -- years. Usually I do vandal fighting -- which is how we ended up here. Gscshoyru ( talk) 15:34, 31 March 2011 (UTC) reply

Note

Aidan, I'm about to make some changes to your userpage. They are for your own good; please read this page to understand why.

I apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. DS ( talk) 03:31, 16 April 2011 (UTC) reply

Recent move

Hi. I recommend that you read Wikipedia:Neutral point of view so as to understand why your recent undiscussed move of Christian mythology was completely inappropriate and will be shortly undone. —chaos5023 ( talk) 21:32, 11 May 2011 (UTC) reply

Christian mythology

I've reverted your edit. A myth is not "a false story," but "a sacred story that attempts to explain how the world came to be." Otherwise, C.S. Lewis would not have said "the story of Christ is simply a true myth." Also, Wikipedia does not push any viewpoint, religious or irreligious. It is the reader's decision what the truth is. You may want to review this essay on the NPOV guidelines and Christianity. Ian.thomson ( talk) 21:36, 11 May 2011 (UTC) reply

May 2011

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Christianity. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Alanraywiki ( talk) 21:38, 11 May 2011 (UTC) reply

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. FaktneviM ( talk) 10:15, 12 May 2011 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Aidan MacLean, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Gscshoyru ( talk) 15:34, 31 March 2011 (UTC) reply

March 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Eiffel Tower, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Gscshoyru ( talk) 15:19, 31 March 2011 (UTC) reply

Actually, I just removed "&nspb" which was in between a word. How was the vandalism? -- Aidan MacLean ( talk) 15:21, 31 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Take a look at the diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Eiffel_Tower&diff=prev&oldid=421659800 . That was not all that was changed, though your other changes may have been unintentional. Sorry if they were -- I just saw the weird symbols and hit the revert button. Gscshoyru ( talk) 15:26, 31 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Alright. How did that happen? XD 'm new to wikipedia, how long have you been here? -- Aidan MacLean ( talk) 15:28, 31 March 2011 (UTC) reply
I have no idea how that happened. Somethings things mess up, albeit very rarely. I fixed it the way you wanted it, anyways -- I think. As for me, been here on and off for a while -- years. Usually I do vandal fighting -- which is how we ended up here. Gscshoyru ( talk) 15:34, 31 March 2011 (UTC) reply

Note

Aidan, I'm about to make some changes to your userpage. They are for your own good; please read this page to understand why.

I apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. DS ( talk) 03:31, 16 April 2011 (UTC) reply

Recent move

Hi. I recommend that you read Wikipedia:Neutral point of view so as to understand why your recent undiscussed move of Christian mythology was completely inappropriate and will be shortly undone. —chaos5023 ( talk) 21:32, 11 May 2011 (UTC) reply

Christian mythology

I've reverted your edit. A myth is not "a false story," but "a sacred story that attempts to explain how the world came to be." Otherwise, C.S. Lewis would not have said "the story of Christ is simply a true myth." Also, Wikipedia does not push any viewpoint, religious or irreligious. It is the reader's decision what the truth is. You may want to review this essay on the NPOV guidelines and Christianity. Ian.thomson ( talk) 21:36, 11 May 2011 (UTC) reply

May 2011

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Christianity. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Alanraywiki ( talk) 21:38, 11 May 2011 (UTC) reply

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. FaktneviM ( talk) 10:15, 12 May 2011 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook