Thank you for experimenting with the page Donald Trump on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -- William S. Saturn ( talk) 18:10, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I saw your addition at Fascism in North America, and I've reverted it. I know that there have been some (well-deserved) comparisons between Trump and Hitler in the news, but outright calling Trump a fascist, without very strong evidence, goes against the biographies of living people policy. It might be possible to include some of these comparisons in the Trump article, or in his campaign article, but with the source attributed - see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view#Attributing and specifying biased statements for the general idea. In the Fascism in North America article, though, merely including Trump at all is tantamount to saying that he is a fascist, so that's probably a no-go, until/unless he goes down in the history books as an actual fascist. (But it's not Wikipedians that write the history books - it's historians.) All the best — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 02:42, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for experimenting with the page Donald Trump on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -- William S. Saturn ( talk) 18:10, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I saw your addition at Fascism in North America, and I've reverted it. I know that there have been some (well-deserved) comparisons between Trump and Hitler in the news, but outright calling Trump a fascist, without very strong evidence, goes against the biographies of living people policy. It might be possible to include some of these comparisons in the Trump article, or in his campaign article, but with the source attributed - see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view#Attributing and specifying biased statements for the general idea. In the Fascism in North America article, though, merely including Trump at all is tantamount to saying that he is a fascist, so that's probably a no-go, until/unless he goes down in the history books as an actual fascist. (But it's not Wikipedians that write the history books - it's historians.) All the best — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 02:42, 14 November 2016 (UTC)