Welcome to Wikipedia, Foxtrot620! Thank you for
your contributions. I am
Dougweller and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on
my talk page. You can also check out
Wikipedia:Questions or type {{
helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
Dougweller ( talk) 07:46, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
Regarding the situation at Malcolm Archer, I believe Paulus Domum and 2A02:A469:4131:1:255D:9E4:EC8:9144 are the same person. I'm not familiar with the CheckUser process; do you think it would be appropriate to request one or is it too small to worry about? {{u| Bowler the Carmine}} (he/him | talk) 22:10, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for reaching out! I think the protection will be sufficient to stop the issue. If it continues, I think proposing a edit block on both accounts will fix the issue. Foxtrot620 ( talk) 22:16, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find
Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the
sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a
vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you.
47.227.95.73 (
talk) 23:26, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
In good faith, the following message is retained. To be clear, the edit was a speedy deletion proposal that was fully valid under the guidelines, but, I don't believe in removing or blanking notices and warnings, even those given improperly:
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to
Harvey Manger-Weil, did not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your
sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on
my talk page. Pls stop messing up the page. This is uncalled for. Be warned!
Padibso (
talk) 00:01, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Where in the cited source does it describe the discovery of the first bones? I can't seem to find it. Brendansoloughlin ( talk) 05:54, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- On the first page, in the last paragraph, quote "Fossils of this Penguin were originally found by one of us (CGC) in the locality in 1980"
- Hope this helps!! Foxtrot620 ( talk) 05:59, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
The Last Flight of Dr. Ain moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to The Last Flight of Dr. Ain. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 02:16, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: The Last Flight of Dr. Ain has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
asilvering ( talk) 04:37, 30 April 2023 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: War in the 20th Century has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Rusalkii ( talk) 05:00, 4 May 2023 (UTC)CS1 error on War
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
War, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A " missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. ( Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can (bot)§ion=new report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 17:15, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
I am not sure why or how you are creating a speedy delete for an item created in 2008.
The creator of the article has not edited since 2021.
I have long moved on from anything to do with such subjects or issues,
I do not see why there is any need for a speedy.
I would be fascinated to see a reasoning for such a particular process at this point.
JarrahTree 07:59, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- Also reasoning in edit summaries is not how wikipedia works - edit summaries are usually lost before you start, and many editors leave vast amounts of text in them unaware that such arguments/components of arguments are relatively pointless, as it is not where a reasonable conversation with other editors can proceed. I have no interest in the article in any way, but I am quite concerned that the demise of the article is not adequately covered by what I would call reasonable process as understood by general practices in wikipedia. I did not have the item on my watch list, and will be very unlikely to respond or show any interest in the article or subject further than this comment. Best of luck, and bye bye. JarrahTree 08:15, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
I have declined your A7 on Mak Erot. The standard for A7 is not notability as you seem to think based on your note on the article talk page. The article need only make a credible claim of significance to clear the very low bar of A7. In this case the presence of reliable sources reporting on the subject means that it is not eligible for A7. Please read and understand the CSD|criteria for speedy deletion. -- Whpq ( talk) 11:44, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, Foxtrot620! Thank you for
your contributions. I am
Dougweller and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on
my talk page. You can also check out
Wikipedia:Questions or type {{
helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
Dougweller ( talk) 07:46, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
Regarding the situation at Malcolm Archer, I believe Paulus Domum and 2A02:A469:4131:1:255D:9E4:EC8:9144 are the same person. I'm not familiar with the CheckUser process; do you think it would be appropriate to request one or is it too small to worry about? {{u| Bowler the Carmine}} (he/him | talk) 22:10, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for reaching out! I think the protection will be sufficient to stop the issue. If it continues, I think proposing a edit block on both accounts will fix the issue. Foxtrot620 ( talk) 22:16, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find
Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the
sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a
vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you.
47.227.95.73 (
talk) 23:26, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
In good faith, the following message is retained. To be clear, the edit was a speedy deletion proposal that was fully valid under the guidelines, but, I don't believe in removing or blanking notices and warnings, even those given improperly:
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to
Harvey Manger-Weil, did not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your
sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on
my talk page. Pls stop messing up the page. This is uncalled for. Be warned!
Padibso (
talk) 00:01, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Where in the cited source does it describe the discovery of the first bones? I can't seem to find it. Brendansoloughlin ( talk) 05:54, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- On the first page, in the last paragraph, quote "Fossils of this Penguin were originally found by one of us (CGC) in the locality in 1980"
- Hope this helps!! Foxtrot620 ( talk) 05:59, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
The Last Flight of Dr. Ain moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to The Last Flight of Dr. Ain. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 02:16, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: The Last Flight of Dr. Ain has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
asilvering ( talk) 04:37, 30 April 2023 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: War in the 20th Century has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Rusalkii ( talk) 05:00, 4 May 2023 (UTC)CS1 error on War
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
War, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A " missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. ( Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can (bot)§ion=new report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 17:15, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
I am not sure why or how you are creating a speedy delete for an item created in 2008.
The creator of the article has not edited since 2021.
I have long moved on from anything to do with such subjects or issues,
I do not see why there is any need for a speedy.
I would be fascinated to see a reasoning for such a particular process at this point.
JarrahTree 07:59, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- Also reasoning in edit summaries is not how wikipedia works - edit summaries are usually lost before you start, and many editors leave vast amounts of text in them unaware that such arguments/components of arguments are relatively pointless, as it is not where a reasonable conversation with other editors can proceed. I have no interest in the article in any way, but I am quite concerned that the demise of the article is not adequately covered by what I would call reasonable process as understood by general practices in wikipedia. I did not have the item on my watch list, and will be very unlikely to respond or show any interest in the article or subject further than this comment. Best of luck, and bye bye. JarrahTree 08:15, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
I have declined your A7 on Mak Erot. The standard for A7 is not notability as you seem to think based on your note on the article talk page. The article need only make a credible claim of significance to clear the very low bar of A7. In this case the presence of reliable sources reporting on the subject means that it is not eligible for A7. Please read and understand the CSD|criteria for speedy deletion. -- Whpq ( talk) 11:44, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)