Welcome!

Hello, Fissionfox, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -- Kf4bdy 08:54, 12 January 2006 (UTC) reply

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Eyeless (song). If you continue to do so, it may be considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

• I deleted a link to a page which contained nothing except a talk page entry (which still exists), and created a redirect. Fissionfox 06:40, 1 February 2007 (UTC) reply

I think I'm talking about a different edit than you...within one minute you made two related edits:

• This one [1] wisely removing a link from Slipknot (album) to Eyeless (song) which would've redirected people back to Slipknot (album)
• This one [2] blanking Eyeless (song), which until your edit contained a potentially useful redirect (created in accordance with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diluted (song))

Perhaps the page linking to itself via a redirect had confused you - I cannot see this being deliberate blanking vandalism, a genuine mistake seems far more likely - I've struck through my original warning above, and would like to appologise for assuming malice for what seems to have been an error. Davidprior 23:27, 4 February 2007 (UTC) reply

• No problem :) Fissionfox 07:10, 5 February 2007 (UTC) reply

I reverted your edit; 'remnant' is one of those words that is, in fact, spelled just like that. Just thought I'd let you know! PaladinWhite 11:49, 6 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Ok, sorry I thought it was spelt differently :) ^Talk User:Fissionfox 11:51, 6 April 2007 (UTC) reply

No worries at all, in fact I had an experience just like this just the other day and another editor had to point it out to me. We all live and learn =D PaladinWhite 12:06, 6 April 2007 (UTC) reply

True :D ^Talk User:Fissionfox 12:07, 6 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks for using sources. Just as a tiny tip I'd suggest reading WP:Rot. Happy editing! :) Devourer09 ( t· c) 00:19, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply

Cheers mate, but I'm just wondering how that link fits in with the WP:Rot policy? Would a link from a news agency be preferable? ^Talk User:Fissionfox 05:56, 17 October 2010 (UTC) reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wreak Havoc. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 10#Wreak Havoc until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 09:13, 10 July 2020 (UTC) reply