Now resolved. Felixphew ( talk) 06:26, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
If you have come to protest against my Doge petition, tell it to the Shiba Inu talk page.
Will you please not screw around with my writing? Thank you very much. Drmies ( talk) 02:43, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
You nominated an article for FA consideration at Talk:Wikipedia, but neglected to start an FAC subpage discussion as laid out in the instructions at WP:FAC, so I removed the nomination template from the talk page.
If you wish to nominate it, please follow all the instructions at WP:FAC.
Thank you,
— Cirt ( talk) 13:31, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Union (American Civil War) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden ( talk) 07:21, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
I hate to be a pain, but is there a timescale for when you think you'll be done? Do you need a hand at all? Adam Cuerden ( talk) 20:28, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
The article Union (American Civil War) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Union (American Civil War) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 3family6 -- 3family6 ( talk) 23:21, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
The article Union (American Civil War) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Union (American Civil War) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 3family6 -- 3family6 ( talk) 04:01, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
Now resolved. Felixphew ( talk) 06:26, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
If you have come to protest against my Doge petition, tell it to the Shiba Inu talk page.
Will you please not screw around with my writing? Thank you very much. Drmies ( talk) 02:43, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
You nominated an article for FA consideration at Talk:Wikipedia, but neglected to start an FAC subpage discussion as laid out in the instructions at WP:FAC, so I removed the nomination template from the talk page.
If you wish to nominate it, please follow all the instructions at WP:FAC.
Thank you,
— Cirt ( talk) 13:31, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Union (American Civil War) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden ( talk) 07:21, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
I hate to be a pain, but is there a timescale for when you think you'll be done? Do you need a hand at all? Adam Cuerden ( talk) 20:28, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
The article Union (American Civil War) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Union (American Civil War) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 3family6 -- 3family6 ( talk) 23:21, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
The article Union (American Civil War) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Union (American Civil War) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 3family6 -- 3family6 ( talk) 04:01, 29 January 2015 (UTC)