Welcome!
Hello, Eduardog3000, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!
Shashwat986 (
talk) 16:15, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to
attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. -
Realkyhick (
Talk to me) 19:37, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia as doing so is not in accordance with our
policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read
Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the
Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
ScottyBerg (
talk) 19:42, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
Hello, Eduardog3000. I hope you don't mind but I had to revert a change you made to the Stephen Hawking article. According to WP:MOSHEAD, section headings in Wikipedia use sentence case rather than title case. Scwlong ( talk) 20:35, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Dan Brown (YouTube)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Dan Brown (YouTube) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. MikeWazowski ( talk) 15:00, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Dan Brown (YouTube) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dan Brown (YouTube) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Brown (YouTube)(2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. MikeWazowski ( talk) 15:16, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Lugia2453. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of
your recent contributions, such as the one you made with
this edit to
February 6, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Lugia2453 (
talk) 21:21, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
Please do not create humorous redirects, as you did with List of bern centers in the United States. While it is cute, this is seen as vandalism on Wikipedia and isn't a plausible redirect. Maybe if Sanders picks up on this and uses it in his campaign it might be plausible, but until then this just shouldn't be added. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:04, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
— Wei4Green | 唯绿远大 ( talk) 08:26, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, maybe I'm wrong, but I think that Sanders 2020 logo is a bit darker than the 2016 version, as you can see here. -- Nick.mon ( talk) 22:23, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- His logo comes in a lot of color combinations, that one is just on his store. Unfortunately the only copies of the logo hosted on his website right now are that one which has been up for a while, and was edited from the original to be a store logo, and the one on the homepage which is all white. His announcement videos actually used an alternate version where "Bernie" is blue but the top stripe is white and the middle is transparent.
[1] We should wait for official campaign material to start coming out.
The 2016 SVG is actually from a Flyer PDF from his site. --
eduardog3000 (
talk) 22:32, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- @ Nick.mon: Ok, I actually found a recent SVG copy of his logo on his campaign signup page. [2] It does have different colors, so I've uploaded it as File:Bernie_Sanders_2020_logo.svg. -- eduardog3000 ( talk) 23:14, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
References
Hello,
I noticed that you reverted my edits to the 2020 Democratic Primaries election article. I have found many reliable third-party sources reporting Beto O’Rourke’s official announcement today regarding his run and campaign for presidency. Thanks Mrbeastmodeallday ( talk) 04:37, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- He hasn't announced quite yet. He is currently listed in a section for candidates who have scheduled announcements, with sources for that. Once he actually announces later today (probably wait until he posts something about it to social media, or if you get an email from him confirming it) you can move him to the table. Please try to keep with the format of the table, and use the "Show preview" button instead of Publishing the changes then correcting mistakes afterward. -- eduardog3000 ( talk) 04:46, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
- Mr X 🖋 16:19, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi Eduardog3000.Y ou are only allowed to make on revert in 24 hours on 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries. You made two. I'm not sure why you ignored the prominent notice at the top of the editing window, but please don't do it again or you may be blocked from editing or topic banned.- Mr X 🖋 16:24, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry, that slipped my mind as those were in different waking periods. I'll be more careful about that. -- eduardog3000 ( talk) 18:05, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
 | Hello! Voting in the
2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
I wanted to apologize to you for briefly deleting your controversy section on Draft: Joshua Collins. The section has validity, and I have re-added it with some small edits. I am also personally sympathetic to the Collins campaign, though trying to keep this bias out of my edits as best as I can. I have been on enough political pages recently that have had unnecessary controversy sections added, and have gotten into a habit of purging them. However, I never want to become one of the people who just deletes things off Wikipedia. (They're one of the things I don't like on here.) So, I apologize for deleting your valid edit, I have done my best to correct it, and thank you for making the Wikipedia community better. PickleG13 ( talk) 21:28, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- @ PickleG13: All good, the edits you just made to it are pretty good imo. -- eduardog3000 ( talk) 21:30, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of MPs elected in the 2019 United Kingdom general election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike Hill. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:14, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Super Thursday (disambiguation), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2011 United Kingdom elections.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:52, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
an ARCA clarified a doubt in the area.
The 30 day / 500 restriction (often dubbed Arbpia) is on the talk page notice and on another one that you see when you edit an article falling under those sanctions. If you are not extended confirmed (30/500) then you can't take part in formal discussions about that article (so, RFC, RM, AfD and so on).
A pain. Get your 500/30 and you can stop worrying about it. Selfstudier ( talk) 17:35, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in the Balkans or Eastern Europe. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{
Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the
guidance on discretionary sanctions and the
Arbitration Committee's decision
here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
TylerBurden ( talk) 15:24, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Cambial —
foliar❧ 20:37, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
I really appreciate that you found my comments on Talk:2023 Israel-Hamas war helpful. I see that my post has since been deleted per ARBPIA, but you are welcome to take them from the talk page history and post them under your own name, with or without attribution! Thanks again, and sorry to clutter your talk page :) WillowCity ( talk) 17:30, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
|
| This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Uyghurs, Uyghur genocide, or topics that are related to Uyghurs or Uyghur genocide. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 22:47, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
You have recently made edits related to the
Arab–Israeli conflict. This is a standard message to inform you that the
Arab–Israeli conflict is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Contentious topics are the successor to the former discretionary sanctions system, which you may be aware of. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see
Wikipedia:Contentious topics. For a summary of difference between the former and new system, see
WP:CTVSDS. —
Red-tailed hawk
(nest) 22:55, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Kite Man Hell Yeah!.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:20, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Eduardog3000, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!
Shashwat986 (
talk) 16:15, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to
attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. -
Realkyhick (
Talk to me) 19:37, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia as doing so is not in accordance with our
policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read
Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the
Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
ScottyBerg (
talk) 19:42, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
Hello, Eduardog3000. I hope you don't mind but I had to revert a change you made to the Stephen Hawking article. According to WP:MOSHEAD, section headings in Wikipedia use sentence case rather than title case. Scwlong ( talk) 20:35, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Dan Brown (YouTube)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Dan Brown (YouTube) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. MikeWazowski ( talk) 15:00, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Dan Brown (YouTube) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dan Brown (YouTube) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Brown (YouTube)(2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. MikeWazowski ( talk) 15:16, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Lugia2453. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of
your recent contributions, such as the one you made with
this edit to
February 6, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Lugia2453 (
talk) 21:21, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
Please do not create humorous redirects, as you did with List of bern centers in the United States. While it is cute, this is seen as vandalism on Wikipedia and isn't a plausible redirect. Maybe if Sanders picks up on this and uses it in his campaign it might be plausible, but until then this just shouldn't be added. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:04, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
— Wei4Green | 唯绿远大 ( talk) 08:26, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, maybe I'm wrong, but I think that Sanders 2020 logo is a bit darker than the 2016 version, as you can see here. -- Nick.mon ( talk) 22:23, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- His logo comes in a lot of color combinations, that one is just on his store. Unfortunately the only copies of the logo hosted on his website right now are that one which has been up for a while, and was edited from the original to be a store logo, and the one on the homepage which is all white. His announcement videos actually used an alternate version where "Bernie" is blue but the top stripe is white and the middle is transparent.
[1] We should wait for official campaign material to start coming out.
The 2016 SVG is actually from a Flyer PDF from his site. --
eduardog3000 (
talk) 22:32, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- @ Nick.mon: Ok, I actually found a recent SVG copy of his logo on his campaign signup page. [2] It does have different colors, so I've uploaded it as File:Bernie_Sanders_2020_logo.svg. -- eduardog3000 ( talk) 23:14, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
References
Hello,
I noticed that you reverted my edits to the 2020 Democratic Primaries election article. I have found many reliable third-party sources reporting Beto O’Rourke’s official announcement today regarding his run and campaign for presidency. Thanks Mrbeastmodeallday ( talk) 04:37, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- He hasn't announced quite yet. He is currently listed in a section for candidates who have scheduled announcements, with sources for that. Once he actually announces later today (probably wait until he posts something about it to social media, or if you get an email from him confirming it) you can move him to the table. Please try to keep with the format of the table, and use the "Show preview" button instead of Publishing the changes then correcting mistakes afterward. -- eduardog3000 ( talk) 04:46, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
- Mr X 🖋 16:19, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi Eduardog3000.Y ou are only allowed to make on revert in 24 hours on 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries. You made two. I'm not sure why you ignored the prominent notice at the top of the editing window, but please don't do it again or you may be blocked from editing or topic banned.- Mr X 🖋 16:24, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry, that slipped my mind as those were in different waking periods. I'll be more careful about that. -- eduardog3000 ( talk) 18:05, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
I wanted to apologize to you for briefly deleting your controversy section on Draft: Joshua Collins. The section has validity, and I have re-added it with some small edits. I am also personally sympathetic to the Collins campaign, though trying to keep this bias out of my edits as best as I can. I have been on enough political pages recently that have had unnecessary controversy sections added, and have gotten into a habit of purging them. However, I never want to become one of the people who just deletes things off Wikipedia. (They're one of the things I don't like on here.) So, I apologize for deleting your valid edit, I have done my best to correct it, and thank you for making the Wikipedia community better. PickleG13 ( talk) 21:28, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- @ PickleG13: All good, the edits you just made to it are pretty good imo. -- eduardog3000 ( talk) 21:30, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of MPs elected in the 2019 United Kingdom general election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike Hill. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:14, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Super Thursday (disambiguation), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2011 United Kingdom elections.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:52, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
an ARCA clarified a doubt in the area.
The 30 day / 500 restriction (often dubbed Arbpia) is on the talk page notice and on another one that you see when you edit an article falling under those sanctions. If you are not extended confirmed (30/500) then you can't take part in formal discussions about that article (so, RFC, RM, AfD and so on).
A pain. Get your 500/30 and you can stop worrying about it. Selfstudier ( talk) 17:35, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in the Balkans or Eastern Europe. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{
Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the
guidance on discretionary sanctions and the
Arbitration Committee's decision
here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
TylerBurden ( talk) 15:24, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Cambial —
foliar❧ 20:37, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
I really appreciate that you found my comments on Talk:2023 Israel-Hamas war helpful. I see that my post has since been deleted per ARBPIA, but you are welcome to take them from the talk page history and post them under your own name, with or without attribution! Thanks again, and sorry to clutter your talk page :) WillowCity ( talk) 17:30, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
|
| This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Uyghurs, Uyghur genocide, or topics that are related to Uyghurs or Uyghur genocide. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 22:47, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
You have recently made edits related to the
Arab–Israeli conflict. This is a standard message to inform you that the
Arab–Israeli conflict is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Contentious topics are the successor to the former discretionary sanctions system, which you may be aware of. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see
Wikipedia:Contentious topics. For a summary of difference between the former and new system, see
WP:CTVSDS. —
Red-tailed hawk
(nest) 22:55, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Kite Man Hell Yeah!.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:20, 19 January 2024 (UTC)