The
Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up
here by 23:59 (UTC) on September 14!
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 22:02, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
The
August 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 22:57, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Ed- I can't summarize it easily enough to reference a specific unit other than the 3 brigades that received direct attention as examples. I'm assigned to the 43rd Sustainment Brigade and am prepping for deployment. Mikeofv ( talk) 20:07, 3 September 2008 (UTC)mikeofv
- Are you trying to use it as a source on an article or trying to make an article about it? The book seems fairly streightforeward, it is history of how Brigades have been structured in the US Armed forces, how many there have been, and how they were used as units of deployment. - Ed! (talk) (Hall of Fame) 21:29, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Why did you mark this page with {{ Refimprove}} when every one of the citations already had its reference given? Urhixidur ( talk) 01:48, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
- Because they aren't in the proper format. per
WP:CITE, the references need to be parenthetical citations that identify the web site, author, access date, and so on, of the source. -
Ed!
(talk)
(Hall of Fame) 02:51, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
- I think this can be easily fixed by changing {{ MPCit_JPL}}. I don't think we should make the inline parenthetical citation link to a References section, as this would grossly overburden the Meanings of asteroid names pages. In any case, the JPL SDB page is itself only a "redirect" of sorts, the true citation being the MPC (Minor Planet Circular)—which aren't available online. Urhixidur ( talk) 15:00, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
- Tricky, this. We can change the dagger for the string "JPL SDB" or "NASA JPL SDB", but there is no good date to put in, since those pages are updated all the time. Most pertinent would be the "Last Updated" date given on the "Reference: DISCOVERY.DB" line, but we're going to need some automated way of extracting this. Remember that there are nearly 15,000 named asteroids: I'm not about to do this manually! Do you know someone who could write a Perl script to do this? (I think Perl can do it, but I'm not sure) Urhixidur ( talk) 15:07, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
The September 2008
Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fourteen candidates. Please
vote here by September 30!
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 21:50, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
We've had a rather large bombshell dropped on us. The Wikipedia editorial team are aiming to release a version of Wikipedia on CD/DVD in time for the end of year holiday season. They've provided us with a list of 1333 Milhist articles they intend including.
The problem is that the quality of these articles varies considerably.
We've put together review page listing all the articles, in twenty-five article worklists. I'm hoping that 15-20 trusted editors can work through the list, weedying out problem articles and identifying suitable versions for release. The work is as far away from a tagging and assessing drive as you can imagine though, for convenience and ease of use, we've closely followed the traditional Milhist drive format.
This is, at the moment, an invitation-only review. The reason is that time is short and we can't afford too many mistakes. I'm only contacting experienced editors who performed very well indeed in the last two Milhist drives. I guess that working through a worklist of twenty-five articles will take between one and three hours to do. We're aiming to get the preliminary work done by next Sunday, so it's urgent too.
I do hope you can help but – if it's not too much trouble – if you are unable to participate at the moment, would you please let me know on my talk page? otherwise, please sign up here. Thank you for your time, -- ROGER DAVIES talk 17:22, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
The
September 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 22:27, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
The
October 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 23:48, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
The
November 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 16:19, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Hey there! My books mostly cover the WWII period, but I have some limited stuff on Vietnam airmobile operations as well. It depends how much detail you want; I could give you a couple of paragraphs on Corregidor in the WWII section and maybe some extra details on Vietnam. What level of detail were you thinking of? Skinny87 ( talk) 08:08, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- I've replied, luckily we can pillage dtuff from the Battle of Dak To. YellowMonkey ( bananabucket) 05:06, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
K50 Dude The Great is wishing you a
Merry
Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!
Have a great holiday, and an eventful new year!
Excellent work on those separate Army Brigades! I was wondering if you'd like to tackle the 198th Infantry Brigade. The 198th currently serves as Infantry OSUT BCT/AIT. Hal06 ( talk) 13:07, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
- Hello. Yes, that Brigade would fall under my expertise, but I have a backup of GANs and Peer reviews going on right now that I'm trying to get out of the way before my busy holiday season, so I've been trying to get those taken care of first. I would like to do some work on it, though. There are probably a few good sources I get on that Brigade, too. - Ed! (talk) (Hall of Fame) 22:18, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for the barnstar! I always enjoy reviewing your GANs, as they are well-written, well-referenced and well-organized. Keep up the good work! Dana boomer ( talk) 14:12, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
The
December 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 02:45, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
hey! if ou are still searching for sources citing that the 172nd was transformed to a infantry brigade combat team, here are two: TFM website, army.mil. greetings from germany -- Tafkas ( talk) 20:54, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
|
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
| You work to a supurb level. This is yours! K50 Dude ROCKS! 17:57, 31 January 2009 (UTC) |
- Thank you very much! It's good to see one's work appreciated. - Ed! (talk) (Hall of Fame) 17:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
The
January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 03:40, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
The
February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 22:07, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
The
Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up
here by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March!
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 18:42, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
The
Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please
vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 00:44, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
The
March 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 02:26, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:OU Baker Center Exterior.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate
copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{
PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{
self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag
here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 02:23, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi Ed, I found the unit insignia and shoulder patches of all ever existing US military formations at www.vetshome.com, which based its work on the U.S. Army Patches, Flashes and Ovals book, which contains over 3600 unit insignias. (if you go to www.vetshome.com, scroll down and then after about 1.5 screens on the left side appears a listing of all the various patches down to Military Medical Company Patch level :-) -- noclador ( talk) 06:24, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for offering to help with the article. While this article seems to be in great shape, I could use some help with improving articles on or related to the Buffalo Soldiers, specifically the 92nd and 93rd divisions. Dodgerblue777 ( talk) 04:52, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- OK then. Pending my work on the first two division articles, I'll see what I can do about these two. Any help would be appreciated. - Ed! (talk) 13:53, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi mate, I am currently undertaking the GA Review for 7th Infantry Division (United States). I have left some comments on the review page attached to the talk page. Could you please take a look and get back to me. I have included a section for your responses at the bottom on the review page, so please feel free to edit the review page. It's looking good so far. Cheers. — AustralianRupert ( talk) 05:51, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- I've fixed two of the three problems you noted. As for the third, I'll look over the article later and try to fix what I find in terms of passive voice. -
Ed!
(talk) 15:59, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- I think I have fixed everything you pointed out to me. -
Ed!
(talk) 18:37, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- Hi, mate. Good work. Sorry it took a while for me to get back to. I got busy fixing one of my own articles up for GA. Its a bit 'jack' but I hope you will understand. I've passed the article for GA now. Nice work. — AustralianRupert ( talk) 12:12, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- I think I have fixed everything you pointed out to me. -
Ed!
(talk) 18:37, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
The
Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up
here by 23:59 (UTC) on September 14!
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 22:02, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
The
August 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 22:57, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Ed- I can't summarize it easily enough to reference a specific unit other than the 3 brigades that received direct attention as examples. I'm assigned to the 43rd Sustainment Brigade and am prepping for deployment. Mikeofv ( talk) 20:07, 3 September 2008 (UTC)mikeofv
- Are you trying to use it as a source on an article or trying to make an article about it? The book seems fairly streightforeward, it is history of how Brigades have been structured in the US Armed forces, how many there have been, and how they were used as units of deployment. - Ed! (talk) (Hall of Fame) 21:29, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Why did you mark this page with {{ Refimprove}} when every one of the citations already had its reference given? Urhixidur ( talk) 01:48, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
- Because they aren't in the proper format. per
WP:CITE, the references need to be parenthetical citations that identify the web site, author, access date, and so on, of the source. -
Ed!
(talk)
(Hall of Fame) 02:51, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
- I think this can be easily fixed by changing {{ MPCit_JPL}}. I don't think we should make the inline parenthetical citation link to a References section, as this would grossly overburden the Meanings of asteroid names pages. In any case, the JPL SDB page is itself only a "redirect" of sorts, the true citation being the MPC (Minor Planet Circular)—which aren't available online. Urhixidur ( talk) 15:00, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
- Tricky, this. We can change the dagger for the string "JPL SDB" or "NASA JPL SDB", but there is no good date to put in, since those pages are updated all the time. Most pertinent would be the "Last Updated" date given on the "Reference: DISCOVERY.DB" line, but we're going to need some automated way of extracting this. Remember that there are nearly 15,000 named asteroids: I'm not about to do this manually! Do you know someone who could write a Perl script to do this? (I think Perl can do it, but I'm not sure) Urhixidur ( talk) 15:07, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
The September 2008
Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fourteen candidates. Please
vote here by September 30!
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 21:50, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
We've had a rather large bombshell dropped on us. The Wikipedia editorial team are aiming to release a version of Wikipedia on CD/DVD in time for the end of year holiday season. They've provided us with a list of 1333 Milhist articles they intend including.
The problem is that the quality of these articles varies considerably.
We've put together review page listing all the articles, in twenty-five article worklists. I'm hoping that 15-20 trusted editors can work through the list, weedying out problem articles and identifying suitable versions for release. The work is as far away from a tagging and assessing drive as you can imagine though, for convenience and ease of use, we've closely followed the traditional Milhist drive format.
This is, at the moment, an invitation-only review. The reason is that time is short and we can't afford too many mistakes. I'm only contacting experienced editors who performed very well indeed in the last two Milhist drives. I guess that working through a worklist of twenty-five articles will take between one and three hours to do. We're aiming to get the preliminary work done by next Sunday, so it's urgent too.
I do hope you can help but – if it's not too much trouble – if you are unable to participate at the moment, would you please let me know on my talk page? otherwise, please sign up here. Thank you for your time, -- ROGER DAVIES talk 17:22, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
The
September 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 22:27, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
The
October 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 23:48, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
The
November 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 16:19, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Hey there! My books mostly cover the WWII period, but I have some limited stuff on Vietnam airmobile operations as well. It depends how much detail you want; I could give you a couple of paragraphs on Corregidor in the WWII section and maybe some extra details on Vietnam. What level of detail were you thinking of? Skinny87 ( talk) 08:08, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- I've replied, luckily we can pillage dtuff from the Battle of Dak To. YellowMonkey ( bananabucket) 05:06, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
K50 Dude The Great is wishing you a
Merry
Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!
Have a great holiday, and an eventful new year!
Excellent work on those separate Army Brigades! I was wondering if you'd like to tackle the 198th Infantry Brigade. The 198th currently serves as Infantry OSUT BCT/AIT. Hal06 ( talk) 13:07, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
- Hello. Yes, that Brigade would fall under my expertise, but I have a backup of GANs and Peer reviews going on right now that I'm trying to get out of the way before my busy holiday season, so I've been trying to get those taken care of first. I would like to do some work on it, though. There are probably a few good sources I get on that Brigade, too. - Ed! (talk) (Hall of Fame) 22:18, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for the barnstar! I always enjoy reviewing your GANs, as they are well-written, well-referenced and well-organized. Keep up the good work! Dana boomer ( talk) 14:12, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
The
December 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 02:45, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
hey! if ou are still searching for sources citing that the 172nd was transformed to a infantry brigade combat team, here are two: TFM website, army.mil. greetings from germany -- Tafkas ( talk) 20:54, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
|
|
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
| You work to a supurb level. This is yours! K50 Dude ROCKS! 17:57, 31 January 2009 (UTC) |
- Thank you very much! It's good to see one's work appreciated. - Ed! (talk) (Hall of Fame) 17:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
The
January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 03:40, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
The
February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 22:07, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
The
Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up
here by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March!
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 18:42, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
The
Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please
vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 00:44, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
The
March 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 02:26, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:OU Baker Center Exterior.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate
copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{
PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{
self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag
here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 02:23, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi Ed, I found the unit insignia and shoulder patches of all ever existing US military formations at www.vetshome.com, which based its work on the U.S. Army Patches, Flashes and Ovals book, which contains over 3600 unit insignias. (if you go to www.vetshome.com, scroll down and then after about 1.5 screens on the left side appears a listing of all the various patches down to Military Medical Company Patch level :-) -- noclador ( talk) 06:24, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for offering to help with the article. While this article seems to be in great shape, I could use some help with improving articles on or related to the Buffalo Soldiers, specifically the 92nd and 93rd divisions. Dodgerblue777 ( talk) 04:52, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- OK then. Pending my work on the first two division articles, I'll see what I can do about these two. Any help would be appreciated. - Ed! (talk) 13:53, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi mate, I am currently undertaking the GA Review for 7th Infantry Division (United States). I have left some comments on the review page attached to the talk page. Could you please take a look and get back to me. I have included a section for your responses at the bottom on the review page, so please feel free to edit the review page. It's looking good so far. Cheers. — AustralianRupert ( talk) 05:51, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- I've fixed two of the three problems you noted. As for the third, I'll look over the article later and try to fix what I find in terms of passive voice. -
Ed!
(talk) 15:59, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- I think I have fixed everything you pointed out to me. -
Ed!
(talk) 18:37, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- Hi, mate. Good work. Sorry it took a while for me to get back to. I got busy fixing one of my own articles up for GA. Its a bit 'jack' but I hope you will understand. I've passed the article for GA now. Nice work. — AustralianRupert ( talk) 12:12, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- I think I have fixed everything you pointed out to me. -
Ed!
(talk) 18:37, 5 May 2009 (UTC)