Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Donald1972, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

• Be Bold!
• Learn from others
• Play nicely with others
• Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
• Tell us a bit about yourself

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

We're so glad you're here! Marek.69 ^talk 10:17, 1 January 2009 (UTC) reply

Wishing you a Happy New Year for 2009!

I notice that this category you created is unpopulated (empty). In other words, no Wikipedia pages belong to it. If it remains unpopulated for four days, it may be deleted, without discussion, in accordance with Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#C1. I'm notifying you in case you wish to (re-)populate it by adding [[Category:Counts / Erfvoogds (Heritage-Bailiffs) of Erkelenz]] to articles/categories that belong in it.

I blanked the category page. This will not, in itself, cause the category to be deleted. It serves to document (in the page history) that the category was empty at the time of blanking and also to alert other watchers that the category is in jeopardy. You are welcome to revert the blanking if you wish. However, doing so will not prevent deletion if the category remains empty.

If you created the category in error, or it is no longer needed, you can speed up the deletion process by tagging it with {{ db-author}}.

Best regards, -- Stepheng3 ( talk) 20:21, 18 February 2009 (UTC) reply

Same thing with Category:Lords of Aldekerk. -- Stepheng3 ( talk) 18:52, 21 February 2009 (UTC) reply

Same thing with Category:Barons of Gemany. -- Stepheng3 ( talk) 23:37, 23 February 2009 (UTC) reply

Sir David Graaff Hi Matthias, saw you contributed to this article. Good work! As a bearer of the Dutch name of Gr aaff (I'm Arthur), I would be interested to know about your sources and especially the link between the South-African Graaffs and the noble Dutch De Graeff family. My family tree runs to about 1736 and shows no clear relationship to De Graeff, although in those days spelling was very liberal and only since Napoleontic times etc. There is a Graaf f family in Germany, and they owned some train factory. ( http://www.graaff-transportsysteme.de/) If you want to, you can mail me at wikipers (at) gmail (dot) com. Best regards AG —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.87.227.28 ( talk) 14:46, 2 March 2009 (UTC) reply

Good on you for making those articles in the pre 19th century individuals/places etc. We could use a lot more of those. :) Kind regards. Calaka ( talk) 08:27, 23 September 2009 (UTC) reply

jacob de graeff - 1728 Johannes Cornelisz SYLVIUS, predikant, geboren 1563/1564 te Amsterdam, overleden op dinsdag 19 oktober 1638 te Amsterdam, bron: Jaap Bottema. "Het geslacht Sylvius in Stad en Ommeland" tot het begin van de 19e eeuw. In het Groningerland komt men telgen uit dit geslacht tegen met de familienaam Sylvius, Silvius en Zelvius. De spelling moge variëren, doch het zijn allen nazaten van de predikant Johannes Cornelisz. Sylvius, geboren in 1563/1564 te Amsterdam. In Friesland hoedde hij de schapen Christi in Tzummarum en Firdgum (1593-1597), Balk en Harich (1597-1602 en Sloten (1604-1610). Op voorspraak van de Amsterdamse regent Jacob de Graeff, tevens ambachtsheer van Sloten, werd hij in 1610 beroepen naar Amsterdam, waar hij twaalf jaar lang predikant was van de gasthuiskerk. In 1622 werd de Graeff's beschermeling dienaar van het Gods Woord in de Oude Kerk aan de Oudezijds Voorburgwal, waar de De Graeff's hun laatste rustplaats kregen. Hij zou de gemeente dienen tot zijn overlijden op 19 oktober 1638.

Thanks for uploading File:Coat of arms Hooft (Amsterdam).gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 ( talk) 04:55, 24 April 2011 (UTC) reply

Stammliste (Auszug)

1. Maurin van der Does († 1331), ∞ mit Lijsbeth van Voorne (Tochter von Albrecht van Voorne und Catharina von Limburg)
   1. Simon van der Does, ∞ mit Bertha van den Coulster
      1. IJsbrand van der Does († 1473), ∞ mit Mechteld van Ruyven († 1471)
         1. Willem van der Does († 1505), ∞ mit Machteld van der Does († 1529)
            1. Frank van der Does († 1540), ∞ mit Dieuwer van Eversdijk († 1545)
               1. Hendrik van der Does († 1497)
               2. Simon van der Does (1507-1587), ∞ mit Maria de Wilde und Lijsbeth Semsdr
                  1. Jacob van der Does, ∞ mit Maria van Soutelande († 1628)
                     1. Simon van der Does († 1648), ∞ mit Beatrix Anselmo
                        1. Jacob van der Does († 1673), ∞ mit Johanna van Geesdorp
                           1. Gideon van der Does
                  2. Sem van der Does († 1646), ∞ mit Mechteld Vink
                     1. Jan van der Does (1567-1648), ∞ mit Elisabeth Adriaansdr de Hoogh (+ 1636)
                        1. Simon Jansz van der Does, ∞ mit Johanna van Muijen
                     2. Adriaan van der Does (1609-1661), ∞ mit Maria Gool
                        1. Jan van der Does (1644-1707), ∞ mit Elisabeth van der Dussen
                           1. Adriaan van der Does, ∞ mit Catharina de Grande
                              1. Bruno van der Does, ∞ mit Helena Marie le Candelle
                           2. Jan van der Does (1694-1794), ∞ mit Cornelia van der Heim
                              1. Johan Hendrik van der Does (1727-1781), ∞ mit Jacoba Prins
                                 1. Adriaan van der Does, ∞ mit Johanna Petronella Meijners (1768-1855)
                                    1. Cornelis Jacob van der Does (1798-1853), ∞ mit Francoise Catherine Emilie Elise Alting Siberg
                                 2. Cornelis van der Does (1765-1805), ∞ mit Cornelia Jacoba Gael
                     3. Hendrik Jansz van der Does (* 1615), ∞ mit Cornelia Reynst (* 1615)
                        1. Jan Hendricksz van der Does († 1674) http://www.genealogieonline.nl/genealogie-database-deunhouwer/I164356.php
                        2. Hendrick Hendricksz van der Does (1646-1726)
                        3. Cornelis van der Does († 1722)

Die Grafen von Eschenloch (auch Eschenlohe) waren ein dynastisches Geschlecht, welches den Meinhardinern entstammte.

Stammherr ist Heinrich, Graf von Eschenloch († 1349), welcher ein außerehelicher Sohn des Meinhard II., Graf von Görz und Tirol sowie Herzog von Kärnten, war. ^[1] Die Grafen benannten sich nach den ausgestorbenen Grafen Eschenlohe, welche ihren Namen von der nördlich von Garmisch gelegenen Burg Eschenlohe ableiteten. Dieser Heinrich war mit Anna von Reichenberg verheiratet.

Die Weidenburg ist eine aus dem Mittelalter stammende, nun verfallenen Burganlage in der Kärnter Gemeinde Kötschach-Mauthen.

Ein vermutlich um 1200 errichteter Ministerialensitz am unteren Berghang südlich von Würmlach, auf einem nach Süden und Osten steil abfallenden Felssporn gelegen. Urkundlich 1225 als castro Weideberch im Besitz von Ulrich und Hugo Reifenberg. Auch diese Burg fiel 1460 durch den Frieden von Pusarnitz an Kaiser Friedrich III., der sie 1461 an die Brüder Hornberger als Lehen vergibt. Danach scheint Hans von Graben als Besitzer auf, und 1545 wird Georg Khevenhüller durch Kauf neuer Eigentümer. Im 17. Jahrhundert war die Familie Fromiller Eigentümer, ab dem 18. Jahrhundert setzte der Verfall ein. – Die Burganlage besaß einen rechteckigen, viergeschossigen Palas (um 1200) und einen an der Südwestecke angebauten quadratischen Bergfried. Die Mauern sind zum Teil bis zu 10 Meter Höhe noch erhalten.

Zu bearbeitende Themen - Fundus

Hello Gräff Matthias,

• http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Gerrit_de_Graeff_%28I.%29_van_Zuid-Polsbroek&diff=288228346&oldid=284787036
• Ordinals

Should it be 21st instead of 21.th?-- Diwas ( talk) 17:30, 1 September 2011 (UTC) reply

hello Diwas!

I think 21st ist wright. Thank you- greetings -- Gräff Matthias ( talk) 17: http://yorkyingers.com/updegraff_family.htm33, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Thank you! -- Diwas ( talk) 18:30, 1 September 2011 (UTC) reply

http://yorkyingers.com/updegraff_family.htm http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~uptegrove/search.htm http://www.unionsverlag.com/info/person.asp?pers_id=191

Thanks for uploading File:Matthias Laurenz Gräff "Stillleben mit Schaukelpferd, Barett und Lampion".JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 16:05, 24 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Matthias Laurenz Gräff "Gitarrenstillleben".JPG. However, it needs some more work before it is okay to use on Wikipedia.

Please click here and do the following:

1. Add a description of where the image comes from (not what it is) and who the creator is. Please be specific, and include a link if you can.
2. Find the appropriate license from the list of free, non-free media, or public domain options. Copy the license template and paste it in the file's page, and save.

If you follow these steps, your image can help enhance Wikipedia. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the media copyright questions page.

Thank you for your contribution! -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 16:05, 24 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Matthias Laurenz Gräff "Stillleben mit Orchideen und Melonen".JPG. However, it needs some more work before it is okay to use on Wikipedia.

Please click here and do the following:

1. Add a description of where the image comes from (not what it is) and who the creator is. Please be specific, and include a link if you can.
2. Find the appropriate license from the list of free, non-free media, or public domain options. Copy the license template and paste it in the file's page, and save.

If you follow these steps, your image can help enhance Wikipedia. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the media copyright questions page.

Thank you for your contribution! -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 16:06, 24 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Matthias Laurenz Gräff "Stillleben mit Orchideen und Seestern".JPG. However, it needs some more work before it is okay to use on Wikipedia.

Please click here and do the following:

1. Add a description of where the image comes from (not what it is) and who the creator is. Please be specific, and include a link if you can.
2. Find the appropriate license from the list of free, non-free media, or public domain options. Copy the license template and paste it in the file's page, and save.

If you follow these steps, your image can help enhance Wikipedia. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the media copyright questions page.

Thank you for your contribution! -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 16:06, 24 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Matthias Laurenz Gräff "Blumenstück mit Früchten".JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 17:06, 24 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Matthias Laurenz Gräff. Blumenstück vor blauem Hintergrund.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 17:06, 24 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Hello, Donald1972!

It was really helpful of you to you to upload File:Matthias Laurenz Gräff. Stillleben im Winter.JPG. However, we need to properly format the image license information in order to keep and use new images.

If you can edit the description and add one of these templates, that would be great. If you're not sure how or would like some help, please ask us at the media copyright questions page and we'll be happy to assist you.

Thanks again! -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 17:07, 24 December 2011 (UTC) reply

So I see that you have been uploading files here, but if it's free, it should go on the the Wikimedia Commons. Don't worry about the work to transfer, as I will be moving them there (in January). Go upload your new files to the commons. The Upload page is still the Special:Upload. Thanks, ~~ Ebe123~~ → report on my contribs. 12:38, 26 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Vollwappen De Graeff.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 13:05, 26 December 2011 (UTC) reply

per the above comment, your images here should be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. I dont know if you can create a category there for your works, but the categories here were not notable and were deleted. Mercurywoodrose ( talk) 04:24, 29 December 2011 (UTC) reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Matthias Laurenz Gräff "Stillleben mit Orchideen und Seestern".JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator ( talk) 13:37, 23 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Matthias Laurenz Gräff. Schloß Greillenstein-1-.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 21:05, 26 February 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello, Donald1972. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello, Donald1972. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Hello, Donald1972. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Hello, Donald1972. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Hallo Donald1972,
In 2010 you wrote a lemma "Cornelis HrR Ridder de Graeff" here (en-wp). I changed the title to "Cornelis Andriesz de Graeff".
Furthermore i made some (in my opinion essential) additions and changes. I hope you can agree with my corrections.
Yours, Paul Berendsen -- Paulbe ( talk) 20:34, 31 December 2018 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   Bbb23 ( talk) 18:36, 15 August 2019 (UTC) reply

Hello Bbb, I know that's it not right to have some more accounts on Wikipedia. The accounts get more over the years, mostly I used Donald1972 for uploading images and Brederode as a writing one. The third Artium72 is useless. If you like to unblock only one of my 3 here, I will vote for my old Donald1972 (since 2008). I've sent you a message via Wikipedia too, and would appreciate to hear from you. Thank you in advance -- Donald1972 ( talk) 11:00, 18 August 2019 (UTC) reply

The file File:Pieter de Graeff painted by Wallerant Vaillant.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:01, 31 January 2020 (UTC) reply

Following an appeal to the Arbitration Committee, Donald1972 ( talk · contribs) has been unblocked, subject to a restriction from editing the Matthias Laurenz Gräff article. Maxim_(talk) 01:47, 28 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Donald1972 unblocked

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Irene Gavala, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from http://www.newdiaspora.com/poets-radio/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Irene Gavala and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Irene Gavala, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Irene Gavala. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Irene Gavala with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Irene Gavala saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Moneytrees🏝️ ^{Talk/ CCI help} 03:25, 28 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited De Graeff, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Noble. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:07, 18 March 2021 (UTC) reply

thank you! I have changed it. -- Donald1972 ( talk) 09:00, 18 March 2021 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Willi Mernyi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Willi Mernyi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Citterz ( talk) 18:31, 23 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Okay, thank you for inform me. -- Donald1972 ( talk) 20:55, 23 March 2021 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Herren von Graben, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rosenberg.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:07, 25 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Drill it. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Von Graben family tree have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Drill it ( talk) 19:58, 29 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, these sources belong to the von Graben family page (and they are there), but not to the family tree, because they havent the sources of that family tree. -- Donald1972 ( talk) 20:03, 29 May 2021 (UTC) reply

I have noticed you are banned from editing Matthias Laurenz Gräff, and on a sock account you have uploaded his paintings as your "own work". This strongly suggests you are him, in which case you should not be shoehorning his paintings on any page you see necessary. Please read WP:PROMOTION and WP:SELFCITE. I have seen that on another of your accounts, you were warned by User:Beyond My Ken for inserting the painting of Norbert Gofer. I removed the painting of Sebastian Kurz for the same reason. This is an encyclopedia, not your Facebook wall to attack politicians. What would people think if pages like Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin were just crude cartoons? It is really not good that you have been warned before and banned, then you come back to reinstate the paintings removed in your absence, for no other reason than you want them to be there. Consider this a warning as I will consider finding an admin if you keep inserting your own biased cartoons back onto serious pages. Unknown Temptation ( talk) 01:36, 19 August 2021 (UTC) reply

Also if - per your own Wikipedia article - you made a painting calling Kurz a "great dictator, opportunist, putschist", you should not be within one million miles of his Wikipedia article. Ever. Unknown Temptation ( talk) 01:46, 19 August 2021 (UTC) reply

On reviewing your recent contributions I have put WP:COI tags on Dialog im Kamptal (your organisation) and Helmuth Gräff (your father). You were the creator and nearly the only contributor on both pages. If you have been on Wikipedia since 2008, you should know not to edit where you have a conflict of interest - especially as you have previously been indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry on your own biography. Please read WP:NOT and remember I have a good case to bring this up with admins if you promote yourself, your family or your organisations again. Unknown Temptation ( talk) 15:23, 19 August 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. Please note, due to a technical error you may not have been able to previously vote, or you may have received this message twice or after opting out. This is a one-time notification. If you are having any issues voting now, please contact the election coordinators for assistance. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:53, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Hey, I see you created Rainer zu Rain! I noticed some citation tags are showing as just text and have no citations associated. I assume you translated it from the German Wikipedia article? I've tagged that on the talk page, but those citation tags should be inserted with actual citations. Also, I did jump on this article pretty quickly so I don't know if you would've marked it on the talk page, but remember to note translations from other Wikipedias on the talk page with the {{Translated page}} template. Thanks! Skarmory (talk • contribs) 23:14, 28 January 2022 (UTC) reply

I didn't know that until now. But I'll keep that in mind in the future. I thank you. Greetings -- Donald1972 ( talk) 00:00, 29 January 2022 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Virgil von Graben, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gouverneur.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:08, 29 January 2022 (UTC) reply

Solved it -- Donald1972 ( talk) 21:00, 29 January 2022 (UTC) reply

Do you have a citation for the material you added about his wife and children? - Dumelow ( talk) 06:59, 1 March 2022 (UTC) reply

I ve added some. Greetings -- Donald1972 ( talk) 22:56, 1 March 2022 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Eggert family, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
• It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
• It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Emir Shane ( talk) 15:53, 28 March 2022 (UTC) reply

I'm not seeing a case for notability regarding Eggert family, and as you know, translating an article from de-wiki is not a reason for us to retain this material. As you've been on wiki a very long time, I'm curious if you could explain this to me. Chris Troutman ( talk) 17:12, 4 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The article Pieter Graeff has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a genealogy website. no indication of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Slywriter ( talk) 14:37, 13 July 2022 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wendela Bicker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wendela Bicker until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Slywriter ( talk) 02:31, 23 July 2022 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Eggert family, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:35, 16 September 2022 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited De Graeff, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liesveld.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:01, 23 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, Donald1972. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Eggert family, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 14:02, 16 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Donald1972. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Eggert family".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:37, 16 March 2023 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Jacoba Bicker

added a link pointing to Jan Vos

Pieter de Graeff

added a link pointing to Jan Vos

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:13, 8 April 2023 (UTC) reply

Hi thanks for creating this article. When we translate or borrow from other language wikis it’s a requirement to acknowledge the source. The best way to do this is to include it in your edit summary (e.g. “translated from nl.wiki”) and there’s also a translation template you can add to the talk page. I’ve added it for you. Happy editing Mccapra ( talk) 20:37, 12 April 2023 (UTC) reply

Thank you very much! Ive forget it. -- Donald1972 ( talk) 21:12, 12 April 2023 (UTC) reply

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Bicker family into Jacob de Graeff. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{ copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa ( talk) 13:34, 23 April 2023 (UTC) reply

Thank you for your information. I will comply with these requirements -- Donald1972 ( talk) 15:33, 23 April 2023 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hendrick van Brederode, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dutch.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:02, 18 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Category:Lords of Emmeloord has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 14:59, 29 July 2023 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Family Association Gräff-Graeff requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, society, or group that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fram ( talk) 12:37, 7 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC) reply

The article Op den Graeff family tree has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTGENEALOGY, a very extensive family tree to list four bluelinked members and many non-notable ones, including info on WP:BLPs. Seems to be mainly based on the personal family website [1], lacks reliable sources for most of the information.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram ( talk) 11:52, 6 December 2023 (UTC) reply

The article Albert Claesz de Graeff has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

His name in mentioned in some books, but not enough to establish notability or to support the information in this article, which comes from a blog and from a family geneaology website.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram ( talk) 12:14, 13 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Hi thanks for creating this article. When we translate or borrow from other language wikis it’s a requirement to acknowledge the source. The best way to do this is to include it in your edit summary (e.g. “translated from nl.wiki”) and there’s also a translation template you can add to the talk page. I’ve added it for you. Mccapra ( talk) 05:36, 15 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Thank you, I ve forgot it, but I will remember it next time. -- Donald1972 ( talk) 10:52, 15 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, Donald1972. Thank you for your work on Georg Grabner zu Rosenburg und Zagging. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:21, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply