I reversed Muuneeb's changes to the talkpage where he put (S.A.W.) behind Muhammad's name in everyone elses comments. Why did you revert that to a state where most of the instances were still in place? I have re-reverted to the situation before Muuneeb made his alterations. Jarkeld ( talk) 23:17, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
You BOTH changed other user's comments. You changed Muuneeb's but then you added your own. Just click undo, don't make your own changes. Doctorx0079 ( talk) 23:22, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
It's ok. It was confusing me too. -- mboverload @ 23:41, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for undoing your refractoring of comments by 75.179.144.10 and HaterofIgnorance. Jarkeld ( talk) 23:45, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Using undo is helpful to avoid this kind of confusion. -- Doctorx0079 ( talk) 21:47, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
That's what he wrote:
Please review Talk:Muhammad/Archive 23 where this is discussed in several sections. Basically this is a problem of terminology. In the context of "Islam" meaning "Mohammedism", Muhammad is the founder, because there was no religion called "Islam" prior to Muhammad. In the literal meaning of "Islam" being "submission to God", Muslims would want everyone to believe that Allah is the founder of Islam, which would basically push a religious point of view in the article.
Personally I'd have no objection to calling Muhammad the "prophet" of Islam rather than the "founder". But strictly speaking, in English usage, "founder" is technically correct.
Did you read it? Kavas ( talk) 00:14, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
You can mention it at the Administrator's noticeboard (I forget the exact link). There's another page I think issues like this can be brought up. WesleyDodds ( talk) 00:06, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello. I am Tagging all of the notable aphex twin pages in search for someone to help me with the creation of "Analogue Bubblebath 5". If you are interested, Please notify me on my user:talk page. thank you. Conkern65 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:38, 20 October 2010 (UTC).
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from
Allies of World War II. When removing content, please specify a reason in the
edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's
talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the
page history. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Shirt58 (
talk) 14:52, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shichimi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sansho ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:51, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kōichi Mashimo may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 16:30, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Dl2000. An edit that you recently made to Diskono seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Dl2000 ( talk) 00:33, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Brother these entries actually translations from Japanese sources. As far as I remember two main sources are Japanese wikipedia page and this one : http://sansesoftcatalog.blogspot.com.tr/2014/05/blog-post_9055.html
Hope that helps. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kamilz ( talk • contribs) 17:48, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited American Psycho (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Horror. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:22, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chuck Aaron, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spectre. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:43, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
I don't know why you care so much what is on another user's own talk page, but I suggest you get over yourself, and get a life. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.69.183.97 ( talk) 23:35, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
No need to delete that. Also, per WP:OWNTALK, you are not free to delete messages from other people's talk pages. If the nonsense makes it 'hard to read', so be it: let it serve as a record of the IP's activity and attitude. That's also only a shared IP, and may very well be a work or home IP. If he gets out of hand, blocks will be applied as needed. Dschslava Δx parlez moi 05:12, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Doctorx0079. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Doctorx0079. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Regarding 2600:1:C6E1:BDC1:A87F:C0E0:E4D:CAC ( talk · contribs · WHOIS), I just opened the thread WP:ANI#Drinkreader IP edits: time for a community ban? — C.Fred ( talk) 14:47, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Doctorx0079. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Doctorx0079. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I removed your comment with this edit [1] hopefully you don't mind. I'm fairly certain the commentator is User:Drinkreader who is WP:community banned [2] and who's comments are therefore subject to reversion. As your comment was only a reference to their inappropriate use of the talk page, it's no longer useful if the original comment is removed. Nil Einne ( talk) 07:50, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in abortion. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 12:01, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in climate change. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
I reversed Muuneeb's changes to the talkpage where he put (S.A.W.) behind Muhammad's name in everyone elses comments. Why did you revert that to a state where most of the instances were still in place? I have re-reverted to the situation before Muuneeb made his alterations. Jarkeld ( talk) 23:17, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
You BOTH changed other user's comments. You changed Muuneeb's but then you added your own. Just click undo, don't make your own changes. Doctorx0079 ( talk) 23:22, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
It's ok. It was confusing me too. -- mboverload @ 23:41, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for undoing your refractoring of comments by 75.179.144.10 and HaterofIgnorance. Jarkeld ( talk) 23:45, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Using undo is helpful to avoid this kind of confusion. -- Doctorx0079 ( talk) 21:47, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
That's what he wrote:
Please review Talk:Muhammad/Archive 23 where this is discussed in several sections. Basically this is a problem of terminology. In the context of "Islam" meaning "Mohammedism", Muhammad is the founder, because there was no religion called "Islam" prior to Muhammad. In the literal meaning of "Islam" being "submission to God", Muslims would want everyone to believe that Allah is the founder of Islam, which would basically push a religious point of view in the article.
Personally I'd have no objection to calling Muhammad the "prophet" of Islam rather than the "founder". But strictly speaking, in English usage, "founder" is technically correct.
Did you read it? Kavas ( talk) 00:14, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
You can mention it at the Administrator's noticeboard (I forget the exact link). There's another page I think issues like this can be brought up. WesleyDodds ( talk) 00:06, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello. I am Tagging all of the notable aphex twin pages in search for someone to help me with the creation of "Analogue Bubblebath 5". If you are interested, Please notify me on my user:talk page. thank you. Conkern65 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:38, 20 October 2010 (UTC).
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from
Allies of World War II. When removing content, please specify a reason in the
edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's
talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the
page history. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Shirt58 (
talk) 14:52, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shichimi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sansho ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:51, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kōichi Mashimo may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 16:30, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Dl2000. An edit that you recently made to Diskono seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Dl2000 ( talk) 00:33, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Brother these entries actually translations from Japanese sources. As far as I remember two main sources are Japanese wikipedia page and this one : http://sansesoftcatalog.blogspot.com.tr/2014/05/blog-post_9055.html
Hope that helps. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kamilz ( talk • contribs) 17:48, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited American Psycho (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Horror. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:22, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chuck Aaron, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spectre. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:43, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
I don't know why you care so much what is on another user's own talk page, but I suggest you get over yourself, and get a life. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.69.183.97 ( talk) 23:35, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
No need to delete that. Also, per WP:OWNTALK, you are not free to delete messages from other people's talk pages. If the nonsense makes it 'hard to read', so be it: let it serve as a record of the IP's activity and attitude. That's also only a shared IP, and may very well be a work or home IP. If he gets out of hand, blocks will be applied as needed. Dschslava Δx parlez moi 05:12, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Doctorx0079. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Doctorx0079. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Regarding 2600:1:C6E1:BDC1:A87F:C0E0:E4D:CAC ( talk · contribs · WHOIS), I just opened the thread WP:ANI#Drinkreader IP edits: time for a community ban? — C.Fred ( talk) 14:47, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Doctorx0079. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Doctorx0079. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I removed your comment with this edit [1] hopefully you don't mind. I'm fairly certain the commentator is User:Drinkreader who is WP:community banned [2] and who's comments are therefore subject to reversion. As your comment was only a reference to their inappropriate use of the talk page, it's no longer useful if the original comment is removed. Nil Einne ( talk) 07:50, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in abortion. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 12:01, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in climate change. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.