Hi, Davide41,
I see you say that you are in Italy. I suppose you are not a native speaker of English. It is perfectly okay to edit articles on any language version of Wikipedia, and I respect your opinion, but editing still has to leave the article looking like an encyclopedia article. Especially, articles about living persons have to be very carefully sourced. If you disagree with Richard Lynn, you can help the article about him become better by finding sources that disagree with his ideas, citing those sources, and rewriting the article to express what those sources say. I would consider such edits constructive edits and would be happy to help you with those as a native speaker of English.
It was your last few edits (diffs) in a series of ten edits that I saw when I reverted those edits. Because those edits were on the talk page rather than the article page (as I first thought at first glance), I will restore those edits, and then invite you to discuss further how the article should be edited—which is what the article talk page is for. Let's discuss sources and discuss neutral point of view calmly. -- WeijiBaikeBianji ( talk) 20:46, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
It should be possible to find sources that show that Lynn's book is not based on good data. I have found such a source for his data on Africa. I have many articles to edit, but I hope to edit that article soon, and I hope to see you in the discussion there. -- WeijiBaikeBianji ( talk) 13:21, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
You posted the following in the "talk page": "Great work. The Best List On Wikipedia. --User:Davide41"
- And I say to you, thank you for your comments from all of us who manage that list. Tony the Marine ( talk) 18:52, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi Davide, please be careful with your data changes. Pavese's book Il Compagno came out in 1947 not 1948. Please use edit summaries to explain why you have made a change. Thank you. Span ( talk) 17:25, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
I'm removing some stuff by you and CN. I was wondering about socks, but see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Colon-el-Nuevo/Archive. Dougweller ( talk) 19:12, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
Davide41, are you on wikipedia to add sources or to delete sources? I see that in your "idea" of who Columbus was you have added everybody and their mother who ever said Columbus and Genoa in one sentence. What about the others who wrote something different are their words less important? Colon-el-Nuevo ( talk) 15:51, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
- You're both at WP:3RR I think. Maybe you'd better take it to the talk page. Dougweller ( talk) 16:05, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
Please stop discussing primary sources with colon-el-nuevo. Wikipedia articles should rely on secondary sources - any further discussion of primary sources is likely to in flame the discussion with Colon-el-nuevo. Please just ignore him. If he continues to disrupt after this short block expires I will block him again, but only if you have not provoked him by continuing discussion of primary sources. You don not need to keep defending the genoese theory - every one who is not fanatically invested in a particular alternative theory already knows that this is the vas majority consensus. Just keep working on improving the article while ignoring disruptive elements. ·Maunus·ƛ· 15:59, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
Warning per WP:ARBMAC.
The
Arbitration Committee has permitted
administrators to impose, at their own discretion,
sanctions on any editor working on pages broadly related to the
Balkans if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the
purpose of Wikipedia, any expected
standards of behavior, or any
normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at
Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Macedonia#Final decision.
This warning is issued due to your edit warring and POV pushing at Giulio Clovio as reported at ANI. You may be able to avoid sanctions if you will agree to wait for consensus before making any further edits to this article. Thank you, EdJohnston ( talk) 04:11, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
(b Grisone [Grizane], Croatia, 1498; d Rome, 3 Jan 1578). Italian painter and illuminator of Croatian birth. The most important illuminator of the 16th century, he was a 'Michelangelo of small works', according to Vasari. Many of his documented works are dispersed or untraced, and some attributions are controversial, but his secure oeuvre gives a clear idea of his stylistic influences and development. Although much of his inspiration came from Raphael and Michelangelo, he developed his own visual language, brilliantly translating their monumental forms for work on the smallest scale.
- Source: Grove Art, Oxford University Press. ( Reference. )
I'm not going to change the page. I dropped the idea. They are the experts... Thanks for the message. Greetings. -- Davide41 ( talk) 22:20, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
- Grove Art Online - the most comprehensive online reference resource for all aspects of the visual art worldwide from prehistory to the present day. This is a magnificent resource: a vast encyclopaedia of art, with both internal and external hyperlinks to even more material... now part of the online reference publications of Oxford University. -- Davide41 ( talk) 08:35, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
Mentioned at WP:ANI
Hello David41. Your name has been mentioned at WP:ANI#EdJohnston - administrative harassment and censorship. The discussion is about Giulio Clovio. You may add your own comment there if you wish. EdJohnston ( talk) 21:54, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
I noticed that you have posted comments to the page
User_talk:Luciano di Martino in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you address your comments. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. For more details, see
Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you.
Sitush (
talk) 12:10, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
As advised by Bwilkins a new section has been started on the Filipa Moniz Talk page "Requesting Editors Who Wish to Resolve/Revamp Article" where you cna present your reasons for not including more about Filipa Moniz's life in the article about her. Colon-el-Nuevo ( talk) 18:54, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
 | This user helped promote Enrico Fermi to good article status. |
On behalf of WP:CHICAGO, I would like to thank you for your editorial contributions to Enrico Fermi, which has recently become a GA.-- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) 07:54, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi, Davide41,
I see you say that you are in Italy. I suppose you are not a native speaker of English. It is perfectly okay to edit articles on any language version of Wikipedia, and I respect your opinion, but editing still has to leave the article looking like an encyclopedia article. Especially, articles about living persons have to be very carefully sourced. If you disagree with Richard Lynn, you can help the article about him become better by finding sources that disagree with his ideas, citing those sources, and rewriting the article to express what those sources say. I would consider such edits constructive edits and would be happy to help you with those as a native speaker of English.
It was your last few edits (diffs) in a series of ten edits that I saw when I reverted those edits. Because those edits were on the talk page rather than the article page (as I first thought at first glance), I will restore those edits, and then invite you to discuss further how the article should be edited—which is what the article talk page is for. Let's discuss sources and discuss neutral point of view calmly. -- WeijiBaikeBianji ( talk) 20:46, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
It should be possible to find sources that show that Lynn's book is not based on good data. I have found such a source for his data on Africa. I have many articles to edit, but I hope to edit that article soon, and I hope to see you in the discussion there. -- WeijiBaikeBianji ( talk) 13:21, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
You posted the following in the "talk page": "Great work. The Best List On Wikipedia. --User:Davide41"
- And I say to you, thank you for your comments from all of us who manage that list. Tony the Marine ( talk) 18:52, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi Davide, please be careful with your data changes. Pavese's book Il Compagno came out in 1947 not 1948. Please use edit summaries to explain why you have made a change. Thank you. Span ( talk) 17:25, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
I'm removing some stuff by you and CN. I was wondering about socks, but see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Colon-el-Nuevo/Archive. Dougweller ( talk) 19:12, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
Davide41, are you on wikipedia to add sources or to delete sources? I see that in your "idea" of who Columbus was you have added everybody and their mother who ever said Columbus and Genoa in one sentence. What about the others who wrote something different are their words less important? Colon-el-Nuevo ( talk) 15:51, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
- You're both at WP:3RR I think. Maybe you'd better take it to the talk page. Dougweller ( talk) 16:05, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
Please stop discussing primary sources with colon-el-nuevo. Wikipedia articles should rely on secondary sources - any further discussion of primary sources is likely to in flame the discussion with Colon-el-nuevo. Please just ignore him. If he continues to disrupt after this short block expires I will block him again, but only if you have not provoked him by continuing discussion of primary sources. You don not need to keep defending the genoese theory - every one who is not fanatically invested in a particular alternative theory already knows that this is the vas majority consensus. Just keep working on improving the article while ignoring disruptive elements. ·Maunus·ƛ· 15:59, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
Warning per WP:ARBMAC.
The
Arbitration Committee has permitted
administrators to impose, at their own discretion,
sanctions on any editor working on pages broadly related to the
Balkans if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the
purpose of Wikipedia, any expected
standards of behavior, or any
normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at
Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Macedonia#Final decision.
This warning is issued due to your edit warring and POV pushing at Giulio Clovio as reported at ANI. You may be able to avoid sanctions if you will agree to wait for consensus before making any further edits to this article. Thank you, EdJohnston ( talk) 04:11, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
(b Grisone [Grizane], Croatia, 1498; d Rome, 3 Jan 1578). Italian painter and illuminator of Croatian birth. The most important illuminator of the 16th century, he was a 'Michelangelo of small works', according to Vasari. Many of his documented works are dispersed or untraced, and some attributions are controversial, but his secure oeuvre gives a clear idea of his stylistic influences and development. Although much of his inspiration came from Raphael and Michelangelo, he developed his own visual language, brilliantly translating their monumental forms for work on the smallest scale.
- Source: Grove Art, Oxford University Press. ( Reference. )
I'm not going to change the page. I dropped the idea. They are the experts... Thanks for the message. Greetings. -- Davide41 ( talk) 22:20, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
- Grove Art Online - the most comprehensive online reference resource for all aspects of the visual art worldwide from prehistory to the present day. This is a magnificent resource: a vast encyclopaedia of art, with both internal and external hyperlinks to even more material... now part of the online reference publications of Oxford University. -- Davide41 ( talk) 08:35, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
Mentioned at WP:ANI
Hello David41. Your name has been mentioned at WP:ANI#EdJohnston - administrative harassment and censorship. The discussion is about Giulio Clovio. You may add your own comment there if you wish. EdJohnston ( talk) 21:54, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
I noticed that you have posted comments to the page
User_talk:Luciano di Martino in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you address your comments. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. For more details, see
Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you.
Sitush (
talk) 12:10, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
As advised by Bwilkins a new section has been started on the Filipa Moniz Talk page "Requesting Editors Who Wish to Resolve/Revamp Article" where you cna present your reasons for not including more about Filipa Moniz's life in the article about her. Colon-el-Nuevo ( talk) 18:54, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
|
| This user helped promote Enrico Fermi to good article status. |
On behalf of WP:CHICAGO, I would like to thank you for your editorial contributions to Enrico Fermi, which has recently become a GA.-- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) 07:54, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)