Your edit to Martina McBride
Your recent edit to Martina McBride ( diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 09:04, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Martina McBride. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. James086 Talk | Contribs 09:06, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Vic Viper. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been undone.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. RA0808 talk contribs 04:38, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Rather than pointing the finger and playing the blame game, why not see what you did wrong. If you want to pursue this, I recommend starting a rough draft at Wikipedia's "Article's for Creation", and getting it approved by a reviewer, until you get a better grasp on how to write a proper article. No more name-calling though, Wikipedia has a policy against that. Sergecross73 msg me 20:22, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- I assume you understand "you're a dick" is not a constructive comment, so I'll pass on to your other points. You fundamentally misunderstand how the speedy deletion process works. I did not "single out" your article, someone else tagged it as an article that was so poorly written that it be deleted without discussion. I agreed with this nomination, and thus, deleted it. I was merely working my way through the list/database of articles tagged for speedy deletion, and came across it. You'd have to ask that other person as to why they "singled it out", though you should also know that other article's being in worse shape than yours is not a defense that works on Wikipedia.
- If you're so intent that I'm being the bad guy here, then by all means, run your article by the article for creation system, and see what the reviewer says. I guaranteed it'd be rejected in its current form. Articles are supposed to be written around what third party sources say about a subject. You provided zero sources at all. That's an auto-fail. Sergecross73 msg me 20:53, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed
maintenance templates from
Minibosses. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been
reverted. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Woodroar (
talk) 03:24, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
Please do not remove
maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been
reverted. Thank you.
Woodroar (
talk) 17:00, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
- Final Warning - any more removal of maintenance tags without addressing the issues and/or finding a consensus on a talk page will get you blocked from editing. Please stop. Sergecross73 msg me 13:36, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Flag of New Zealand. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Mdaniels5757 (
talk) 01:42, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Your edit to Martina McBride
Your recent edit to Martina McBride ( diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 09:04, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Martina McBride. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. James086 Talk | Contribs 09:06, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Vic Viper. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been undone.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. RA0808 talk contribs 04:38, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Rather than pointing the finger and playing the blame game, why not see what you did wrong. If you want to pursue this, I recommend starting a rough draft at Wikipedia's "Article's for Creation", and getting it approved by a reviewer, until you get a better grasp on how to write a proper article. No more name-calling though, Wikipedia has a policy against that. Sergecross73 msg me 20:22, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- I assume you understand "you're a dick" is not a constructive comment, so I'll pass on to your other points. You fundamentally misunderstand how the speedy deletion process works. I did not "single out" your article, someone else tagged it as an article that was so poorly written that it be deleted without discussion. I agreed with this nomination, and thus, deleted it. I was merely working my way through the list/database of articles tagged for speedy deletion, and came across it. You'd have to ask that other person as to why they "singled it out", though you should also know that other article's being in worse shape than yours is not a defense that works on Wikipedia.
- If you're so intent that I'm being the bad guy here, then by all means, run your article by the article for creation system, and see what the reviewer says. I guaranteed it'd be rejected in its current form. Articles are supposed to be written around what third party sources say about a subject. You provided zero sources at all. That's an auto-fail. Sergecross73 msg me 20:53, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed
maintenance templates from
Minibosses. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been
reverted. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Woodroar (
talk) 03:24, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
Please do not remove
maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been
reverted. Thank you.
Woodroar (
talk) 17:00, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
- Final Warning - any more removal of maintenance tags without addressing the issues and/or finding a consensus on a talk page will get you blocked from editing. Please stop. Sergecross73 msg me 13:36, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Flag of New Zealand. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Mdaniels5757 (
talk) 01:42, 14 April 2019 (UTC)