From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Creator.w3)

Welcome

File:Verifiability and Neutral point of view (Common Craft)-en.ogv
A video showing the basics of verifiability and neutral point of view policies.

Welcome!

Hello, Merlinux, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!  - Ahunt ( talk) 16:57, 9 August 2012 (UTC) reply

October 2018

Information icon Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to The Passion of the Christ. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Binksternet ( talk) 14:28, 14 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wonderful Dizzy (July 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic ( talk) 10:02, 3 July 2021 (UTC) reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Merlinux! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic ( talk) 10:02, 3 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wonderful Dizzy (July 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ProClasher97 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 16:12, 14 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Concern regarding Draft:Wonderful Dizzy

Information icon Hello, Merlinux. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wonderful Dizzy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 17:02, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

April 2024

Information icon Hello, I'm Cerebral726. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Bill Watterson, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Cerebral726 (talk) 15:37, 15 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi. No harm done. I was warned that the first citation was not from a reliable source and so i added a second one (for which i did not receive any warning!).
Still, i think it's for the better that you removed it. Soon, after submit it, i recall how much the artist praises it's privacy and as such it's better this info is not available in a place like wikipedia. I will not resubmit it. :) thank you!
Keep up the good job :) Merlinux ( talk) 14:48, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Creator.w3)

Welcome

File:Verifiability and Neutral point of view (Common Craft)-en.ogv
A video showing the basics of verifiability and neutral point of view policies.

Welcome!

Hello, Merlinux, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!  - Ahunt ( talk) 16:57, 9 August 2012 (UTC) reply

October 2018

Information icon Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to The Passion of the Christ. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Binksternet ( talk) 14:28, 14 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wonderful Dizzy (July 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic ( talk) 10:02, 3 July 2021 (UTC) reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Merlinux! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic ( talk) 10:02, 3 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wonderful Dizzy (July 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ProClasher97 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 16:12, 14 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Concern regarding Draft:Wonderful Dizzy

Information icon Hello, Merlinux. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wonderful Dizzy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 17:02, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

April 2024

Information icon Hello, I'm Cerebral726. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Bill Watterson, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Cerebral726 (talk) 15:37, 15 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi. No harm done. I was warned that the first citation was not from a reliable source and so i added a second one (for which i did not receive any warning!).
Still, i think it's for the better that you removed it. Soon, after submit it, i recall how much the artist praises it's privacy and as such it's better this info is not available in a place like wikipedia. I will not resubmit it. :) thank you!
Keep up the good job :) Merlinux ( talk) 14:48, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook