This page has archives. Sections older than 1 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
{{
Talkback}}
template below{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
NeilN
talk to me 23:20, 31 January 2018 (UTC)ChocolateRabbit ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have not been disruptively editing, also I believe this block to be inappropriate as I haven't even been given any warnings -- 🐇 Chocolate Rabbit 23:21, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
There is clearly disruption and a breadth of unaddressed concerns regarding your use of this account. I'm declining this request as it's nowhere near WP:GAB-compliant. As an aside, I strongly suggest you begin to listen to what NeilN and TonyBallioni are attempting to explain to you below as opposed to playing the "unfair block" card. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 00:00, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Instead of responding to my two requests for an explanation, you make the same report? -- NeilN talk to me 23:22, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
@ NeilN: I reported Ethan111 because of vandalism and disruptive editing. I said that at the AIV page. -- 🐇 Chocolate Rabbit 23:31, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
@ NeilN: He added unsourced content. -- 🐇 Chocolate Rabbit 23:37, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
How can you block me anyway, when I haven't recieved any prior warnings? You surely cannot do that without giving sufficient warnings -- 🐇 Chocolate Rabbit 23:41, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
@ NeilN: How about this. I only make 1 revert on individual articles to avoid potential edit wars. -- 🐇 Chocolate Rabbit 23:48, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
@ NeilN: I reported what I believed to be vandalism, everyone makes mistakes -- 🐇 Chocolate Rabbit 23:52, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
You cannot impose a threat like that it would be using the block as a punishment. -- 🐇 Chocolate Rabbit 23:56, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Block evasion -- NeilN talk to me 15:56, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
This page has archives. Sections older than 1 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
{{
Talkback}}
template below{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
NeilN
talk to me 23:20, 31 January 2018 (UTC)ChocolateRabbit ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have not been disruptively editing, also I believe this block to be inappropriate as I haven't even been given any warnings -- 🐇 Chocolate Rabbit 23:21, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
There is clearly disruption and a breadth of unaddressed concerns regarding your use of this account. I'm declining this request as it's nowhere near WP:GAB-compliant. As an aside, I strongly suggest you begin to listen to what NeilN and TonyBallioni are attempting to explain to you below as opposed to playing the "unfair block" card. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 00:00, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Instead of responding to my two requests for an explanation, you make the same report? -- NeilN talk to me 23:22, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
@ NeilN: I reported Ethan111 because of vandalism and disruptive editing. I said that at the AIV page. -- 🐇 Chocolate Rabbit 23:31, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
@ NeilN: He added unsourced content. -- 🐇 Chocolate Rabbit 23:37, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
How can you block me anyway, when I haven't recieved any prior warnings? You surely cannot do that without giving sufficient warnings -- 🐇 Chocolate Rabbit 23:41, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
@ NeilN: How about this. I only make 1 revert on individual articles to avoid potential edit wars. -- 🐇 Chocolate Rabbit 23:48, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
@ NeilN: I reported what I believed to be vandalism, everyone makes mistakes -- 🐇 Chocolate Rabbit 23:52, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
You cannot impose a threat like that it would be using the block as a punishment. -- 🐇 Chocolate Rabbit 23:56, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Block evasion -- NeilN talk to me 15:56, 4 February 2018 (UTC)