Hi Chaialhurriya! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! 〜 Adflatuss • talk 22:43, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions—specifically
this edit to
Umm Habiba—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse or the
Help desk. Thanks.
Materialscientist (
talk) 00:10, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Sjö. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
Shell shock, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Sjö (
talk) 05:59, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Abdullah bin Zayd (January 10)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abdullah bin Zayd and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Chaialhurriya!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Jeraxmoira🐉 (
talk) 18:06, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
|
Your recent editing history at Jim Bradley (politician) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Mr. No Funny Nickname ( talk) 17:45, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
- I am adding an important event in Municipal Politics to Jim Bradley's page, which I have cited with sources, can I ask why you keep on reverting it? People need to know his stance on issues come election time. Chaialhurriya ( talk) 18:28, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template. ARandomName123 ( talk)Ping me! 02:46, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Additionally, please make sure the images you upload are under a compatible license. The large majority of images online are not, and thus can not be uploaded to Commons. However, this situation falls under one of the fair use exceptions, but you need to upload the image via the Wikipedia:File upload wizard. Thanks. ARandomName123 ( talk)Ping me! 02:57, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: The Blue Between Sky and Water (February 18)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Blue Between Sky and Water and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
CS1 error on Jordan
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
Jordan, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A " bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 10:41, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
CS1 error on Saudi Arabia
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
Saudi Arabia, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A " bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 10:48, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Sidra Hassouna (February 23)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sidra Hassouna and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, I'm
StefenTower. I noticed that you recently
removed content from
Malcolm X without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use
your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Mass removal of cited material to be replaced with your point of view, all without explanation, is frowned upon at the Wikipedia.
Stefen Towers among the rest!
Gab •
Gruntwerk 18:38, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- To wit, if you can find a way to add useful content without removing other whole cited parts, while explaining why you are doing it, there would be a much higher chance of it being kept. Stefen Towers among the rest! Gab • Gruntwerk 18:44, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the
guide to appealing blocks (specifically
this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{
unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard, I suggest you use the
arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (
by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page.
Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."
If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the
guide to appealing blocks (specifically
this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{
unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard, I suggest you use the
arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (
by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page.
Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."
You'll need to demonstrate that you understand WP:ECR and commit to abide by that sanction to be unblocked. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 16:48, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- Can you explain exactly what I am doing that is wrong? I did not post on an ECR page when you instituted this block. Chaialhurriya ( talk) 15:32, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
Chaialhurriya ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Thank you for outlining the ECR policy, I am hoping you can consider unblocking me as I was unaware of the technical details of the policy. I though that ECR meant I could not edit pages specific to the topic that had ECR placed on them, I didn't realize that it meant I could not discuss the topic on any page. Chaialhurriya ( talk) 17:09, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
No response to query below in a week. — Daniel Case ( talk) 06:14, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
@ Daniel Case: Yes this was the statement I wanted to be transferred to a notice board, I also submitted a ticket request, I hadn't been able to respond to 331dot because it was not letting me do so in the visual editor.
Is this the statement that you want transferred to a notice board, or are you addressing the blocking admin? 331dot ( talk) 08:39, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Chaialhurriya ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Thank you for outlining the ECR policy, I am hoping you can consider unblocking me as I was unaware of the technical details of the policy. I thought that ECR meant I could not edit pages specific to the topic that had ECR placed on them, I didn't realize that it meant I could not discuss the topic on any page.Please copy this request to the appeal board
Decline reason:
No, I'm not going to copy-paste this message to a noticeboard because nobody will know what you're talking about. It sounds like this is a direct reply to someone else's comment. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 14:57, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Chaialhurriya ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I was previously making edits related to Israel-Palestine and the ongoing situation, I was unaware that I could not make edits on the topic even on pages that had not been marked with ECR access specifically. I understand now that I can not make edits to pages related to this topic until I have reached the qualifications related to ECR. I am requesting that I am granted editing access again so I can continue to make contributions. Can you please copy this request onto the appeal board?
Accept reason:
Your submission at Articles for creation: The Blue Between Sky and Water has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Atlantic306 ( talk) 22:45, 7 March 2024 (UTC)Hi Chaialhurriya! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! 〜 Adflatuss • talk 22:43, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions—specifically
this edit to
Umm Habiba—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse or the
Help desk. Thanks.
Materialscientist (
talk) 00:10, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Sjö. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
Shell shock, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Sjö (
talk) 05:59, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Abdullah bin Zayd (January 10)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abdullah bin Zayd and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
|
Hello, Chaialhurriya!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Jeraxmoira🐉 (
talk) 18:06, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
|
Your recent editing history at Jim Bradley (politician) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Mr. No Funny Nickname ( talk) 17:45, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
- I am adding an important event in Municipal Politics to Jim Bradley's page, which I have cited with sources, can I ask why you keep on reverting it? People need to know his stance on issues come election time. Chaialhurriya ( talk) 18:28, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template. ARandomName123 ( talk)Ping me! 02:46, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Additionally, please make sure the images you upload are under a compatible license. The large majority of images online are not, and thus can not be uploaded to Commons. However, this situation falls under one of the fair use exceptions, but you need to upload the image via the Wikipedia:File upload wizard. Thanks. ARandomName123 ( talk)Ping me! 02:57, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: The Blue Between Sky and Water (February 18)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Blue Between Sky and Water and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
CS1 error on Jordan
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
Jordan, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A " bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 10:41, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
CS1 error on Saudi Arabia
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
Saudi Arabia, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A " bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 10:48, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Sidra Hassouna (February 23)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sidra Hassouna and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, I'm
StefenTower. I noticed that you recently
removed content from
Malcolm X without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use
your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Mass removal of cited material to be replaced with your point of view, all without explanation, is frowned upon at the Wikipedia.
Stefen Towers among the rest!
Gab •
Gruntwerk 18:38, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- To wit, if you can find a way to add useful content without removing other whole cited parts, while explaining why you are doing it, there would be a much higher chance of it being kept. Stefen Towers among the rest! Gab • Gruntwerk 18:44, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the
guide to appealing blocks (specifically
this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{
unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard, I suggest you use the
arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (
by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page.
Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."
If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the
guide to appealing blocks (specifically
this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{
unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard, I suggest you use the
arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (
by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page.
Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."
You'll need to demonstrate that you understand WP:ECR and commit to abide by that sanction to be unblocked. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 16:48, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- Can you explain exactly what I am doing that is wrong? I did not post on an ECR page when you instituted this block. Chaialhurriya ( talk) 15:32, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
Chaialhurriya ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Thank you for outlining the ECR policy, I am hoping you can consider unblocking me as I was unaware of the technical details of the policy. I though that ECR meant I could not edit pages specific to the topic that had ECR placed on them, I didn't realize that it meant I could not discuss the topic on any page. Chaialhurriya ( talk) 17:09, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
No response to query below in a week. — Daniel Case ( talk) 06:14, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
@ Daniel Case: Yes this was the statement I wanted to be transferred to a notice board, I also submitted a ticket request, I hadn't been able to respond to 331dot because it was not letting me do so in the visual editor.
Is this the statement that you want transferred to a notice board, or are you addressing the blocking admin? 331dot ( talk) 08:39, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Chaialhurriya ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Thank you for outlining the ECR policy, I am hoping you can consider unblocking me as I was unaware of the technical details of the policy. I thought that ECR meant I could not edit pages specific to the topic that had ECR placed on them, I didn't realize that it meant I could not discuss the topic on any page.Please copy this request to the appeal board
Decline reason:
No, I'm not going to copy-paste this message to a noticeboard because nobody will know what you're talking about. It sounds like this is a direct reply to someone else's comment. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 14:57, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Chaialhurriya ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I was previously making edits related to Israel-Palestine and the ongoing situation, I was unaware that I could not make edits on the topic even on pages that had not been marked with ECR access specifically. I understand now that I can not make edits to pages related to this topic until I have reached the qualifications related to ECR. I am requesting that I am granted editing access again so I can continue to make contributions. Can you please copy this request onto the appeal board?
Accept reason:
Your submission at Articles for creation: The Blue Between Sky and Water has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Atlantic306 ( talk) 22:45, 7 March 2024 (UTC)