This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 |
Hello Bradv,
The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.
New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.
Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi Bradv, I've been approached by another editor about some harassment issues. I don't want to give too much information away publicly, but I/they have tried the standard channels, and haven't really been able arrive at a satisfactory conclusion. I'm wondering whether there's anything that Arbcom might be able to do about it (or, whether the wise heads on the committee have any suggestions for where else we might turn). Would you be willing to receive an e-mail where I can set everything out, so you can let me know whether you think there is anything to committee could do? Or would you advise my just to e-mail the general committee address so everyone can see it? Thanks in advance. GirthSummit (blether) 19:03, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
Dear Bradv,
Noticed you have deleted my page Neeyamo under the speedy deletion process initiated by DGG. I request you to please restore my draft so that i work as per wikipedia guidelines and also will include information in talk page as told by DGG who had initiated the speedy deletion. Irenejones2009 ( talk) 06:38, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Dear Bradv,
Awaiting your comment Irenejones2009 ( talk) 09:41, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Hello! This is benjaminzyg and I wish my global lock to be appealed. Let me know in my talk page -- 182.239.160.241 ( talk) 02:04, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
done and awaiting response! -- 203.17.215.22 ( talk) 00:35, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
I find the complaints lodged against Kudpung to be so weak that they're laughable. I also find your assessment of Kudpung's behavior unreasonable and your decision to remove his mop unmerited. While I have great respect for our admins that remain polite and unflappable in every circumstance, I think that attitude is neither required nor reasonable for all admins. While you may think that you protected this project by punishing Kudpung or preventing personal attacks, your actions today have only played into the hands of a certain clique of editors who took advantage of this opportunity to remove an obstacle to their plans. You, especially should know that those folks will turn on you. I can only assume that you've joined the "hasten the day" crowd. (I am not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention.) Chris Troutman ( talk) 01:08, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
News and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (February 2019).
Hello everyone and welcome to the 13th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:
Scripts Submit your new/improved script here
|
|
I hope everyone is having a great year so far! -- DannyS712 ( talk) 15:53, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2020).
|
must notundo or alter CheckUser or Oversight blocks, rather than
should not.
Thanks for managing safety issues on Wikipedia. Blue Rasberry (talk) 22:04, 2 March 2020 (UTC) |
For doing what the people ask and then taking abuse for it. Natureium ( talk) 22:20, 2 March 2020 (UTC) |
Are you an Arb, or just a clerk? - Roxy, the PROD. . wooF 19:06, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Five hours, 11 minutes after you "cautiously unprotected" Talk:North East Delhi riots they're back! Threatening to bring down the wrath of Indian law. NedFausa ( talk) 04:14, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Please don’t refactor other editors comments. It is in poor taste and unnecessary except in cases of vandalism or BLP-violations. Inappropriate and ultimately very disappointing from an admin. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1012:B042:B106:5D42:B518:A8DD:5FC ( talk) 00:12, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
For your commitment to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia and helping out people when they need it. qedk ( t 心 c) 11:15, 15 March 2020 (UTC) |
Hi Bradv, I think you will be able to recall the edits I am referring to without providing more details here. Could you please suggest here or in email how should I draft the request and also email the final version of the request I made (I have my email configured in Wikipedia). I guess use of even nowiki to share a problem link is discouraged, I will remove that. Thank you. Jaydayal ( talk) 06:15, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
And all of my edits were simply reverted, no matter what I wrote on TP. How can you have miningfull discussion if you don't have anyone to discuss it with? Čeha ( razgovor) 06:19, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
April 2020, Volume 6, Issue 4, Numbers 150, 151, 159, 160, 161, 162
Online events:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 14:58, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
I was aware that articles created about this but I tried to create a short new one with reliable sources so it can be expanded by other editors. I think it should stay. a simple search in google shows that Cardano is an important matter. All the best. Spada II ♪♫ ( talk) 06:23, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- Ok. I'm also working on this User:Spada2/sandbox7 , has been deleted once but the the admin is no longer aviable. would you please take a look. Thanks in Advance. Spada II ♪♫ ( talk) 13:00, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Hello Sir Madam, Greetings!
I noticed that "User: Joanrivers" only created an account just to attack wikipedia pages. His first edit was to nominate this page for deletion. He even added (2nd nomination) and went ahead to vandalize the page removing some references and also nominated another pages for deletion.
(Please see the attached Screenshot https://ibb.co/vYRcnvH )
This is quite sad and discouraging for me at this time of COVID-19 crisis. Is this how the English wikipedia platform works?
Thanks & Regards Ashish Verma Ashish Verma 9891 ( talk) 06:02, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
News and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (March 2020).
Hello everyone and welcome to the 14th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:
Scripts Submit your new/improved script here
|
|
Stay safe, -- DannyS712 ( talk) 05:48, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2020).
|
Arbcom RfC regarding on-wiki harassment. A draft RfC has been posted at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Anti-harassment RfC (Draft) and not open to comments from the community yet. Interested editors can comment on the RfC itself on its talk page.
The AfD you closed for this page was 10 delete to 8 keep or move. How do you figure that as a consensus for delete?
Why did you also lock:
??
There’s no way that page would be a BLP violation. Bbny-wiki-editor ( talk) 17:52, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
I just read the alert you just placed my talk page and at the end you asked that I contact you with questions or concerns. I have both. I know Trump is not a scientist and I have never claimed that Trump is a scientist. I have never, ever attempted to edit the hydoxychloquine article with information supported by Trump. I did edit the article with information supported by a reliable source, an FDA issued report written by the Chief Scientist of the FDA and that's it. Now, there is an editor, on whose page you also placed an alert. This editor wrote a wildly speculative personal opinion, a conspiracy theory, about Trump and some unnamed billionaire friend of Trump. You can review that edit here: wildly speculative claim by a Wikipedia editor that is not supported by a reliable source and the only source for it is the Wikipedia's editor imagination. I have asked that editor to conform to the Wikipedia policies about NOT using the talk pages to rant about political things, engage in conspiracy theories, which unfortunately is exactly what that editor did in the above edit. This editor needs to remove the false claim and cease and desist from using the talk page to attack anyone politically (or repeat conspiracy theories) and direct the conversation only toward making the article about Hydroxychloquine a better article and that's it. As an administrator I would think that your only goal as a administrator is to stop the violations of Wikipedia policies and focus the comments on the talk pages and edits to the articles to making the articles better and I'm sure you want to stop the talk page being used a forum to rant about Trump, who was never the topic of the article, or to engage in conspiracy theories about Trump. The article is about hydroxychloquine and not about Trump. I'm sure that is what you want to see: the talk page being used to the make the article better and that's it. I'm sure you will agree with me that using the talk page to make wild, unsupported claims that Trump and some friend of Trump (an outlandish conspiracy theory) is not the proper use of the talk page, right? I'm sure that was the only reason for the alert, correct? - CharlesShirley ( talk) 21:18, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
The Admin's Barnstar | |
Amazing! Your great work gives the reason why Wikipedia is a place worth visits. Reciprocater (Talk) 07:42, 7 April 2020 (UTC) |
Hello! The Wikipedia page of Bitcoin Suisse AG had been in consideration to get deleted for one week and then suddenly got removed. There were also other tags on this article, like "might have been created in return for illegal payments". Based on the talk page, it is not understandable why latter, and why the page was deleted, because the last comments/discussion was done by reviewing persons not speaking German (there were some German sources noted in the article). As sources, there are often only crypto sites that report - it is unclear why those are classified as non-reliable sources, while for other company articles on wikipedia, online articles from various news portals or even the own website seems to be sufficient as source. I realized that the site had some promotional phrases at the beginning, these were then adapted. This is a company established in 2013, it is also in the Swiss commercial register. It would be great if you could provide a feedback and inform if there is a chance of getting it recovered. I am looking forward to your reply. Brandnewz ( talk) 08:42, 7 April 2020 (UTC) Brandnewz ( talk) 08:48, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
The No Spam Barnstar | |
For filter 1035 - I'm getting a surprising amount of mileage out of that on my daily spam watch. Nice work! creffett ( talk) 16:25, 9 April 2020 (UTC) |
What you wrote here really struck a chord with me. The stress brought by this world crisis, indeed, has spilled over to the project, but I also agree that especially because these are trying times, it calls for the best in us to shine brighter than ever. So, I wanted to personally thank you for the sentiment behind that note. And, of course, extend my best wishes for your health and safety during these unprecedented times. All the best, El_C 21:43, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
May 2020, Volume 6, Issue 5, Numbers 150, 151, 163, 164, 165, 166
Online events:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 20:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Could you please delete this as G2 as well? (I can't tag the page due to a technical glitch, so I originally put the CSD tag on the talk page) * Pppery * it has begun... 02:26, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
I want to learn how to edit the page and how to add image to the page. All the coding and citing and how to secure the page. Fizzaabbas05 ( talk) 09:23, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello bradv, the person you were talking to on kiwi, yeah that's me. Just wanted to let you know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LucasA04 ( talk • contribs) 03:52, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
No question about it, I was trolling, so I guess you did feed me. Although, to the extent I had anything specific in mind with that foolish prank (other than blowing off steam), it was to explicitly point out the fantastic ridiculousness of the suggestion, and invite some sober reminders for the overly credulous out there, which you did very nicely. (While it lasted.) Anyway, have a nice day (and I mean that sincerely, not in the trolling sense). — Steve Summit ( talk) 17:52, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Hey there, hope you're going good. recently you had relisted the deleted nomination for the page that has been nominated for deletion since 19 days
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Camila_Guiribitey
Could you please help me by suggesting ways to fasten the deletion process review? (Sorry for bad English) Thanks 2019KB ( talk) 07:24, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Sorry, I'm new on Wikipedia and not sure but the link you has shared of WP:NODEADLINE has a section which says there are certain deadline in Wikipedia
Deletion discussions should usually be finished after a maximum of 21 days. Article deletion discussions have a deadline of seven days which may be extended to 14 or 21 days (in rare cases, discussions can run longer). As such, Article Rescue Squadron always works to a deadline.
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:There_is_no_deadline#Deadlines_in_Wikipedia
Again I might be wrong but I don't think that article is eligible for rare case. Please let me know, thanks — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
2019KB (
talk •
contribs) 18:26, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello! We were still in the middle of discussion but then you closed it already. I don't really mind if the majority vote is keep or delete but I believe it was prematurely closed as "keep". I don't know how to re-open the discussion or renominate it so I am confused what to do now. If you can do something to re-open the discussion, that would be great. Cheers!— Allenjambalaya ( talk) 12:05, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
I've replied back. I would like a reply back from you please. {{
replyto}}
Can I Log In's
(talk) page 18:10, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
The Admin's Barnstar | ||
Thank you for being a admin on this wiki. Also, I thank you for constantly reverting edits made in bad faith,such as vandalism. Henry20090 ( talk) 11:29, 29 April 2020 (UTC) |
News and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (April 2020).
Hello everyone and welcome to the 15th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:
Scripts Submit your new/improved script here
|
|
Morebits.date
class to replace the moment library. It can handle custom formatting and natural language for dates, as well as section header regexes. If you were using getUTCMonthName
or getUTCMonthNameAbbrev
with Date
objects, those have been deprecated and should
be updated.Hope everyone stays safe. -- DannyS712 ( talk) 20:27, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2020).
Hello Brad, the Superlinks are not working properly for me since I think the day before yesterday. The text and other content on the page shows in front of the information box. See here for a screenshot. -- MrClog ( talk) 18:49, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi Bradv! Please help me edit the draft I’m working on and understand if there is a problem with it being listed? The sock you have now indefinitely blocked (thank you) bullied me and wouldn’t help! He/she also shared a personal gmail ID when I asked for help on how to edit the page. I’m the owner of an agency but that in no way means I’m being paid to edit the page I’m working on. I’ve disclosed the agency name, and I’ve also shared as many links and references as possible on the draft - if you could please help me so that the page gets created, it would be the kindest thing! Thanks and stay safe! Parisgirl89 ( talk) 09:32, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi Brad, there are more IP edits at Cathy Areu that need to be revdeleted. [1] Best, SarahSV (talk) 00:55, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 |
Hello Bradv,
The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.
New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.
Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi Bradv, I've been approached by another editor about some harassment issues. I don't want to give too much information away publicly, but I/they have tried the standard channels, and haven't really been able arrive at a satisfactory conclusion. I'm wondering whether there's anything that Arbcom might be able to do about it (or, whether the wise heads on the committee have any suggestions for where else we might turn). Would you be willing to receive an e-mail where I can set everything out, so you can let me know whether you think there is anything to committee could do? Or would you advise my just to e-mail the general committee address so everyone can see it? Thanks in advance. GirthSummit (blether) 19:03, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
Dear Bradv,
Noticed you have deleted my page Neeyamo under the speedy deletion process initiated by DGG. I request you to please restore my draft so that i work as per wikipedia guidelines and also will include information in talk page as told by DGG who had initiated the speedy deletion. Irenejones2009 ( talk) 06:38, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Dear Bradv,
Awaiting your comment Irenejones2009 ( talk) 09:41, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Hello! This is benjaminzyg and I wish my global lock to be appealed. Let me know in my talk page -- 182.239.160.241 ( talk) 02:04, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
done and awaiting response! -- 203.17.215.22 ( talk) 00:35, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
I find the complaints lodged against Kudpung to be so weak that they're laughable. I also find your assessment of Kudpung's behavior unreasonable and your decision to remove his mop unmerited. While I have great respect for our admins that remain polite and unflappable in every circumstance, I think that attitude is neither required nor reasonable for all admins. While you may think that you protected this project by punishing Kudpung or preventing personal attacks, your actions today have only played into the hands of a certain clique of editors who took advantage of this opportunity to remove an obstacle to their plans. You, especially should know that those folks will turn on you. I can only assume that you've joined the "hasten the day" crowd. (I am not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention.) Chris Troutman ( talk) 01:08, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
News and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (February 2019).
Hello everyone and welcome to the 13th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:
Scripts Submit your new/improved script here
|
|
I hope everyone is having a great year so far! -- DannyS712 ( talk) 15:53, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2020).
|
must notundo or alter CheckUser or Oversight blocks, rather than
should not.
Thanks for managing safety issues on Wikipedia. Blue Rasberry (talk) 22:04, 2 March 2020 (UTC) |
For doing what the people ask and then taking abuse for it. Natureium ( talk) 22:20, 2 March 2020 (UTC) |
Are you an Arb, or just a clerk? - Roxy, the PROD. . wooF 19:06, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Five hours, 11 minutes after you "cautiously unprotected" Talk:North East Delhi riots they're back! Threatening to bring down the wrath of Indian law. NedFausa ( talk) 04:14, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Please don’t refactor other editors comments. It is in poor taste and unnecessary except in cases of vandalism or BLP-violations. Inappropriate and ultimately very disappointing from an admin. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1012:B042:B106:5D42:B518:A8DD:5FC ( talk) 00:12, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
For your commitment to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia and helping out people when they need it. qedk ( t 心 c) 11:15, 15 March 2020 (UTC) |
Hi Bradv, I think you will be able to recall the edits I am referring to without providing more details here. Could you please suggest here or in email how should I draft the request and also email the final version of the request I made (I have my email configured in Wikipedia). I guess use of even nowiki to share a problem link is discouraged, I will remove that. Thank you. Jaydayal ( talk) 06:15, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
And all of my edits were simply reverted, no matter what I wrote on TP. How can you have miningfull discussion if you don't have anyone to discuss it with? Čeha ( razgovor) 06:19, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
April 2020, Volume 6, Issue 4, Numbers 150, 151, 159, 160, 161, 162
Online events:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 14:58, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
I was aware that articles created about this but I tried to create a short new one with reliable sources so it can be expanded by other editors. I think it should stay. a simple search in google shows that Cardano is an important matter. All the best. Spada II ♪♫ ( talk) 06:23, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- Ok. I'm also working on this User:Spada2/sandbox7 , has been deleted once but the the admin is no longer aviable. would you please take a look. Thanks in Advance. Spada II ♪♫ ( talk) 13:00, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Hello Sir Madam, Greetings!
I noticed that "User: Joanrivers" only created an account just to attack wikipedia pages. His first edit was to nominate this page for deletion. He even added (2nd nomination) and went ahead to vandalize the page removing some references and also nominated another pages for deletion.
(Please see the attached Screenshot https://ibb.co/vYRcnvH )
This is quite sad and discouraging for me at this time of COVID-19 crisis. Is this how the English wikipedia platform works?
Thanks & Regards Ashish Verma Ashish Verma 9891 ( talk) 06:02, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
News and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (March 2020).
Hello everyone and welcome to the 14th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:
Scripts Submit your new/improved script here
|
|
Stay safe, -- DannyS712 ( talk) 05:48, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2020).
|
Arbcom RfC regarding on-wiki harassment. A draft RfC has been posted at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Anti-harassment RfC (Draft) and not open to comments from the community yet. Interested editors can comment on the RfC itself on its talk page.
The AfD you closed for this page was 10 delete to 8 keep or move. How do you figure that as a consensus for delete?
Why did you also lock:
??
There’s no way that page would be a BLP violation. Bbny-wiki-editor ( talk) 17:52, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
I just read the alert you just placed my talk page and at the end you asked that I contact you with questions or concerns. I have both. I know Trump is not a scientist and I have never claimed that Trump is a scientist. I have never, ever attempted to edit the hydoxychloquine article with information supported by Trump. I did edit the article with information supported by a reliable source, an FDA issued report written by the Chief Scientist of the FDA and that's it. Now, there is an editor, on whose page you also placed an alert. This editor wrote a wildly speculative personal opinion, a conspiracy theory, about Trump and some unnamed billionaire friend of Trump. You can review that edit here: wildly speculative claim by a Wikipedia editor that is not supported by a reliable source and the only source for it is the Wikipedia's editor imagination. I have asked that editor to conform to the Wikipedia policies about NOT using the talk pages to rant about political things, engage in conspiracy theories, which unfortunately is exactly what that editor did in the above edit. This editor needs to remove the false claim and cease and desist from using the talk page to attack anyone politically (or repeat conspiracy theories) and direct the conversation only toward making the article about Hydroxychloquine a better article and that's it. As an administrator I would think that your only goal as a administrator is to stop the violations of Wikipedia policies and focus the comments on the talk pages and edits to the articles to making the articles better and I'm sure you want to stop the talk page being used a forum to rant about Trump, who was never the topic of the article, or to engage in conspiracy theories about Trump. The article is about hydroxychloquine and not about Trump. I'm sure that is what you want to see: the talk page being used to the make the article better and that's it. I'm sure you will agree with me that using the talk page to make wild, unsupported claims that Trump and some friend of Trump (an outlandish conspiracy theory) is not the proper use of the talk page, right? I'm sure that was the only reason for the alert, correct? - CharlesShirley ( talk) 21:18, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
The Admin's Barnstar | |
Amazing! Your great work gives the reason why Wikipedia is a place worth visits. Reciprocater (Talk) 07:42, 7 April 2020 (UTC) |
Hello! The Wikipedia page of Bitcoin Suisse AG had been in consideration to get deleted for one week and then suddenly got removed. There were also other tags on this article, like "might have been created in return for illegal payments". Based on the talk page, it is not understandable why latter, and why the page was deleted, because the last comments/discussion was done by reviewing persons not speaking German (there were some German sources noted in the article). As sources, there are often only crypto sites that report - it is unclear why those are classified as non-reliable sources, while for other company articles on wikipedia, online articles from various news portals or even the own website seems to be sufficient as source. I realized that the site had some promotional phrases at the beginning, these were then adapted. This is a company established in 2013, it is also in the Swiss commercial register. It would be great if you could provide a feedback and inform if there is a chance of getting it recovered. I am looking forward to your reply. Brandnewz ( talk) 08:42, 7 April 2020 (UTC) Brandnewz ( talk) 08:48, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
The No Spam Barnstar | |
For filter 1035 - I'm getting a surprising amount of mileage out of that on my daily spam watch. Nice work! creffett ( talk) 16:25, 9 April 2020 (UTC) |
What you wrote here really struck a chord with me. The stress brought by this world crisis, indeed, has spilled over to the project, but I also agree that especially because these are trying times, it calls for the best in us to shine brighter than ever. So, I wanted to personally thank you for the sentiment behind that note. And, of course, extend my best wishes for your health and safety during these unprecedented times. All the best, El_C 21:43, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
May 2020, Volume 6, Issue 5, Numbers 150, 151, 163, 164, 165, 166
Online events:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 20:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Could you please delete this as G2 as well? (I can't tag the page due to a technical glitch, so I originally put the CSD tag on the talk page) * Pppery * it has begun... 02:26, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
I want to learn how to edit the page and how to add image to the page. All the coding and citing and how to secure the page. Fizzaabbas05 ( talk) 09:23, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello bradv, the person you were talking to on kiwi, yeah that's me. Just wanted to let you know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LucasA04 ( talk • contribs) 03:52, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
No question about it, I was trolling, so I guess you did feed me. Although, to the extent I had anything specific in mind with that foolish prank (other than blowing off steam), it was to explicitly point out the fantastic ridiculousness of the suggestion, and invite some sober reminders for the overly credulous out there, which you did very nicely. (While it lasted.) Anyway, have a nice day (and I mean that sincerely, not in the trolling sense). — Steve Summit ( talk) 17:52, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Hey there, hope you're going good. recently you had relisted the deleted nomination for the page that has been nominated for deletion since 19 days
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Camila_Guiribitey
Could you please help me by suggesting ways to fasten the deletion process review? (Sorry for bad English) Thanks 2019KB ( talk) 07:24, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Sorry, I'm new on Wikipedia and not sure but the link you has shared of WP:NODEADLINE has a section which says there are certain deadline in Wikipedia
Deletion discussions should usually be finished after a maximum of 21 days. Article deletion discussions have a deadline of seven days which may be extended to 14 or 21 days (in rare cases, discussions can run longer). As such, Article Rescue Squadron always works to a deadline.
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:There_is_no_deadline#Deadlines_in_Wikipedia
Again I might be wrong but I don't think that article is eligible for rare case. Please let me know, thanks — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
2019KB (
talk •
contribs) 18:26, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello! We were still in the middle of discussion but then you closed it already. I don't really mind if the majority vote is keep or delete but I believe it was prematurely closed as "keep". I don't know how to re-open the discussion or renominate it so I am confused what to do now. If you can do something to re-open the discussion, that would be great. Cheers!— Allenjambalaya ( talk) 12:05, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
I've replied back. I would like a reply back from you please. {{
replyto}}
Can I Log In's
(talk) page 18:10, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
The Admin's Barnstar | ||
Thank you for being a admin on this wiki. Also, I thank you for constantly reverting edits made in bad faith,such as vandalism. Henry20090 ( talk) 11:29, 29 April 2020 (UTC) |
News and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (April 2020).
Hello everyone and welcome to the 15th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:
Scripts Submit your new/improved script here
|
|
Morebits.date
class to replace the moment library. It can handle custom formatting and natural language for dates, as well as section header regexes. If you were using getUTCMonthName
or getUTCMonthNameAbbrev
with Date
objects, those have been deprecated and should
be updated.Hope everyone stays safe. -- DannyS712 ( talk) 20:27, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2020).
Hello Brad, the Superlinks are not working properly for me since I think the day before yesterday. The text and other content on the page shows in front of the information box. See here for a screenshot. -- MrClog ( talk) 18:49, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi Bradv! Please help me edit the draft I’m working on and understand if there is a problem with it being listed? The sock you have now indefinitely blocked (thank you) bullied me and wouldn’t help! He/she also shared a personal gmail ID when I asked for help on how to edit the page. I’m the owner of an agency but that in no way means I’m being paid to edit the page I’m working on. I’ve disclosed the agency name, and I’ve also shared as many links and references as possible on the draft - if you could please help me so that the page gets created, it would be the kindest thing! Thanks and stay safe! Parisgirl89 ( talk) 09:32, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi Brad, there are more IP edits at Cathy Areu that need to be revdeleted. [1] Best, SarahSV (talk) 00:55, 8 May 2020 (UTC)