This is Beauty111's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Hello! Beauty111,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
David.moreno72 13:39, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
|
You wrote: "I ... have documented it in exactly the way I was requested to do so." By whom? Who requested that you submit Draft:Angela Workman? Robert McClenon ( talk) 12:48, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Theroadislong ( talk) 21:18, 23 November 2016 (UTC)Hello, Beauty111. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Angela Workman, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. If you are Angela Workman as you have suggested, please do not edit the article directly but make suggestions on the talk page for others to consider. Theroadislong ( talk) 19:51, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Please reconsider your edit on the Angela Workman page which read "Angela Workman was trained as a classical stage actress and received a Masters Degree from the Yale School of Drama." Please also reconsider your edit on same page which read "The War Bride" won two Genie Awards in Toronto."
http://saylescreen.com/clients/workman-angela-2/
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. Some or all of the changes weren't supported by neutral, independent, reliable sources. Consider re-submitting with content based on media, books and scholarly works. |
Beauty111 ( talk) 03:34, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Here's an archived photograph of Angela Workman from Yale University Library, to support the contention that Angela Workman graduated from Yale School of Drama with a degree in classical stage acting (as per your edit removal).
http://findit.library.yale.edu/catalog/digcoll:940124
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. Some or all of the changes weren't supported by neutral, independent, reliable sources. Consider re-submitting with content based on media, books and scholarly works. |
Beauty111 ( talk) 03:34, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
.. it is to the credit of the person who created the film. The editor here has no fundamental understanding of the working reality of the film business. If 'The War Bride' was nominated for seven, and won two, awards, of course that is a credit to the person who created the film!
A photo from Yale University Library, to support the contention that Angela Workman did indeed graduate with a Masters Degree from the Yale School of Drama in classical stage acting (as per edit removal).
http://images.library.yale.edu/drama/oneitem.asp?id=511
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. Some or all of the changes weren't supported by neutral, independent, reliable sources. Consider re-submitting with content based on media, books and scholarly works. |
Beauty111 (
talk) 03:35, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
I just want to clarify that although I attempted to edit my new page (I didn't realize we aren't supposed to do that, my apologies), there are other people who have worked for two months to get this page posted. No one is paid by me to do this. As mentioned previously, I've worked professionally as a screenwriter for over twenty years, all over the world, for most of the major studios. I have a major motion picture coming out (The Zookeeper's Wife (film) based on the best selling book by Diane Ackerman). These are the kinds of high-profile films I write, and have been writing for many years. I'm considered 'notable' in my profession, though some editors on this site might not recognize me as such. I hope you will remove the warning template. (AW)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. Some or all of the changes weren't supported by neutral, independent, reliable sources. Consider re-submitting with content based on media, books and scholarly works. |
Newspaper article in ScreenDaily re the film 'The War Bride' and its seven Genie Awards nominations (as per edit removing this line from Angela Workman's page). Please revise!
http://www.screendaily.com/atanarjuat-and-war-bride-lead-genie-race/407774.article
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. Some or all of the changes weren't supported by neutral, independent, reliable sources. Consider re-submitting with content based on media, books and scholarly works. |
Beauty111 ( talk) 03:32, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
To the editors,
I note that you have completely revised this page, and have added a very unflattering review of "Snow Flower and the Secret Fan" by the New York Times. Why would you put that on here? I would undo myself but have been advised not to. Here is a positive review of the film and I hope you will post this instead (the Hollywood Reporter is a major trade publication):
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/snow-flower-secret-fan-film-210501
PLEASE REMOVE THE NEW YORK TIMES REVIEW IMMEDIATELY. If your intent is to remove my page entirely than I will do it, rather than allowing such cruel and unflattering pieces of information edited onto the page without my consent. Wikipedia is difficult to code for those of us who are not familiar with these methods, and who don't know all the many 'rules.' I have tried very heard to learn how to do it. But something punitive is going on here.
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. The changes suggested removing content that is well-cited or where sources exist. |
Beauty111 ( talk) 19:23, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
I included the Hollywood Reporter review simply to point out that there are other, far more positive reviews of the Snow Flower film, and I would appreciate you linking to that instead of the New York Times review. If you insist on keeping the NY Times commentary on the page then I ask that you remove the page entirely (which is, I suspect, what you'd like to do). I've read many other pages of screenwriters, and those involved in the film industry. Rarely have I seen such unflattering references posted on these pages. This was not my doing; I believe it was yours.
You and I are at an unpleasant crossroads. You win. Please remove the NY Times notice, or this page entirely.
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. The changes suggested removing content that is well-cited or where sources exist. |
Beauty111 ( talk) 22:16, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
I am asking you to please remove the additional comment about the Snow Flower screenplay (which, if disjointed, was not by me -- the Los Angeles Times review testifies to the fact that additional layers were added to my original draft). Please, will you remove it?
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. The changes suggested removing content that is well-cited or where sources exist. |
Beauty111 ( talk) 22:58, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Good news. I guess. It looks like the Angela Workman article will be deleted because you don't meet the notability criteria (yet). Sorry your first encounter with Wikipedia was a problematic one. If I can help in future, let me know. Cheers, Yintan 19:02, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
This is Beauty111's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Hello! Beauty111,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
David.moreno72 13:39, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
|
You wrote: "I ... have documented it in exactly the way I was requested to do so." By whom? Who requested that you submit Draft:Angela Workman? Robert McClenon ( talk) 12:48, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Theroadislong ( talk) 21:18, 23 November 2016 (UTC)Hello, Beauty111. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Angela Workman, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. If you are Angela Workman as you have suggested, please do not edit the article directly but make suggestions on the talk page for others to consider. Theroadislong ( talk) 19:51, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Please reconsider your edit on the Angela Workman page which read "Angela Workman was trained as a classical stage actress and received a Masters Degree from the Yale School of Drama." Please also reconsider your edit on same page which read "The War Bride" won two Genie Awards in Toronto."
http://saylescreen.com/clients/workman-angela-2/
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. Some or all of the changes weren't supported by neutral, independent, reliable sources. Consider re-submitting with content based on media, books and scholarly works. |
Beauty111 ( talk) 03:34, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Here's an archived photograph of Angela Workman from Yale University Library, to support the contention that Angela Workman graduated from Yale School of Drama with a degree in classical stage acting (as per your edit removal).
http://findit.library.yale.edu/catalog/digcoll:940124
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. Some or all of the changes weren't supported by neutral, independent, reliable sources. Consider re-submitting with content based on media, books and scholarly works. |
Beauty111 ( talk) 03:34, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
.. it is to the credit of the person who created the film. The editor here has no fundamental understanding of the working reality of the film business. If 'The War Bride' was nominated for seven, and won two, awards, of course that is a credit to the person who created the film!
A photo from Yale University Library, to support the contention that Angela Workman did indeed graduate with a Masters Degree from the Yale School of Drama in classical stage acting (as per edit removal).
http://images.library.yale.edu/drama/oneitem.asp?id=511
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. Some or all of the changes weren't supported by neutral, independent, reliable sources. Consider re-submitting with content based on media, books and scholarly works. |
Beauty111 (
talk) 03:35, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
I just want to clarify that although I attempted to edit my new page (I didn't realize we aren't supposed to do that, my apologies), there are other people who have worked for two months to get this page posted. No one is paid by me to do this. As mentioned previously, I've worked professionally as a screenwriter for over twenty years, all over the world, for most of the major studios. I have a major motion picture coming out (The Zookeeper's Wife (film) based on the best selling book by Diane Ackerman). These are the kinds of high-profile films I write, and have been writing for many years. I'm considered 'notable' in my profession, though some editors on this site might not recognize me as such. I hope you will remove the warning template. (AW)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. Some or all of the changes weren't supported by neutral, independent, reliable sources. Consider re-submitting with content based on media, books and scholarly works. |
Newspaper article in ScreenDaily re the film 'The War Bride' and its seven Genie Awards nominations (as per edit removing this line from Angela Workman's page). Please revise!
http://www.screendaily.com/atanarjuat-and-war-bride-lead-genie-race/407774.article
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. Some or all of the changes weren't supported by neutral, independent, reliable sources. Consider re-submitting with content based on media, books and scholarly works. |
Beauty111 ( talk) 03:32, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
To the editors,
I note that you have completely revised this page, and have added a very unflattering review of "Snow Flower and the Secret Fan" by the New York Times. Why would you put that on here? I would undo myself but have been advised not to. Here is a positive review of the film and I hope you will post this instead (the Hollywood Reporter is a major trade publication):
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/snow-flower-secret-fan-film-210501
PLEASE REMOVE THE NEW YORK TIMES REVIEW IMMEDIATELY. If your intent is to remove my page entirely than I will do it, rather than allowing such cruel and unflattering pieces of information edited onto the page without my consent. Wikipedia is difficult to code for those of us who are not familiar with these methods, and who don't know all the many 'rules.' I have tried very heard to learn how to do it. But something punitive is going on here.
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. The changes suggested removing content that is well-cited or where sources exist. |
Beauty111 ( talk) 19:23, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
I included the Hollywood Reporter review simply to point out that there are other, far more positive reviews of the Snow Flower film, and I would appreciate you linking to that instead of the New York Times review. If you insist on keeping the NY Times commentary on the page then I ask that you remove the page entirely (which is, I suspect, what you'd like to do). I've read many other pages of screenwriters, and those involved in the film industry. Rarely have I seen such unflattering references posted on these pages. This was not my doing; I believe it was yours.
You and I are at an unpleasant crossroads. You win. Please remove the NY Times notice, or this page entirely.
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. The changes suggested removing content that is well-cited or where sources exist. |
Beauty111 ( talk) 22:16, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
I am asking you to please remove the additional comment about the Snow Flower screenplay (which, if disjointed, was not by me -- the Los Angeles Times review testifies to the fact that additional layers were added to my original draft). Please, will you remove it?
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. The changes suggested removing content that is well-cited or where sources exist. |
Beauty111 ( talk) 22:58, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Good news. I guess. It looks like the Angela Workman article will be deleted because you don't meet the notability criteria (yet). Sorry your first encounter with Wikipedia was a problematic one. If I can help in future, let me know. Cheers, Yintan 19:02, 27 November 2016 (UTC)