|
|
Yes, I know I misspelled June.
Bearian, I've always seen you being helpful in various ways and I honestly believe that you would make a good bureaucrat. Since you already have lots of experience in different areas of Wikipedia for many years, I think that it will be great if we all could have an extra bureaucrat like you. Although it's your choice, but do think about it. Thanks. TheGeneralUser ( talk) 08:05, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Hello Bearian and thank you for your welcoming words. I have been predominantly collaborating on the Greek Wikipedia and have only one entry on the American WP, <Fotos Politis>, a very important Greek stage director in the first part of the 20th century. Though Greek, I grew up in Manhattan and attended Power Memorial Academy and Columbia College class of 58. Take care -- Bastias ( talk) 15:10, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
I've blocked for copyvios and username. I've declined your speedy and reverted and then done a revdel. Takes it back to a tagged for improvement state. The beggar might start talking now... Peridon ( talk) 20:58, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for your comment on talk:Joni Ernst. Would you be willing to help maintain the content under dispute at the article itself? CFredkin ( talk) 23:04, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Bearian, I saw that you're on Wikibreak. As a courtesy notice, I wanted to let you know that you were mentioned on ANI here . (I didn't initiate this and have nothing to do with this ). You may want to respond when you get a moment. Kosh Vorlon 11:24, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
Howdy, I've been informed that I should come here to request to have a Wikipedia block lifted. I googled around for how to fix the problem and was under the impression that these folks could help; if they can, they haven't. The folks over there told me to ask you to reconsider the block instead. Per this article I came across, it seems as though the idea of deleting *block* notices is debatable amongst even well-versed users, but I did find direct references in wikipedia policy stating that the removal of a warning from a user's talk page is permitted. So, I'd like to ask you to reconsider the one month block you've placed on the IP address in question. Thanks. Meteoritekid ( talk) 11:58, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
Bearian, I would like to take this moment and thank you for the trust you had placed in me and for your support in my RfA that happened a while ago. Although it didn't turn out as I had planned, I certainly appreciated all the comments and suggestions given by you and other people. I will learn from all of them and will hopefully run again someday when I'm fully ready. Thank you. TheGeneralUser ( talk) 13:09, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
Upcoming events hosted by New England Wikimedians! | |
---|---|
After many months of doubt, nature has finally warmed up and summer is almost here! The New England Wikimedians user group have planned some upcoming events. This includes some unique and interesting events to those who are interested:
Although we also aren't hosting this year's Wikimania, we would like to let you know that Wikimania this year will be occurring in London in August: If you have any questions, please leave a message at Kevin Rutherford's talk page. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list. |
I have reported both the page and its creator to administrators. They have removed about 10 templates today (about 6 of them after a final warning). There's no point in battling him since both he and the page will be gone soon. DJAMP4444 ( talk) 15:28, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Carlos Bulosan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mount Pleasant Cemetery ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:50, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
It does not look as if the deletion of the Lake George Music Festival article has been very controversial, maybe it is too early yet since it has only been at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lake George Music Festival since 21 May. -- Bejnar ( talk) 19:19, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
law
Thank you for quality articles and contributions to articles concerning law, such as
Alcohol laws of New Jersey, for articles rescued from deletion, for factual articles on people you know and an informative infobox of yourself, - you are an
awesome Wikipedian!
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 16:20, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
A year ago, you were the 507th recipient of my Pumpkin Sky Prize, -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:06, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
USer:Maghasito try to spread of pseudo science, the so-called Hungarian Turanism , which is now a politically motivated chauvinist pseudo-science from the 19th century and a core agenda of far right Jobbik party and ww2 nazi Arrow Cross Party . There are not a single contemporary scholar (academics university professors) linguistics, historian population geneticist on this planet, who support that fantasy theory. Wikikpedia is a free encyclopedia, however it is not the place of the popularization of pseudo-scientific politically-motivated fantastic nonsenses. The best option would be the permanent ban of Maghasito. Thank you!-- Dosemark ( talk) 10:23, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
Your comment about waiting till he edited notwithstanding, I have blocked the account indefinitely as it's basically "I eat my shit" with the common practice of inserting "izn" into the first syllable of any taboo word to avoid censure for using it. Therefore it was hard-blockable on sight. Daniel Case ( talk) 00:54, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, thanks for prod of HelMSIC. First I tagged it for CSD, because it seems to be non-notable organization but you denied CSD. I'm fine with prod if you think prod suits more than CSD. Thank you. A.Minkowiski _Lets t@lk 18:35, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Avellone (2nd nomination). Thanks. Hirolovesswords ( talk) 22:49, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:49, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
Upcoming Saturday event - June 21: Wiki Loves Pride NYC | |
---|---|
You are invited to join us at Jefferson Market Library for "Wiki Loves Pride", hosted by New York Public Library, Metropolitan New York Library Council, Wikimedia LGBT and Wikimedia New York City, where both experienced and new Wikipedia editors will collaboratively improve articles on this theme:
|
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by removing your name from this list.)
Respected sir
some data has been deleted from the article. is it possible to get back. and modify as per your requirement. Awards and achievements section in our article..we have some photographs is it possible to use it as a reference. i will upload it on wikimedia. we have some new paper reference but in our language.
thanks and Regards V S Dongre. Vsdongre ( talk) 22:57, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Can you add simultaneous indefinite pending-changes protection? Without interfering the semi-protection? -- George Ho ( talk) 07:18, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
I think I may have come to this nice person's rescue just in time; could you take another look, please? Yngvadottir ( talk) 17:29, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
I am not very knowledgeable of how to use wikipedia but I would like to tell you that William M. Windsor is truly pumping himself up to be some sort of well known person such as larry klayman. He is engaged in a lawsuit against 20 or more people in regards to liibel and slander and defamation yet he has been harassing people in person and also online using the resources of Alcatraz media. See lawlessamerica.org there are some links there to show you how. my opinion is that he is not notable enough to have a history here on wiki. He has actually sued facebook recently. He does not want any of these crazy lawsuits to be known about in the open because it does not do well for him. that is all. You can email if need be because I have no clue how to use this for discussion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seandfleming ( talk • contribs) 05:42, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Palashi may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 16:53, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
Thanks! Unexpected, but very much appreciated!! (Certainly a VAST improvement on the average reaction (i.e. none) to my edits.) Never underestimate the value of good manners - it might not do you as much good as you might wish, but it's most unlikely to elicit harm, and at a minimum will generally elicit a smile. Best wishes, Pdfpdf ( talk) 14:21, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Sunday July 6: WikNYC Picnic | |
---|---|
You are invited to join us the "picnic anyone can edit" in Central Park, as part of the Great American Wiknic celebrations being held across the USA. Remember it's a wiki-picnic, which means potluck.
Also, before the picnic, you can join in the Wikimedia NYC chapter's annual meeting.
We hope to see you there!-- Pharos ( talk) 16:51, 28 June 2014 (UTC) |
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by removing your name from this list.)
The Editor's Barnstar | |
For improving the Wikipedia project !! M.Karelin ( talk) 10:54, 29 June 2014 (UTC) |
Hey there Bearian. We last spoke after I'd reported Jetson2012 to AIV. He appears to have returned as Jetson2014, if you agree, hit 'em with the sloppy mop water! A good day to you sir. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 17:14, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
Your comment on the AIV notwithstanding, I blocked him anyway per this. Daniel Case ( talk) 15:33, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Word salad? I beg to differ. Salad can be consumed. Seriously, I would have speedied this had I been able to think of an appropriate tag. TheLongTone ( talk) 18:36, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I notice that you tagged this page for a merge, but you didn't carry out the rest of the merge proposal process. Do you mind if I ask why? Also, why do you think this page should be merged rather than deleted? There seems to be no new information on the page, and since it is such a tiny page, there doesn't seem to be any point in merging what little is there. Benboy00 ( talk) 01:15, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
You may be interested in this topic. LibStar ( talk) 00:03, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
You tagged Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Irish Food Guide as {{ under construction}} in November 2013. I just wanted to remind you about the article in case you were considering improving it. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 10:30, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Since you participated in the deletion discussion of this article, and since you are an administrator, I am seeking your help in dealing with a problem which I see as vandalism. During the time when deletion discussions were taking place, I noticed problems with the existing references; often, they did not mention Mersini-Houghton's name; one reference was to a bookstore (Amazon). So I revamped the article, with reliable sources with inline easy-to-check citations, removed the unsourced speculation as per biographical article rules. The article was closed as no consensus. But user Holybeef seems to have a POV-pushing agenda of removing any article on Laura Mersini-Houghton. When the article was revamped to a much improved version Holybeef reverted it here and again here back to the same problematic poorly referenced version that Holybeef wanted to delete. Further, on the Houghton talk page, then Holybeef wrote above that s/he doesn't want anybody else to edit the problematic version while he tries to get the closure decision reversed by writing Do not edit the article until the revision is completed. My sense is this behavior is disruptive, possibly an academic seeking to discount another academic, but I am in a position where if I try to revert the reverts, it will look like (or be) edit-warring, so I am looking for guidance here.-- Tomwsulcer ( talk) 16:17, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Please note that this article is under relist revision ("to be re-listed") for deletion discussion because closing seemed premature due to article's numerous issues as seen by countless tags for years. This means numerous editors had seen this article as problematic to say the least. Not enough time has passed for even a fraction of those editors to familiarize themselves with delete nominations. Note also that user:Tomwsulcer is a rather nervous proponent of keeping the article, so much so that, immediately after the delete nomination, he attempted to forge a major overhaul without any discussion whatsoever. Note that disputed articles are not subject to WP:BOLD by any stretch of imagination. He repeated his suspicious deed immediately after the closing too. His edit is biased at best since it tries to portray the person the article is about as notable despite this person not meeting any academic notability criteria but being just an average researcher instead, as noted by several editors during the delete nomination's first discussion. Furthermore, his proposed intro paragraph would want you to believe that the claimed notability is in her "proposing a controversial theory" which however is nonsense: there are thousands of theories and all are controversial until proven correct. That's just one issue with his "improvements" but there are too many issues to list here. In summary: his article is basically a hand waving and POV, not to mention clear errors such as her claims: no-black-holes (the credit for which goes to Stephen Hawking rather than the person the article is about), and the dark flow (recently shown by a 175-strong Planck satellite mission collaboration to be a ghost). See article's talk page for details. Thanks for trying though, it's always refreshing to see a lawyer such as yourself trying to give his/her input on science. Not appreciated, but refreshing nonetheless. Holybeef ( talk) 14:58, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
First, thank you for recent protection of Guardians of the Galaxy (film). The film is due out on July 31 and these types of high-profile films typically attract a lot vandalism / unconstructive edits around the time of release and are usually protected but I was wondering if it wouldn't be more prudent to just prolong the protection now. Thank you.-- TriiipleThreat ( talk) 21:08, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Rooney. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:53, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Clyde_Lewis
hi - there is chat at blp board - please do not simply replace disputed content without contributing any talk chat at all - Mosfetfaser ( talk) 21:07, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
BRD is not a policy, though it is an oft-cited essay. This means it is not a process that you can require other editors to follow.. As far as I can tell, that's been in this essay since at least 2012. — MusikAnimal talk 14:46, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
you an admin matey? Mosfetfaser ( talk) 22:41, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
{Pasted from another talk page.}
You wrote:
Admins are supposed to follow rules - log off and don't come back mate -
So are regular users of Wikipedia.
No personal attacks is one of them .
Kosh Vorlon 16:12, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for saving my draft from speedy deletion. I believe it is a valid draft and can stand on its own merit. Hopefully it will emerge as a valuable article as well. Thank you for your help Asdklf; ( talk) 02:49, 23 July 2014 (UTC)Asdklf;
QVVERTYVS ( hm?) 09:54, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
I've changed the block settings for 64.134.162.154 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS) to 31 hours. You cannot block for a year with no relevant editing history to support that decision. The WHOIS report suggests the IP is a public WiFi hotspot. The concerned user may have moved on to another coffee shop and is now editing from a different IP. Following this logic, your block is then accomplishing nothing more than shutting out potentially constructive users for an entire 365 days. Furthermore, IPs cannot be considered vandalism-only accounts. They are not accounts. Vandalism-only implies a hard, indefinite block. We don't do that to IPs. I know you mean well, Brian, but you must exert better judgement with the block tool. This is unacceptable, in my opinion. I can't reiterate enough that blocking is a preventive measure, not punitive. We're not punishing users, we're protecting the wiki from further disruption. — MusikAnimal talk 17:44, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
hello, and thank you both for the intervention against 64.134.162.154 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS) and 64.134.171.42 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS), he has some kind of personal animosity against me for previously reporting him for vandalism and sock puppetry and thinks he is settling some score by launching his racially derogatory personal attacks. i had hoped that those derogatory messages and edit summaries would be deleted per RD2 as was done in this case 64.134.127.27 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS) by a patrolling admin. Is this something you would be able to do? or is there something else i need to do to have those messages redacted? thank you, Pvpoodle ( talk) 23:47, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Greetings! Since I found your name on the Notice board for autism-related topics, I figured you might be interested in the recently created WikiProject Autism. Muffinator ( talk) 21:48, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia ads | file info – #251 |
I opened an SPI related to Jeju outer port and The dredging works for outer wall quay of Pyeongtaek (Asan) Port (3rd and 4th berth). -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 23:19, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello,
I created an article, "Zhu Lin (tennis)" but the article was deleted, as Zhu had failed to meet any of the Tennis Notability Standards at the time. However, she has recently appeared in the main draw of the 2014 Jiangxi International Women's Tennis Open, which is a WTA 125K event. Does her appearance in the tournament now meet the "WTA main draw" standard for the Tennis Notability Standards? If so, can we restore the page I created?
Thank you, Zane Nariman — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zane Nariman ( talk • contribs) 01:08, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
I'd like to order a large pepperoni pizza to go, please. Erik L'Ensle :) ( talk) 14:33, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
Hey, Bearian, you edited this article once recently, so you might appreciate that this somewhat subtle vandalism fooled us all for 5 + years: [5].-- Milowent • has spoken 13:22, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Semi-protection should not be used as a preemptive measure. The block is even more baffling. That IP belongs to Oberlin College (as the Daily Dot article says, the editor was a sophmore), so the IP represents multiple users. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the vandalism occurred over five years ago. The chances that the same person is editing on the same machine five years later is slim to none. That is considered (very) stale and no block or protection is warranted. Please understand I'm just trying to help. Regards — MusikAnimal talk 16:33, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Bearian ( talk) 22:21, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Semi-protecting the page was very reasonable, but the block was not and is now something folks are laughing at. As administrators, we're supposed to not only janitorize, but also exercise good judgment. Blocking an IP for a 5-year-old vandalism not only doesn't help the situation in any measurable way, it harms the (sometimes already shaky) reputation of administrators. There are already thousands of folks out there that think we're power-mad martinets instead of mop pushers which is part of why I don't log-in that often unless I need the bit to do something useful. Please use this opportunity to learn and recognize that an ineffective action is often worse than inaction. We're not here to send messages, we're here to keep things shiny. CHAIRBOY ( ☎) 17:10, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
I'm referring to this: User_talk:132.162.68.56, what good did blocking do since it's over 5 years old? It's incredibly stale. Tutelary ( talk) 21:27, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Bearian ( talk) 22:21, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Girls needs may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 23:08, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Faran college jhang, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prep school. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:51, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Not sure what "review" means, as this is the first time I've noticed receiving "notifications" and I didn't see any edits from you. Hope they were of use. Beth Wellington ( talk) 20:35, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Illegitimi non carborundum 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 14:10, 31 July 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
Yes, I know I misspelled June.
Bearian, I've always seen you being helpful in various ways and I honestly believe that you would make a good bureaucrat. Since you already have lots of experience in different areas of Wikipedia for many years, I think that it will be great if we all could have an extra bureaucrat like you. Although it's your choice, but do think about it. Thanks. TheGeneralUser ( talk) 08:05, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Hello Bearian and thank you for your welcoming words. I have been predominantly collaborating on the Greek Wikipedia and have only one entry on the American WP, <Fotos Politis>, a very important Greek stage director in the first part of the 20th century. Though Greek, I grew up in Manhattan and attended Power Memorial Academy and Columbia College class of 58. Take care -- Bastias ( talk) 15:10, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
I've blocked for copyvios and username. I've declined your speedy and reverted and then done a revdel. Takes it back to a tagged for improvement state. The beggar might start talking now... Peridon ( talk) 20:58, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for your comment on talk:Joni Ernst. Would you be willing to help maintain the content under dispute at the article itself? CFredkin ( talk) 23:04, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Bearian, I saw that you're on Wikibreak. As a courtesy notice, I wanted to let you know that you were mentioned on ANI here . (I didn't initiate this and have nothing to do with this ). You may want to respond when you get a moment. Kosh Vorlon 11:24, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
Howdy, I've been informed that I should come here to request to have a Wikipedia block lifted. I googled around for how to fix the problem and was under the impression that these folks could help; if they can, they haven't. The folks over there told me to ask you to reconsider the block instead. Per this article I came across, it seems as though the idea of deleting *block* notices is debatable amongst even well-versed users, but I did find direct references in wikipedia policy stating that the removal of a warning from a user's talk page is permitted. So, I'd like to ask you to reconsider the one month block you've placed on the IP address in question. Thanks. Meteoritekid ( talk) 11:58, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
Bearian, I would like to take this moment and thank you for the trust you had placed in me and for your support in my RfA that happened a while ago. Although it didn't turn out as I had planned, I certainly appreciated all the comments and suggestions given by you and other people. I will learn from all of them and will hopefully run again someday when I'm fully ready. Thank you. TheGeneralUser ( talk) 13:09, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
Upcoming events hosted by New England Wikimedians! | |
---|---|
After many months of doubt, nature has finally warmed up and summer is almost here! The New England Wikimedians user group have planned some upcoming events. This includes some unique and interesting events to those who are interested:
Although we also aren't hosting this year's Wikimania, we would like to let you know that Wikimania this year will be occurring in London in August: If you have any questions, please leave a message at Kevin Rutherford's talk page. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list. |
I have reported both the page and its creator to administrators. They have removed about 10 templates today (about 6 of them after a final warning). There's no point in battling him since both he and the page will be gone soon. DJAMP4444 ( talk) 15:28, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Carlos Bulosan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mount Pleasant Cemetery ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:50, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
It does not look as if the deletion of the Lake George Music Festival article has been very controversial, maybe it is too early yet since it has only been at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lake George Music Festival since 21 May. -- Bejnar ( talk) 19:19, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
law
Thank you for quality articles and contributions to articles concerning law, such as
Alcohol laws of New Jersey, for articles rescued from deletion, for factual articles on people you know and an informative infobox of yourself, - you are an
awesome Wikipedian!
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 16:20, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
A year ago, you were the 507th recipient of my Pumpkin Sky Prize, -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:06, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
USer:Maghasito try to spread of pseudo science, the so-called Hungarian Turanism , which is now a politically motivated chauvinist pseudo-science from the 19th century and a core agenda of far right Jobbik party and ww2 nazi Arrow Cross Party . There are not a single contemporary scholar (academics university professors) linguistics, historian population geneticist on this planet, who support that fantasy theory. Wikikpedia is a free encyclopedia, however it is not the place of the popularization of pseudo-scientific politically-motivated fantastic nonsenses. The best option would be the permanent ban of Maghasito. Thank you!-- Dosemark ( talk) 10:23, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
Your comment about waiting till he edited notwithstanding, I have blocked the account indefinitely as it's basically "I eat my shit" with the common practice of inserting "izn" into the first syllable of any taboo word to avoid censure for using it. Therefore it was hard-blockable on sight. Daniel Case ( talk) 00:54, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, thanks for prod of HelMSIC. First I tagged it for CSD, because it seems to be non-notable organization but you denied CSD. I'm fine with prod if you think prod suits more than CSD. Thank you. A.Minkowiski _Lets t@lk 18:35, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Avellone (2nd nomination). Thanks. Hirolovesswords ( talk) 22:49, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:49, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
Upcoming Saturday event - June 21: Wiki Loves Pride NYC | |
---|---|
You are invited to join us at Jefferson Market Library for "Wiki Loves Pride", hosted by New York Public Library, Metropolitan New York Library Council, Wikimedia LGBT and Wikimedia New York City, where both experienced and new Wikipedia editors will collaboratively improve articles on this theme:
|
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by removing your name from this list.)
Respected sir
some data has been deleted from the article. is it possible to get back. and modify as per your requirement. Awards and achievements section in our article..we have some photographs is it possible to use it as a reference. i will upload it on wikimedia. we have some new paper reference but in our language.
thanks and Regards V S Dongre. Vsdongre ( talk) 22:57, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Can you add simultaneous indefinite pending-changes protection? Without interfering the semi-protection? -- George Ho ( talk) 07:18, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
I think I may have come to this nice person's rescue just in time; could you take another look, please? Yngvadottir ( talk) 17:29, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
I am not very knowledgeable of how to use wikipedia but I would like to tell you that William M. Windsor is truly pumping himself up to be some sort of well known person such as larry klayman. He is engaged in a lawsuit against 20 or more people in regards to liibel and slander and defamation yet he has been harassing people in person and also online using the resources of Alcatraz media. See lawlessamerica.org there are some links there to show you how. my opinion is that he is not notable enough to have a history here on wiki. He has actually sued facebook recently. He does not want any of these crazy lawsuits to be known about in the open because it does not do well for him. that is all. You can email if need be because I have no clue how to use this for discussion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seandfleming ( talk • contribs) 05:42, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Palashi may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 16:53, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
Thanks! Unexpected, but very much appreciated!! (Certainly a VAST improvement on the average reaction (i.e. none) to my edits.) Never underestimate the value of good manners - it might not do you as much good as you might wish, but it's most unlikely to elicit harm, and at a minimum will generally elicit a smile. Best wishes, Pdfpdf ( talk) 14:21, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Sunday July 6: WikNYC Picnic | |
---|---|
You are invited to join us the "picnic anyone can edit" in Central Park, as part of the Great American Wiknic celebrations being held across the USA. Remember it's a wiki-picnic, which means potluck.
Also, before the picnic, you can join in the Wikimedia NYC chapter's annual meeting.
We hope to see you there!-- Pharos ( talk) 16:51, 28 June 2014 (UTC) |
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by removing your name from this list.)
The Editor's Barnstar | |
For improving the Wikipedia project !! M.Karelin ( talk) 10:54, 29 June 2014 (UTC) |
Hey there Bearian. We last spoke after I'd reported Jetson2012 to AIV. He appears to have returned as Jetson2014, if you agree, hit 'em with the sloppy mop water! A good day to you sir. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 17:14, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
Your comment on the AIV notwithstanding, I blocked him anyway per this. Daniel Case ( talk) 15:33, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Word salad? I beg to differ. Salad can be consumed. Seriously, I would have speedied this had I been able to think of an appropriate tag. TheLongTone ( talk) 18:36, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I notice that you tagged this page for a merge, but you didn't carry out the rest of the merge proposal process. Do you mind if I ask why? Also, why do you think this page should be merged rather than deleted? There seems to be no new information on the page, and since it is such a tiny page, there doesn't seem to be any point in merging what little is there. Benboy00 ( talk) 01:15, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
You may be interested in this topic. LibStar ( talk) 00:03, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
You tagged Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Irish Food Guide as {{ under construction}} in November 2013. I just wanted to remind you about the article in case you were considering improving it. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 10:30, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Since you participated in the deletion discussion of this article, and since you are an administrator, I am seeking your help in dealing with a problem which I see as vandalism. During the time when deletion discussions were taking place, I noticed problems with the existing references; often, they did not mention Mersini-Houghton's name; one reference was to a bookstore (Amazon). So I revamped the article, with reliable sources with inline easy-to-check citations, removed the unsourced speculation as per biographical article rules. The article was closed as no consensus. But user Holybeef seems to have a POV-pushing agenda of removing any article on Laura Mersini-Houghton. When the article was revamped to a much improved version Holybeef reverted it here and again here back to the same problematic poorly referenced version that Holybeef wanted to delete. Further, on the Houghton talk page, then Holybeef wrote above that s/he doesn't want anybody else to edit the problematic version while he tries to get the closure decision reversed by writing Do not edit the article until the revision is completed. My sense is this behavior is disruptive, possibly an academic seeking to discount another academic, but I am in a position where if I try to revert the reverts, it will look like (or be) edit-warring, so I am looking for guidance here.-- Tomwsulcer ( talk) 16:17, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Please note that this article is under relist revision ("to be re-listed") for deletion discussion because closing seemed premature due to article's numerous issues as seen by countless tags for years. This means numerous editors had seen this article as problematic to say the least. Not enough time has passed for even a fraction of those editors to familiarize themselves with delete nominations. Note also that user:Tomwsulcer is a rather nervous proponent of keeping the article, so much so that, immediately after the delete nomination, he attempted to forge a major overhaul without any discussion whatsoever. Note that disputed articles are not subject to WP:BOLD by any stretch of imagination. He repeated his suspicious deed immediately after the closing too. His edit is biased at best since it tries to portray the person the article is about as notable despite this person not meeting any academic notability criteria but being just an average researcher instead, as noted by several editors during the delete nomination's first discussion. Furthermore, his proposed intro paragraph would want you to believe that the claimed notability is in her "proposing a controversial theory" which however is nonsense: there are thousands of theories and all are controversial until proven correct. That's just one issue with his "improvements" but there are too many issues to list here. In summary: his article is basically a hand waving and POV, not to mention clear errors such as her claims: no-black-holes (the credit for which goes to Stephen Hawking rather than the person the article is about), and the dark flow (recently shown by a 175-strong Planck satellite mission collaboration to be a ghost). See article's talk page for details. Thanks for trying though, it's always refreshing to see a lawyer such as yourself trying to give his/her input on science. Not appreciated, but refreshing nonetheless. Holybeef ( talk) 14:58, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
First, thank you for recent protection of Guardians of the Galaxy (film). The film is due out on July 31 and these types of high-profile films typically attract a lot vandalism / unconstructive edits around the time of release and are usually protected but I was wondering if it wouldn't be more prudent to just prolong the protection now. Thank you.-- TriiipleThreat ( talk) 21:08, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Rooney. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:53, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Clyde_Lewis
hi - there is chat at blp board - please do not simply replace disputed content without contributing any talk chat at all - Mosfetfaser ( talk) 21:07, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
BRD is not a policy, though it is an oft-cited essay. This means it is not a process that you can require other editors to follow.. As far as I can tell, that's been in this essay since at least 2012. — MusikAnimal talk 14:46, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
you an admin matey? Mosfetfaser ( talk) 22:41, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
{Pasted from another talk page.}
You wrote:
Admins are supposed to follow rules - log off and don't come back mate -
So are regular users of Wikipedia.
No personal attacks is one of them .
Kosh Vorlon 16:12, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for saving my draft from speedy deletion. I believe it is a valid draft and can stand on its own merit. Hopefully it will emerge as a valuable article as well. Thank you for your help Asdklf; ( talk) 02:49, 23 July 2014 (UTC)Asdklf;
QVVERTYVS ( hm?) 09:54, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
I've changed the block settings for 64.134.162.154 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS) to 31 hours. You cannot block for a year with no relevant editing history to support that decision. The WHOIS report suggests the IP is a public WiFi hotspot. The concerned user may have moved on to another coffee shop and is now editing from a different IP. Following this logic, your block is then accomplishing nothing more than shutting out potentially constructive users for an entire 365 days. Furthermore, IPs cannot be considered vandalism-only accounts. They are not accounts. Vandalism-only implies a hard, indefinite block. We don't do that to IPs. I know you mean well, Brian, but you must exert better judgement with the block tool. This is unacceptable, in my opinion. I can't reiterate enough that blocking is a preventive measure, not punitive. We're not punishing users, we're protecting the wiki from further disruption. — MusikAnimal talk 17:44, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
hello, and thank you both for the intervention against 64.134.162.154 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS) and 64.134.171.42 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS), he has some kind of personal animosity against me for previously reporting him for vandalism and sock puppetry and thinks he is settling some score by launching his racially derogatory personal attacks. i had hoped that those derogatory messages and edit summaries would be deleted per RD2 as was done in this case 64.134.127.27 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS) by a patrolling admin. Is this something you would be able to do? or is there something else i need to do to have those messages redacted? thank you, Pvpoodle ( talk) 23:47, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Greetings! Since I found your name on the Notice board for autism-related topics, I figured you might be interested in the recently created WikiProject Autism. Muffinator ( talk) 21:48, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia ads | file info – #251 |
I opened an SPI related to Jeju outer port and The dredging works for outer wall quay of Pyeongtaek (Asan) Port (3rd and 4th berth). -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 23:19, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello,
I created an article, "Zhu Lin (tennis)" but the article was deleted, as Zhu had failed to meet any of the Tennis Notability Standards at the time. However, she has recently appeared in the main draw of the 2014 Jiangxi International Women's Tennis Open, which is a WTA 125K event. Does her appearance in the tournament now meet the "WTA main draw" standard for the Tennis Notability Standards? If so, can we restore the page I created?
Thank you, Zane Nariman — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zane Nariman ( talk • contribs) 01:08, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
I'd like to order a large pepperoni pizza to go, please. Erik L'Ensle :) ( talk) 14:33, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
Hey, Bearian, you edited this article once recently, so you might appreciate that this somewhat subtle vandalism fooled us all for 5 + years: [5].-- Milowent • has spoken 13:22, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Semi-protection should not be used as a preemptive measure. The block is even more baffling. That IP belongs to Oberlin College (as the Daily Dot article says, the editor was a sophmore), so the IP represents multiple users. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the vandalism occurred over five years ago. The chances that the same person is editing on the same machine five years later is slim to none. That is considered (very) stale and no block or protection is warranted. Please understand I'm just trying to help. Regards — MusikAnimal talk 16:33, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Bearian ( talk) 22:21, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Semi-protecting the page was very reasonable, but the block was not and is now something folks are laughing at. As administrators, we're supposed to not only janitorize, but also exercise good judgment. Blocking an IP for a 5-year-old vandalism not only doesn't help the situation in any measurable way, it harms the (sometimes already shaky) reputation of administrators. There are already thousands of folks out there that think we're power-mad martinets instead of mop pushers which is part of why I don't log-in that often unless I need the bit to do something useful. Please use this opportunity to learn and recognize that an ineffective action is often worse than inaction. We're not here to send messages, we're here to keep things shiny. CHAIRBOY ( ☎) 17:10, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
I'm referring to this: User_talk:132.162.68.56, what good did blocking do since it's over 5 years old? It's incredibly stale. Tutelary ( talk) 21:27, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Bearian ( talk) 22:21, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Girls needs may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 23:08, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Faran college jhang, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prep school. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:51, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Not sure what "review" means, as this is the first time I've noticed receiving "notifications" and I didn't see any edits from you. Hope they were of use. Beth Wellington ( talk) 20:35, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Illegitimi non carborundum 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 14:10, 31 July 2014 (UTC) |