Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate
your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to
Syunik rebellion, it appears that you have added
original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses
combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the
tutorial on citing sources. Thank you.
Alon Alush (
talk) 06:30, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Please do not add
original research or
novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to
Syunik rebellion. Please cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.
Alon Alush (
talk) 06:36, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi User:Based-Hay, I noticed your edits on Syunik rebellion where you removed sourced material without explanation. Both the content in the article and the specific citation that I added most recently explain why the rebellion is marked as an Ottoman victory. Even if you think this is wrong, you have cite reliable sources when you make claims on the article and come to a consensus when making possibly controversial changes. Best, Revolution Saga ( talk) 18:49, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- @
Based-Hay you need to actually cite sources when you make edits. Just saying that you "researched from books" is not enough. If you keep up with your disruptive edits and ignore everyone else, you might get blocked from using Wikipedia.
Revolution Saga (
talk) 07:50, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- I have sources not only from books and stop editing that your fake battles u turkish kid
Based-Hay (
talk) 05:25, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- On Wikipedia you have to cite your sources, not just say that you read some books. Go read the tutorial on citing sources and strike out your offensive comment, or else I will have to take it to the Administrators' noticeboard to stop your disruptive editing. Revolution Saga ( talk) 06:54, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- I have sources not only from books and stop editing that your fake battles u turkish kid
Based-Hay (
talk) 05:25, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Battle of Nakhchivan (1919) moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Nakhchivan (1919). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boleyn ( talk) 21:53, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- I have sources but I can’t add. Can u add if i tell you? Based-Hay ( talk) 12:06, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks mate Based-Hay ( talk) 12:08, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Battle of Sarikamish (1920) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see the
Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place
{{Help me}}on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this message: Battle of Sarikamish (1920) was changed by Based-Hay (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.891338 on 2024-03-26T11:50:53+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 11:50, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate
your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to
Syunik rebellion, it appears that you have added
original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses
combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the
tutorial on citing sources. Thank you.
Alon Alush (
talk) 06:30, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Please do not add
original research or
novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to
Syunik rebellion. Please cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.
Alon Alush (
talk) 06:36, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi User:Based-Hay, I noticed your edits on Syunik rebellion where you removed sourced material without explanation. Both the content in the article and the specific citation that I added most recently explain why the rebellion is marked as an Ottoman victory. Even if you think this is wrong, you have cite reliable sources when you make claims on the article and come to a consensus when making possibly controversial changes. Best, Revolution Saga ( talk) 18:49, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- @
Based-Hay you need to actually cite sources when you make edits. Just saying that you "researched from books" is not enough. If you keep up with your disruptive edits and ignore everyone else, you might get blocked from using Wikipedia.
Revolution Saga (
talk) 07:50, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- I have sources not only from books and stop editing that your fake battles u turkish kid
Based-Hay (
talk) 05:25, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- On Wikipedia you have to cite your sources, not just say that you read some books. Go read the tutorial on citing sources and strike out your offensive comment, or else I will have to take it to the Administrators' noticeboard to stop your disruptive editing. Revolution Saga ( talk) 06:54, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- I have sources not only from books and stop editing that your fake battles u turkish kid
Based-Hay (
talk) 05:25, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Battle of Nakhchivan (1919) moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Nakhchivan (1919). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boleyn ( talk) 21:53, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- I have sources but I can’t add. Can u add if i tell you? Based-Hay ( talk) 12:06, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks mate Based-Hay ( talk) 12:08, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Battle of Sarikamish (1920) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see the
Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place
{{Help me}}on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this message: Battle of Sarikamish (1920) was changed by Based-Hay (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.891338 on 2024-03-26T11:50:53+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 11:50, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.