Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. MrOllie ( talk) 04:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC) reply

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Water heating. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NJGW ( talk) 18:04, 24 February 2009 (UTC) reply

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please know that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors on Water heating. If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. NJGW ( talk) 18:08, 24 February 2009 (UTC) reply

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Water heating. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. NJGW ( talk) 18:12, 24 February 2009 (UTC) reply

Axten, your last edit summary was: "I should be allowed to reference where the content came from." [1] You cannot however lay claim to information. If you have a link to an wp:RS and wp:V source which backs up the information then that is great, but your personal website is not such a link. I thank you for your contributions as they are very helpful and informative, but Wikipedia does not use personal websites as sources. NJGW ( talk) 18:16, 24 February 2009 (UTC) reply

Please note that you are now in violation of wp:3rr. Please self revert the last addition of your website so that an administrator does not block you (as they are obliged to do automatically for such violations). NJGW ( talk) 18:18, 24 February 2009 (UTC) reply

I see you have been reverted already. I urge you to discuss these issues before you continue to edit the articles. NJGW ( talk) 18:19, 24 February 2009 (UTC) reply

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Nintendo. Alansohn ( talk) 19:38, 24 February 2009 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism after final warning and blanking of reports on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam‎. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{ unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Mfield ( talk) 18:14, 3 March 2009 (UTC) reply