Hi Austin613! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 20:32, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
FYI, I just posted the godreports article on RSN to see what people think of it. Shinealittlelight ( talk) 19:22, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Concerns regarding your editing at Antioch International Movement of Churches
Regarding
this edit of yours, and then
this revert, sourced to a blog in Healthy Place, please seriously review
WP:PRIMARY: Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published secondary sources, and to a lesser extent, on tertiary sources and primary sources ... Any exceptional claim would require exceptional sources.
and
WP:BLOGS: self-published material such as ... group blogs ... are largely not acceptable
.
starship
.paint (
RUN) 05:44, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Regarding
this edit of yours, please seriously review
WP:UNDUE:
represent all significant viewpoints that have been published by reliable sources, in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint in those sources
. Your edit was mostly using primary source material, not reliable source material. starship .paint ( RUN) 06:08, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Regarding
this edit of yours and
this readdition, please seriously review
WP:BLP. You wrote that The site noted numerous controversies including accusations of lack of transparency, homophobia, and anti-semitic remarks by pastor Robert Herbert. This are serious allegations regarding a living person. You cited this to
an advoacy campaign. WP:BLP says that
Editors must take particular care when adding information about living persons ... Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources. All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be supported by an inline citation to a reliable, published source.
Your source was assuredly not reliable. starship .paint ( RUN) 06:14, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Regarding
this edit of yours and
this readdition, please seriously review
WP:BLP. You wrote that The site noted numerous controversies including accusations of lack of transparency, homophobia, and anti-semitic remarks by pastor Robert Herbert. This are serious allegations regarding a living person. You cited this to
an advoacy campaign. WP:BLP says that
- WP:SELFSOURCE Self-published and questionable sources may be used as sources of information about themselves, usually in articles about themselves or their activities, without the self-published source requirement that they are established experts in the field.
- The latest edit I had on Becky Oberg was a self source about herself and activities. Even if the source is questionable, it may be used on an article about herself.
- Also, check the talk page before any hasty actions. Some issues were already discussed and taken to the noticeboard to discuss and/or were pending or completed discussions. Austin613 ( talk) 06:49, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
I have requested a sockpuppet investigation against you. You may wish to clear your name at the link above. starship .paint ( RUN) 08:24, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi Austin613! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 20:32, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
FYI, I just posted the godreports article on RSN to see what people think of it. Shinealittlelight ( talk) 19:22, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Concerns regarding your editing at Antioch International Movement of Churches
Regarding
this edit of yours, and then
this revert, sourced to a blog in Healthy Place, please seriously review
WP:PRIMARY: Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published secondary sources, and to a lesser extent, on tertiary sources and primary sources ... Any exceptional claim would require exceptional sources.
and
WP:BLOGS: self-published material such as ... group blogs ... are largely not acceptable
.
starship
.paint (
RUN) 05:44, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Regarding
this edit of yours, please seriously review
WP:UNDUE:
represent all significant viewpoints that have been published by reliable sources, in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint in those sources
. Your edit was mostly using primary source material, not reliable source material. starship .paint ( RUN) 06:08, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Regarding
this edit of yours and
this readdition, please seriously review
WP:BLP. You wrote that The site noted numerous controversies including accusations of lack of transparency, homophobia, and anti-semitic remarks by pastor Robert Herbert. This are serious allegations regarding a living person. You cited this to
an advoacy campaign. WP:BLP says that
Editors must take particular care when adding information about living persons ... Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources. All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be supported by an inline citation to a reliable, published source.
Your source was assuredly not reliable. starship .paint ( RUN) 06:14, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Regarding
this edit of yours and
this readdition, please seriously review
WP:BLP. You wrote that The site noted numerous controversies including accusations of lack of transparency, homophobia, and anti-semitic remarks by pastor Robert Herbert. This are serious allegations regarding a living person. You cited this to
an advoacy campaign. WP:BLP says that
- WP:SELFSOURCE Self-published and questionable sources may be used as sources of information about themselves, usually in articles about themselves or their activities, without the self-published source requirement that they are established experts in the field.
- The latest edit I had on Becky Oberg was a self source about herself and activities. Even if the source is questionable, it may be used on an article about herself.
- Also, check the talk page before any hasty actions. Some issues were already discussed and taken to the noticeboard to discuss and/or were pending or completed discussions. Austin613 ( talk) 06:49, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
I have requested a sockpuppet investigation against you. You may wish to clear your name at the link above. starship .paint ( RUN) 08:24, 10 April 2024 (UTC)