Welcome to Wikipedia, Aronoel! I am Marek69 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{ helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{ helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!
Marek. 69 talk 21:42, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for
this. :)
Amalthea 16:37, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi, Aronoel,
I see you and I are watching some of the same articles. I was wondering if you have any suggestions for the source lists I keep in user space for all of us wikipedians to use in updating articles. I get the impression that you and I joined Wikipedia at just about the same time, and definitely I feel that I am still getting to know my way around here. I'll appreciate learning from your perspective on issues as we keep editing here. -- WeijiBaikeBianji ( talk, how I edit) 16:58, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi Aronoel, I believe the review you are looking for is this one http://www.sciencemag.org/content/330/6009/1320.full - I can access it, so I'm not sure if access is limited otherwise. Tell me if you can't read it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hypocryptickal ( talk • contribs) 13:49, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
- Too bad, perhaps your local library has a Science subscription? PS: My email contact is on my userpage. -- Hypocryptickal ( talk) 12:40, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
On my talk page you gave me a helpful bit of info and a link that aided my integration into the wiki community a great deal and I would like to thank you for doing so, Cheers! Rpm2005 ( talk) 06:35, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of
your recent edits, such as the one you made to
Sailor Moon, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Did your account get compromised?
Allen4
names 03:04, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, I thought I was undoing the vandalism, not adding it back. That was pretty stupid of me! Thanks for letting me know though. -- Aronoel ( talk) 05:07, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello,
It is unfortunate that you felt the need to try to strong arm me over the sex and psychology edits. I believe you unfairly deleted my first reversal. I did not simply just reverse it. I took into account your criticisms and moved the appropriate sections. I also deleted some of the extraneous information. After the second reversal I made it clear that I wanted to work out something we both could agree on and was not opposed to an additional revision by you. Please do not become aggressive over this. I understand that as a feminist you have a vested interest in how these articles are portrayed. I do as well. I feel we can work together to make these articles robust from outside criticism and most importantly, we can make sure that the articles concisely represent the information in the most accurate way possible. In fact, I think we have a great opportunity to work together to ensure that none of these articles become biased in favor of MRA or Feminist ideology. I actively want to pursue phrasing that is as objective and fair as possible and want you to work with me. Most of the changes that you have made to what I have wrote I have accepted, so please don't say that I am being uncooperative. In addition, I would appreciate that you don't charge me with edit waring when I make significant changes and not just a straight reversal.
I am very aware of how controversial an issue this is and I fully expect we will get on each others nerves due to our different interpretations of studies. However, we have a great opportunity to bring balance to these issues and I ask that you help me by working with me. Phoenixlanding ( talk) 22:39, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- I appreciate your comments and your interest in working collaboratively on articles. However, I disagree that I have been "strong-arming" you or aggressive. Yesterday, you didn't comment on my objections on the talk page, even though you were participating in discussions at
Feminism. I assumed you were done discussing it or were ignoring it and I reverted your changes. Today, I was frustrated by how many times you made reverts (including in
Feminism) before even discussing anything on the talk page. Currently, your preferred version is the live one, even though I think that was technically more than 3 total reverts. I think our disagreement is fine and will ultimately result in a more balanced article, but I don't think editing behavior like this is acceptable, and I hope that you don't do it in the future. Please, finish discussions on the talk page before making more article changes that are controversial. As long as you do that, I don't think we will have problems in the future. --
Aronoel (
talk) 22:50, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- It was an honest mistake I didn't comment. I didn't notice it was there. I apologize for that and will definitely try to be more careful in the future. Phoenixlanding ( talk) 22:40, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Hello, Aronoel. I've noticed that you have taken a step in the
Dispute Resolution Process by posting in
WQA. Please note that it is recommended that you advise the other party of your complaint filing so that they are aware of it, and so that they have a chance to respond.
If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Gerardw ( talk) 22:08, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- I notified them on the article talk page, but I'll post on theirs as well. -- Aronoel ( talk) 22:12, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{ You've got mail}} or {{ ygm}} template.
Gerardw ( talk) 21:39, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
-- Babank ( talk) 21:08, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
- Lol thanks :) --
Aronoel (
talk) 21:30, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
- Ah, The Sibyl... never met her; know the type .-)
- ... and thanks very much, Aronoel, for doing some work to improve
Femininity! --
bonze blayk (
talk) 21:53, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for pointing out the problems with Femininity in the first place, I didn't even realize that page existed! -- Aronoel ( talk) 22:01, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Aronoel, edit warring is unjustified, so please stop doing it, it's very disruptive. Please replace the dispute tags on the Femininity article until the dispute is resolved. If you can't provide reliable sources for the claims you're making, it's not unreasonable for other editors to respectfully ask that you find sources to support your claims. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. USchick ( talk) 17:00, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
- Hi, multiple other editors have already removed the tags and have provided sources for all of the disputed material. I don't know what else I can do for you at this point. --
Aronoel (
talk) 17:10, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
- First, you can replace the dispute tags that you removed. Then you can provide accurate sources for the edits that you made. Thank you so much.
USchick (
talk) 17:14, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
- I didn't remove them originally, it was Fistoffoucault. But I support his removal because everything in those sections is referenced. -- Aronoel ( talk) 17:17, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
- If it's referenced, why is there an ongoing dispute on the talk page in different sections? Fistoffoucault has only been registered for two days and may be a sockpuppet for all we know. His activity should not influence your participation in edit warring.
USchick (
talk) 17:23, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
- You are the only person who is disputing these sections, and there are many other editors involved besides Fistoffoucault. Anyway, I'm not adding the tags back now because I believe people have provided more than enough references. I'm not going to discuss this any more on my talk page, but you can continue to make comments at Talk:Femininity.--
Aronoel (
talk) 17:29, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
- It only takes one editor to dispute something, especially when a source does not support the statement. Also, please address the use of the shaman image on the talk page, instead of just adding it back in without discussion. I'm removing it per discussion on the talk page. USchick ( talk) 17:33, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
- You are the only person who is disputing these sections, and there are many other editors involved besides Fistoffoucault. Anyway, I'm not adding the tags back now because I believe people have provided more than enough references. I'm not going to discuss this any more on my talk page, but you can continue to make comments at Talk:Femininity.--
Aronoel (
talk) 17:29, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
- First, you can replace the dispute tags that you removed. Then you can provide accurate sources for the edits that you made. Thank you so much.
USchick (
talk) 17:14, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
|
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/John254 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 12:23, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
Refer to section
User:Fistoffoucault and User:Aronoel reported by User:Dave3457
at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring
Aronoel and Fistoffoucault refuse to accept consensus.
Dave3457 ( talk) 12:25, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
Notification of WP:AN/EW report
Hello Aronoel,
This is an automated friendly notification to inform you that you have been reported for Violation of the
Edit warring policy at the
Administrators' noticeboard.
If you feel that this report has been made in error, please reply as soon as possible on the
noticeboard. However, before contesting an Edit warring report, please review the respective policies to ensure you are not in violation of them.
~
NekoBot (
MeowTalk) 12:28, 17 July 2011 (UTC) (False positive?
Report it!)
Hi! I wanted to let you know that we have created an IRC channel for "countering systemic bias one new editor at a time", aka closing the gender gap! Come hang out at #wikimedia-gendergap if that subject interests you. We hope this channel can serve as a safe haven to hang out, talk about Wiki, brainstorming, increasing women's participation in Wikimedia, article alerts and foster friendships. I hope you join us! (And if you need any IRC help, just let me know!) See you there! SarahStierch ( talk) 22:39, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I'm a new editor on here ^_^. Could you help me making a customized signature? And also, how can I fic my userboxes at my userpage? Thank you. MusicsColors ( talk) 00:29, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
| WikiWomen Unite! | |
|---|---|
 |
Hi Aronoel! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative. As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:
We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our
meta page (under construction) to see how else you can participate! |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, Aronoel! I am Marek69 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{ helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{ helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!
Marek. 69 talk 21:42, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for
this. :)
Amalthea 16:37, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi, Aronoel,
I see you and I are watching some of the same articles. I was wondering if you have any suggestions for the source lists I keep in user space for all of us wikipedians to use in updating articles. I get the impression that you and I joined Wikipedia at just about the same time, and definitely I feel that I am still getting to know my way around here. I'll appreciate learning from your perspective on issues as we keep editing here. -- WeijiBaikeBianji ( talk, how I edit) 16:58, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi Aronoel, I believe the review you are looking for is this one http://www.sciencemag.org/content/330/6009/1320.full - I can access it, so I'm not sure if access is limited otherwise. Tell me if you can't read it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hypocryptickal ( talk • contribs) 13:49, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
- Too bad, perhaps your local library has a Science subscription? PS: My email contact is on my userpage. -- Hypocryptickal ( talk) 12:40, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
On my talk page you gave me a helpful bit of info and a link that aided my integration into the wiki community a great deal and I would like to thank you for doing so, Cheers! Rpm2005 ( talk) 06:35, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of
your recent edits, such as the one you made to
Sailor Moon, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Did your account get compromised?
Allen4
names 03:04, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, I thought I was undoing the vandalism, not adding it back. That was pretty stupid of me! Thanks for letting me know though. -- Aronoel ( talk) 05:07, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello,
It is unfortunate that you felt the need to try to strong arm me over the sex and psychology edits. I believe you unfairly deleted my first reversal. I did not simply just reverse it. I took into account your criticisms and moved the appropriate sections. I also deleted some of the extraneous information. After the second reversal I made it clear that I wanted to work out something we both could agree on and was not opposed to an additional revision by you. Please do not become aggressive over this. I understand that as a feminist you have a vested interest in how these articles are portrayed. I do as well. I feel we can work together to make these articles robust from outside criticism and most importantly, we can make sure that the articles concisely represent the information in the most accurate way possible. In fact, I think we have a great opportunity to work together to ensure that none of these articles become biased in favor of MRA or Feminist ideology. I actively want to pursue phrasing that is as objective and fair as possible and want you to work with me. Most of the changes that you have made to what I have wrote I have accepted, so please don't say that I am being uncooperative. In addition, I would appreciate that you don't charge me with edit waring when I make significant changes and not just a straight reversal.
I am very aware of how controversial an issue this is and I fully expect we will get on each others nerves due to our different interpretations of studies. However, we have a great opportunity to bring balance to these issues and I ask that you help me by working with me. Phoenixlanding ( talk) 22:39, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- I appreciate your comments and your interest in working collaboratively on articles. However, I disagree that I have been "strong-arming" you or aggressive. Yesterday, you didn't comment on my objections on the talk page, even though you were participating in discussions at
Feminism. I assumed you were done discussing it or were ignoring it and I reverted your changes. Today, I was frustrated by how many times you made reverts (including in
Feminism) before even discussing anything on the talk page. Currently, your preferred version is the live one, even though I think that was technically more than 3 total reverts. I think our disagreement is fine and will ultimately result in a more balanced article, but I don't think editing behavior like this is acceptable, and I hope that you don't do it in the future. Please, finish discussions on the talk page before making more article changes that are controversial. As long as you do that, I don't think we will have problems in the future. --
Aronoel (
talk) 22:50, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- It was an honest mistake I didn't comment. I didn't notice it was there. I apologize for that and will definitely try to be more careful in the future. Phoenixlanding ( talk) 22:40, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Hello, Aronoel. I've noticed that you have taken a step in the
Dispute Resolution Process by posting in
WQA. Please note that it is recommended that you advise the other party of your complaint filing so that they are aware of it, and so that they have a chance to respond.
If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Gerardw ( talk) 22:08, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- I notified them on the article talk page, but I'll post on theirs as well. -- Aronoel ( talk) 22:12, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{ You've got mail}} or {{ ygm}} template.
Gerardw ( talk) 21:39, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
-- Babank ( talk) 21:08, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
- Lol thanks :) --
Aronoel (
talk) 21:30, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
- Ah, The Sibyl... never met her; know the type .-)
- ... and thanks very much, Aronoel, for doing some work to improve
Femininity! --
bonze blayk (
talk) 21:53, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for pointing out the problems with Femininity in the first place, I didn't even realize that page existed! -- Aronoel ( talk) 22:01, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Aronoel, edit warring is unjustified, so please stop doing it, it's very disruptive. Please replace the dispute tags on the Femininity article until the dispute is resolved. If you can't provide reliable sources for the claims you're making, it's not unreasonable for other editors to respectfully ask that you find sources to support your claims. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. USchick ( talk) 17:00, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
- Hi, multiple other editors have already removed the tags and have provided sources for all of the disputed material. I don't know what else I can do for you at this point. --
Aronoel (
talk) 17:10, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
- First, you can replace the dispute tags that you removed. Then you can provide accurate sources for the edits that you made. Thank you so much.
USchick (
talk) 17:14, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
- I didn't remove them originally, it was Fistoffoucault. But I support his removal because everything in those sections is referenced. -- Aronoel ( talk) 17:17, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
- If it's referenced, why is there an ongoing dispute on the talk page in different sections? Fistoffoucault has only been registered for two days and may be a sockpuppet for all we know. His activity should not influence your participation in edit warring.
USchick (
talk) 17:23, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
- You are the only person who is disputing these sections, and there are many other editors involved besides Fistoffoucault. Anyway, I'm not adding the tags back now because I believe people have provided more than enough references. I'm not going to discuss this any more on my talk page, but you can continue to make comments at Talk:Femininity.--
Aronoel (
talk) 17:29, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
- It only takes one editor to dispute something, especially when a source does not support the statement. Also, please address the use of the shaman image on the talk page, instead of just adding it back in without discussion. I'm removing it per discussion on the talk page. USchick ( talk) 17:33, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
- You are the only person who is disputing these sections, and there are many other editors involved besides Fistoffoucault. Anyway, I'm not adding the tags back now because I believe people have provided more than enough references. I'm not going to discuss this any more on my talk page, but you can continue to make comments at Talk:Femininity.--
Aronoel (
talk) 17:29, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
- First, you can replace the dispute tags that you removed. Then you can provide accurate sources for the edits that you made. Thank you so much.
USchick (
talk) 17:14, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
|
|
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/John254 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 12:23, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
Refer to section
User:Fistoffoucault and User:Aronoel reported by User:Dave3457
at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring
Aronoel and Fistoffoucault refuse to accept consensus.
Dave3457 ( talk) 12:25, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
Notification of WP:AN/EW report
Hello Aronoel,
This is an automated friendly notification to inform you that you have been reported for Violation of the
Edit warring policy at the
Administrators' noticeboard.
If you feel that this report has been made in error, please reply as soon as possible on the
noticeboard. However, before contesting an Edit warring report, please review the respective policies to ensure you are not in violation of them.
~
NekoBot (
MeowTalk) 12:28, 17 July 2011 (UTC) (False positive?
Report it!)
Hi! I wanted to let you know that we have created an IRC channel for "countering systemic bias one new editor at a time", aka closing the gender gap! Come hang out at #wikimedia-gendergap if that subject interests you. We hope this channel can serve as a safe haven to hang out, talk about Wiki, brainstorming, increasing women's participation in Wikimedia, article alerts and foster friendships. I hope you join us! (And if you need any IRC help, just let me know!) See you there! SarahStierch ( talk) 22:39, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I'm a new editor on here ^_^. Could you help me making a customized signature? And also, how can I fic my userboxes at my userpage? Thank you. MusicsColors ( talk) 00:29, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
| WikiWomen Unite! | |
|---|---|
|
Hi Aronoel! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative. As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:
We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our
meta page (under construction) to see how else you can participate! |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)