Hello, Arabeditor11786, and welcome to Wikipedia! Just so you are aware, Wikipedia is not a place for you to write about yourself. While your userpage is a place for you to provide some basic details about yourself with the intentions of introducing yourself to other Wikipedia editors, it is not the website's primary goal. If you're new to Wikipedia, you can see our Introduction page, which will introduce you to what Wikipedia is really about, and you can learn how to edit in a fun, interactive way by playing The Wikipedia Adventure. If you are looking to create a new article, this page will be extremely helpful. And finally, if you have any questions, you may ask at the Teahouse, a friendly place for newcomers where experienced editors can answer your questions. Regards : Noyster (talk), 19:43, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Teratix. I noticed that you recently removed content from
Islam in Nigeria without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Tera
TIX 10:41, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Hinduism by country, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the
sandbox for that. Thank you.
Adamgerber80 (
talk) 16:35, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for contributing to the article
Religion in Africa . However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be
verifiable and attributed to
reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or
mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a
circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at
Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at
Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you.
Kuru
(talk) 12:07, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Islam in Southeast Asia, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Kuru
(talk) 13:36, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi Arabeditor11786. Welcome to Wikipedia. I've added a welcome message to the top of this page that gives a great deal of information about Wikipedia. I hope you find it useful.
Additionally, I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily.
Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.
If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter.
Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.
I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. -- Ronz ( talk) 17:20, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Islam by country, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
JimRenge (
talk) 17:46, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
- This is becoming disruptive; I've left two clear explanations of what a mirror is and why you cannot use them as references. At this point, please consider this a final warning. If you continue to use clearly circular references, this account will be blocked. Kuru (talk) 23:21, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Copied from my talk page to keep the discussion in one place. JimRenge ( talk) 03:25, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
Sorry, But I Think You Didn't Check The Citations Which Is Officially Of CIA & US State Department.So, Before Saying Something To Others Editor. Please Sure That You Check It First. And Also The Page Is Under Progress Me & Nillurcheier Are Completing It. Arabeditor11786 ( talk) 18:29, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
- You have changed statistical data citing dubious sources, such as:
https://www.islamawareness.net/Asia/India/news_exploit.html https://www.quora.com/profile/Kshitij-Patil-61%7Ctitle=Kshitij Patil - Quora https://www.islamawareness.net/LatinAmerica/Haiti/ https://joshuaproject.net/countries/IZ https://www.revolvy.com/page/Islam-in-Lesotho
JimRenge ( talk) 03:25, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. JimRenge ( talk) 11:30, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Siddiqui, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dari ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:10, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Lafayette Baguette. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
User:Kuru have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help Desk. Thanks.
Lafayette Baguette
talk 22:54, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did on
Siddiqui. This violates
Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Yamaguchi先生 (
talk) 19:39, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Religion in South America. This edit
[1] changed statistical data based on inappropriate sources (
https://www.islamawareness.net and
https://www.revolvy.com). Your marking of this edit as "minor" appears to be misleading.
JimRenge (
talk) 10:18, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at
Islam in India, you may be
blocked from editing. Continuing to mark substantial edits such as
[2] as "minor" appears to be misleading or deceptive when you have made substantial and in some cases inaccurate changes to figures and sources.
SovalValtos (
talk) 19:09, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
SovalValtos (
talk) 19:09, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Faisalic
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Faisalic requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Wgolf ( talk) 22:37, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Muslims in business, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Polyus ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 14:37, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
 | Hello! Voting in the
2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Hello, Arabeditor11786, and welcome to Wikipedia! Just so you are aware, Wikipedia is not a place for you to write about yourself. While your userpage is a place for you to provide some basic details about yourself with the intentions of introducing yourself to other Wikipedia editors, it is not the website's primary goal. If you're new to Wikipedia, you can see our Introduction page, which will introduce you to what Wikipedia is really about, and you can learn how to edit in a fun, interactive way by playing The Wikipedia Adventure. If you are looking to create a new article, this page will be extremely helpful. And finally, if you have any questions, you may ask at the Teahouse, a friendly place for newcomers where experienced editors can answer your questions. Regards : Noyster (talk), 19:43, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Teratix. I noticed that you recently removed content from
Islam in Nigeria without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Tera
TIX 10:41, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Hinduism by country, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the
sandbox for that. Thank you.
Adamgerber80 (
talk) 16:35, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for contributing to the article
Religion in Africa . However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be
verifiable and attributed to
reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or
mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a
circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at
Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at
Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you.
Kuru
(talk) 12:07, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Islam in Southeast Asia, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Kuru
(talk) 13:36, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi Arabeditor11786. Welcome to Wikipedia. I've added a welcome message to the top of this page that gives a great deal of information about Wikipedia. I hope you find it useful.
Additionally, I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily.
Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.
If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter.
Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.
I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. -- Ronz ( talk) 17:20, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Islam by country, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
JimRenge (
talk) 17:46, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
- This is becoming disruptive; I've left two clear explanations of what a mirror is and why you cannot use them as references. At this point, please consider this a final warning. If you continue to use clearly circular references, this account will be blocked. Kuru (talk) 23:21, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Copied from my talk page to keep the discussion in one place. JimRenge ( talk) 03:25, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
Sorry, But I Think You Didn't Check The Citations Which Is Officially Of CIA & US State Department.So, Before Saying Something To Others Editor. Please Sure That You Check It First. And Also The Page Is Under Progress Me & Nillurcheier Are Completing It. Arabeditor11786 ( talk) 18:29, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
- You have changed statistical data citing dubious sources, such as:
https://www.islamawareness.net/Asia/India/news_exploit.html https://www.quora.com/profile/Kshitij-Patil-61%7Ctitle=Kshitij Patil - Quora https://www.islamawareness.net/LatinAmerica/Haiti/ https://joshuaproject.net/countries/IZ https://www.revolvy.com/page/Islam-in-Lesotho
JimRenge ( talk) 03:25, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. JimRenge ( talk) 11:30, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Siddiqui, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dari ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:10, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Lafayette Baguette. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
User:Kuru have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help Desk. Thanks.
Lafayette Baguette
talk 22:54, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did on
Siddiqui. This violates
Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Yamaguchi先生 (
talk) 19:39, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Religion in South America. This edit
[1] changed statistical data based on inappropriate sources (
https://www.islamawareness.net and
https://www.revolvy.com). Your marking of this edit as "minor" appears to be misleading.
JimRenge (
talk) 10:18, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at
Islam in India, you may be
blocked from editing. Continuing to mark substantial edits such as
[2] as "minor" appears to be misleading or deceptive when you have made substantial and in some cases inaccurate changes to figures and sources.
SovalValtos (
talk) 19:09, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
SovalValtos (
talk) 19:09, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Faisalic
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Faisalic requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Wgolf ( talk) 22:37, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Muslims in business, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Polyus ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 14:37, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |