This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Alastairward#Please_Stop_Ruining_South_Park_Articles It'd be great if would comment on his page to show support. Thanks. HWD 69.120.7.167 ( talk) 08:15, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Now back on. -- Herby talk thyme 15:11, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to 6 August, did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- CalendarWatcher ( talk) 00:04, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
Hey Anthony, i need you to testiy for me on the Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts page. I started a new section against Alastairward regarding his manipulation of Wikipedia articles and controlling the information that is put on articles such as the China Probrem. I really appreciate everything you have done to show Alastairward that he is wrong and now i think we can address it to the admins because he did the same thing again. I am also going to ask Stijndon if he can testify. I will support you to stop Alastairward from controlling articles -- J miester25 ( talk) 11:39, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
I was going to put this on the page before the section was deleted, storing it here in the meantime:
I appreciate everything you have done. I have set a final destination to this problem. Since the admins in the Wikiquette alerts won't help us, it seems we have to take matters into our own hands. I am calling for a 4 party plus admin that includes me, you, Roger (admin who will help us), Stijndon, and Alastairward in the Talk Page of The China Probrem. The new discussion will be called Final Compromise and it will discuss this issue and it be regarding what Alastairward has done (we can copy paste what we posted in Wikiquette), have administrative guidance so that Alastairward will learn his lesson, include insite from Stijndon in this matter. I will be posting information from time to time, and i hope that you and the others will as well. Again, Thank you for all your time. -- J miester25 ( talk) 22:33, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Another-anomaly ( talk) 22:45, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
I believe Stijndon found the link. Look under the discussion of The China Probrem. I think the link is there under Trivia is Incorrect. -- J miester25 ( talk) 22:48, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Hehe... indeed could've been a nice episode, telling the story of Alastairworm on Wikipickia, maybe teaming with Professor Chaos or something. NotAnotherAliGFan ( talk) 19:59, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Stijndon#New_edit_war
Just reusing his own arguments. Thought you might get a chuckle out of this.
Harassment - you've broken this several times now, whereas the only thing I've done is a very indirect personal attack in a conversation on another user's talk page. I don't live in New Jersey, don't wish to, but even claiming that I do is harassment, and that gives me enough grounds to bring in an administrator regarding your constant edits (in addition to the personal attacks you pointed out).
We've both made mistakes, we're both humans, but I don't by any definition other than your own owe you an apology, so find something better to do that doesn't involve editing my talk page or sandbox. Let it go, since for someone under editor review you should watch this kind of behavior more, don't you think?
There are still some rules you can't ignore.
Another-anomaly ( talk) 00:57, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:Itanium-arch.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:File:Itanium-arch.svg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
Q
T
C 20:14, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
I'll try and look for them later, but I really don't see the point anymore. I haven't been logged in for over a month, mainly because I got tired of fighting some bitter high-tech dads whose day's highlight is going around Wikipedia assigning "parking tickets." Moreover - even when you do find sources, rest assured this twat will repeatedly challenge them as well, making you puke blood to prove yourself worthy. Yup, it sucks, but that's the way WP is right now and frankly, I'm more worried about real life politicians.
P.S. Nice template :)
NotAnotherAliGFan ( talk) 15:13, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi. Can you offer your opinion on the conflict described here? Thanks. Nightscream ( talk) 00:51, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Check this out. 87.69.131.47 ( talk) 19:54, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi Anomaly, how've you been? Its been quite a while since our falling out and I wondered how you've been. I still regret my actions way back when, it is against everything I hold dear, here on Wikipedia. I hope that your editing is going well, and hopefully, you are too. Kind regards, from that bastard who kept on harrasing you. -- Soetermans | is listening | what he'd do now? 01:00, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nikki Dubose is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikki Dubose(2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Michig ( talk) 10:37, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Alastairward#Please_Stop_Ruining_South_Park_Articles It'd be great if would comment on his page to show support. Thanks. HWD 69.120.7.167 ( talk) 08:15, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Now back on. -- Herby talk thyme 15:11, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to 6 August, did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- CalendarWatcher ( talk) 00:04, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
Hey Anthony, i need you to testiy for me on the Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts page. I started a new section against Alastairward regarding his manipulation of Wikipedia articles and controlling the information that is put on articles such as the China Probrem. I really appreciate everything you have done to show Alastairward that he is wrong and now i think we can address it to the admins because he did the same thing again. I am also going to ask Stijndon if he can testify. I will support you to stop Alastairward from controlling articles -- J miester25 ( talk) 11:39, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
I was going to put this on the page before the section was deleted, storing it here in the meantime:
I appreciate everything you have done. I have set a final destination to this problem. Since the admins in the Wikiquette alerts won't help us, it seems we have to take matters into our own hands. I am calling for a 4 party plus admin that includes me, you, Roger (admin who will help us), Stijndon, and Alastairward in the Talk Page of The China Probrem. The new discussion will be called Final Compromise and it will discuss this issue and it be regarding what Alastairward has done (we can copy paste what we posted in Wikiquette), have administrative guidance so that Alastairward will learn his lesson, include insite from Stijndon in this matter. I will be posting information from time to time, and i hope that you and the others will as well. Again, Thank you for all your time. -- J miester25 ( talk) 22:33, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Another-anomaly ( talk) 22:45, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
I believe Stijndon found the link. Look under the discussion of The China Probrem. I think the link is there under Trivia is Incorrect. -- J miester25 ( talk) 22:48, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Hehe... indeed could've been a nice episode, telling the story of Alastairworm on Wikipickia, maybe teaming with Professor Chaos or something. NotAnotherAliGFan ( talk) 19:59, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Stijndon#New_edit_war
Just reusing his own arguments. Thought you might get a chuckle out of this.
Harassment - you've broken this several times now, whereas the only thing I've done is a very indirect personal attack in a conversation on another user's talk page. I don't live in New Jersey, don't wish to, but even claiming that I do is harassment, and that gives me enough grounds to bring in an administrator regarding your constant edits (in addition to the personal attacks you pointed out).
We've both made mistakes, we're both humans, but I don't by any definition other than your own owe you an apology, so find something better to do that doesn't involve editing my talk page or sandbox. Let it go, since for someone under editor review you should watch this kind of behavior more, don't you think?
There are still some rules you can't ignore.
Another-anomaly ( talk) 00:57, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:Itanium-arch.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:File:Itanium-arch.svg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
Q
T
C 20:14, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
I'll try and look for them later, but I really don't see the point anymore. I haven't been logged in for over a month, mainly because I got tired of fighting some bitter high-tech dads whose day's highlight is going around Wikipedia assigning "parking tickets." Moreover - even when you do find sources, rest assured this twat will repeatedly challenge them as well, making you puke blood to prove yourself worthy. Yup, it sucks, but that's the way WP is right now and frankly, I'm more worried about real life politicians.
P.S. Nice template :)
NotAnotherAliGFan ( talk) 15:13, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi. Can you offer your opinion on the conflict described here? Thanks. Nightscream ( talk) 00:51, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Check this out. 87.69.131.47 ( talk) 19:54, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi Anomaly, how've you been? Its been quite a while since our falling out and I wondered how you've been. I still regret my actions way back when, it is against everything I hold dear, here on Wikipedia. I hope that your editing is going well, and hopefully, you are too. Kind regards, from that bastard who kept on harrasing you. -- Soetermans | is listening | what he'd do now? 01:00, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nikki Dubose is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikki Dubose(2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Michig ( talk) 10:37, 10 July 2011 (UTC)