Welcome to Wikipedia, Andreasmperu! I am E dog95 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{ helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{ helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! E_dog95' ^{Hi '} 04:15, 27 July 2008 (UTC) reply

You are apparently unaware that editors are free to remove comments from their own talk page. In other words, stop mucking with my talk page. 98.248.32.178 ( talk) 04:50, 4 August 2009 (UTC) reply

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ghansoli. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. NJA (t/ c) 08:25, 7 January 2010 (UTC) reply

Andreasmperu you gave me a final warning on my talk page and told me to just talk to you. I don't know how to just talk to you in Wikipedia. May I ask you some questions here? Are you engaged in an edit war with me??? over the International Churches of Christ page??? Are you a member of the International Churches of Christ?? It looks like you hold some sort of job in Wikipedia? I did not know that you an employee of Wikipedia. Why are my edits to the International Churches of Christ page not acceptable?

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Hola Andreasmperu, sabes eres una gran peruana editora, redactora y culta, eres una gloriosa, maravillosa y candorosa peruana, y si no me equivoco creo que eres la peruana con mas ediciones en la historia de la Wikipedia! tienes como 35.084 ediciones ¡asuuu! ahora estas en puesto 56 del Ranking de ediciones de la Wikipedia en español. Saludos de corazon -- Globalphilosophy ( talk) 03:34, 23 July 2010 (UTC) reply

Sigue asi!! edita siempre cada semana, ojala los peruanos Mansoncc, Mercenario97 y Axxgreazz no te pasen. Saludos cordiales -- Globalphilosophy ( talk) 03:37, 23 July 2010 (UTC) reply

Hello there Andreasmperu, I happened to come across your signature and noticed you have an image in it. I should point out to you that in doing so violates the signatures guideline, as images in signatures are strictly not allowed. Could you please remove the image from your signature? Thank you. — ξ ^xplicit 04:04, 2 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Hi - I've added the rollback flag for you per your request. Happy editing. Pedro :  Chat  10:22, 3 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Wikipedia is not to be used as pro-ICOC propaganda. The ICOC Wikipedia page is not neutral; it's full of pro-ICOC and pro-ICC propaganda. I have included some reputable information and sources to make the page appear neutral. It would seem that you are an ICOC/ICC member who is trying to use the ICOC/ICC Wikipedia page as an evangelism tool. Stop it. Qewr4231 ( talk) 23:31, 3 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Every time that I make a legitimate edit using reputable sources, some of which are even ICOC/ICC in origin, to the International Churches of Christ page Andreasmperu erases them. Andreasmperu's version of the ICOC/ICC page is not neutral; it's pro-ICOC and pro-ICC. Shouldn't all the relevant facts about the ICOC/ICC be reported whether the facts are positive or negative? I am requesting Wikipedia's help. Qewr4231 ( talk) 00:43, 4 August 2010 (UTC) reply

I've declined several of your speedy deletion requests for school articles such as this one because A7 does not apply to schools. If you think that these schools are not notable then you should nominate them for deletion. -- Ron Ritzman ( talk) 04:07, 2 January 2011 (UTC) reply

The December 2010 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 04:00, 4 January 2011 (UTC) reply

The January 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 03:09, 1 February 2011 (UTC) reply

The February 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 03:09, 1 March 2011 (UTC) reply

The March 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 21:06, 3 April 2011 (UTC) reply

The April 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 22:35, 1 May 2011 (UTC) reply

The May 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 01:38, 2 June 2011 (UTC) reply

The June 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. We are also seeking new members to assist in writing the newsletter, if interested please leave a note on the Outreach department's talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 04:30, 2 July 2011 (UTC) reply

Hi Andreasmperu, I noticed that you moved this article [1] a little while ago. If you move an article and it has any media in it like pictures or sound files, please be sure to check those files and update any fair use rationales on the pages. Changing the article name can break the FUR and someone may later come along and remove the file and then delete it. [2] I went ahead and fixed this one for you. Any questions or trouble let me know on my talk page. Thanks!-- Crossmr ( talk) 10:15, 4 July 2011 (UTC) reply

No trouble, just wanted to let you know for the future.-- Crossmr ( talk) 22:52, 4 July 2011 (UTC) reply

The July 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. We are also seeking new members to assist in writing the newsletter, if interested please leave a note on the Outreach department's talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 03:30, 2 August 2011 (UTC) reply

Hello Andreasmperu! I hope you enjoy this cookie as an amicable greeting from a fellow Wikipedian, SwisterTwister talk 02:09, 7 September 2011 (UTC) reply

I can't read Spanish, so I can't review the Spanish deletion discussion, but this version says that Ricardo Letts Colmenares was a member of the national legislature. That's not only a claim of significance enough to meet WP:CSD#A7, but probably enough (assuming it was verified) to automatically make the person notable. If the whole article is a hoax, then it could still be deleted, or if the info can't be verified, it could be deleted via AfD, but without more info, I cannot speedily delete it via A7. Qwyrxian ( talk) 05:12, 7 September 2011 (UTC) reply

The September 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. — Erik ( talk | contribs) 16:35, 30 September 2011 (UTC) reply

Voting for WikiProject Film's October 2011 project coordinator election has started. We are aiming to select five coordinators to serve for the next year; please take a moment from editing to vote here by October 29! Erik ( talk | contribs) 11:55, 15 October 2011 (UTC) reply

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Andreasmperu! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 11:04, 25 October 2011 (UTC). reply

The October 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. — Erik ( talk | contribs) 15:00, 31 October 2011 (UTC) reply

The March 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. — Peppage ( talk | contribs) 22:35, 5 December 2011 (UTC) reply

The December 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. — Peppage ( talk | contribs) 22:00, 4 January 2012 (UTC) reply

The January 2012 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

To unsubscribe, please remove your name from the distribution list. GRAPPLE X 00:35, 4 March 2012 (UTC) reply

Good news! You now have access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Here's what you need to know:

• Your account activation code has been emailed to your Wikipedia email address.
  • Only 407 of 444 codes were successfully delivered; most failed because email was simply not set up (You can set it in Special:Preferences).
  • If you did not receive a code but were on the approved list, add your name to this section and we'll try again.
• The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code.
• To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1; 2) You’ll see the first page of a two-page registration. 3) Put in an email address and set up a password. (Use a different email address if you signed up for a free trial previously); 4) Click “Continue” to reach the second page of registration; 5) Input your basic information; 6) Input the activation code; 7) Click “Finish”. Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive.
• If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
• A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate
• HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
• Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
• When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 20:31, 13 April 2012 (UTC) reply

Credo Reference, who generously donated 400 free Credo 250 research accounts to Wikipedia editors over the past two years, has offered to expand the program to include 100 additional reference resources. Credo wants Wikipedia editors to select which resources they want most. So, we put together a quick survey to do that:

• Link to Survey (should take between 5-10 minutes): http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/N8FQ6MM

It also asks some basic questions about what you like about the Credo program and what you might want to improve.

At this time only the initial 400 editors have accounts, but even if you do not have an account, you still might want to weigh in on which resources would be most valuable for the community (for example, through WikiProject Resource Exchange).

Also, if you have an account but no longer want to use it, please leave me a note so another editor can take your spot.

If you have any other questions or comments, drop by my talk page or email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com. Cheers! Ocaasi ^{t | c} 17:06, 11 July 2012 (UTC) reply

Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Wikipedia email!

1. Go to https://www.questia.com/specialoffer
2. Input your unique Offer ID and Promotional code. Click Continue. (Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive).
3. Create your account by entering the requested information. (This is private and no one from Wikipedia will see it).
4. You'll then see the welcome page with your Login ID. (The account is now active for 1 year).

If you need help, please first ask Ocaasi at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com and, second, email QuestiaHelp@cengage.com along with your Offer ID and Promotional Code (subject: Wikipedia).

• A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Questia article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Questia pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:Questia/Citations.
• Questia would love to hear feedback at WP:Questia/Experiences
• Show off your Questia access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/Questia_userbox}} on your userpage
• When the 1-year period is up, check the applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi EdwardsBot ( talk) 05:00, 19 September 2012 (UTC) reply

I don't think you intended it, but you reverted vandalism with more vandalism. see here. Trackinfo ( talk) 05:56, 20 September 2012 (UTC) reply

WikiWomen Unite!

Hi Andreasmperu! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative. As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by: Liking the WikiWomen's Collaborative on Facebook and share your tips, projects, and connect with other WikiWomen Join the conversation on our Twitter feed Reading and writing for our blog channel We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can participate! Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch ( talk) 20:29, 9 October 2012 (UTC) reply

Hola Andrea, no me consta que efectivamente te hayan avisado por lo que te aviso nuevamente, pero en la wiki-es se te abrió una RECAB, saludos Hprmedina ( talk) 20:55, 15 November 2012 (UTC) reply

Hola Andrea, creo que muchos lamentamos lo sucedido, pero seguramente serás bienvenida!!!!. Un saludo afectuoso. Sergio Andres Segovia ( talk) 15:58, 7 December 2012 (UTC) reply

My best wishes for you! Hugs! :) Nixón ( wop!) 02:39, 23 December 2012 (UTC) reply

Sorry about that, I redirected H. maxinae as it is now considered to be a jr. synonym of Homalopteroides smithi (formerly Homalopterus smithi) as per Kottelat's revision of the loaches. This is a rather massive revision as so there have been a few times that I have forgotten to give the reason for the change. Thank you for calling it to my attention. Divingpetrel ( talk) 04:07, 4 January 2013 (UTC) reply

A move would not work in this case as a page for Homalopterus smithi already existed and has been moved to Homalopteroides smithi. Again thanks for the feedback Divingpetrel ( talk) 04:23, 4 January 2013 (UTC) reply

"Business person" is another variation of businessperson just like the others. you must not revert it again, or i will send my level 69 Azumarill after you, no i won't. but i ask that you leave it alone, ok? 199.101.61.190 ( talk) 05:44, 4 January 2013 (UTC) reply

Now i may not be able to send darkrai after you but if i see my edit to business person reverted, i will force you to go 3 rounds on The Roller Coaster, ok? 199.101.61.190 ( talk) 07:46, 4 January 2013 (UTC) reply

Hola Andrea soy Bambadee de la wikipedia en español. Desde el 5 de nov de 2012 no editas ¿porqué?.-- 190.33.67.43 ( talk) 01:35, 8 January 2013 (UTC) reply

• Freedom for the Thought That We Hate

Thanks much for your category help at Freedom for the Thought That We Hate. Much appreciated, — Cirt ( talk) 07:28, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply

Folklore and fiction are mutually discrete forms of literature - I fail to see how you can join them, any clues why? thanks Satu Suro 04:55, 24 January 2013 (UTC) reply

Hi, maybe you are confusing subcategories with intersections. While there are some similarities between categories and sets, categories are rather organized as trees. Having said that, all subcategories contained in Category:Fairy tales by country were in turn categorized as "Category:Country literature" and "Category:Country folklore". Since "literature" is a broad category, I chose to specify what kind of literature ("fiction" or better "fantasy"). Andreasm ^{just talk to me} 16:44, 24 January 2013 (UTC) reply

Hi Andreasmperu, and first of all, thanks for your ongoing translation of Bennet family from the French article. Second, I wanted to ask you about Mr Bennet and whether it has any content that could be valuable to the family article in its current state. It reads like a literature essay right now, citing only P&P itself and one critical work. I had thought to merge or redirect it to Bennet family; when I saw that you were in the process of bringing French content over, I thought I'd ask whether it would be sensible to just redirect it now. I don't know French, but it looks like their existing content on Mr Bennet in the family article is better than what we have in the standalone article. Did I make that confusing enough? -- BDD ( talk) 01:30, 30 January 2013 (UTC) reply

Once I started translating fr:Famille Bennet, I found myself on the opposite dilemma: I thought the article was too long, so it could be divided into small articles for each character. I gave up on this option because the main article had a good cohesion that was to be broken. So, I agree with your choice, given that the section concerning Mr Bennet is much better than the article itself. It is therefore necessary to complete the translation. Since my mother tongue is not English, I will be more than grateful if you could help me with some proofreading (correction of grammatical or typographical errors), in order to accelerate the process. Andreasm ^{just talk to me} 04:23, 30 January 2013 (UTC) reply

We may make a good team, then. I'd be happy to copy edit for you after your translation. -- BDD ( talk) 06:24, 30 January 2013 (UTC) reply

I will be careful,thanks by the advice :) Carliitaeliza TALK 01:14, 31 January 2013 (UTC) reply

You are not doing anything better in reverting the other editor on Category:German novels. It is no better that you revert to a normal version if you yourself engage in potentially warring behavior. Please use the talk page for discussion, and WP:ANI for anything that escalates. Lord Roem ~ ( talk) 00:53, 3 February 2013 (UTC) reply

Hi, do you want to continue the discussion at Category talk:French novels? Or can I change the categories without being reverted? Smetanahue ( talk) 10:00, 6 February 2013 (UTC) reply

You cannot do whatever you want. There is an ongoing discussion (precisely to wait for comments from other editors). Moreover, you have not answered the objections raised in RFC by the other editor. Andreasm ^{just talk to me} 17:20, 6 February 2013 (UTC) reply

RE: Year 0 - I believe my alterations to this article should not have been reversed by you as the citations have already been aluded to in the text or already present. There is considerable dispute over the facts and article should reflect this. The 2 citations are here - 1.) http://www.socialismtoday.org/44/millennium.html (This was already listed in the article by someone else and is visible when editing the page) 2.) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/0s (This was already aluded to in the text when I said that what was previously claimed contradicted every other wikipedia article on decades since the year 1AD - There are at least 200 other Wikipedia articles which also contradict it, for each of the 200 or so decades since this point. Would you like me to list all 200 of them? If not, please restore the alterations you removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.25.68.155 ( talk) 19:03, 6 February 2013 (UTC) reply

Please see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2013_February_7#Ethnic_categories_related_to_Vojvodina 80.232.234.114 ( talk) 18:04, 8 February 2013 (UTC) reply

Other user already deleted that category from most articles. There is no need that category remains only in few articles. Would you revert that other user too: http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Stepanovi%C4%87evo&diff=537226782&oldid=531983045 80.232.234.114 ( talk) 18:10, 8 February 2013 (UTC) reply

Hola Andreasmperu! La referencia especifica debio ser esta [3], en la que no es considerada la misma amplitude instituciones, y que define "Iberoamerican Higher Education Insitutions". En tal caso si es aplicable la referencia y su consideracion como clasificacion academica. Saludos cordials.-- Kanon6996 ( talk) 01:05, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply

• Hola Andreasmperu! En relacion a tu comentario te dejo 2 puntos que no has considerado: 1) El hecho de criticar el punto de evaluacion de un ranking como el de SCimago, implicaria tambien criticar el ranking 4ICU (que es un ranking netamente de presencia web. En lineas generales todas las clasificaciones incluidas ponderan grados a universidades, y pueden considerarse como mediciones objetivas, siendo obviamente ninguna definitive. 2) Al revertir no has considerado la existencia de ediciones de cada ranking, el uso de una referencia como el Diario La Republica es justamente en razon de corroborar los datos de version del ranking web de Webometrics de 2011. En tal sentido ninguna referencia es duplicada, debiendo considerarse que tal como existen diferentes clasificaciones academicas, tambien existen diversas ediciones (anuales) de estas. Saludos cordiales-- Kanon6996 ( talk) 01:41, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Hola Andreasmperu! Justamente el error de empezar a debatir sobre que ranking es adecuado y cual no ya hace a uno caer en subjetividad. Ninguno pondra content a todos porque todos tienen distintas metodologias: presencia web, investigacion, impacto web, papers publicados, etc. Algunos se enfocan mas en uno, otros consideran un poco de todos. Lo mas adecuado para no formar un sesgo de informacion es referenciar todos los que son accesibles o en todo caso ninguno. Saludos cordials.-- Kanon6996 ( talk) 01:58, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
• Hola Andreasmperu! Con tu permiso continuare escribiendo en espanol, porque me resulta mas sencillo expresarme y porque no veo ningun impedimiento en hacerlo, gracias. En ningun momento dije que tu fueras subjetiva, sino te mencione que la valoracion personal de unos rankings sobre otros es propia de cada uno y ello ya va dentro de la subjetividad personal de cada uno. Lo objetivo en tal sentido como te mencione es la correcta inclusion de todos, porque como te mencione empezar a descartar alguno por una u otra razon, hace que tambien sea possible descartar otros como el de Webometrics, etc. Agradecere no hagas comentarios hacia mi persona que indiquen que no contribuyo. Llevo un buen tiempo contribuyendo en Wikipedia en redaccion de articulos y tambien vigilando ediciones, en este caso lo que te indico es mi postura, esperando en todo caso pueda encontrarse una postura media en la que ambos estemos de acuerdo. Saludos cordials :)-- Kanon6996 ( talk) 02:25, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
• Es lo mas recommendable pero no obligatorio, en todo caso dado que el asunto tambien implica a los articulos de la Wikipedia ES, y la facilidad para ambos de comunicarnos alli, continuare con mi respuesta en la wikipeida ES. Gracias por la comprension.-- Kanon6996 ( talk) 02:49, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply

– Fayenatic L ondon 18:08, 13 February 2013 (UTC) reply

And again. Sorry, I only just noticed your last reply. – Fayenatic L ondon 17:13, 30 March 2013 (UTC) reply

Hello ! Je viens juste de découvrir le démarrage de votre traduction. C'est vrai, en français on présente souvent aux labels BA et AdQ des articles beaucoup plus longs et plus fouillés qu'en anglais. Nous avons, Azurfrog et moi-même, pris beaucoup beaucoup de plaisir à faire tous ces articles sur et autour de Jane Austen ! Désolée, je n'ai pas de talk page sur en.wiki. EYMERY.

No where in the entire article is the actual word 'cancel' used. It is the term people scan the article for when trying to make a decision to start a series on Hulu or Netflix. They also want to know if there is a cliff hanger ending or some resolution before investing time in watching the show. 97.85.168.22 ( talk) 08:54, 24 March 2013 (UTC) reply

You are going to edit war over adding two truthful adjectives to the opening sentence of the article? That's ridiculous. The show is from 2004 and there is no second season coming. 97.85.168.22 ( talk) 20:19, 24 March 2013 (UTC) reply

Just because I'm not signed in and am using an IP edit does NOT mean I'm not an established editor. Stop your edit warring about a simple descriptive adjectives giving a concise view of the state of the show. "What (or who) is the subject?" = A cancelled, single season science fiction television series. Short, sweet and concise. Please review the Wikipedia:Lead section TT first sentence content and please stop abusing the anonymous editors. Alatari ( talk) 21:57, 24 March 2013 (UTC) reply

Actually, the complete guideline is WP:MOSBEGIN. For some examples regarding the first sentence of an article, you can check on Wikipedia:MOSBEGIN#Proper names and titles, where it clearly states this order: [Name of work] is a [YEAR] [type of work] [genre]. If you think the information is really important, the rest of the introduction section is the right place to put it. Andreasm ^{just talk to me} 00:06, 25 March 2013 (UTC) reply

Thankyou, I can always learn something new. Alatari ( talk) 00:12, 25 March 2013 (UTC) reply

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Shadowjams ( talk) 00:15, 25 March 2013 (UTC) reply

Hi Andreasmperu, I am looking for volunteers to re-create the link below for all 196 countries. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mcnabber091/Economy_of_the_United_States The goal of this project is to map out the global economy. Here is the project page https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Global_Economic_Map — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcnabber091 ( talk • contribs) 03:30, 10 April 2013 (UTC) reply

Your recent editing history at Pontifical Catholic University of Peru shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.-- Kanon6996 ( talk) 01:37, 14 May 2013 (UTC) reply

Retomando el dialogo

Hola Andreasmperu! Tus ediciones vuelven a caer en el mismo problema. En base a un dialogo que tuvimos, siempre te mencione que la referencia que reiteradamente eliminas hace mencion a una clasificacion de "Iberoamerican Higher Education Insitutions", contrario a tu argumento inicial en que referias una clasificacion como de "research-devoted institutions". Posterior a ello reformulaste tu postura indicando que es "the tool for the analysis of the research performance of all Iberoamerican Higher Education Insitutions", y desacreditando la inclusion de la clasificacion por ser esta una clasificacion que evalua solo el nivel de investigacion, sin considerar que cada clasificacion tiene su metodologia. Clasificaciones como la de CSIC y 4ICU consideran solo la presencia web por ejemplo. Mostrando una situacion similar y que en todo caso merecerian igual tratamiento que el que quieres dar a la referencia de SCImago. Con eliminar uno sobre otros que presentan el mismo problema, no haces mas que crear un sesgo en la informacion disponible. Dado ello, reitero que lo mas adecuado es la inclusion de todas las referencias iniciales, o en todo caso la no utilizacion de ninguno de estos 3, que segun tu postura, caerian en el mismo saco. Saludos cordiales.-- Kanon6996 ( talk) 01:37, 14 May 2013 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Werner Schroeter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Willow Springs ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:13, 22 July 2013 (UTC) reply

Please assist I have a MediaWiki bug that is bothering me and the most recent instance just happened a few minutes ago, evidently from you. Did you do anything (editing, assessment, reviewing, changing permissions, etc.) to Superman (The Clique song)? — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 05:32, 23 July 2013 (UTC) reply

No, but I have edited the Wikidata item related ( d:Q3977961). So, probably that is what you saw. Andreasm ^{just talk to me} 05:56, 23 July 2013 (UTC) reply

Ah That is almost certainly it. Thanks! — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 06:49, 23 July 2013 (UTC) reply

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 14:51, 9 December 2013 (UTC) reply

Dear Andreasmperu,

i'm sorry, but Novelas ejemplares is a set of novellas, not short stories.

Best regards,
-- Hgfernan ( talk) 19:08, 22 January 2014 (UTC) reply

MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 04:00, 1 March 2014 (UTC) reply

MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 17:54, 19 April 2014 (UTC) reply

MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:59, 5 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi Books & Bytes recipients: The Wikipedia Library has been expanding rapidly and we need some help! We currently have 10 signups for free account access open and several more in the works... In order to help with those signups, distribute access codes, and manage accounts we'll need 2-3 more Account Coordinators.

It takes about an hour to get up and running and then only takes a couple hours per week, flexible depending upon your schedule and routine. If you're interested in helping out, please drop a note in the next week at my talk page or shoot me an email at: jorlowitzgmail.com. Thanks and cheers, Jake Ocaasi via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:41, 20 June 2014 (UTC) reply

MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:20, 31 July 2014 (UTC) reply

MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 04:51, 7 October 2014 (UTC) reply

MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:36, 8 January 2015 (UTC) reply

MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 17:40, 4 March 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello Books & Bytes subscribers. There is a new Visual Editor reference feature in development called Citoid. It is designed to "auto-fill" references using a URL or DOI. We would really appreciate you testing whether TWL partners' references work in Citoid. Sharing your results will help the developers fix bugs and improve the system. If you have a few minutes, please visit the testing page for simple instructions on how to try this new tool. Regards, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:47, 10 April 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello Books & Bytes subscribers. There is a new Visual Editor reference feature in development called Citoid. It is designed to "auto-fill" references using a URL or DOI. We would really appreciate you testing whether TWL partners' references work in Citoid. Sharing your results will help the developers fix bugs and improve the system. If you have a few minutes, please visit the testing page for simple instructions on how to try this new tool. Regards, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 19:47, 10 April 2015 (UTC) reply

MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:20, 4 May 2015 (UTC) reply

Delivered on behalf of The Wikipedia Library by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:16, 11 June 2015 (UTC) reply

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

• Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
• Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
• Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
• Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
• Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
• Research coordinators: run reference services

Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC) reply

The Interior 15:23, 16 July 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi, thanks for coming to the Oxford meetup yesterday; it's always good to meet fellow Wikipedians. Our next Oxford meetup is 20 September 2015, and I hope to see you there. I have added your name at User:Redrose64#Wikipedians I have met. -- Redrose64 ( talk) 11:50, 17 August 2015 (UTC) reply

@ Redrose64: Hi! Indeed, it was nice to meet people involved in these projects. I would probably be in town next month. If so, I will definitely go to the meeting. Andreasm ^{just talk to me} 01:27, 21 August 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello! I'm running a survey to identify the best way to notify Wikimedians about upcoming UK wikimeets (informal, in-person social meetings of Wikimedians), and to see if we can improve UK wikimeets to make them accessible and attractive to more editors and readers. All questions are optional, and it will take about 10 minutes to complete. Please fill it in at:

https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/JJMNVVD

Thanks! Mike Peel ( talk) 18:48, 20 September 2015 (UTC) reply

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:29, 1 October 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi, I hope I can successfully draw your attention to this section of the project chat on Wikidata. I know some people only look at their Wikipedia messages or are otherwise too busy to chat. Any input will be appreciated. Thank you. -- BurritoBazooka ( talk) 00:12, 15 October 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC) reply

The Interior, via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 19:12, 10 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Rubbish computer ( Merry Christmas!: ...And a Happy New Year!) 20:20, 26 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

@ Rubbish computer: Thank you! I wish you a great 2016!!! Andreasm ^{just talk to me} 20:54, 1 January 2016 (UTC) reply

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 19:19, 19 February 2016 (UTC) reply

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 15:16, 14 April 2016 (UTC) reply

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:36, 16 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:25, 31 August 2016 (UTC) reply

19:07, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Hola, en la referencia indicada se muestar que los Testigos de Jehova cambiaron su sede. me gustaria actualizar dicha info. Saludos — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcovenas ( talk • contribs) 18:49, 2 December 2016 (UTC) reply

-- Rubbish computer ( HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 14:18, 22 December 2016 (UTC) reply

--
Rubbish computer (
HALP!: 
I dropped the bass?) 19:04, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
reply

MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:59, 17 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Hi Andreasmperu, you may wish to add to the discussion at Talk:Wind-powered vehicle#Scope—Land only?. Sincerely, User:HopsonRoad 14:41, 27 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:54, 6 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:35, 20 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:03, 23 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Hello Andreasmperu, I come to you because I have seen that you had been the last person to update this page here /info/en/?search=Category:Novels_by_Juliette_Benzoni First of all, it was not me who created that Article - but I would like to be the one who writes now all the missing titles in that Category. My question: the author wrote 86 books /info/en/?search=Juliette_Benzoni - but so far only 14 books have been translated from French into English. Is it now correct to add all the original French titles and maybe in brackets the English titels - or would it be better to write those 14 titles separately also on that page ? I am looking forward to your answer. ~Have a nice day,Best to you Laramie1960 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 12:40, 30 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 04:53, 21 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:57, 15 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors. Your signature is also causing Tidy bug affecting font tags wrapping links.

You are encouraged to change

[[User:Andreasmperu|<span style="color:black;">Andreasm</span>]] [[User talk:Andreasmperu|<sup style="color:green;">just talk to me</sup>]] : Andreasm ^{just talk to me}

to

[[User:Andreasmperu|<span style="color: black;">Andreasm</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Andreasmperu|<span style="color: green;">just talk to me</span>]]</sup> : Andreasm ^{just talk to me}

— Anomalocaris ( talk) 09:56, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 17:35, 31 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 14:49, 18 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 19:33, 20 June 2018 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:02, 25 August 2018 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 03:42, 25 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 14:34, 21 December 2018 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 03:29, 26 February 2019 (UTC) reply

Category:Julio Cortázar, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- wooden superman 09:54, 10 May 2019 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:40, 21 May 2019 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 14:20, 12 July 2019 (UTC) reply

On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:58, 27 September 2019 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 05:20, 21 November 2019 (UTC) reply

On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 07:09, 1 February 2020 (UTC) reply

On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --15:57, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:12, 11 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Hi,

Greetings, Just came across your interesting user profile. I was looking for some support in following areas.

• Please do have a look at upcoming encyclopedic articles Draft:Ex-Muslims along with Draft talk:Ex-Muslims and also Superstitions in Muslim societies.

If any of above topics interest you, then pl. do contribute towards expansion of the same.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku ( talk) 07:23, 18 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:14, 10 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:47, 18 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello Andreasmperu,

I removed some elements in order the clarify the French infobox (for example, there is to much musical styles which can lost the reader) and in order to mention only true information. I refer to the French Wikipedian article which is a featured article that I mostly wrote in order to have the entire references. I'm a modest specialist of George Michael and my contributions on this page isn't vandalism but common sense. Read my contributions in details and you'll understand my goal. I would like to finish by saying that this kind of problem wouldn't exist if the infobox have stayed in the French statement, even though I understand the whole spirit of the common participation on Wikidata.

Regards, • Frantogian ^{You talkin' to me?} • 18:38, 31 December 2020 (UTC) reply

P.S. : Can you disable the blocking please. I think this is unreasonable.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:00, 25 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:27, 22 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:11, 10 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:04, 30 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:14, 22 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:58, 10 November 2021 (UTC) reply

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --15:12, 2 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:05, 25 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:52, 1 June 2022 (UTC) (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:45, 1 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:20, 30 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:19, 17 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:14, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:45, 16 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:03, 24 May 2023 (UTC) reply

Please see Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2023_June_27#Works_by_writer_nationality. – Fayenatic London 11:00, 27 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:22, 18 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:26, 12 September 2023 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:15, 27 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --13:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:02, 23 April 2024 (UTC) reply