|
Hi, when you update the stats in football players' infoboxes please remember that you should also update the |pcupdate= (or |club-update=) parameter. This shows when the stats were last updated and prevents editors from accidentally updating the stats again. Thank you. --
Jaellee (
talk) 07:13, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
|
Hi AllSportsfan16! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Missvain ( I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot ( talk) 16:11, 3 March 2015 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 CONCACAF U-17 Championship, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages José Rodríguez and Luis Arias. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:54, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of
your recent edits, such as the edit you made to
2014–15 UEFA Champions League knockout phase, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the
welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use
the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.
QED237
(talk) 21:32, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
computer live scores are behind live video
- But still in the table you put Dortmund as 3-0 winners and that City beat barca and did not add aggregate score and winner. Also incorrect update of goal parameter and your first edit was too soon. QED237 (talk) 21:42, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
That was a mistake I thought the score had to be lined up with the home first and away second. Also I was getting to the other information. I'll just let you edit it if you are going to be picky.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United States men's national under-23 soccer team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chicago Fire. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:55, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United States men's national under-23 soccer team, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mario Rodriguez and Jordan Morris. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:15, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Qed237. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on
Gedion Zelalem, but you didn’t support your changes with a
citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning
how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
QED237
(talk) 23:06, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of
your recent edits, such as the edit you made to
2015–16 Premier League, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the
welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use
the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.
Qed237
(talk) 16:09, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
I have to disagree with you. I left a message on your page but I forgot log in. Let me repeat you can not choose to show no flags on only the premier league page. Basically all the other leagues show flags. Nowhere does it say flags should not be used. They've historically been used for years and are used with all other leagues
×== World Cup qualification ==
Hi, I see you are updating the results before I can see that the matches has ended. What is the source and how to you follow the matches so you can see result so quickly? Qed237 (talk) 22:18, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
I'm watching them live using different streaming websites and when the whistle blows I post the result. AllSportsfan16 ( talk) 22:41, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Excuse me? That's not true, I updated it after it ended, I just didn't notice the very late goal and I would correct it quick were not your constant edit conflict. The Replicator ( talk) 20:48, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
How do you not notice a goal in stoppage time. You shouldn't hit save page until whatever site your using says the game is final, live scoring is not allowed. AllSportsfan16 ( talk) 20:51, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
In case you don't know, UEFA matchcentre removes the yellow shade when the match is over. I updated after that. Then on the same moment I identified my mistake and I couldn't revert it as soon as I could because of your edit conflict. The Replicator ( talk) 20:58, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
No, I did not know that. Also you're not the only one editing I saw a mistake and then I proceeded to fix it. AllSportsfan16 ( talk) 21:03, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
But my point is not about you fixing my mistake, I have no problem in acknowledging my mistakes, the point is that you accused me of live updating, which is not the case. The Replicator ( talk) 21:07, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Okay I acknowledge you weren't live scoring. AllSportsfan16 ( talk) 21:12, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Thank you. Next time I will check it yet again. The Replicator ( talk) 21:14, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 CONCACAF Men's Olympic Qualifying Championship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jordan Morris. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:01, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to
Fabian Johnson. Your edits could be interpreted as
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please
cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's
talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the
sandbox. Thank you. --
Jaellee (
talk) 16:56, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Not sure who you think you are. I was updating Fabian Johnson's statistics, he scored a goal today and according to the time stamp his stats haven't been updated in a while. So I would appreciate it if you don't undo correct edits.
AllSportsfan16 (
talk) 17:00, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- I'm an editor who is interested in correct stats. You just added a goal (and strangely without an appearance), did not update the totals and did not update the time stamps. With so many errors this is it bold to claim that your edits were "correct edits". -- Jaellee ( talk) 17:31, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
I've edited many different sports articles on wikipedia. I was in the process of updating the statistics. I didn't realize that they were so out of date. So I took a couple of minutes to look up the stats and then I was going to add them. If you look at the time stamp it had only been a couple minutes. I added the goal and then noticed that the number of appearances was not even close to correct, it was off by several numbers. Anyways next time you don't have to undo the edit just keep updating the statistics. AllSportsfan16 ( talk) 19:25, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Unfortunately there are a lot of editors which only selectively update the statistics (mostly adding a goal immediately after a player scored). They never calculate the totals or update the time stamp and generally make a mess of the statistics table. I usually revert such edits on sight. I'm sorry if you got caught in the process, but your edit was not really correct and I did not at the time stamp to see how old that edit was. -- Jaellee ( talk) 18:26, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
2016–17 UEFA Champions League, you may be
blocked from editing.
Qed237
(talk) 20:44, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
I'm not sure what you're talking about. Manchester City qualified for the champions league, it was impossible for Man United to catch them. AllSportsfan16 ( talk) 23:08, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- @
AllSportsfan16: There's a difference between highly unlikely and impossible, you know.
The Replicator (
talk) 23:35, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Theoretically they had not qualified and you even admitted it yourself, how unlikely it may be but Manchester United still had a chance to qualify. Qed237 (talk) 23:44, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- A year ago people said it would be impossible for Leicester City to win Premier League, but it still happened. Qed237 (talk) 23:45, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Ok I won't do it in the future, but I think you can be realistic. I'm sure Man City thought they were in the Champions league qualifying round once the whistle blew to finish their game on Sunday. AllSportsfan16 ( talk) 23:46, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016 in American soccer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Brooks. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:37, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Swimming at the 2016 Summer Olympics – Qualification, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ryan Murphy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:25, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Swimming at the 2016 Summer Olympics – Men's 1500 metre freestyle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henrik Christiansen. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:14, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Knowledgekid87 (
talk) 16:38, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
Seriously. I could do the same thing to you. In fact I think I will. AllSportsfan16 ( talk) 16:41, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
or
) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
I went ahead and added the template "Unsigned" to your comments in the Articles for Deletion discussion. It is very important that you remember to sign your comments, particularly in a deletion discussion. I also bulleted and indented your comments, as that it makes it easier for other participants to follow the flow of the discussion. Thanks. Safiel ( talk) 14:51, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| Sometimes it isnt easy to admit that you misunderstand something on wikipedia. Thank you for listening to other editors when it came to the polling article. Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 15:36, 4 October 2016 (UTC) |
Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 21:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
AllSportsfan16, here's a link to help you with doing proper referencing - Wikipedia:Citing sources as you are adding lots of polls for the following article - Statewide opinion polling for the United States presidential election, 2016. If you need any clarification, please message me. DrFargi ( talk) 08:27, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- AllSportsfan16, just a friendly reminder to try to do proper referencing and citations for sources. If you have to reference several points in the article, you need to put a reference name, and that way we don't have multiple references in the reference list. Please try to put the name of your sources and dates, and not just paste the url or weblinks. Hope for your understanding. DrFargi ( talk) 06:04, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, AllSportsfan16. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Generation Z, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the
sandbox for that. Thank you. --
DynaGirl (
talk) 14:46, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Add- I see that you commented on talk page. I missed that earlier as it was not noted in edit summary. Edit summary was blank.[ [1] I will respond further there. -- DynaGirl ( talk) 14:50, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at
New York City FC 0–7 New York Red Bulls, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Sounder
Bruce 07:32, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:AllSportsfan16 reported by User:Amaury (Result: ). Thank you.
Amaury (
talk |
contribs) 01:50, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
- Please put back the comments by others
that you removed from the noticeboard here. If you want to withdraw your 3RR report you can say that in your own comment at the bottom. You don't have the right to remove anyone else's comments; you should leave them in place.
EdJohnston (
talk) 03:50, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
- @ EdJohnston: It was my post, so I removed it one other person made a comment, but it wasn't important. No need to clutter up the board with unnecessary reports.
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
Hello, AllSportsfan16. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, AllSportsfan16. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, AllSportsfan16. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
|
Hi, when you update the stats in football players' infoboxes please remember that you should also update the |pcupdate= (or |club-update=) parameter. This shows when the stats were last updated and prevents editors from accidentally updating the stats again. Thank you. --
Jaellee (
talk) 07:13, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
|
|
Hi AllSportsfan16! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Missvain ( I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot ( talk) 16:11, 3 March 2015 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 CONCACAF U-17 Championship, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages José Rodríguez and Luis Arias. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:54, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of
your recent edits, such as the edit you made to
2014–15 UEFA Champions League knockout phase, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the
welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use
the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.
QED237
(talk) 21:32, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
computer live scores are behind live video
- But still in the table you put Dortmund as 3-0 winners and that City beat barca and did not add aggregate score and winner. Also incorrect update of goal parameter and your first edit was too soon. QED237 (talk) 21:42, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
That was a mistake I thought the score had to be lined up with the home first and away second. Also I was getting to the other information. I'll just let you edit it if you are going to be picky.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United States men's national under-23 soccer team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chicago Fire. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:55, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United States men's national under-23 soccer team, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mario Rodriguez and Jordan Morris. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:15, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Qed237. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on
Gedion Zelalem, but you didn’t support your changes with a
citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning
how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
QED237
(talk) 23:06, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of
your recent edits, such as the edit you made to
2015–16 Premier League, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the
welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use
the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.
Qed237
(talk) 16:09, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
I have to disagree with you. I left a message on your page but I forgot log in. Let me repeat you can not choose to show no flags on only the premier league page. Basically all the other leagues show flags. Nowhere does it say flags should not be used. They've historically been used for years and are used with all other leagues
×== World Cup qualification ==
Hi, I see you are updating the results before I can see that the matches has ended. What is the source and how to you follow the matches so you can see result so quickly? Qed237 (talk) 22:18, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
I'm watching them live using different streaming websites and when the whistle blows I post the result. AllSportsfan16 ( talk) 22:41, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Excuse me? That's not true, I updated it after it ended, I just didn't notice the very late goal and I would correct it quick were not your constant edit conflict. The Replicator ( talk) 20:48, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
How do you not notice a goal in stoppage time. You shouldn't hit save page until whatever site your using says the game is final, live scoring is not allowed. AllSportsfan16 ( talk) 20:51, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
In case you don't know, UEFA matchcentre removes the yellow shade when the match is over. I updated after that. Then on the same moment I identified my mistake and I couldn't revert it as soon as I could because of your edit conflict. The Replicator ( talk) 20:58, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
No, I did not know that. Also you're not the only one editing I saw a mistake and then I proceeded to fix it. AllSportsfan16 ( talk) 21:03, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
But my point is not about you fixing my mistake, I have no problem in acknowledging my mistakes, the point is that you accused me of live updating, which is not the case. The Replicator ( talk) 21:07, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Okay I acknowledge you weren't live scoring. AllSportsfan16 ( talk) 21:12, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Thank you. Next time I will check it yet again. The Replicator ( talk) 21:14, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 CONCACAF Men's Olympic Qualifying Championship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jordan Morris. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:01, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to
Fabian Johnson. Your edits could be interpreted as
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please
cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's
talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the
sandbox. Thank you. --
Jaellee (
talk) 16:56, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Not sure who you think you are. I was updating Fabian Johnson's statistics, he scored a goal today and according to the time stamp his stats haven't been updated in a while. So I would appreciate it if you don't undo correct edits.
AllSportsfan16 (
talk) 17:00, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- I'm an editor who is interested in correct stats. You just added a goal (and strangely without an appearance), did not update the totals and did not update the time stamps. With so many errors this is it bold to claim that your edits were "correct edits". -- Jaellee ( talk) 17:31, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
I've edited many different sports articles on wikipedia. I was in the process of updating the statistics. I didn't realize that they were so out of date. So I took a couple of minutes to look up the stats and then I was going to add them. If you look at the time stamp it had only been a couple minutes. I added the goal and then noticed that the number of appearances was not even close to correct, it was off by several numbers. Anyways next time you don't have to undo the edit just keep updating the statistics. AllSportsfan16 ( talk) 19:25, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Unfortunately there are a lot of editors which only selectively update the statistics (mostly adding a goal immediately after a player scored). They never calculate the totals or update the time stamp and generally make a mess of the statistics table. I usually revert such edits on sight. I'm sorry if you got caught in the process, but your edit was not really correct and I did not at the time stamp to see how old that edit was. -- Jaellee ( talk) 18:26, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
2016–17 UEFA Champions League, you may be
blocked from editing.
Qed237
(talk) 20:44, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
I'm not sure what you're talking about. Manchester City qualified for the champions league, it was impossible for Man United to catch them. AllSportsfan16 ( talk) 23:08, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- @
AllSportsfan16: There's a difference between highly unlikely and impossible, you know.
The Replicator (
talk) 23:35, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Theoretically they had not qualified and you even admitted it yourself, how unlikely it may be but Manchester United still had a chance to qualify. Qed237 (talk) 23:44, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- A year ago people said it would be impossible for Leicester City to win Premier League, but it still happened. Qed237 (talk) 23:45, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Ok I won't do it in the future, but I think you can be realistic. I'm sure Man City thought they were in the Champions league qualifying round once the whistle blew to finish their game on Sunday. AllSportsfan16 ( talk) 23:46, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016 in American soccer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Brooks. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:37, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Swimming at the 2016 Summer Olympics – Qualification, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ryan Murphy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:25, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Swimming at the 2016 Summer Olympics – Men's 1500 metre freestyle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henrik Christiansen. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:14, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Knowledgekid87 (
talk) 16:38, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
Seriously. I could do the same thing to you. In fact I think I will. AllSportsfan16 ( talk) 16:41, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
or
) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
I went ahead and added the template "Unsigned" to your comments in the Articles for Deletion discussion. It is very important that you remember to sign your comments, particularly in a deletion discussion. I also bulleted and indented your comments, as that it makes it easier for other participants to follow the flow of the discussion. Thanks. Safiel ( talk) 14:51, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
|
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| Sometimes it isnt easy to admit that you misunderstand something on wikipedia. Thank you for listening to other editors when it came to the polling article. Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 15:36, 4 October 2016 (UTC) |
Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 21:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
AllSportsfan16, here's a link to help you with doing proper referencing - Wikipedia:Citing sources as you are adding lots of polls for the following article - Statewide opinion polling for the United States presidential election, 2016. If you need any clarification, please message me. DrFargi ( talk) 08:27, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- AllSportsfan16, just a friendly reminder to try to do proper referencing and citations for sources. If you have to reference several points in the article, you need to put a reference name, and that way we don't have multiple references in the reference list. Please try to put the name of your sources and dates, and not just paste the url or weblinks. Hope for your understanding. DrFargi ( talk) 06:04, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, AllSportsfan16. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Generation Z, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the
sandbox for that. Thank you. --
DynaGirl (
talk) 14:46, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Add- I see that you commented on talk page. I missed that earlier as it was not noted in edit summary. Edit summary was blank.[ [1] I will respond further there. -- DynaGirl ( talk) 14:50, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at
New York City FC 0–7 New York Red Bulls, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Sounder
Bruce 07:32, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:AllSportsfan16 reported by User:Amaury (Result: ). Thank you.
Amaury (
talk |
contribs) 01:50, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
- Please put back the comments by others
that you removed from the noticeboard here. If you want to withdraw your 3RR report you can say that in your own comment at the bottom. You don't have the right to remove anyone else's comments; you should leave them in place.
EdJohnston (
talk) 03:50, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
- @ EdJohnston: It was my post, so I removed it one other person made a comment, but it wasn't important. No need to clutter up the board with unnecessary reports.
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
Hello, AllSportsfan16. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, AllSportsfan16. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, AllSportsfan16. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)