I find it very ironic that I am talking on my discussion page before actually creating a User page.

However, it could not be avoided, as for some reason I seem to be unable to create my own user page, since for reasons as yet unknown to me, The words "Wikipedia does not have a user page with this name yet" keep appearing. It is very annoying, and I would like to know how to stop this.

However, it is very unlikely that anyone will respond to this here, since there is no way to reach this discussion page without going to the actual page, which is very hard to do since I have not created it yet. I will have to write this somewhere else. Please ignore all I have written above, since the mere fact that you are reading it proves that I have a user page, and the problem is therefore solved.

An editor has nominated Leslie (Star Trek), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also " What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leslie (Star Trek) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 19:36, 16 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Hello, Ye Olde Luke, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- Geniac 15:42, 9 May 2007 (UTC) reply

Much obliged! Ye Olde Luke 22:54, 8 August 2007 (UTC) reply

i have book not done yet Wikraptor 21:07, 13 July 2007 (UTC) Hey I have a Uncyclopedia account now called Unraptor reply

if you scientist visit www.mds-usa.com

Great! nice meeting you here, buddy! -- Ye Olde Luke 22:56, 11 August 2007 (UTC) reply

I couldn't resist seeing what would happen. Weather Man 23:55, 16 September 2007 (UTC) reply

Well, it certainly gave interesting results! BTW, I wasn't pissed off or anything. I just couldn't figure out what you were doing! Ye Olde Luke 00:02, 17 September 2007 (UTC) reply

Well, sandboxes are for playing in! Weather Man 00:39, 17 September 2007 (UTC) reply

So true! Ye Olde Luke 03:30, 17 September 2007 (UTC) reply

I am dummmmmmy on uncyclopedia. I had to change my name here to Arceus Fan. Thanks for bein' on my wiki.-- Arceus fan 15:59, 28 September 2007 (UTC) reply

Nice seeing you! I'll ask my friends if they'd like to join the Humor Meta Wiki! -- Ye Olde Luke 23:56, 28 September 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks for signing my autograph book!-- Arceus fan 15:14, 29 September 2007 (UTC) reply

Me and my wiki friends hang out here. You wanna join?-- Arceus fan 15:51, 30 September 2007 (UTC) reply

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Leslie (Star Trek), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also " What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{ db-author}} to the top of Leslie (Star Trek). Ejfetters 23:45, 30 November 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the E=mc² Barnstar! Happy editing, Goochelaar ( talk) 09:52, 9 December 2007 (UTC) reply

lolz it's the NPP... I'm working on that weird Indian tech university article, so you can have some fun as I wikify some of the article. Happy NPPing! - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ contribs} 06:22, 12 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Well now that's an interesting request. Why do you want to know? I'll tell you if you promise not to use the information for evil. :-) Grand master ka 04:09, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply

The IP is 66.121.127.94. I see some ugly recent vandalism. :-/ Grand master ka 00:53, 27 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks for fixing the typo on my page. I read over it twice and missed it. I think I must be legally blind. p.s. forgot to tell you thanks for the welcome when i created my profile. have a good one.-- AgnosticPreachersKid ( talk) 08:04, 23 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Yes and no.
I would say yes all the way but there are 2 reasons why I don't:

1. I've never been an admin before on ANY Wiki
2. I don't visit the Land Before Time Wiki all that often (but not many people do anyway)
   

Yet, I would enjoy that at the same time.
So, maybe I will be an admin. I'll try my best to do a good job. But, you can on my talk page tell me what to do please. Becuase as I said, I've never been an admin before. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4myself4 ( talk • contribs) 01:47, 8 March 2008 (UTC) reply

You had me laughing there. Just wondering, how do you become an admin. If you can just tell me what to do and I'll try to become an admin the best (and as you said (kind of) expimental) I am capable. Thanks. 4M 4| Go here 03:24, 8 March 2008 (UTC) reply

Well, this message is a wonderful surprise. I've responded over in TLBT's wiki, respectfully. Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 23:28, 21 March 2008 (UTC) reply

You wrote:

Sorry my question on the Miscellaneous Reference Desk got you into hot water...

That's all right, these things happen. Thanks for your kind words. -- 207.176.159.90 ( talk) 19:45, 6 May 2008 (UTC) reply

Hey, thanks very much for the barnstar - my first in over two years of RD editing! -- Richardrj ^{talk email} 09:09, 11 June 2008 (UTC) reply

And thanks from me, too! It's nice to be appreciated :) Grutness... wha? 12:19, 13 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the note. I've sent a message to the WP Oversight group who look after any pages with too much personal info. If you find any more user pages like that, the best place to go is straight to Wikipedia:Requests_for_oversight - the overseers can permanently delete page info from the WP files, something which I can't do (as far as I know). Hopefully they'll get rid of the infor within the next few hours. Grutness... wha? 23:51, 13 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Sign your posts. Please. 70.179.52.204 ( talk) 05:50, 6 July 2008 (UTC) reply

WTF? That comment was made over a year ago. I didn't even have an account then. -- Ye Olde Luke ( talk) 20:20, 6 July 2008 (UTC) reply

In accordance to WP:NFCC#3, the lead image should suffice for the list - this FAQ may help. The AFD ( Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Littlefoot) made it quite clear what should be done for the articles, but nothing has happened since December to prove notability. « ₣M₣ » 00:39, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

User:Electrical Experiment/Guestbook/awards Here Ford 20:26, 31 July 2008 (UTC) reply

Then, for your honesty, the ribbon for finding it again. TREKphiler ^{hit me ♠} 22:22, 31 July 2008 (UTC) (Resistance is stupid.) reply

FYI. Glad for the good discussion there. Baccyak4H ( Yak!) 16:19, 4 August 2008 (UTC) reply

In case you're wondering, I took your question out of the gallery in the previous thread. The previous poster didn't close the gallery. But I just used your standard sig so you can go and resign that post if you use a different sig. Zain Ebrahim ( talk) 21:18, 4 August 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks! -- Ye Olde Luke ( talk) 22:20, 4 August 2008 (UTC) reply

I found your land before time.. but i dont see myself as lucky.. nor a hacker! well, i should earn it, i might as well enjoy the stay in "your land before time." -- Axxand SPEAK ACT 01:05, 11 August 2008 (UTC) reply

Nope, its okay.. i get lots of fun in finding secrets here in wikipedia. It is my great pleasure to visit that page. Thanks for the barnstar and Kudos to you. i enjoyed it! -- Axxand SPEAK ACT 02:02, 11 August 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Farsightedness.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{ di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? SchuminWeb ( Talk) 07:12, 3 September 2008 (UTC) reply

If that template was to combine Spielberg's directing work and productions, then it would be ultra-huge. The only films that were on that temple are indeed films he directed. User:Alientraveller did a Spielberg productions template, you can view at Talk:Steven Spielberg. Cheers. — Wildroot ( talk) 01:23, 21 September 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for awarding me a barnstar!!!! Leif edling ( talk) 06:22, 16 October 2008 (UTC) reply

I'll second that. It is my first barnstar, and is special if only for that reason. A very kind gesture. -- Scray ( talk) 13:08, 16 October 2008 (UTC) reply

Yes, thanks and I wish you luck. IQ tests are fascinating, and I find all criticism of them a bit silly, at least as long as one keeps in mind that "intelligence" is not well defined and is, what you see in these tests. If you got a high score, you are good in the things they teach you in the tests, no more, no less. It is as with "Japanese in 30 days". In the end you don·t know Japanese, but the very few, but basic things in the book. -- Radh ( talk) 14:47, 17 October 2008 (UTC) reply

Yeah, thanks for the barnstar! I really didn't expect one for something as small as that. Thank you very much. Densock| Dendodge^{in public} 11:23, 21 October 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks, me five, don't think I really deserve it but I have done a few other things so I'll take it in a general probabilistic sense,rather like a single bit Digital Differential Analyzer or a neuron passing along signals. :) It looks very nice. Dmcq ( talk) 17:02, 25 October 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks, me six. -- JackofOz ( talk) 05:08, 13 November 2008 (UTC) reply

Well, I guess this makes me seven :) Awesome that Leibniz won for Best Human Being of All Time! I love that guy! Belisarius ( talk) 16:51, 13 November 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks again, YOL (me seven). -- JackofOz ( talk) 05:17, 13 November 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks me ate... Thanks YOL for the fun. On behalf of David G, we lerv your generous (and nicely positioned) barnstars. =) Julia Rossi ( talk) 07:26, 13 November 2008 (UTC) reply

I'll second (eigth?) this, thanks a lot for my first WP:RD Barnstar. Prokhorovka ( talk) 22:00, 18 June 2009 (UTC) reply

I just wanted to write and thank you for those nice barnstars you gave me, for helping you out on the ref-desk! So nice when people do that :) And I so seldom find time to use my overly geeky (and nigh encyclopedic, if I may say so myself) knowledge of Greek mythology in real life. I hope your story works out!

(Also, if you ever have any questions about Norse mythology, I'm killer at that too. I can recite the story of the death of Balder from memory ;) Belisarius ( talk) 23:30, 1 January 2009 (UTC) reply

Ok, thanks for telling me. 4M 4| Go here 00:45, 10 February 2009 (UTC) reply

You're welcome. I appreciate the barn star! Dismas| ^(talk) 02:06, 11 July 2009 (UTC) reply

You gave me one too (my second from you). Thanks! It really made my weekend (sad maybe, but it is the cherry on top of my RD work). Prokhorovka ( talk) 16:54, 11 July 2009 (UTC) reply

A star came my too! Sir, I salute you as a gentleman. May your shadow never grow shorter. Cuddlyable3 ( talk) 06:42, 26 August 2009 (UTC) reply

You are most welcome! That was my pleasure!-- Gilisa ( talk) 19:03, 21 November 2009 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on File:Worldtravelforum1.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster ( talk) 09:24, 13 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Hey there Ye Olde Luke, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Ye Olde Luke/thorntree.

• See a log of files removed today here.
• Shut off the bot here.
• Report errors here.
• If you have any questions, place a {{ helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.

Thank you, -- DASHBot ( talk) 05:03, 14 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Worldtravelforum2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk) 04:04, 15 February 2012 (UTC) reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Darwin's Soldiers image.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 19:42, 28 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Hello, Aabicus. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 22:05, 18 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. reply

Stefan2 ( talk) 22:05, 18 September 2012 (UTC) reply

Hello, Aabicus. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 22:18, 22 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. reply

Stefan2 ( talk) 22:18, 22 September 2012 (UTC) reply

Hello, Aabicus. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Miscellaneous.
Message added   Miss Bono  (zootalk) 16:10, 13 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. reply

As I said on the ref. desk, I'm sorry that I misunderstood your intention with posting what appeared to be a separate question as a response to the section above it. As I said on the desk, without the indentation, I thought you were asking a new question and it therefore required its own section. Dismas| ^(talk) 04:38, 8 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Sentinels of the Multiverse

added a link pointing to Android

Sentinels of the Multiverse The Video Game

added a link pointing to Android

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:06, 23 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Oops. My bad! -- Aabicus ( talk) 02:01, 14 July 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Night Light Interactive, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Logan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:01, 29 August 2015 (UTC) reply

Mkay, I'll go fix it. Thanks bot! -- Aabicus ( talk) 18:23, 29 August 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi Aabicus: Sorry to trouble you, but I could not help but notice your expression of affection for TOS on the Wikipedians who like Star Trek: The Original Series page, and so I would be curious of your thoughts on the notability of a Star Trek author for whom I just created a Wikipedia article -- which may be promptly destined for the trash pile. As a newcomer here at Wikipedia, my first article attempt was indeed recommended for deletion within hours of its creation by a senior user named JzG who seems to me to be overly hostile and dismissive of Star Trek, calling it fancruft (= trivial, obscure, of importance to just a tiny group of fanatics) . Since you are a Trek fan, if it is also your good faith opinion that my subject is in no way deserving of an article on this site; and you could let me know, I would feel much more comfortable with the justice of the pending deletion action. My proposed article may be seen here, assuming you visit the page soon enough ... /info/en/?search=Gerald_Gurian Kind Regards. Tosresearcher ( talk) 04:53, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello, Aabicus. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello, Aabicus. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Hello, Aabicus. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Hello, Aabicus. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect The Land Befoe Time 7. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 7#The Land Befoe Time 7 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC 678 16:27, 7 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Skull and Bones. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 17:56, 25 June 2020 (UTC) reply

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 17:57, 25 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:09, 23 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC) reply