You seem to be in an edit war at Cheyenne, Wyoming. Please take a moment to read WP:USCITIES to see what should and should not be included in a city article. Thank you. Magnolia677 ( talk) 03:06, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
NeilN
talk to me 16:52, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —the one you made with
this edit to
User:Wiki_Zachary— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs) 17:03, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
I was going to help you find a reference for a casino called "Horse Palace" in Cheyenne. The only Horse Palace is here on Dell Range Blvd., and there's barely any sources to support it. One unit filled with slot machines in a suburban strip mall barely makes it notable. Magnolia677 ( talk) 23:18, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
My reply
- It was purely awesome that you found the official website. Is it okay that I link it back through the Cheyenne article?
174.45.128.124 ( talk) 17:01, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Greetings. At least one of
your recent edits, such as the edit you made to
User:Wiki Zachary, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be
reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use
the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.
CLCStudent (
talk) 17:27, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation warning
You are suspected of
sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the
notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wiki Zachary. Thank you.
Steel1943 (
talk) 01:25, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Good Morning, Steel1943!
It appears that you have looked back at my contribution history. All 2016 edits to
User: Wiki Zachary explain that his account was blocked indefinitely, and what other users can do. As of today, those have been reverted by another user, so you cant see them now. But I can tell you are more concerned with my 2015 edits. I must explain. Originally, I was mad because I was blocked for being strong about
,
File:Cheyenne Downtown Tower Cam.jpg, and others, so I started trying to use this account to defend myself. BUT PLEASE NOTE THAT I HAVE SINCE THEN DROPPED MY SITUATION< and USE THIS ACCOUNT TO CONTRIBUTE FAIRLY TO WIKIPEDIA. What you're seeing is that a long time ago, someone targeted me for sock puppetry, and then again recently, without hearing my story.
If that long paragraph was too confusing, here is a summary: I originally used this account to defend Wiki Zachary, but then I eventually dropped it. I have since then used my account fairly. I made some good edits to Cheyenne, Wyoming! I recently let people know that the account is blocked, (they should know), and I also looked down memory lane to see what went wrong with my old account. And what you're seeing is a user who cannot forget. Ciao, 174.45.128.124 ( talk) 17:51, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- ...Which means that you have just admitted to sock puppetry, (or meatpuppetry; not sure which one at this point, but it's not allowed either) and sock puppetry is not allowed on Wikipedia. If you want to edit on Wikipedia again, you will have to convince the community to unblock the User:Wiki Zachary account. If you wish to get the Wiki Zachary account unblocked, see Wikipedia:Blocking policy#Unblocking. Until the Wiki Zachary account gets unblocked and you declare any accounts or IPs that you use as alternates accounts (preferably listed on User:Wiki Zachary), any alternate accounts or IPs that you use will be blocked on sight. (But, at this point, I'm not even sure if you are Wiki Zachary, but either way, you seem to be a single-purpose account who defends Wiki Zachary and edits the same articles they did, so you obviously have strong ties with the indef-blocked Wiki Zachary account.) Even with that though, I strongly suspect you and the user of the Wiki Zachary account are the same person since the edits by this IP did not start on Wiki Zachary's page until Wiki Zachary was blocked. Steel1943 ( talk) 18:12, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- ...I may not have been so bright in the past, but now this account is used to help grow the encyclopedia. It can also help you out when you are wikibonked, like you say on your page. BTW, you're saying that I have to revive my old account, right? Even though User:NeilN is very Argumentative about my problems, I'll look at that. 174.45.128.124 ( talk) 18:43, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
There are editors that have accused me of what happended in October 2015. That's fine, BUT THEY NEVER MOVED ON. Currently, I have been innocently making articles better on Wikipedia and WikiVoyage, so you can tell that I've moved on. However, someone recently looked back at my contributions, and re-blocked me. I now understand that what I did was not okay, but now I just need to get to editing please. 174.45.128.124 ( talk) 18:57, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
174.45.128.124 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have already served my block for what I have done in October, but someone found my account and re- blocked me again, even though I have been just improving articles on Wikipedia and WikiVoyage recently. See Above. 174.45.128.124 ( talk) 20:26, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Appropriately blocked as a sockpuppet of an indefinitely-blocked user. Kinu t/ c 19:31, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Note to admin who responds to this: As shown above, this IP is a sockpuppet of Wiki Zachary. Steel1943 ( talk) 19:28, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
- Edit: WAS, not IS. 174.45.128.124 ( talk) 19:41, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
- Should've known that you was going to jump on me. Every Zachary that ever lived was treated poorly. You guys are forgetting that User:NeilN blocked me earlier, and I have learned from it. Recent contributions are to help Wikipedia, and inform people. In fact, User:Magnolia677 worked with me on the Cheyenne article to decide whether to add something or not. Even though I won't you guys are implying I should change my name to Manny and Move to Miami. This is the kind of argument that bloked User:Wiki Zachary. 174.45.128.124 ( talk) 19:39, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
- You have already been provided by me the proper path to be able to edit on Wikipedia again: Before you can edit again, the User:Wiki Zachary account has to be unblocked. Steel1943 ( talk) 19:48, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you for that link, but why does User:Wiki Zachary have to be blocked first? 174.45.128.124 ( talk) 20:22, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
- I assume you mean "unblocked", and I already told you why: Using any account or IP other than User:Wiki Zachary is sockpuppetry, which is not allowed. I've also already told you what you will need to do to edit again: Get User:Wiki Zachary unblocked. I've already been straight to the point, and any further failure on your part to understand the process and steps you have to do in order to edit again, I would have to assume, is a failure to "get it". Steel1943 ( talk) 00:40, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
- On a sidenote, I noticed that Wiki Zachary was blocked during an argument, but I also found this on the Block Policy:
When blocking may not be used
Policy shortcut: WP:BLOCKNO
Conflicts and involvement
Administrators must not block users with whom they are engaged in a content dispute; instead, they should report the problem to other administrators. Administrators should also be aware of potential conflicts involving pages or subject areas with which they are involved. It is acceptable for an administrator to block someone who has been engaging in clear-cut vandalism in that administrator's userspace. Can someone post this to Wiki Zachary's talk page since I can't? 174.45.128.124 ( talk) 19:33, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wiki Zachary, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
 | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
You seem to be in an edit war at Cheyenne, Wyoming. Please take a moment to read WP:USCITIES to see what should and should not be included in a city article. Thank you. Magnolia677 ( talk) 03:06, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
NeilN
talk to me 16:52, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —the one you made with
this edit to
User:Wiki_Zachary— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs) 17:03, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
I was going to help you find a reference for a casino called "Horse Palace" in Cheyenne. The only Horse Palace is here on Dell Range Blvd., and there's barely any sources to support it. One unit filled with slot machines in a suburban strip mall barely makes it notable. Magnolia677 ( talk) 23:18, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
My reply
- It was purely awesome that you found the official website. Is it okay that I link it back through the Cheyenne article?
174.45.128.124 ( talk) 17:01, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Greetings. At least one of
your recent edits, such as the edit you made to
User:Wiki Zachary, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be
reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use
the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.
CLCStudent (
talk) 17:27, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation warning
You are suspected of
sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the
notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wiki Zachary. Thank you.
Steel1943 (
talk) 01:25, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Good Morning, Steel1943!
It appears that you have looked back at my contribution history. All 2016 edits to
User: Wiki Zachary explain that his account was blocked indefinitely, and what other users can do. As of today, those have been reverted by another user, so you cant see them now. But I can tell you are more concerned with my 2015 edits. I must explain. Originally, I was mad because I was blocked for being strong about
,
File:Cheyenne Downtown Tower Cam.jpg, and others, so I started trying to use this account to defend myself. BUT PLEASE NOTE THAT I HAVE SINCE THEN DROPPED MY SITUATION< and USE THIS ACCOUNT TO CONTRIBUTE FAIRLY TO WIKIPEDIA. What you're seeing is that a long time ago, someone targeted me for sock puppetry, and then again recently, without hearing my story.
If that long paragraph was too confusing, here is a summary: I originally used this account to defend Wiki Zachary, but then I eventually dropped it. I have since then used my account fairly. I made some good edits to Cheyenne, Wyoming! I recently let people know that the account is blocked, (they should know), and I also looked down memory lane to see what went wrong with my old account. And what you're seeing is a user who cannot forget. Ciao, 174.45.128.124 ( talk) 17:51, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- ...Which means that you have just admitted to sock puppetry, (or meatpuppetry; not sure which one at this point, but it's not allowed either) and sock puppetry is not allowed on Wikipedia. If you want to edit on Wikipedia again, you will have to convince the community to unblock the User:Wiki Zachary account. If you wish to get the Wiki Zachary account unblocked, see Wikipedia:Blocking policy#Unblocking. Until the Wiki Zachary account gets unblocked and you declare any accounts or IPs that you use as alternates accounts (preferably listed on User:Wiki Zachary), any alternate accounts or IPs that you use will be blocked on sight. (But, at this point, I'm not even sure if you are Wiki Zachary, but either way, you seem to be a single-purpose account who defends Wiki Zachary and edits the same articles they did, so you obviously have strong ties with the indef-blocked Wiki Zachary account.) Even with that though, I strongly suspect you and the user of the Wiki Zachary account are the same person since the edits by this IP did not start on Wiki Zachary's page until Wiki Zachary was blocked. Steel1943 ( talk) 18:12, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- ...I may not have been so bright in the past, but now this account is used to help grow the encyclopedia. It can also help you out when you are wikibonked, like you say on your page. BTW, you're saying that I have to revive my old account, right? Even though User:NeilN is very Argumentative about my problems, I'll look at that. 174.45.128.124 ( talk) 18:43, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
There are editors that have accused me of what happended in October 2015. That's fine, BUT THEY NEVER MOVED ON. Currently, I have been innocently making articles better on Wikipedia and WikiVoyage, so you can tell that I've moved on. However, someone recently looked back at my contributions, and re-blocked me. I now understand that what I did was not okay, but now I just need to get to editing please. 174.45.128.124 ( talk) 18:57, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
174.45.128.124 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have already served my block for what I have done in October, but someone found my account and re- blocked me again, even though I have been just improving articles on Wikipedia and WikiVoyage recently. See Above. 174.45.128.124 ( talk) 20:26, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Appropriately blocked as a sockpuppet of an indefinitely-blocked user. Kinu t/ c 19:31, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Note to admin who responds to this: As shown above, this IP is a sockpuppet of Wiki Zachary. Steel1943 ( talk) 19:28, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
- Edit: WAS, not IS. 174.45.128.124 ( talk) 19:41, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
- Should've known that you was going to jump on me. Every Zachary that ever lived was treated poorly. You guys are forgetting that User:NeilN blocked me earlier, and I have learned from it. Recent contributions are to help Wikipedia, and inform people. In fact, User:Magnolia677 worked with me on the Cheyenne article to decide whether to add something or not. Even though I won't you guys are implying I should change my name to Manny and Move to Miami. This is the kind of argument that bloked User:Wiki Zachary. 174.45.128.124 ( talk) 19:39, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
- You have already been provided by me the proper path to be able to edit on Wikipedia again: Before you can edit again, the User:Wiki Zachary account has to be unblocked. Steel1943 ( talk) 19:48, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you for that link, but why does User:Wiki Zachary have to be blocked first? 174.45.128.124 ( talk) 20:22, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
- I assume you mean "unblocked", and I already told you why: Using any account or IP other than User:Wiki Zachary is sockpuppetry, which is not allowed. I've also already told you what you will need to do to edit again: Get User:Wiki Zachary unblocked. I've already been straight to the point, and any further failure on your part to understand the process and steps you have to do in order to edit again, I would have to assume, is a failure to "get it". Steel1943 ( talk) 00:40, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
- On a sidenote, I noticed that Wiki Zachary was blocked during an argument, but I also found this on the Block Policy:
When blocking may not be used
Policy shortcut: WP:BLOCKNO
Conflicts and involvement
Administrators must not block users with whom they are engaged in a content dispute; instead, they should report the problem to other administrators. Administrators should also be aware of potential conflicts involving pages or subject areas with which they are involved. It is acceptable for an administrator to block someone who has been engaging in clear-cut vandalism in that administrator's userspace. Can someone post this to Wiki Zachary's talk page since I can't? 174.45.128.124 ( talk) 19:33, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wiki Zachary, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
|
| This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |