![]() | Older warnings and/or other comments on this page have been removed, but are still viewable in the page history. |
Hello, I'm
Jusdafax. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —specifically
this edit to
Ahmadu Bello University— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help desk. Thanks.
Jusdafax (
talk)
05:21, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
You have been blanking so many warnings from your talkpage, be aware they're still accesible. This is your final warning, please desist from this disruptive editing, otherwise you may get blocked without further notice. – Ammarpad ( talk) 06:32, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Ahmadu Bello University shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – Ammarpad ( talk) 07:17, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Zizikuli, you seem to have moved from trying to puff up your own university to trying to damage articles on other competitive universities. Please stop immediately. You are continuously engaging in behavior as though you are daring to be blocked, whether it's adding POV material, adding unsourced material, unmeritously deleting tags, and denigrating other articles; and then continually deleting all your previous warnings to hide your trail. Stop now. TJRC ( talk) 21:19, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —specifically
this edit to
Helen Paul— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help desk. Thanks.
Serols (
talk)
15:32, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello Zizikuli, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to
Lilian Salami have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the
public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a
suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see
Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid
copyright and
plagiarism issues.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 ( talk) 23:57, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
![]() | Older warnings and/or other comments on this page have been removed, but are still viewable in the page history. |
Hello, I'm
Jusdafax. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —specifically
this edit to
Ahmadu Bello University— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help desk. Thanks.
Jusdafax (
talk)
05:21, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
You have been blanking so many warnings from your talkpage, be aware they're still accesible. This is your final warning, please desist from this disruptive editing, otherwise you may get blocked without further notice. – Ammarpad ( talk) 06:32, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Ahmadu Bello University shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – Ammarpad ( talk) 07:17, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Zizikuli, you seem to have moved from trying to puff up your own university to trying to damage articles on other competitive universities. Please stop immediately. You are continuously engaging in behavior as though you are daring to be blocked, whether it's adding POV material, adding unsourced material, unmeritously deleting tags, and denigrating other articles; and then continually deleting all your previous warnings to hide your trail. Stop now. TJRC ( talk) 21:19, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —specifically
this edit to
Helen Paul— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help desk. Thanks.
Serols (
talk)
15:32, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello Zizikuli, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to
Lilian Salami have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the
public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a
suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see
Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid
copyright and
plagiarism issues.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 ( talk) 23:57, 13 December 2019 (UTC)