Welcome!

Hello, Zeyfah, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!  - Ahunt ( talk) 12:34, 14 March 2015 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   Ian.thomson ( talk) 02:24, 27 June 2018 (UTC) reply

I'm still looking for just one edit that wasn't an excuse to spam eyerys.com. So far it looks like that was your only purpose here. Ian.thomson ( talk) 02:24, 27 June 2018 (UTC) reply

{unblock|1=It's never my intention to spam references. It was meant to add information to Wikipedia readers - by adding changes that adds value to the overall article.

The reference pages were not created for this intention. They are long posts written to help whoever came across them. If that is regarded as a spam, please excuse my previous contribution, as it won't happen again. Thank you }

And yet you consistently linked only to eyerys.com, a marketing site. Ian.thomson ( talk) 03:40, 27 June 2018 (UTC) reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zeyfah ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))

---

Request reason:

That is considering, and thinking, that the pages aren't low-quality posts, in which I believe can add value to Wikipedia. But if that isn't so, I assure you that this won't happen again. My future contribution will be varied by including other websites as sources as well. Thank you

Decline reason:

If you think those were high quality citations suitable for use according to WP:RS, WP:CITE, and WP:SPAM, then you lack the competence we require of editors here. Your promise to vary the citations you use singularly fails to convince me we should lift the block. Yamla ( talk) 13:25, 27 June 2018 (UTC) reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zeyfah ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))

---

Request reason:

thank you for your response, Yamla.

the content of the pages on the site in question don't promote any product or entice anyone rather than being informational. they are articles with long posts. and my contributions were in a good faith to add value to Wikipedia.

this is also why in every edits, i always fill the description box to verify my purpose.

never have I been told this issue until the ban happened. this is my first time, and this is why I am asking for your consideration. and again I can assure you that this wont again happen.

thank you

Decline reason:

Request lacks sincerity. Edits are not in good faith. ---- Anthony Bradbury ^"talk" 21:43, 28 June 2018 (UTC) reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have revoked talk page access here to prevent this user wasting any more of our time. Linking to their site, eyerys.com, was clearly done in bad faith. The site runs ads and this was a transparent attempt at SEO and at profiting from the ads served. Trying to proclaim this was done in good faith is offensive and we should not tolerate such naked attempts to violate WP:COI, WP:PAID, and WP:REFSPAM. -- Yamla ( talk) 11:54, 28 June 2018 (UTC) reply

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Zeyfah ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))

---

UTRS appeal #21941 was submitted on Jun 29, 2018 04:51:43. This review is now closed.

-- UTRSBot ( talk) 04:51, 29 June 2018 (UTC) reply