|
|
What is this tirade even supposed to mean? No one is arguing about whether content is true or false. We’re saying that you do not have the option of opting out of discussions or acting without a consensus. That is 100% absolutely not a right you have. Do it again, and your account is blocked. Sergecross73 msg me 03:32, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
I've said this many times, and I seem to act like a broken record here. When sources such as Gamefaqs.com have the same exact release dates as the Nintendo sites or Nintendo Life, Gematsu and the like. They seem to be 100% accurate. Sometimes they have placeholders put in, but according to their boards, their dates CAN be accurate when applicable. I don't what else to explain better here. Wikipedia is user-based. Nintendo Life and Gematsu sources their stuff from Nintendo Everything, Pure Nintendo and such. What is it with you admins? If you want to get rid of me, than do it. But you can't block anyone from viewing pages. Zacharyalejandro ( talk) 19:07, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pawapuro Productions. Since you had some involvement with the Pawapuro Productions redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 19:01, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
I noticed that you blanked your talk page back in March–as per WP:ARCHIVENOTDELETE, please don't do that. I can't say I know what you were doing, but if you really want it off of this page, I recommend you paste your old talk page into a page titled something like User talk:Zacharyalejandro/archive. (I can't restore your old talk because I think it would ping everyone who's already posted there, lol). L ke ( talk) 20:42, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Zacharyalejandro
Thank you for creating Captain Tsubasa: Rise of New Champions.
User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good start!
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 ( talk) 01:29, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Zacharyalejandro,
Thank you for creating MotoGP 20.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Please add multiple independent, reliable sources.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Willsome429}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Willsome429 ( say hey or see my edits!) 18:31, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Games that release on the Japanese Nintendo and PlayStation Stores must include Japanese language support. Not true for Xbox. The Japanese Xbox Store carries many western titles that do not offer Japanese language support. Do you think this should be footnoted on List of Xbox One games? — Niche-gamer 21:25, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
Please stop adding the October 16 2020 as release date for Dirt 5 List of PlayStation 5 games, there is been no confirmed specific date for the PS5 version of the game. Thank you. Poklane 02:39, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. --
ferret (
talk)
15:45, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Captain
Galaxy
is
wishing
you
a
Merry
Christmas (
quite possibly a
White
Christmas).
This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove.
Spread the Christmas spirit by adding {{subst:User:Matty.007/template/Christmas}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message. If everyone who got this put it on two talk pages, we would have... lots of Christmas spirit! Have fun finding links in this message!
— 15:53, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
UTRS decline
I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. Please describe in greater detail how your editing was unconstructive and how you would edit constructively if unblocked. ( Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. ( /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks) As you still have access to your talk page, please post your unblock request to your user talk page, omitting any off-Wiki personally identifying information. If you have not already done so, please place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in "Your reason here "{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.Thank you for your attention to these matters. Please see UTRS appeal #39127
-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:46, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Zacharyalejandro ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I understand the reasons why I was blocked for my disruptive behavior in ensuing threats towards other moderators/contributors. I believe that my actions were very uncomfortable with others. I'm very sorry for my unlawful yelling in all caps, angering people I wish I'd never did, as well as not adhering to rules regarding list articles. I will instead just go with what you guys want to change. I will keep my thoughts to myself and keep my mouth shut. I will go as far as make weekly contributions instead of daily. I promise anyone that. I'm truly sorry for what I've done the past year. Zacharyalejandro ( talk) 04:41, 31 March 2021 (UTC)Zacharyalejandro
Decline reason:
We don't want you to be silent, cave in to others, and reduce your editing if that's not what you want to do; that doesn't address the underlying thinking behind your actions. We want to know how your behavior will change going forward. This is a collaborative project and it may not be possible to just not interact with others. You can adhere to consensus without agreeing with it. Your actions were not "unlawful" as Wikipedia is not a government with laws. I think there is a path to you being unblocked, we just want you to describe how you will better collaborate with others in the future. 331dot ( talk) 08:11, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Zacharyalejandro ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I will be collaborative to others by making reasonable contributions instead of abusive actions towards others. I will show gratitude by agreeing to anyone else who may have different ideas in regards to improving video game list articles. Zacharyalejandro ( talk) 01:03, 24 April 2021 (UTC)Zacharyalejandro
Decline reason:
Procedural decline, only one unblock request at a time please. I'll review the request below in the next 24 hours if someone else doesn't first. Floquenbeam ( talk) 21:50, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Zacharyalejandro ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I understand my reasoning behind the block that my actions were very unnecessary. I swear on my oath that I will not blame others for what they are doing right. I will not harass or bully others to do what they want and instead, just fix mistakes without saying anything that would otherwise upset editors. I have read the entire article on the site guidelines and I would like to have another chance. There are a few mistakes that are minor that I would like to politely fix. Zacharyalejandro ( talk) 03:40, 6 May 2021 (UTC)Zacharyalejandro
Accept reason:
see comments in #Unblocked (last one) below. Floquenbeam ( talk) 20:00, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
though I'll leave the IP users to you guys from now on, as I'm concerned about saying something in a snarky tone like I did numerous times in the past, and that is probably also what led to my actions that got me blocked, not just the changes in the lists. Zacharyalejandro ( talk) 06:41, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Thanks, User:Ferret, I think that was a productive talk. Zach, I've unblocked you, based on your assurances that you're going to turn over a new leaf. That means, in particular, no personal attacks, name calling, harassment, or bullying of others (or anything resembling that), and respecting consensus decisions, guidelines, and policies even if you do not agree with them. Follow Ferret's advice and I think you'll do fine. Don't follow it, and I fear the next block will be a throw-away-the-key type. As you know, you've got a lot of eyes on you now. If anything is unclear, or you're not sure where the boundaries are, please ask first. Good luck. -- Floquenbeam ( talk) 15:21, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
GameSpot is a fine/strong source. I don't see a need to switch it to Nintendo Life
in this case. Usually editors leave an edit summary to explain their logic. (not
watching, please {{
ping}}
)
czar
02:14, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Wait a moment, I actually was trying to transport the source from the List to the article on the topic. But that source with the review, should be under the Reception. There are probably some things that have changed with in regards to sources, are there, @ Ferret:? I thought if the same source is repeated twice, then we would condense it with the ref name tag. Zacharyalejandro ( talk) 16:59, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
{{
r|GS}}
, that's a way of doing ref name tags. It's a template with the same functionality. The references are defined in the References section, and referenced in the article with {{
r}}. --
ferret (
talk)
17:52, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
i edited the PS5 page because while i was reading it, i was a bit confused that it may have contained PS4 games, if you could maybe sometime take a look at this and tell me what you think, and if i made the right call here, thankyou friend! EzeeWiki ( talk) 06:47, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Are you still having this problem? One solution I have seen suggested is to switch to desktop view, because mobile view has some problems that desktop view does not. Also, you might try asking at WP:VPT.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:38, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
disrupt Wikipedia. Please immediately stop removing DATEVAR and ENGVAR templates. If you don't, I'll block you indefinitely again. This is an area you had past issues with and you should not be messing with standard MOS templates. The templates indicate to editors the proper date format to use, and some other templates automatically detect it's presence and format their dates automatically based on it. Stop. --
ferret (
talk)
17:50, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello! I see you're an avid editor in the "List of X games" genre, specifically adding release dates. A lot of the games don't have sources to back them up, so here's an easy way of finding them (if you don't know this already); I'm gonna use Paper Mario: The Origami King as an example.
When citing a release date, use the cite web template and plop in the overview page's URL. For the title, I normally do "[Name of the game] - [Name of the website]". Hope this guide helps you in finding release date sources! Panini! 🥪 18:27, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Panini! 🥪 19:02, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Part of your unblock agreement was that you would keep a good attitude and be civil to people, but I keep seeing instances where you keep griping about having to follow policies or consensus formed. It's getting old. You know what Wikipedia is. Following these things are a non-negotiable part of Wikipedia, so randomly complaining about it isn't going to get you anywhere.
You're wasting too much of peoples time with your idle complaining. Here's your options.
Please think hard about your future here at Wikipedia. You're already on your last chance. Sergecross73 msg me 18:24, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
[4] [5] -- kindly knock it off. ProcrastinatingReader ( talk) 01:22, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Where can we get law enforcement for your blatant violation of free speech??? Hello??? You guys and your Wikipedia rules! Laughable and intolerable! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zacharyalejandro ( talk • contribs) 02:57, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Fuzheado |
Talk
02:53, 11 November 2021 (UTC)Reading this user talk page, I am disappointed. You had the chance to be constructive, but instead, you blew it even after you appealed an indefinite ban. Pyraminxsolver ( talk) 04:52, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Notice, this user has been evading their block. This is checkuser confirmed, and I've updated the block to reflect that. -- ferret ( talk) 00:08, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Further block evasion in Oct/Nov 2022. -- ferret ( talk) 04:56, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
The article Drancia Saga has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Redirect makes no sense GooseTheGreat ( talk) 12:50, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 10:00, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
Drancia Saga and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 19#Drancia Saga until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Ten Pound Hammer • (
What did I screw up now?)
05:33, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
|
|
What is this tirade even supposed to mean? No one is arguing about whether content is true or false. We’re saying that you do not have the option of opting out of discussions or acting without a consensus. That is 100% absolutely not a right you have. Do it again, and your account is blocked. Sergecross73 msg me 03:32, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
I've said this many times, and I seem to act like a broken record here. When sources such as Gamefaqs.com have the same exact release dates as the Nintendo sites or Nintendo Life, Gematsu and the like. They seem to be 100% accurate. Sometimes they have placeholders put in, but according to their boards, their dates CAN be accurate when applicable. I don't what else to explain better here. Wikipedia is user-based. Nintendo Life and Gematsu sources their stuff from Nintendo Everything, Pure Nintendo and such. What is it with you admins? If you want to get rid of me, than do it. But you can't block anyone from viewing pages. Zacharyalejandro ( talk) 19:07, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pawapuro Productions. Since you had some involvement with the Pawapuro Productions redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 19:01, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
I noticed that you blanked your talk page back in March–as per WP:ARCHIVENOTDELETE, please don't do that. I can't say I know what you were doing, but if you really want it off of this page, I recommend you paste your old talk page into a page titled something like User talk:Zacharyalejandro/archive. (I can't restore your old talk because I think it would ping everyone who's already posted there, lol). L ke ( talk) 20:42, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Zacharyalejandro
Thank you for creating Captain Tsubasa: Rise of New Champions.
User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good start!
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 ( talk) 01:29, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Zacharyalejandro,
Thank you for creating MotoGP 20.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Please add multiple independent, reliable sources.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Willsome429}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Willsome429 ( say hey or see my edits!) 18:31, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Games that release on the Japanese Nintendo and PlayStation Stores must include Japanese language support. Not true for Xbox. The Japanese Xbox Store carries many western titles that do not offer Japanese language support. Do you think this should be footnoted on List of Xbox One games? — Niche-gamer 21:25, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
Please stop adding the October 16 2020 as release date for Dirt 5 List of PlayStation 5 games, there is been no confirmed specific date for the PS5 version of the game. Thank you. Poklane 02:39, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. --
ferret (
talk)
15:45, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Captain
Galaxy
is
wishing
you
a
Merry
Christmas (
quite possibly a
White
Christmas).
This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove.
Spread the Christmas spirit by adding {{subst:User:Matty.007/template/Christmas}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message. If everyone who got this put it on two talk pages, we would have... lots of Christmas spirit! Have fun finding links in this message!
— 15:53, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
UTRS decline
I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. Please describe in greater detail how your editing was unconstructive and how you would edit constructively if unblocked. ( Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. ( /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks) As you still have access to your talk page, please post your unblock request to your user talk page, omitting any off-Wiki personally identifying information. If you have not already done so, please place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in "Your reason here "{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.Thank you for your attention to these matters. Please see UTRS appeal #39127
-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:46, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Zacharyalejandro ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I understand the reasons why I was blocked for my disruptive behavior in ensuing threats towards other moderators/contributors. I believe that my actions were very uncomfortable with others. I'm very sorry for my unlawful yelling in all caps, angering people I wish I'd never did, as well as not adhering to rules regarding list articles. I will instead just go with what you guys want to change. I will keep my thoughts to myself and keep my mouth shut. I will go as far as make weekly contributions instead of daily. I promise anyone that. I'm truly sorry for what I've done the past year. Zacharyalejandro ( talk) 04:41, 31 March 2021 (UTC)Zacharyalejandro
Decline reason:
We don't want you to be silent, cave in to others, and reduce your editing if that's not what you want to do; that doesn't address the underlying thinking behind your actions. We want to know how your behavior will change going forward. This is a collaborative project and it may not be possible to just not interact with others. You can adhere to consensus without agreeing with it. Your actions were not "unlawful" as Wikipedia is not a government with laws. I think there is a path to you being unblocked, we just want you to describe how you will better collaborate with others in the future. 331dot ( talk) 08:11, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Zacharyalejandro ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I will be collaborative to others by making reasonable contributions instead of abusive actions towards others. I will show gratitude by agreeing to anyone else who may have different ideas in regards to improving video game list articles. Zacharyalejandro ( talk) 01:03, 24 April 2021 (UTC)Zacharyalejandro
Decline reason:
Procedural decline, only one unblock request at a time please. I'll review the request below in the next 24 hours if someone else doesn't first. Floquenbeam ( talk) 21:50, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Zacharyalejandro ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I understand my reasoning behind the block that my actions were very unnecessary. I swear on my oath that I will not blame others for what they are doing right. I will not harass or bully others to do what they want and instead, just fix mistakes without saying anything that would otherwise upset editors. I have read the entire article on the site guidelines and I would like to have another chance. There are a few mistakes that are minor that I would like to politely fix. Zacharyalejandro ( talk) 03:40, 6 May 2021 (UTC)Zacharyalejandro
Accept reason:
see comments in #Unblocked (last one) below. Floquenbeam ( talk) 20:00, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
though I'll leave the IP users to you guys from now on, as I'm concerned about saying something in a snarky tone like I did numerous times in the past, and that is probably also what led to my actions that got me blocked, not just the changes in the lists. Zacharyalejandro ( talk) 06:41, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Thanks, User:Ferret, I think that was a productive talk. Zach, I've unblocked you, based on your assurances that you're going to turn over a new leaf. That means, in particular, no personal attacks, name calling, harassment, or bullying of others (or anything resembling that), and respecting consensus decisions, guidelines, and policies even if you do not agree with them. Follow Ferret's advice and I think you'll do fine. Don't follow it, and I fear the next block will be a throw-away-the-key type. As you know, you've got a lot of eyes on you now. If anything is unclear, or you're not sure where the boundaries are, please ask first. Good luck. -- Floquenbeam ( talk) 15:21, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
GameSpot is a fine/strong source. I don't see a need to switch it to Nintendo Life
in this case. Usually editors leave an edit summary to explain their logic. (not
watching, please {{
ping}}
)
czar
02:14, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Wait a moment, I actually was trying to transport the source from the List to the article on the topic. But that source with the review, should be under the Reception. There are probably some things that have changed with in regards to sources, are there, @ Ferret:? I thought if the same source is repeated twice, then we would condense it with the ref name tag. Zacharyalejandro ( talk) 16:59, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
{{
r|GS}}
, that's a way of doing ref name tags. It's a template with the same functionality. The references are defined in the References section, and referenced in the article with {{
r}}. --
ferret (
talk)
17:52, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
i edited the PS5 page because while i was reading it, i was a bit confused that it may have contained PS4 games, if you could maybe sometime take a look at this and tell me what you think, and if i made the right call here, thankyou friend! EzeeWiki ( talk) 06:47, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Are you still having this problem? One solution I have seen suggested is to switch to desktop view, because mobile view has some problems that desktop view does not. Also, you might try asking at WP:VPT.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:38, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
disrupt Wikipedia. Please immediately stop removing DATEVAR and ENGVAR templates. If you don't, I'll block you indefinitely again. This is an area you had past issues with and you should not be messing with standard MOS templates. The templates indicate to editors the proper date format to use, and some other templates automatically detect it's presence and format their dates automatically based on it. Stop. --
ferret (
talk)
17:50, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello! I see you're an avid editor in the "List of X games" genre, specifically adding release dates. A lot of the games don't have sources to back them up, so here's an easy way of finding them (if you don't know this already); I'm gonna use Paper Mario: The Origami King as an example.
When citing a release date, use the cite web template and plop in the overview page's URL. For the title, I normally do "[Name of the game] - [Name of the website]". Hope this guide helps you in finding release date sources! Panini! 🥪 18:27, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Panini! 🥪 19:02, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Part of your unblock agreement was that you would keep a good attitude and be civil to people, but I keep seeing instances where you keep griping about having to follow policies or consensus formed. It's getting old. You know what Wikipedia is. Following these things are a non-negotiable part of Wikipedia, so randomly complaining about it isn't going to get you anywhere.
You're wasting too much of peoples time with your idle complaining. Here's your options.
Please think hard about your future here at Wikipedia. You're already on your last chance. Sergecross73 msg me 18:24, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
[4] [5] -- kindly knock it off. ProcrastinatingReader ( talk) 01:22, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Where can we get law enforcement for your blatant violation of free speech??? Hello??? You guys and your Wikipedia rules! Laughable and intolerable! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zacharyalejandro ( talk • contribs) 02:57, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Fuzheado |
Talk
02:53, 11 November 2021 (UTC)Reading this user talk page, I am disappointed. You had the chance to be constructive, but instead, you blew it even after you appealed an indefinite ban. Pyraminxsolver ( talk) 04:52, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Notice, this user has been evading their block. This is checkuser confirmed, and I've updated the block to reflect that. -- ferret ( talk) 00:08, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Further block evasion in Oct/Nov 2022. -- ferret ( talk) 04:56, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
The article Drancia Saga has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Redirect makes no sense GooseTheGreat ( talk) 12:50, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 10:00, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
Drancia Saga and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 19#Drancia Saga until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Ten Pound Hammer • (
What did I screw up now?)
05:33, 19 April 2022 (UTC)