Photos were taken at Adelaide Olympic welcome home parade, September 18, 2008.

They were all very ladylike and gentlemanly. Very dignified and genial.

• Great photos. Well done on getting them all and of such quality! -- Mattinbgn\ ^talk 09:32, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply

Simply vote and comment as follows below the individual sections.

• Comment (numbering pictures from 1, 2, 3 etc, left to right) and ~~~~

• No:2 - I like the light dark combination more but would crop slightly (if possible) to lose more of the top of head at the bottom.-- VS ^talk 08:57, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 1. appropriately cropped (if anyone can be bothered) -- Mattinbgn\ ^talk 09:01, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 2. unless we get a really good crop on 1. Giggy ( talk) 00:59, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 2. – Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 01:13, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No 1. is of better quality, although No. 2 is the better picture. Khoi khoi 03:42, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 2 -- Y  not? 04:22, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 2. Good Balance of shadow and light —Preceding unsigned comment added by PurpleView ( talk • contribs) 06:58, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 1. Higher quality, will look good if cropped. Nishkid64 _{( Make articles, not wikidrama)} 23:37, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 2., looks more personable and interactive/friendly. Cirt ( talk) 00:36, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 1. Could be cropped a bit more at top to reduce the overexposure. Durova ^Charge! 01:11, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 1 definitely 211.30.12.197 ( talk) 07:50, 8 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 1 Cbrown1023 talk 23:41, 8 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• Number 1 Dance to be free 23:55, 8 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• Number 1 -- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTM) 04:02, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• Number 2 - Privatemusings ( talk) 04:54, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No.1.-- thunderboltz ^(TALK) 07:44, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No 2 The Firewall ( talk) 08:13, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 2. ~ Riana ⁂ 08:46, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 2. Coldmachine ^Talk 09:29, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 1. Brighter Dineshkannambadi ( talk) 01:19, 10 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 2- pretty.:) Sticky Parkin 12:41, 14 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 2- Better shot of her face.— Ѕandahl ♥ 03:51, 30 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No.1 - Looks better lit and more newsy... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sidin ( talk • contribs) 08:47, 4 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• No.2 - Use both, but I think No.2 is more inviting and the background provides context. As for improvement on No.2, the hand can be photoshopped out and the skull at the bottom cropped out. -- Suntag ☼ 07:52, 5 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 1 — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 07:04, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• Definitely 2 - never mind the arty farty issues, more of her face is visible. -- Dweller ( talk) 12:23, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• 2 Pdfpdf ( talk) 11:26, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
  • Yes, I still prefer #2 Pdfpdf ( talk) 11:39, 18 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 1 Abraham, B.S. ( talk) 03:51, 14 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• #2 - pretty smile and more face on. --- BlackJack | ^{talk page} 06:17, 17 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• Number 1 - I like the cute side-ways look and smile! -- vi5in ^[talk] 02:45, 19 November 2008 (UTC) reply

• No:3 In mid signature - where Lisa is probably writing "To Yellow Monkey - you are my Gitarzan"-- VS ^talk 08:58, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 2 -- Mattinbgn\ ^talk 09:02, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 3., lighting is definitely best there (though unfortuneately none of them are that great....). Giggy ( talk) 00:59, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• Agreed with Giggy. – Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 01:13, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 3. Khoi khoi 03:42, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• Looks like a dude. They're equally bad. -- Y  not? 04:23, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• All are bad too fat face sorry for being blunt may be camera gone too close PurpleView ( talk) 07:02, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• Agree with Y. If I had to choose, I'd say No. 2. Nishkid64 _{( Make articles, not wikidrama)} 23:37, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 3. Good contrast. Cirt ( talk) 00:37, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 2. Best color and composition of the three. Durova ^Charge! 01:12, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• Agreed, No. 2. -- Avi ( talk) 04:26, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 2. Ncmvocalist ( talk) 02:05, 8 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• I'd go with No. 3 211.30.12.197 ( talk) 07:50, 8 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 3 Cbrown1023 talk 23:41, 8 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• Gotta work on the lighting on this one, Notorious Dance to be free 23:55, 8 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• These are all... Really bad, I have to say. 2, I guess. Grand master ka 04:43, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 3 - it is a bit unflattering though! :-) Privatemusings ( talk) 04:55, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• I would've liked 2, but the photo's bad. So my vote goes for 3.-- thunderboltz ^(TALK) 07:44, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No 3 The Firewall ( talk) 08:15, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 2. ~ Riana ⁂ 08:46, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 3 Coldmachine ^Talk 09:30, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 2, Slightly on the bright side but no pen sticking out. Dineshkannambadi ( talk) 01:19, 10 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 3- best of an unflattering bunch:) Sticky Parkin 12:42, 14 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 3- none are great but 3 is the best of the lot.— Ѕandahl ♥ 03:55, 30 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No.3 is the best of the lot. But they're all sub-optimal though... Sidin ( talk) 08:51, 4 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 3, No. 2 is a overexposed. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 07:05, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• 2. Perhaps 3 if you can photoshop the pen to oblivion. -- Dweller ( talk) 12:24, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• All are bad Pdfpdf ( talk) 11:26, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 2 Abraham, B.S. ( talk) 03:51, 14 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• sorry, don't like any of them. --- BlackJack | ^{talk page} 06:18, 17 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• All are kinda overexposed, but if pressed I'll go with 3. -- vi5in ^[talk] 02:46, 19 November 2008 (UTC) reply

• No 2 for Amber IMHO-- VS ^talk 08:59, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 2 -- Mattinbgn\ ^talk 09:02, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 2. Giggy ( talk) 00:59, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 2. No. 3 would be good if it wasn't so blurry, though. – Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 01:13, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• Number 3 is the best picture except the quality isn't as good as the others. It would be best if it was a "frame" instead of a "thumb". Khoi khoi 03:42, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 3. I resized to fix the blurry. -- Y  not? 04:24, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 3. Put more light in this photo and it worth putting in album. Looks very old in all other photos PurpleView ( talk) 07:03, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 2. Nishkid64 _{( Make articles, not wikidrama)} 23:37, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 3. Even though it could be better quality, I like this because she looks vibrant and happy. Cirt ( talk) 00:38, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No 3 also is the only one in which she is not squinting, and the lines are not in sharp relief. Although it is a bit blurry. -- Avi ( talk) 04:38, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• With all these pics why doesn't her bio have one?-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTM) 20:43, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply

• Some people don't like cramming all the low quality images they can find into an article: these polls are, if I read them correctly, designed to select the best quality picture to go into the article. Woody ( talk) 21:01, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply

• I added teh second one when I uploaded it but somehow YetiHunter thinks that it is a net negative. YellowMonkey ( click here to choose Australia's next top model) 23:25, 8 October 2008 (UTC) reply

• No. 2. Ncmvocalist ( talk) 02:07, 8 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 2 211.30.12.197 ( talk) 07:50, 8 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 2 Cbrown1023 talk 23:41, 8 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• She's awesome. Oh ya, number 2 Dance to be free 23:55, 8 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• She's #1s. But I vote for #2.-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTM) 04:05, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• I actually like #4. 3 is second-best. Grand master ka 04:27, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 2 Privatemusings ( talk) 05:02, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 3.-- thunderboltz ^(TALK) 07:44, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 3 The Firewall ( talk) 08:16, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 3. 4 is a cute pic though, probably not particularly representative. ~ Riana ⁂ 08:46, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 2. Although I like 4, it's kinda funny. Coldmachine ^Talk 09:37, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 3, despite the fact it is slightly hazy, the smile is good. Dineshkannambadi ( talk) 01:19, 10 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 3 Could this be Naomi Watts' long lost sister? ˉˉ ^anetode ╦╩ 10:21, 10 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 2- sweet. The last one looks like my nose sometimes lol. Sticky Parkin 12:43, 14 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 3- It would help if it were lightened though.— Ѕandahl ♥ 03:58, 30 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No.3 is the best! Sidin ( talk) 08:55, 4 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• No.4 - No.3 is the best pose, but the photo didn't come out that well. For No. 4, photoshop out the automobile and the lamp post. -- Suntag ☼ 07:55, 5 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 2 seems to be the best available. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 07:07, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• 3 - maybe you can "push" it to make the face brighter? Pdfpdf ( talk) 11:26, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 3 Abraham, B.S. ( talk) 03:51, 14 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• #3 would be best if not fuzzy; too much light in #1 and 2; #4 is a poor angle and again she's clearly got too much sun in her eyes. --- BlackJack | ^{talk page} 06:20, 17 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• #4 - probably not her best angle but you can see that she's cute. -- vi5in ^[talk] 02:47, 19 November 2008 (UTC) reply

• No: 1 for Claire - Great photographic Tallent here!-- VS ^talk 09:00, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 1 again cropped if poss -- Mattinbgn\ ^talk 09:02, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 1 works well even without a crop. Giggy ( talk) 00:59, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 1 or 3. – Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 01:13, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 2 is the most flattering image of her. Khoi khoi 03:42, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 2 -- Y  not? 04:25, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 2 Very pretty side pose though require to put additional light. All other is having glare PurpleView ( talk) 07:05, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 2. Nishkid64 _{( Make articles, not wikidrama)} 23:37, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 3. I like the affect of the sunlight in that one. Cirt ( talk) 00:39, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 2. Ncmvocalist ( talk) 02:08, 8 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• Im going No. 1 here 211.30.12.197 ( talk) 07:50, 8 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 2 Cbrown1023 talk 23:41, 8 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• Number 3 Dance to be free 23:55, 8 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• Number 2 is clearly the best. Grand master ka 04:15, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• despite the sun not quite being in the right place, no. 2 :-) Privatemusings ( talk) 05:03, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No.3-- thunderboltz ^(TALK) 07:44, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 3 The Firewall ( talk) 08:16, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 3. Coldmachine ^Talk 09:37, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 3, Clean background Dineshkannambadi ( talk) 01:19, 10 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 3- shows face more fully, though not as flattering as the profile in 2. Sticky Parkin 12:44, 14 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 3- Ѕandahl ♥ 04:00, 30 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No.3! Sidin ( talk) 08:58, 4 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 2. Needs to be fixed though. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 07:10, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• 2 - "Needs to be fixed though" Pdfpdf ( talk) 11:26, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 3 Abraham, B.S. ( talk) 03:51, 14 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• definitely #2 as the shade works well and she has a very nice smile. --- BlackJack | ^{talk page} 06:21, 17 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• I like #2 -- vi5in ^[talk] 02:48, 19 November 2008 (UTC) reply

• No: 1 for moi.-- VS ^talk 09:02, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 2. She isn't looking down so much, shame the one without the sunnies looks a little blurry. -- Mattinbgn\ ^talk 09:03, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• Either 2 or 3, ideally 3 if we can get a decent crop. Giggy ( talk) 00:59, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 2. – Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 01:13, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 2 is good, 3 is better. Khoi khoi 03:42, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 2 -- Y  not? 04:25, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 3 Nice smiling 3/4 shot of pretty face. You might want to add bit more light. General rule photo with sunglasses are not good for memorabilia content PurpleView ( talk) 07:09, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 2. Nishkid64 _{( Make articles, not wikidrama)} 23:37, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 3. I like the full short, encompassing the medal. Cirt ( talk) 00:40, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 1 looks best 211.30.12.197 ( talk) 07:50, 8 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 3 Cbrown1023 talk 23:41, 8 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• Number 3 Dance to be free 23:55, 8 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 2 is a much better smile. Grand master ka 04:37, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 3 - good to see the eyes (a bit) Privatemusings ( talk) 05:03, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• Number three.-- thunderboltz ^(TALK) 07:18, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 2 The Firewall ( talk) 08:17, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 3. ~ Riana ⁂ 08:46, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 3. Great pic! Coldmachine ^Talk 09:37, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 3. The best so far. Dineshkannambadi ( talk) 01:19, 10 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 2- looks like Katy Holmes. Sticky Parkin 12:45, 14 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 3- best of the lot.— Ѕandahl ♥ 04:01, 30 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 3 again! Sidin ( talk) 08:59, 4 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 3 - Nice pose and the background provides good context. Photoshop out the chairs and frame the photo a little better. -- Suntag ☼ 07:57, 5 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 3. She's kweute. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 07:14, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• 3 no question. Surprised anyone would say otherwise. It's a decent shot and best of all it has relevant context. -- Dweller ( talk) 12:26, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• 3 - agree with most comments by others who've said #3. Pdfpdf ( talk) 11:26, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 3 Abraham, B.S. ( talk) 03:51, 14 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• none of them; she's looking down in three of them and seems embarrassed in the other. --- BlackJack | ^{talk page} 06:23, 17 November 2008 (UTC) reply
  • Mmmm. You have a point. But never-the-less, I still think #3. Pdfpdf ( talk) 11:39, 18 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• I like #3 -- vi5in ^[talk] 02:49, 19 November 2008 (UTC) reply

• I'd say No:1 but I assume you had to crop from a couple of people? Anyway I suggest No:3 especially if you are able to lighten up a little bit more.-- VS ^talk 09:03, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 3 with a tight crop around the head. -- Mattinbgn\ ^talk 09:04, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 3. Giggy ( talk) 00:59, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 1. – Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 01:13, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 3 is the best. Khoi khoi 03:42, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 1 -- Y  not? 04:25, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 1 is great smiling photo just remove glare. PurpleView ( talk) 07:12, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 3. Nishkid64 _{( Make articles, not wikidrama)} 23:37, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 1. = first choice. No. 3. = second choice. Cirt ( talk) 00:42, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 3. Durova ^Charge! 01:21, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 3 with a bit of a touch up 211.30.12.197 ( talk) 07:50, 8 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 3 Cbrown1023 talk 23:41, 8 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• What is that, wrapping paper? I'll say 1. Grand master ka 04:30, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• shame about the crop, but still no. 1 Privatemusings ( talk) 05:04, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 1 or 3. More preference to 1.-- thunderboltz ^(TALK) 07:20, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 1 The Firewall ( talk) 08:18, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 3. ~ Riana ⁂ 08:46, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 1. Not sure I get the wrapping paper thing otherwise I'd have said No. 3. Coldmachine ^Talk 09:37, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 3. clean view of the medal, despite the sticks sticking out. Dineshkannambadi ( talk) 01:19, 10 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 3- nice. Sticky Parkin 12:46, 14 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 3 is best. -- Ѕandahl ♥ 15:26, 30 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No.3 is the best... Sidin ( talk) 09:02, 4 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 1 - Provides the most emotion. -- Suntag ☼ 07:58, 5 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• Edit and use No. 3 — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 07:14, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• 1 - the medal is what he's about and the face is clear. -- Dweller ( talk) 12:27, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• Errrrrr. It's a guy. Who cares? Pdfpdf ( talk) 11:26, 11 November 2008 (UTC) (Comment deliberately designed to offend at least 50% of the population) reply
• No. 3 Abraham, B.S. ( talk) 03:51, 14 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• #2 & 3 are equally good; too much light in 1 and 4. --- BlackJack | ^{talk page} 06:24, 17 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• #3 -- vi5in ^[talk] 02:50, 19 November 2008 (UTC) reply

• No: 4 - - a nice natural look at camera and with the medal is good.-- VS ^talk 09:04, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 4 (with a crop, again) -- Mattinbgn\ ^talk 09:05, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 4. Giggy ( talk) 00:59, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 4. – Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 01:13, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 4. Khoi khoi 03:42, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 3 -- Y  not? 04:26, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 3. Nishkid64 _{( Make articles, not wikidrama)} 23:37, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 4. If it could be lightened just a tad that might be nice, but it's fine as is. Cirt ( talk) 00:43, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• Just for a change im going No. 2 211.30.12.197 ( talk) 07:50, 8 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 4 Cbrown1023 talk 23:41, 8 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• Number 4 Dance to be free 23:55, 8 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• Number 3-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTM) 04:08, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 3. If we could see the medal in 1 or 2, I'd probably prefer those. Grand master ka 04:32, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 3 Privatemusings ( talk) 05:05, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No.4 or No. 2, in that order.-- thunderboltz ^(TALK) 07:22, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No 4 The Firewall ( talk) 08:19, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 3. ~ Riana ⁂ 08:46, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 3 (or number 2) Coldmachine ^Talk 09:37, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 3. Another clean image. Dineshkannambadi ( talk) 01:19, 10 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 2- some of these look like Bianca from Eastenders. Sticky Parkin 12:47, 14 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 3 or 4, both have nice shots of her face. -- Ѕandahl ♥ 15:29, 30 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• Definitely no.4! Sidin ( talk) 09:05, 4 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• 3 or 4. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 07:30, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• 3 Even comes pre-captioned, or perhaps pre- ioned. -- Dweller ( talk) 12:28, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• 3 or 4 Pdfpdf ( talk) 11:26, 11 November 2008 (UTC) (This is disturbing; same as Nearly Headless Nick again) reply
• No. 4 Abraham, B.S. ( talk) 03:51, 14 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• definitely #4; main reason is that she hasn't got her hair in front of her face! --- BlackJack | ^{talk page} 06:25, 17 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• #4 -- vi5in ^[talk] 02:50, 19 November 2008 (UTC) reply

• No: 1 - background also adds interest to the photograph.-- VS ^talk 09:05, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• Probably No. 3, although unfortunately the hat in No. 2 obscures part of his face, otherwise I would choose that. -- Mattinbgn\ ^talk 09:06, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• Someone good with photoshop could remove the hat in 2, but if not, then I'd say 3. Giggy ( talk) 00:59, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 1 or 3. – Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 01:13, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 1 or 2. Khoi khoi 03:42, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 2, and un-crop it to reveal the hat-person. -- Y  not? 04:27, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply

• Pulling a leg? YellowMonkey ( choose Australia's next top model) 05:11, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply

• Not at all - a little fan adoration adds a human touch. not everything needs to be a formal posed shot -- Y  not? 16:32, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply

• No. 1. Nishkid64 _{( Make articles, not wikidrama)} 23:37, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 1. Confident and mid-stride, looks good. Cirt ( talk) 00:44, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 1 Durova ^Charge! 01:22, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 2 would have been best but our little friend in there is popping up. Go with No. 1 211.30.12.197 ( talk) 07:50, 8 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 1 Cbrown1023 talk 23:41, 8 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 2 - and maybe either crop more, or less Privatemusings ( talk) 05:06, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No.2 - something needs to be done about the cropping though.-- thunderboltz ^(TALK) 07:25, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No 3 The Firewall ( talk) 08:19, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 3. ~ Riana ⁂ 08:46, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• Number 2. Do not crop though! Adoring fans are a bonus! Coldmachine ^Talk 09:37, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 1. Unfortunately, the medal does not show, but atleast no half faces. Dineshkannambadi ( talk) 01:19, 10 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 2- better view of face. Sticky Parkin 12:48, 14 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 4 The tree adds a nice background. Would have chosen 2 but the hat hides part of his face. -- Ѕandahl ♥ 15:31, 30 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 3 see my comments above about medal -- Dweller ( talk) 12:29, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 1 Abraham, B.S. ( talk) 03:51, 14 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• probably #4 although the angle isn't good; too much light in #2. --- BlackJack | ^{talk page} 06:27, 17 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• #1 -- vi5in ^[talk] 02:51, 19 November 2008 (UTC) reply

• No 3 for Laura (I don't think she like her neck profile in number 1 :) )-- VS ^talk 09:06, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 3. I think ... -- Mattinbgn\ ^talk 09:06, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 3. Giggy ( talk) 00:59, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 3. – Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 01:13, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 3, absolutely. Khoi khoi 03:42, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 3 with mickey mouse ears :) -- Y  not? 04:27, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 2 Again a fat face with un-propotionate body PurpleView ( talk) 07:17, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 3. Nishkid64 _{( Make articles, not wikidrama)} 23:37, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 3. is the best. Cirt ( talk) 00:46, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 3. Durova ^Charge! 01:23, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• Yep, No. 3 211.30.12.197 ( talk) 07:50, 8 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 3 Cbrown1023 talk 23:41, 8 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• Number 3 Dance to be free 23:55, 8 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 3 is very cute. Grand master ka 04:23, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No.3 - although it looks like she has giant mickey mouse ears.... Privatemusings ( talk) 05:06, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No.3-- thunderboltz ^(TALK) 07:26, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No 3 Its the best pic on this page :) The Firewall ( talk) 08:21, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 3. ~ Riana ⁂ 08:46, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 3. Coldmachine ^Talk 09:37, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 3, just for looking so good. Dineshkannambadi ( talk) 01:19, 10 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 3- fwoargh:) Sticky Parkin 12:49, 14 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 3. Too obvious to warrant an explanation. :) Aditya^{( talk • contribs)} 12:14, 27 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 3 without a doubt. -- Ѕandahl ♥ 15:33, 30 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No.3 - -- Suntag ☼ 07:59, 5 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• 3 is best available. (-: — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 07:32, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• Lord knows. How comes she looks pretty in 2 and pretty awful in 1? Is it even the same person? -- Dweller ( talk)
• NOT 1!! I rather like 2, and you can see the medal. 3 is OK. Pdfpdf ( talk) 11:26, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 3 Abraham, B.S. ( talk) 03:51, 14 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• not sure about these; probably #3 but none of them flatter her. --- BlackJack | ^{talk page} 06:29, 17 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• #3 - Nice, natural smile. -- vi5in ^[talk] 02:51, 19 November 2008 (UTC) reply

• No. 1 definitely (a crop?) -- Mattinbgn\ ^talk 09:06, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No: 1 for me - and I'd give the others the Chop (is that Judo or Karate?)-- VS ^talk 09:07, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 1. (4 as backup if you can't get a crop) Giggy ( talk) 00:59, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 1. I'll try to get a crop done on that for you. – Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 01:13, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 1. Khoi khoi 03:42, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 1 -- Y  not? 04:28, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 1 Looks cool dude PurpleView ( talk) 07:16, 3 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 1. Nishkid64 _{( Make articles, not wikidrama)} 23:37, 6 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 1. I like it as is, nicely framed. Cirt ( talk) 00:47, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 1 is fine for me 211.30.12.197 ( talk) 07:50, 8 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 1 Cbrown1023 talk 23:41, 8 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• I'd go 4 Privatemusings ( talk) 05:07, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• Go for No. 1.-- thunderboltz ^(TALK) 07:44, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No 4 The Firewall ( talk) 08:22, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 1 as is, or 4. ~ Riana ⁂ 08:46, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 4. Or, number 1. Coldmachine ^Talk 09:37, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 1, boy next door image. Dineshkannambadi ( talk) 01:19, 10 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 4- a bit blurry though. Sticky Parkin 12:50, 14 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• 1 cropped.-- Ѕandahl ♥ 15:34, 30 October 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 1 - Zoom in on face and crop. -- Suntag ☼ 08:00, 5 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• 1. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 07:34, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• 1. But isn't it just Prince William with Boris Johnson's haircut? -- Dweller ( talk) 12:31, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 1 Abraham, B.S. ( talk) 03:51, 14 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• No. 1. I didn't know they still made boys this cute. — An gr 10:24, 14 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• #1 is the best but I think I would crop it just a little. --- BlackJack | ^{talk page} 06:30, 17 November 2008 (UTC) reply
• #1, with some crop. -- vi5in ^[talk] 02:52, 19 November 2008 (UTC) reply