From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Photos were taken at Adelaide Olympic welcome home parade, September 18, 2008.
They were all very ladylike and gentlemanly. Very dignified and genial.
Simply vote and comment as follows below the individual sections.
Comment (numbering pictures from 1, 2, 3 etc, left to right) and ~~~~
No:2 - I like the light dark combination more but would crop slightly (if possible) to lose more of the top of head at the bottom.--
VS
talk
08:57, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 1. appropriately cropped (if anyone can be bothered) --
Mattinbgn \
talk
09:01, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 2. unless we get a really good crop on 1.
Giggy (
talk )
00:59, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 2. –
Juliancolton
T ropical
C yclone
01:13, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No 1. is of better quality, although No. 2 is the better picture.
Khoi
khoi
03:42, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
2 --
Y
not?
04:22, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 2. Good Balance of shadow and light —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
PurpleView (
talk •
contribs )
06:58, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 1. Higher quality, will look good if cropped.
Nishkid64 (
Make articles, not wikidrama )
23:37, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 2., looks more personable and interactive/friendly.
Cirt (
talk )
00:36, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 1. Could be cropped a bit more at top to reduce the overexposure.
Durova
Charge!
01:11, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 1 definitely
211.30.12.197 (
talk )
07:50, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
1
Cbrown1023
talk
23:41, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
Number 1
Dance to be free
23:55, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
Number 1 --
TonyTheTiger (
t /
c /
bio /
WP:CHICAGO /
WP:LOTM )
04:02, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
Number 2 -
Privatemusings (
talk )
04:54, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No.1.--
thunderboltz
(TALK)
07:44, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No 2
The Firewall (
talk )
08:13, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
2. ~
Riana ⁂
08:46, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 2.
Coldmachine
Talk
09:29, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 1. Brighter
Dineshkannambadi (
talk )
01:19, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
2- pretty.:)
Sticky
Parkin
12:41, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
2- Better shot of her face.—
Ѕandahl
♥
03:51, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No.1 - Looks better lit and more newsy... —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Sidin (
talk •
contribs )
08:47, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
No.2 - Use both, but I think No.2 is more inviting and the background provides context. As for improvement on No.2, the hand can be photoshopped out and the skull at the bottom cropped out. --
Suntag
☼
07:52, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 1 —
Nearly Headless Nick
{C}
07:04, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
Definitely 2 - never mind the arty farty issues, more of her face is visible. --
Dweller (
talk )
12:23, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
2
Pdfpdf (
talk )
11:26, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 1
Abraham, B.S. (
talk )
03:51, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
#2 - pretty smile and more face on. ---
BlackJack |
talk page
06:17, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
Number 1 - I like the cute side-ways look and smile! --
vi5in
[talk]
02:45, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
No:3 In mid signature - where Lisa is probably writing "To Yellow Monkey - you are my Gitarzan"--
VS
talk
08:58, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 2 --
Mattinbgn \
talk
09:02, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 3., lighting is definitely best there (though unfortuneately none of them are that great....).
Giggy (
talk )
00:59, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
Agreed with Giggy. –
Juliancolton
T ropical
C yclone
01:13, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
3.
Khoi
khoi
03:42, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
Looks like a dude. They're equally bad. --
Y
not?
04:23, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
All are bad too fat face sorry for being blunt may be camera gone too close
PurpleView (
talk )
07:02, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
Agree with Y. If I had to choose, I'd say No. 2.
Nishkid64 (
Make articles, not wikidrama )
23:37, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 3. Good contrast.
Cirt (
talk )
00:37, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 2. Best color and composition of the three.
Durova
Charge!
01:12, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
Agreed, No. 2. --
Avi (
talk )
04:26, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 2.
Ncmvocalist (
talk )
02:05, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
I'd go with No. 3
211.30.12.197 (
talk )
07:50, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
3
Cbrown1023
talk
23:41, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
Gotta work on the lighting on this one, Notorious
Dance to be free
23:55, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
These are all... Really bad, I have to say. 2, I guess.
Grand
master
ka
04:43, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 3 - it is a bit unflattering though! :-)
Privatemusings (
talk )
04:55, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
I would've liked 2, but the photo's bad. So my vote goes for 3.--
thunderboltz
(TALK)
07:44, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No 3
The Firewall (
talk )
08:15, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
2. ~
Riana ⁂
08:46, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 3
Coldmachine
Talk
09:30, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 2, Slightly on the bright side but no pen sticking out.
Dineshkannambadi (
talk )
01:19, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
3- best of an unflattering bunch:)
Sticky
Parkin
12:42, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
3- none are great but 3 is the best of the lot.—
Ѕandahl
♥
03:55, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No.3 is the best of the lot. But they're all sub-optimal though...
Sidin (
talk )
08:51, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 3, No. 2 is a overexposed. —
Nearly Headless Nick
{C}
07:05, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
2. Perhaps 3 if you can photoshop the pen to oblivion. --
Dweller (
talk )
12:24, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
All are bad
Pdfpdf (
talk )
11:26, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 2
Abraham, B.S. (
talk )
03:51, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
sorry, don't like any of them. ---
BlackJack |
talk page
06:18, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
All are kinda overexposed, but if pressed I'll go with 3. --
vi5in
[talk]
02:46, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
No 2 for Amber IMHO--
VS
talk
08:59, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 2 --
Mattinbgn \
talk
09:02, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
2.
Giggy (
talk )
00:59, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 2. No. 3 would be good if it wasn't so blurry, though. –
Juliancolton
T ropical
C yclone
01:13, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
Number 3 is the best picture except the quality isn't as good as the others. It would be best if it was a "frame" instead of a "thumb".
Khoi
khoi
03:42, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
3. I resized to fix the blurry. --
Y
not?
04:24, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
3. Put more light in this photo and it worth putting in album. Looks very old in all other photos
PurpleView (
talk )
07:03, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 2.
Nishkid64 (
Make articles, not wikidrama )
23:37, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 3. Even though it could be better quality, I like this because she looks vibrant and happy.
Cirt (
talk )
00:38, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No 3 also is the only one in which she is not squinting, and the lines are not in sharp relief. Although it is a bit blurry. --
Avi (
talk )
04:38, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
With all these pics why doesn't her bio have one?--
TonyTheTiger (
t /
c /
bio /
WP:CHICAGO /
WP:LOTM )
20:43, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
Some people don't like cramming all the low quality images they can find into an article: these polls are, if I read them correctly, designed to select the best quality picture to go into the article.
Woody (
talk )
21:01, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 2.
Ncmvocalist (
talk )
02:07, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 2
211.30.12.197 (
talk )
07:50, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
2
Cbrown1023
talk
23:41, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
She's awesome. Oh ya, number 2
Dance to be free
23:55, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
She's #1s. But I vote for #2.--
TonyTheTiger (
t /
c /
bio /
WP:CHICAGO /
WP:LOTM )
04:05, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
I actually like #4. 3 is second-best.
Grand
master
ka
04:27, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 2
Privatemusings (
talk )
05:02, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 3.--
thunderboltz
(TALK)
07:44, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 3
The Firewall (
talk )
08:16, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
3. 4 is a cute pic though, probably not particularly representative. ~
Riana ⁂
08:46, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 2. Although I like 4, it's kinda funny.
Coldmachine
Talk
09:37, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 3, despite the fact it is slightly hazy, the smile is good.
Dineshkannambadi (
talk )
01:19, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 3 Could this be
Naomi Watts' long lost sister? ˉˉ
anetode
╦╩
10:21, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
2- sweet. The last one looks like my nose sometimes lol.
Sticky
Parkin
12:43, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
3- It would help if it were lightened though.—
Ѕandahl
♥
03:58, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No.3 is the best!
Sidin (
talk )
08:55, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
No.4 - No.3 is the best pose, but the photo didn't come out that well. For No. 4, photoshop out the automobile and the lamp post. --
Suntag
☼
07:55, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 2 seems to be the best available. —
Nearly Headless Nick
{C}
07:07, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
3 - maybe you can "push" it to make the face brighter?
Pdfpdf (
talk )
11:26, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 3
Abraham, B.S. (
talk )
03:51, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
#3 would be best if not fuzzy; too much light in #1 and 2; #4 is a poor angle and again she's clearly got too much sun in her eyes. ---
BlackJack |
talk page
06:20, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
#4 - probably not her best angle but you can see that she's cute. --
vi5in
[talk]
02:47, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
No: 1 for Claire - Great photographic Tallent here!--
VS
talk
09:00, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 1 again cropped if poss --
Mattinbgn \
talk
09:02, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
1 works well even without a crop.
Giggy (
talk )
00:59, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 1 or 3. –
Juliancolton
T ropical
C yclone
01:13, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 2 is the most flattering image of her.
Khoi
khoi
03:42, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
2 --
Y
not?
04:25, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
2 Very pretty side pose though require to put additional light. All other is having glare
PurpleView (
talk )
07:05, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 2.
Nishkid64 (
Make articles, not wikidrama )
23:37, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 3. I like the affect of the sunlight in that one.
Cirt (
talk )
00:39, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 2.
Ncmvocalist (
talk )
02:08, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
Im going No. 1 here
211.30.12.197 (
talk )
07:50, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
2
Cbrown1023
talk
23:41, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
Number 3
Dance to be free
23:55, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
Number 2 is clearly the best.
Grand
master
ka
04:15, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
despite the sun not quite being in the right place, no. 2 :-)
Privatemusings (
talk )
05:03, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No.3--
thunderboltz
(TALK)
07:44, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 3
The Firewall (
talk )
08:16, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 3.
Coldmachine
Talk
09:37, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 3, Clean background
Dineshkannambadi (
talk )
01:19, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
3- shows face more fully, though not as flattering as the profile in 2.
Sticky
Parkin
12:44, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
3-
Ѕandahl
♥
04:00, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No.3!
Sidin (
talk )
08:58, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 2. Needs to be fixed though. —
Nearly Headless Nick
{C}
07:10, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
2 - "Needs to be fixed though"
Pdfpdf (
talk )
11:26, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 3
Abraham, B.S. (
talk )
03:51, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
definitely #2 as the shade works well and she has a very nice smile. ---
BlackJack |
talk page
06:21, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
I like #2 --
vi5in
[talk]
02:48, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
No: 1 for moi.--
VS
talk
09:02, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 2. She isn't looking down so much, shame the one without the sunnies looks a little blurry. --
Mattinbgn \
talk
09:03, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
Either 2 or 3, ideally 3 if we can get a decent crop.
Giggy (
talk )
00:59, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 2. –
Juliancolton
T ropical
C yclone
01:13, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
2 is good, 3 is better.
Khoi
khoi
03:42, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
2 --
Y
not?
04:25, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
3 Nice smiling 3/4 shot of pretty face. You might want to add bit more light. General rule photo with sunglasses are not good for memorabilia content
PurpleView (
talk )
07:09, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 2.
Nishkid64 (
Make articles, not wikidrama )
23:37, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 3. I like the full short, encompassing the medal.
Cirt (
talk )
00:40, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 1 looks best
211.30.12.197 (
talk )
07:50, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
3
Cbrown1023
talk
23:41, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
Number 3
Dance to be free
23:55, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
2 is a much better smile.
Grand
master
ka
04:37, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 3 - good to see the eyes (a bit)
Privatemusings (
talk )
05:03, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
Number three.--
thunderboltz
(TALK)
07:18, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 2
The Firewall (
talk )
08:17, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
3. ~
Riana ⁂
08:46, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 3. Great pic!
Coldmachine
Talk
09:37, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 3. The best so far.
Dineshkannambadi (
talk )
01:19, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
2- looks like
Katy Holmes .
Sticky
Parkin
12:45, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
3- best of the lot.—
Ѕandahl
♥
04:01, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 3 again!
Sidin (
talk )
08:59, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 3 - Nice pose and the background provides good context. Photoshop out the chairs and frame the photo a little better. --
Suntag
☼
07:57, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 3. She's kweute. —
Nearly Headless Nick
{C}
07:14, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
3 no question. Surprised anyone would say otherwise. It's a decent shot and best of all it has relevant context. --
Dweller (
talk )
12:26, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
3 - agree with most comments by others who've said #3.
Pdfpdf (
talk )
11:26, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 3
Abraham, B.S. (
talk )
03:51, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
none of them; she's looking down in three of them and seems embarrassed in the other. ---
BlackJack |
talk page
06:23, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
I like #3 --
vi5in
[talk]
02:49, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
I'd say No:1 but I assume you had to crop from a couple of people? Anyway I suggest No:3 especially if you are able to lighten up a little bit more.--
VS
talk
09:03, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 3 with a tight crop around the head. --
Mattinbgn \
talk
09:04, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
3.
Giggy (
talk )
00:59, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 1. –
Juliancolton
T ropical
C yclone
01:13, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
3 is the best.
Khoi
khoi
03:42, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
1 --
Y
not?
04:25, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
1 is great smiling photo just remove glare.
PurpleView (
talk )
07:12, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 3.
Nishkid64 (
Make articles, not wikidrama )
23:37, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 1. = first choice. No. 3. = second choice.
Cirt (
talk )
00:42, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 3.
Durova
Charge!
01:21, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 3 with a bit of a touch up
211.30.12.197 (
talk )
07:50, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
3
Cbrown1023
talk
23:41, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
What is that, wrapping paper? I'll say 1.
Grand
master
ka
04:30, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
shame about the crop, but still no. 1
Privatemusings (
talk )
05:04, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
1 or 3. More preference to 1.--
thunderboltz
(TALK)
07:20, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 1
The Firewall (
talk )
08:18, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
3. ~
Riana ⁂
08:46, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 1. Not sure I get the wrapping paper thing otherwise I'd have said No. 3.
Coldmachine
Talk
09:37, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 3. clean view of the medal, despite the sticks sticking out.
Dineshkannambadi (
talk )
01:19, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
3- nice.
Sticky
Parkin
12:46, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
3 is best. --
Ѕandahl
♥
15:26, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No.3 is the best...
Sidin (
talk )
09:02, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 1 - Provides the most emotion. --
Suntag
☼
07:58, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
Edit and use No. 3 —
Nearly Headless Nick
{C}
07:14, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
1 - the medal is what he's about and the face is clear. --
Dweller (
talk )
12:27, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
Errrrrr. It's a guy. Who cares?
Pdfpdf (
talk )
11:26, 11 November 2008 (UTC) (Comment deliberately designed to offend at least 50% of the population)
reply
No. 3
Abraham, B.S. (
talk )
03:51, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
#2 & 3 are equally good; too much light in 1 and 4. ---
BlackJack |
talk page
06:24, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
#3 --
vi5in
[talk]
02:50, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
No: 4 - - a nice natural look at camera and with the medal is good.--
VS
talk
09:04, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 4 (with a crop, again) --
Mattinbgn \
talk
09:05, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
4.
Giggy (
talk )
00:59, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 4. –
Juliancolton
T ropical
C yclone
01:13, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
4.
Khoi
khoi
03:42, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
3 --
Y
not?
04:26, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 3.
Nishkid64 (
Make articles, not wikidrama )
23:37, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 4. If it could be lightened just a tad that might be nice, but it's fine as is.
Cirt (
talk )
00:43, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
Just for a change im going No. 2
211.30.12.197 (
talk )
07:50, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
4
Cbrown1023
talk
23:41, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
Number 4
Dance to be free
23:55, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
Number 3--
TonyTheTiger (
t /
c /
bio /
WP:CHICAGO /
WP:LOTM )
04:08, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
3. If we could see the medal in 1 or 2, I'd probably prefer those.
Grand
master
ka
04:32, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 3
Privatemusings (
talk )
05:05, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No.4 or No. 2, in that order.--
thunderboltz
(TALK)
07:22, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No 4
The Firewall (
talk )
08:19, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
3. ~
Riana ⁂
08:46, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 3 (or number 2)
Coldmachine
Talk
09:37, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 3. Another clean image.
Dineshkannambadi (
talk )
01:19, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
2- some of these look like
Bianca from
Eastenders .
Sticky
Parkin
12:47, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
3 or 4, both have nice shots of her face. --
Ѕandahl
♥
15:29, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
Definitely no.4!
Sidin (
talk )
09:05, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
3 or 4. —
Nearly Headless Nick
{C}
07:30, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
3 Even comes pre-captioned, or perhaps pre- ioned. --
Dweller (
talk )
12:28, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
3 or 4
Pdfpdf (
talk )
11:26, 11 November 2008 (UTC) (This is disturbing; same as Nearly Headless Nick again)
reply
No. 4
Abraham, B.S. (
talk )
03:51, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
definitely #4; main reason is that she hasn't got her hair in front of her face! ---
BlackJack |
talk page
06:25, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
#4 --
vi5in
[talk]
02:50, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
No: 1 - background also adds interest to the photograph.--
VS
talk
09:05, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
Probably No. 3, although unfortunately the hat in No. 2 obscures part of his face, otherwise I would choose that. --
Mattinbgn \
talk
09:06, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
Someone good with photoshop could remove the hat in 2, but if not, then I'd say 3.
Giggy (
talk )
00:59, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
1 or 3. –
Juliancolton
T ropical
C yclone
01:13, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
1 or 2.
Khoi
khoi
03:42, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
2, and un-crop it to reveal the hat-person. --
Y
not?
04:27, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 1.
Nishkid64 (
Make articles, not wikidrama )
23:37, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 1. Confident and mid-stride, looks good.
Cirt (
talk )
00:44, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 1
Durova
Charge!
01:22, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 2 would have been best but our little friend in there is popping up. Go with No. 1
211.30.12.197 (
talk )
07:50, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
1
Cbrown1023
talk
23:41, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 2 - and maybe either crop more, or less
Privatemusings (
talk )
05:06, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No.2 - something needs to be done about the cropping though.--
thunderboltz
(TALK)
07:25, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No 3
The Firewall (
talk )
08:19, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
3. ~
Riana ⁂
08:46, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
Number 2. Do not crop though! Adoring fans are a bonus!
Coldmachine
Talk
09:37, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 1. Unfortunately, the medal does not show, but atleast no half faces.
Dineshkannambadi (
talk )
01:19, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
2- better view of face.
Sticky
Parkin
12:48, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
4 The tree adds a nice background. Would have chosen 2 but the hat hides part of his face. --
Ѕandahl
♥
15:31, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
3 see my comments above about medal --
Dweller (
talk )
12:29, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 1
Abraham, B.S. (
talk )
03:51, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
probably #4 although the angle isn't good; too much light in #2. ---
BlackJack |
talk page
06:27, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
#1 --
vi5in
[talk]
02:51, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
No 3 for Laura (I don't think she like her neck profile in number 1 :) )--
VS
talk
09:06, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 3. I think ... --
Mattinbgn \
talk
09:06, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
3.
Giggy (
talk )
00:59, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
3. –
Juliancolton
T ropical
C yclone
01:13, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
3, absolutely.
Khoi
khoi
03:42, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
3 with mickey mouse ears :) --
Y
not?
04:27, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
2 Again a fat face with un-propotionate body
PurpleView (
talk )
07:17, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 3.
Nishkid64 (
Make articles, not wikidrama )
23:37, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 3. is the best.
Cirt (
talk )
00:46, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 3.
Durova
Charge!
01:23, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
Yep, No. 3
211.30.12.197 (
talk )
07:50, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
3
Cbrown1023
talk
23:41, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
Number 3
Dance to be free
23:55, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
3 is very cute.
Grand
master
ka
04:23, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No.3 - although it looks like she has giant mickey mouse ears....
Privatemusings (
talk )
05:06, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No.3--
thunderboltz
(TALK)
07:26, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No 3 Its the best pic on this page :)
The Firewall (
talk )
08:21, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
3. ~
Riana ⁂
08:46, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 3.
Coldmachine
Talk
09:37, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 3, just for looking so good.
Dineshkannambadi (
talk )
01:19, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
3- fwoargh:)
Sticky
Parkin
12:49, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
3. Too obvious to warrant an explanation. :)
Aditya (
talk •
contribs )
12:14, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
3 without a doubt. --
Ѕandahl
♥
15:33, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No.3 - --
Suntag
☼
07:59, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
3 is best available. (-: —
Nearly Headless Nick
{C}
07:32, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
Lord knows. How comes she looks pretty in 2 and pretty awful in 1? Is it even the same person? --
Dweller (
talk )
NOT 1!! I rather like 2, and you can see the medal. 3 is OK.
Pdfpdf (
talk )
11:26, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 3
Abraham, B.S. (
talk )
03:51, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
not sure about these; probably #3 but none of them flatter her. ---
BlackJack |
talk page
06:29, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
#3 - Nice, natural smile. --
vi5in
[talk]
02:51, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 1 definitely (a crop?) --
Mattinbgn \
talk
09:06, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No: 1 for me - and I'd give the others the Chop (is that Judo or Karate?)--
VS
talk
09:07, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
1. (4 as backup if you can't get a crop)
Giggy (
talk )
00:59, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
1. I'll try to get a crop done on that for you. –
Juliancolton
T ropical
C yclone
01:13, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
1.
Khoi
khoi
03:42, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
1 --
Y
not?
04:28, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
1 Looks cool dude
PurpleView (
talk )
07:16, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 1.
Nishkid64 (
Make articles, not wikidrama )
23:37, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 1. I like it as is, nicely framed.
Cirt (
talk )
00:47, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 1 is fine for me
211.30.12.197 (
talk )
07:50, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
1
Cbrown1023
talk
23:41, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
I'd go 4
Privatemusings (
talk )
05:07, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
Go for No. 1.--
thunderboltz
(TALK)
07:44, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No 4
The Firewall (
talk )
08:22, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
1 as is, or 4. ~
Riana ⁂
08:46, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 4. Or, number 1.
Coldmachine
Talk
09:37, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 1, boy next door image.
Dineshkannambadi (
talk )
01:19, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
4- a bit blurry though.
Sticky
Parkin
12:50, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
1 cropped.--
Ѕandahl
♥
15:34, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 1 - Zoom in on face and crop. --
Suntag
☼
08:00, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
1. —
Nearly Headless Nick
{C}
07:34, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
1. But isn't it just Prince William with Boris Johnson's haircut? --
Dweller (
talk )
12:31, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 1
Abraham, B.S. (
talk )
03:51, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
No. 1. I didn't know they still made boys this cute. —
An
gr
10:24, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
#1 is the best but I think I would crop it just a little. ---
BlackJack |
talk page
06:30, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
reply
#1, with some crop. --
vi5in
[talk]
02:52, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
reply