Thank you for taking the time to review the Ottawa Senators articles. Could you update the GA 'box' templates on the Talk pages for the articles? I suppose the templates could be deleted from the talk page, or maybe they should be kept, according to the rules. Alaney2k ( talk) 16:02, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
Happy new year | |
Chúc anh và gia đình Tân xuân hạnh phúc |
Magnifier ( talk) 16:40, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I selected your name at random from the list of Arbitration Committee members, so you will have a neutral viewpoint. Can you have a look at what's going on here [1] please. I feel that the admin involved in the case may be a little too close to the subject I requested an RfCU on; certainly, the process seems to have ground to a halt. Anything you can do would be much appreciated. Thanks. Jack1956 ( talk) 20:49, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
User:Earthbendingmaster/Poll I like the thing on your user page. Basketball 110 Clinton, Obama, McCain, Huckabee, Romney, or Paul? 00:21, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your review. We're chugging away on the article.
Can you recommend two city articles which we could use as style and content exemplars? As Vancouver is a FA, that would give us a set of three to compare and contrast.
As a side note, when you point out use of "clearly" in Sports, where the article says "biggest...following...clearly belongs to hockey", that's a tough one for Montrealer's and Canadians to deal with, because, well, it just clearly does!! But yes, we need to find a better way to convey the national passion. Cheers! Franamax ( talk) 04:13, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello! Mr. Blnguyen! I want to ask why you reverted my edits on the article Shoaib Malik twice? I am also citing the reference. If your concern is that his marriage is not confirmed by any source than please change the heading of the para, but whats the reason of deleting the whole para. Waiting for you reply! Thanks! -- SMS Talk 09:26, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Done? Thanks for the review. Its been months there. -- BritandBeyonce ( talk) 06:02, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Chúc mừng năm mới! I visited Vietnam in the summer of 2006 on some family business (đám giỗ bà nội). In that trip, I also went sightseeing in Hanoi and met some Wikipedians in Hanoi, Hoi An, and Saigon (around 6 in total). It wasn't an organized event, I just put my contact info in the my userpage and people started calling me and we made plans to meet up for lunch or to go to a museum. There were several organized meetups in Hanoi and HCMC among vi Wikipedians several months ago; I think the biggest one had about 15 attendees. Where did you hear about our meetups? DHN ( talk) 07:20, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Blnguyen: You were an involved admin wrt User:Wiki Raja. A discussion thread on WP:ANI has been started, and please feel free to provide your inputs for the discussion. Thank you, - KNM Talk 18:00, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Cảm ơn lời chúc của bạn. Chúc bạn năm mới sức khỏe tốt, thành công trong cuộc sống và hạnh phúc. Mong bạn tiếp tục mang văn hóa Việt Nam ra thế giới nhiều hơn nữa. Genghiskhanviet ( talk) 08:29, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
|
Any chance you could post the update? I've got it ready, and it's a couple of hours late. Gatoclass ( talk) 04:12, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Howdy, the article Ichisada Miyazaki was tagged as a copyright violation of the main reference. I don't think you were previously informed, so I thought I would let you know. JackSchmidt ( talk) 05:57, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 7 | 11 February 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot ( talk) 08:11, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Congrats! Plus the coveted pictured slot, too! Ruhrfisch ><>°° 21:33, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
I've got a couple of College football articles ( 2007 ACC Championship Game, 2008 Orange Bowl) up for FAC or nearly there, and I was wondering if you'd be willing to read through them and let me know which areas — from the point of view of someone completely unfamiliar with American football — are unclear or difficult to understand. I'd really appreciate that, as it seems to be the primary objection from the two people who have thus far objected to the first FAC. Thanks. JKBrooks85 ( talk) 05:53, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi! I think this IP address 125.164.255.116 must be BLOCK as soon as possible. For what? Because this user always vandalize the profiles of non-Indonesian beauty queens and much higher height for Indonesian contestants without any sources!
Thank you so much!
Angelo De La Paz ( talk) 09:13, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello could you please tell me the reason for reverting the Belgaum wikipedia page , please do let me know if the information is not adding any value to the page i would be glad to remove it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Strydon ( talk • contribs) 09:53, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
-- BorgQueen ( talk) 12:18, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Naadapriya has continued with disruptive edits to push POV and vandalize articles (despite warnings), including in the article Music of Karnataka, and once in another article via book-advertising. He fails to observe that there is no consensus by other editors when it comes to his proposals for Carnatic music and continues trying to push his Kannada/Karnataka (or should I say Knataka) POV on other users talk pages. Furthermore, his contributions (since his arrival at Wikipedia) have been non-constructive towards improving the encyclopedia. I request he be blocked so that further disruptive edits and pov-pushing on others talk pages will no longer be an issue for members of Wikipedia. Thanks - Ncmvocalist ( talk) 09:47, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi! Please join us here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Lianga13#Bingo.21
Thank so much!
Angelo De La Paz ( talk) 12:36, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Many thanks for your comments. You raised some interesting points and I shall look into addressing them as soon as possible. Cheers, B e t t i a t a l k 09:09, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Care to explain this edit? Relata refero ( talk) 12:53, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi!
Please help me to add Lianga13 with his/her multiple accounts into WP:RFCU because I don't know how to do that and I am not an admin! So please help me, OK? Block that account for a year at least! Thank so much!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Lianga13#Bingo.21
Angelo De La Paz ( talk) 06:20, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi Blnguyen, thanks for taking the time to review Judges of the International Criminal Court. If you're interested, I've left a detailed response here. All the best, Sideshow Bob Roberts ( talk) 14:03, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Can you can your CU-privileged eyes over the request I made of Rebecca here. She seems to have gone AWOL. If I need to raise a RFCU to ascertain a decent range block then let me know... Thanks -- Step hen 00:18, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
I want to draw your attention to the Signature of the User:AjitParkash which you can find here on my talk page. Its really confusing, because first i was reply to you at your talk page for that comment at my talk page! -- SMS Talk 20:18, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for putting Michiko Maeda up on the DYK page, Blnguyen! I notice a typo though: "that Michiko Maeda, the first Japanese actress..." should read "that Michiko Maeda was the first Japanese actress..." Cheers! Dekkappai ( talk) 00:32, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Hu Blnguyen! Do you think it's fair to fail the Zinta article because the reviews are from Indian newspapers? I tried my best to add NYT reviews as the reviewer asked me to, but there are no other reviews describing her film performances (the NYT usually do not discuss performances). The one I found, makes its presence on the article. I also have two reviews from Variety. But he still asks for it. I can't see the point. She is an Indian actor, not an American, and using reviews by critics from Indian sources (leading websites and newspapers), is an obvious act.
Apart from this, when I tried to address all the reliability issues (back in the FAC), especially reviews etc., I looked for reviews from mainly newspapers, and when I found them, I did an analysis to prove that the reviews on the page represent the majority view (even though new FAs, like Reese Witherspoon contain only positive reviews, except for one).
Please tell me your opinion on the matter. I did my best to address neutrality, reliability issues. One reviewer already gave it a review (see talk page) and conluded that it's definitely a GA, but now it fails because of some unexplained reasons which are not even supported by the WP:WIAGA criteria. That's so unfair.
Regards, Shahid • Talk2me 06:46, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi! Please visit my last edits in "Demographics" of Japan about Religions in Japan. Do you think it was Christian spamlinks? Thanks!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Japan#Christian_spamlinks
Angelo De La Paz ( talk) 14:50, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
The Running Man Barnstar | |
For all those great shots of the Indian cricket team! ~ Riana ⁂ 02:30, 15 February 2008 (UTC) |
Way better than my crap, lol. :) ~
Riana ⁂
02:30, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the vandal dusting! SGGH speak! 09:59, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello Blnguyen. I request the John Howard article be unlocked. You have in the past been involved in the content of this article. Also, it's an article with multiple active participants (not just 2), so locking penalises others. Regards, Lester 13:21, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
I've reviewed the article and left notes on the talk page. I've put the nomination on hold for seven days to allow the issues to be addressed. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, here, or on the article talk page with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on. Ealdgyth | Talk 16:13, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Hey, this is the first edition of the WP F1 newsletter. If you want to keep getting it, please talk back on my talk page.
Enjoy! LB22 ( talk) 11:17, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
![]() Year I - Issue 1 - February 2008 | |
---|---|
"So to avoid any confusion, here is the order: Hakkinen leads and is yet to stop. Coulthard leads and is yet to stop..." -
Murray Walker | |
Hello, Reader! Welcome to our first monthly Formula 1 WP Newsletter. This is to give you the best source of information, right in your user talk page. We hope that you find this newsletter useful, and please leave me a message on this newsletter in my talk page. All that is left to say is, I hope that you enjoy the read! Enjoy! -- LB22 ( talk) 21:13, 16 February 2008 (UTC) | |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
The Good Article Medal of Merit | |
Congratulations, I have chosen you as my GAN Reviewer of the Week for the week ending 16th February 2008. Epbr123 ( talk) 18:15, 17 February 2008 (UTC) |
Thank you for taking the time to review the Ottawa Senators articles. Could you update the GA 'box' templates on the Talk pages for the articles? I suppose the templates could be deleted from the talk page, or maybe they should be kept, according to the rules. Alaney2k ( talk) 16:02, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
Happy new year | |
Chúc anh và gia đình Tân xuân hạnh phúc |
Magnifier ( talk) 16:40, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I selected your name at random from the list of Arbitration Committee members, so you will have a neutral viewpoint. Can you have a look at what's going on here [1] please. I feel that the admin involved in the case may be a little too close to the subject I requested an RfCU on; certainly, the process seems to have ground to a halt. Anything you can do would be much appreciated. Thanks. Jack1956 ( talk) 20:49, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
User:Earthbendingmaster/Poll I like the thing on your user page. Basketball 110 Clinton, Obama, McCain, Huckabee, Romney, or Paul? 00:21, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your review. We're chugging away on the article.
Can you recommend two city articles which we could use as style and content exemplars? As Vancouver is a FA, that would give us a set of three to compare and contrast.
As a side note, when you point out use of "clearly" in Sports, where the article says "biggest...following...clearly belongs to hockey", that's a tough one for Montrealer's and Canadians to deal with, because, well, it just clearly does!! But yes, we need to find a better way to convey the national passion. Cheers! Franamax ( talk) 04:13, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello! Mr. Blnguyen! I want to ask why you reverted my edits on the article Shoaib Malik twice? I am also citing the reference. If your concern is that his marriage is not confirmed by any source than please change the heading of the para, but whats the reason of deleting the whole para. Waiting for you reply! Thanks! -- SMS Talk 09:26, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Done? Thanks for the review. Its been months there. -- BritandBeyonce ( talk) 06:02, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Chúc mừng năm mới! I visited Vietnam in the summer of 2006 on some family business (đám giỗ bà nội). In that trip, I also went sightseeing in Hanoi and met some Wikipedians in Hanoi, Hoi An, and Saigon (around 6 in total). It wasn't an organized event, I just put my contact info in the my userpage and people started calling me and we made plans to meet up for lunch or to go to a museum. There were several organized meetups in Hanoi and HCMC among vi Wikipedians several months ago; I think the biggest one had about 15 attendees. Where did you hear about our meetups? DHN ( talk) 07:20, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Blnguyen: You were an involved admin wrt User:Wiki Raja. A discussion thread on WP:ANI has been started, and please feel free to provide your inputs for the discussion. Thank you, - KNM Talk 18:00, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Cảm ơn lời chúc của bạn. Chúc bạn năm mới sức khỏe tốt, thành công trong cuộc sống và hạnh phúc. Mong bạn tiếp tục mang văn hóa Việt Nam ra thế giới nhiều hơn nữa. Genghiskhanviet ( talk) 08:29, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
|
Any chance you could post the update? I've got it ready, and it's a couple of hours late. Gatoclass ( talk) 04:12, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Howdy, the article Ichisada Miyazaki was tagged as a copyright violation of the main reference. I don't think you were previously informed, so I thought I would let you know. JackSchmidt ( talk) 05:57, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 7 | 11 February 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot ( talk) 08:11, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Congrats! Plus the coveted pictured slot, too! Ruhrfisch ><>°° 21:33, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
I've got a couple of College football articles ( 2007 ACC Championship Game, 2008 Orange Bowl) up for FAC or nearly there, and I was wondering if you'd be willing to read through them and let me know which areas — from the point of view of someone completely unfamiliar with American football — are unclear or difficult to understand. I'd really appreciate that, as it seems to be the primary objection from the two people who have thus far objected to the first FAC. Thanks. JKBrooks85 ( talk) 05:53, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi! I think this IP address 125.164.255.116 must be BLOCK as soon as possible. For what? Because this user always vandalize the profiles of non-Indonesian beauty queens and much higher height for Indonesian contestants without any sources!
Thank you so much!
Angelo De La Paz ( talk) 09:13, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello could you please tell me the reason for reverting the Belgaum wikipedia page , please do let me know if the information is not adding any value to the page i would be glad to remove it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Strydon ( talk • contribs) 09:53, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
-- BorgQueen ( talk) 12:18, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Naadapriya has continued with disruptive edits to push POV and vandalize articles (despite warnings), including in the article Music of Karnataka, and once in another article via book-advertising. He fails to observe that there is no consensus by other editors when it comes to his proposals for Carnatic music and continues trying to push his Kannada/Karnataka (or should I say Knataka) POV on other users talk pages. Furthermore, his contributions (since his arrival at Wikipedia) have been non-constructive towards improving the encyclopedia. I request he be blocked so that further disruptive edits and pov-pushing on others talk pages will no longer be an issue for members of Wikipedia. Thanks - Ncmvocalist ( talk) 09:47, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi! Please join us here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Lianga13#Bingo.21
Thank so much!
Angelo De La Paz ( talk) 12:36, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Many thanks for your comments. You raised some interesting points and I shall look into addressing them as soon as possible. Cheers, B e t t i a t a l k 09:09, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Care to explain this edit? Relata refero ( talk) 12:53, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi!
Please help me to add Lianga13 with his/her multiple accounts into WP:RFCU because I don't know how to do that and I am not an admin! So please help me, OK? Block that account for a year at least! Thank so much!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Lianga13#Bingo.21
Angelo De La Paz ( talk) 06:20, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi Blnguyen, thanks for taking the time to review Judges of the International Criminal Court. If you're interested, I've left a detailed response here. All the best, Sideshow Bob Roberts ( talk) 14:03, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Can you can your CU-privileged eyes over the request I made of Rebecca here. She seems to have gone AWOL. If I need to raise a RFCU to ascertain a decent range block then let me know... Thanks -- Step hen 00:18, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
I want to draw your attention to the Signature of the User:AjitParkash which you can find here on my talk page. Its really confusing, because first i was reply to you at your talk page for that comment at my talk page! -- SMS Talk 20:18, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for putting Michiko Maeda up on the DYK page, Blnguyen! I notice a typo though: "that Michiko Maeda, the first Japanese actress..." should read "that Michiko Maeda was the first Japanese actress..." Cheers! Dekkappai ( talk) 00:32, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Hu Blnguyen! Do you think it's fair to fail the Zinta article because the reviews are from Indian newspapers? I tried my best to add NYT reviews as the reviewer asked me to, but there are no other reviews describing her film performances (the NYT usually do not discuss performances). The one I found, makes its presence on the article. I also have two reviews from Variety. But he still asks for it. I can't see the point. She is an Indian actor, not an American, and using reviews by critics from Indian sources (leading websites and newspapers), is an obvious act.
Apart from this, when I tried to address all the reliability issues (back in the FAC), especially reviews etc., I looked for reviews from mainly newspapers, and when I found them, I did an analysis to prove that the reviews on the page represent the majority view (even though new FAs, like Reese Witherspoon contain only positive reviews, except for one).
Please tell me your opinion on the matter. I did my best to address neutrality, reliability issues. One reviewer already gave it a review (see talk page) and conluded that it's definitely a GA, but now it fails because of some unexplained reasons which are not even supported by the WP:WIAGA criteria. That's so unfair.
Regards, Shahid • Talk2me 06:46, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi! Please visit my last edits in "Demographics" of Japan about Religions in Japan. Do you think it was Christian spamlinks? Thanks!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Japan#Christian_spamlinks
Angelo De La Paz ( talk) 14:50, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
The Running Man Barnstar | |
For all those great shots of the Indian cricket team! ~ Riana ⁂ 02:30, 15 February 2008 (UTC) |
Way better than my crap, lol. :) ~
Riana ⁂
02:30, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the vandal dusting! SGGH speak! 09:59, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello Blnguyen. I request the John Howard article be unlocked. You have in the past been involved in the content of this article. Also, it's an article with multiple active participants (not just 2), so locking penalises others. Regards, Lester 13:21, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
I've reviewed the article and left notes on the talk page. I've put the nomination on hold for seven days to allow the issues to be addressed. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, here, or on the article talk page with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on. Ealdgyth | Talk 16:13, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Hey, this is the first edition of the WP F1 newsletter. If you want to keep getting it, please talk back on my talk page.
Enjoy! LB22 ( talk) 11:17, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
![]() Year I - Issue 1 - February 2008 | |
---|---|
"So to avoid any confusion, here is the order: Hakkinen leads and is yet to stop. Coulthard leads and is yet to stop..." -
Murray Walker | |
Hello, Reader! Welcome to our first monthly Formula 1 WP Newsletter. This is to give you the best source of information, right in your user talk page. We hope that you find this newsletter useful, and please leave me a message on this newsletter in my talk page. All that is left to say is, I hope that you enjoy the read! Enjoy! -- LB22 ( talk) 21:13, 16 February 2008 (UTC) | |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
The Good Article Medal of Merit | |
Congratulations, I have chosen you as my GAN Reviewer of the Week for the week ending 16th February 2008. Epbr123 ( talk) 18:15, 17 February 2008 (UTC) |