|
A tag has been placed on Rick Roeber requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Grey Wanderer | Talk 00:10, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
I have nominated Rick Roeber, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rick Roeber. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Tijuana Brass ( talk) 00:24, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the
Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --
SineBot (
talk)
18:14, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
I've changed to "keep" at AfD. Well done for the effort put in. Looks good with the picture too :-) Cheers. Sting_au Talk 10:19, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:06patriotsrun4.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILYsock (TALK) 02:55, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:06patriotsrun5.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILYsock (TALK) 02:56, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at
Rick Roeber, you may be
blocked from editing. What you did is akin to vandalism. It is pure nonsense to change an article based on predicting the future, and to think that you can literally rewrite history itself in the process. —
Smuckola
(talk)
17:10, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Philipnelson99. I noticed that in
this edit to
Rick Roeber, you removed all the content from the page.
Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please
redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been
vandalised, please
revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please
the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the
deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Philipnelson99 (
talk)
02:03, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's
no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at
Rick Roeber. You probably need to stop editing this article. —
Smuckola
(talk)
01:30, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
|
A tag has been placed on Rick Roeber requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Grey Wanderer | Talk 00:10, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
I have nominated Rick Roeber, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rick Roeber. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Tijuana Brass ( talk) 00:24, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the
Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --
SineBot (
talk)
18:14, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
I've changed to "keep" at AfD. Well done for the effort put in. Looks good with the picture too :-) Cheers. Sting_au Talk 10:19, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:06patriotsrun4.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILYsock (TALK) 02:55, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:06patriotsrun5.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILYsock (TALK) 02:56, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at
Rick Roeber, you may be
blocked from editing. What you did is akin to vandalism. It is pure nonsense to change an article based on predicting the future, and to think that you can literally rewrite history itself in the process. —
Smuckola
(talk)
17:10, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Philipnelson99. I noticed that in
this edit to
Rick Roeber, you removed all the content from the page.
Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please
redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been
vandalised, please
revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please
the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the
deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Philipnelson99 (
talk)
02:03, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's
no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at
Rick Roeber. You probably need to stop editing this article. —
Smuckola
(talk)
01:30, 6 March 2024 (UTC)