Please do not
delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at
Talk:Gaza flotilla raid. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be
vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you. It is related. Please read it again. Please refrian form doing this without discussion in the future. You have a concern, you can address it with the editor before refactoring.
Cerejota (
talk)
14:49, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add non-free images, such as File:Kkbrove yeni.png to templates, such as Template:Turkish military info box as you did here. The use of non-free images on templates is strictly forbidden by WP:NFCC #9. Thank you, -- Hammersoft ( talk) 20:14, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Dear Yakamoz51, I'm Buckshot06, a wikipedian from New Zealand. This edit was I thought quite strange and I have reverted the removal of these interesting explanations of important parts of the Turkish Armed Forces' history. Can you please tell me what your thinking was in making this edit ? Both World War II and Cyprus in 1974 are important parts of the TAF's history which need to be more fully explained in English to a worldwide audience than they are now, allowing increased understanding between all countries. Kind regards Buckshot06 (talk) 22:34, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
- We have very little detail on what the TAF's operations were during World War II. A visit to German units and potential military cooperation is very valid. It provides something to build upon. Check Russian Ground Forces for an article that incorporates political factors into an analysis of an armed force, or, if you like Military of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Please also be very careful dealing with Cyprus; I initially believed you were trying to make more obscure the TAF's actions on the island.While this is clearly not the case, please, again, do not remove data - even if it is incomplete or not portraying the full context and picture, because wikipedia works on adding things in slowly. If you remove it, there's nothing to build upon. Kind regards Buckshot06 (talk) 23:49, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
MOTDs ( This space for rent)
You may have noticed over the past few days that the MOTD that you link to on your user page has simply displayed a red link. This is due to the fact that not enough people are reviewing pending MOTDs here. Please help us keep the MOTD template alive and simply go and review a few of the MOTDs in the list. That way we can have a real MOTD in the future rather than re-using ( This space for rent). Any help would be appreciated! – pjoef ( talk • contribs) 14:32, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nizamiye Masjid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ottoman ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 14:26, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
The article List of countries by real GDP growth rate (2010) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Unnecessary duplication. The page List of countries by real GDP growth rate already exists.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
LK (
talk)
09:13, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Velella. I noticed that you recently removed some content from
Fethullah Gülen, with
this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Velella
Velella Talk
13:46, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Necmettin Bilal Erdoğan
Hello, Yakamoz51,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Necmettin Bilal Erdoğan should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Necmettin Bilal Erdoğan .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks, Gilded Snail ( talk) 04:37, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the LaunchGood page, your edit caused a URL error ( help). ( Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:22, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
I'd just like to state that I'm reverting back to the original version before you made the changes, as I strongly believe your edit is bias because a lot of it is about the Turkish government and trying to undermine the allegations the group is currently facing. These pages are about Fethullah Gulen, the Gulen Movement and Gulen Movement Schools, and therefore the content should be closely linked to them.
You have also removed multiple times the statement of Turkish officials referring to the Gulen movement as a terrorist group. This statement is not being bias, as this is actually what the Turkish officials refer to the movement as. The public has the right to know about the different names of the group.
The closures of the Gulen schools have and are occurring, and are not something that should be removed. The sources are sufficient to prove this. Removing it is actually being bias because you are trying to hide certain aspects regarding the schools. I would like to emphasize that being bias is not just about writing in a one-sided manner, but also omitting certain information. You have no solid claims to remove this.
You also removed other information I added, showing another side to the storey, such as claims of Zaman being the most circulated newspaper in Turkey as being fabricated. The sources explaining this are reliable, and indeed such extra information provides a two sided argument ensuring there is no bias. You removing this is what really creates a bias nature.
I would also like to highlight that many others have reverted your changes, and many others have made edits to these pages without removing the content which I have put, but you have removed. I have even been thanked for my edits. All this points towards me not being bias.
If you would like to raise bias issues, please do so in talk pages of the relevant pages.
Thanks, Alasss123 ( talk) 13:45, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Please do not
delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at
Talk:Gaza flotilla raid. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be
vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you. It is related. Please read it again. Please refrian form doing this without discussion in the future. You have a concern, you can address it with the editor before refactoring.
Cerejota (
talk)
14:49, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add non-free images, such as File:Kkbrove yeni.png to templates, such as Template:Turkish military info box as you did here. The use of non-free images on templates is strictly forbidden by WP:NFCC #9. Thank you, -- Hammersoft ( talk) 20:14, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Dear Yakamoz51, I'm Buckshot06, a wikipedian from New Zealand. This edit was I thought quite strange and I have reverted the removal of these interesting explanations of important parts of the Turkish Armed Forces' history. Can you please tell me what your thinking was in making this edit ? Both World War II and Cyprus in 1974 are important parts of the TAF's history which need to be more fully explained in English to a worldwide audience than they are now, allowing increased understanding between all countries. Kind regards Buckshot06 (talk) 22:34, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
- We have very little detail on what the TAF's operations were during World War II. A visit to German units and potential military cooperation is very valid. It provides something to build upon. Check Russian Ground Forces for an article that incorporates political factors into an analysis of an armed force, or, if you like Military of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Please also be very careful dealing with Cyprus; I initially believed you were trying to make more obscure the TAF's actions on the island.While this is clearly not the case, please, again, do not remove data - even if it is incomplete or not portraying the full context and picture, because wikipedia works on adding things in slowly. If you remove it, there's nothing to build upon. Kind regards Buckshot06 (talk) 23:49, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
MOTDs ( This space for rent)
You may have noticed over the past few days that the MOTD that you link to on your user page has simply displayed a red link. This is due to the fact that not enough people are reviewing pending MOTDs here. Please help us keep the MOTD template alive and simply go and review a few of the MOTDs in the list. That way we can have a real MOTD in the future rather than re-using ( This space for rent). Any help would be appreciated! – pjoef ( talk • contribs) 14:32, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nizamiye Masjid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ottoman ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 14:26, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
The article List of countries by real GDP growth rate (2010) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Unnecessary duplication. The page List of countries by real GDP growth rate already exists.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
LK (
talk)
09:13, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Velella. I noticed that you recently removed some content from
Fethullah Gülen, with
this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Velella
Velella Talk
13:46, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Necmettin Bilal Erdoğan
Hello, Yakamoz51,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Necmettin Bilal Erdoğan should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Necmettin Bilal Erdoğan .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks, Gilded Snail ( talk) 04:37, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the LaunchGood page, your edit caused a URL error ( help). ( Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:22, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
I'd just like to state that I'm reverting back to the original version before you made the changes, as I strongly believe your edit is bias because a lot of it is about the Turkish government and trying to undermine the allegations the group is currently facing. These pages are about Fethullah Gulen, the Gulen Movement and Gulen Movement Schools, and therefore the content should be closely linked to them.
You have also removed multiple times the statement of Turkish officials referring to the Gulen movement as a terrorist group. This statement is not being bias, as this is actually what the Turkish officials refer to the movement as. The public has the right to know about the different names of the group.
The closures of the Gulen schools have and are occurring, and are not something that should be removed. The sources are sufficient to prove this. Removing it is actually being bias because you are trying to hide certain aspects regarding the schools. I would like to emphasize that being bias is not just about writing in a one-sided manner, but also omitting certain information. You have no solid claims to remove this.
You also removed other information I added, showing another side to the storey, such as claims of Zaman being the most circulated newspaper in Turkey as being fabricated. The sources explaining this are reliable, and indeed such extra information provides a two sided argument ensuring there is no bias. You removing this is what really creates a bias nature.
I would also like to highlight that many others have reverted your changes, and many others have made edits to these pages without removing the content which I have put, but you have removed. I have even been thanked for my edits. All this points towards me not being bias.
If you would like to raise bias issues, please do so in talk pages of the relevant pages.
Thanks, Alasss123 ( talk) 13:45, 5 April 2016 (UTC)