Here's a change you made recently: your change
After reading the citation you added, I believe the quoted text is taken out of context - it refers to GDI applications running with DWM (i.e. Aero) as opposed to running Vista's UI without Aero - there is noticeable tearing in this mode - "Vista Basic" as it is not hardware accelerated, as previously stated in the same citation, as well as others.
If, for example, your machine is not capable of running Aero, you will experience a much worse desktop experience than running XP - as GDI+ is not hardware accelerated. I hope you consider this if you make any further revisions to this article.
|
The Copyeditor's Barnstar | |
...when you have cleaned up after my lack of any sensible grammatical sense :-P soum talk 20:10, 6 April 2008 (UTC) |
Im aware of that, however older versions of Windows 2000 without Service Pack 4 cannot upgrade. Certain versions of Vista cannot be upgraded to if the client has Windows 2000 and wants to upgrade. Thank you for correcting my edits. As you can see I am not a Vista fan :) // A Raider Like Indiana 23:08, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Windows 2000 was superseded by Server 2003 and XP not Vista and Server 2008. Server 2003 and XP were superseded by Server 2008 and Vista. I fixed that issue.// A Raider Like Indiana 23:15, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
A
proposed deletion template has been added to the article
List of Carbon applications, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Dougie WII ( talk) 00:26, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
I have nominated List of Carbon applications, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Carbon applications. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Dougie WII ( talk) 11:37, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, I had to nominate a couple of articles created by you for deletion. I hope you realize there is nothing personal in this. :-) Btw, I responded to your chat messages. -- soum talk 20:34, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
You once told me that you do not like Image:Visual Studio Editions.svg. Is Image:Visual Studio Editions Compact.svg any better? -- soum talk 08:01, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
![]() Hi, Xpclient/Talk archive 1. You are cordially invited to join the Genetics WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to genetics. We've noticed that you have an interest in the field, and may be interested in joining Wikipedia's dedicated collaborative effort. We look forward to working with you in the project! – Liveste ( talk • edits) 13:50, 10 May 2008 (UTC) |
You are receiving this automated message because your userpage appears in Category:Wikipedians interested in genetics.
Hi, Can you please share your opinion about this on the talk page. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:WorldWide_Telescope#Issues Mohit Agarwal ( talk) 21:09, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Nice sig you have created for yourself. :) -- soum talk 05:16, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your intelligent input to and good work on the Win2k article. Sorry but I've asked another little question, hidden within this. Could you take a look? Morenoodles ( talk) 04:45, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Thank you! And I've just now posted another. I'll probably post more, too, but I won't clutter up this page with notices about them. Meanwhile, thank you for your patience. Morenoodles ( talk) 06:42, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
They're called Security Support Providers, not Security Service Providers. Don't get confused with the term "Credential Security Service Provider"... they aren't the same thing. -/- Warren 19:02, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi, Some VCD records different languages in the two audio channels (say Cantonese in left channel and Mandarin in right channel), one can use that feature as a 'bilingual'. While in Windows XP, one can select left or right audio channel only while playing VCD with WMP. This function is gone in Vista.-- 218.102.95.31 ( talk) 12:52, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Yes that suggestion on my talk is sound. Ultra! 18:05, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Are you actually an XP client? Ultra! 18:07, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
What happenned to Taskbar now? I stopped following that ridiculuous debate long back. Can you get me up to speed on the current status? -- soum talk 08:03, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
This is my preferred way of contacting. I think I threw it out, and the reason for even being on that wikipedia page was because I was just wondering what it was. If I still have it did you want to buy it or something?-- WhereAmI ( talk) 21:33, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, I only got som old catalogues (paper) - not any MS Home CD-ROMs! Regards, Necessary Evil ( talk) 16:32, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Sorry I don't get a chance to try it, since I don't have access to Windows 2000 in a VM or real machine at present. But since the official resolution attempts to solve exactly the same problem (i.e. GDI+) as in that unofficial workaround, plus it was published by Microsoft themselves who had confirmed this is a problem in their products, I'd assume it will work.-- Wengier ( talk) 17:13, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Sorry for not including a proper summary with my edit - however I'm not a vandal or someone testing out Wikipedia. That sentence read like someone was just complaining about a bug they'd encountered with Hotmail; as it was unsourced and completely unessential to the article I figured my removal wouldn't be problematic. GrahameS ( talk) 15:23, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Vista Shutdown.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 05:12, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
Please do not add
defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to
Features removed from Windows Vista. If you would like to experiment please use the
sandbox. Please do not include incendiary edit summaries. Thank you.Bettering the Wiki 15:18, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, I did, and edited accordingly.Bettering the Wiki 00:51, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:ASPNETlogo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 05:04, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
PowerCalc, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
PowerCalc is a redirect page resulting from an implausible typo (
CSD R3).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
PowerCalc, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the
bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click
here
CSDWarnBot (
talk) 22:20, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
I understand now, but I don't see why keep emphasising that its the same application. Isn't it always the same apps that get grouped or combined? - Josh ( talk | contribs) 16:59, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I removed the section because:
Remember that WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS isn't a good reason to keep something. I don't doubt that the Office Assistant has many parodies, and a "popular culture" prose section based on that could probably be sourced to some reliable sources. (I say "probably" because I've been both pleasantly surprised and frustratingly disappointed by what I have and have not been able to source in the past.) But that section would need to limit itself to examples specifically mentioned in reliable sources, and, in my experience at least, the majority of one-off references in popular culture don't have reliably sourced analysis. Again, this is not always the case, but the signal-to-noise ratio tends to be low when it comes time to source everything.
If you feel strongly enough about the section, I won't contest a revert. However, do keep in mind that, left unchecked, such lists tend to grow over time; a list of trivial mentions isn't a good encyclopedic example to set for for new contributors. (On a lighter note, here's xkcd's take on these lists: [1].) — TKD:: {talk} 16:57, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated SSMS, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SSMS. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Fiddle Faddle ( talk) 08:11, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Regarding your deleting various sections of the MHTML article, I am curious as to your motivations. None of the content contravened WP policies in any way, all was relevant to the article topic and all benefited the article. On your reasons given for each deletion:
I take issue with that statement - a similar format change to the one found between 97/98 was also found between all versions prior to this (i.e. 1 - 2 - 3/95 - 97 - 98) - so there were 5 different formats and 4 different schisms. Additionally, in an age when most Office file formats remained compatible without the need to convert them (Word 97 - 2003, for example), Publisher's file formats remained incompatible between versions in the absence of the new version (which could downsave - no import filter for the older version though). It was only with Publisher 2002 that a forwards-compatible file format was adopted, 5 years after it was introduced in other Office apps. (Interestingly it was also Publisher 2002 where it finally started to look like the rest of Office, and adopted the Escher/Office Art 1.0 system used elsewhere since Office 97). Stannered ( talk) 09:11, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Hey, I restored the text I'd removed previously and changed the wording a bit... how does that look? Warren -talk- 02:43, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
If the RC does truncte long filenames, than 75 characters isn't long enough, unless the Name column is too short. - Josh ( talk | contribs) 14:29, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Regarding this entry you removed: All context menu items are not available when right clicking search results in the Start menu.. If you are running Windows 7 RTM, try right clicking a Start menu entry by going specifically from Start -> All Programs -> then right clicking on it. Now use Start search box to bring up the same item and try right clicking on it. "Run as admin" chiefly and some other context menu items are missing when right clicking on a search result. - xpclient Talk 21:18, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
I see. I wasn't aware of that. Thanks for telling me. --Josh ( Mephiles602) 14:56, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Xpclient Thanks for your editions in ICO (file format). The article looks much better now. (It is still a bit weasel-wordy and a bit confusing in some parts, but I think we're going to make it even better.)
By the way, you have add comment about MSDN suggesting a 72 pixel icon dimension cap. I don't know what you mean by "Later OS" but at least in Windows XP with Service Pack 3, there really is such a cap. Here is a screenshot: http://bayimg.com/GAEKpAACl. The field "Size" does not accept a value above 72.
Fleet Command ( talk) 19:35, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
.ICO files, .CUR files and icon library files can be edited or exported with a number of graphics programs and specialized free and commercial icon editors.
.ICO files, .CUR files and icon library files can be edited or exported with graphics programs and specialized free and commercial icon editors.
“ | Before this was registered, image/x-icon was the most common
MIME type used in the industry since it complied with the rules of using x- for unregistered tokens. Many other erroneous MIME types are also still used inconsistently, including image/ico , image/icon , text/ico , and application/ico .
Web servers which do not come configured with a MIME type setting for .ICO files, send their default MIME type, which might be text/html or text/plain .
|
” |
“ | IANA MIME type assignments, image/vnd.microsoft.icon | ” |
For your information the ATP rankings that i posted were the ranking that the website orginally posted, they were actually the one who made a mistake on the rankings, that was their original post, it didn't look that suspiscious compared tot he mistake that they made on the doubles rankings were they screwed it up badly and the when category is really stupid which means you are not a tennis supporter to not know that the changes are from week-to-week that was like started many years ago. ( Dencod16) 23:32, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
I appreciate your drive to improve the article, however you last edits like this and this only added trivial or even grossly misinterpreted information. Specifically,
Please look through relevant MSDN Library sections on Windows Device Driver Kit and Windows Graphics APIs before making broad conclusion based on simply-worded guidelines for support personnel. -- 83.167.100.36 ( talk) 20:03, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
I'm sorry that I reply to you late (I'm offline for a few months).
I removed tons of game publishers and developers in Casual game because I think they're not notable publishers (original search by myself).
Ʈuaηèsε™ (literally 俊的) 10:43, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles ( talk) 18:45, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
This cited source does not agree with you. It explicitly states that DVD-RAM support is new to IMAPI version 2. Fleet Command ( talk) 12:04, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
I'm afraid I don't understand you. What are you exactly talking about? Is it related to my recent edit to Office 2010 article? Fleet Command ( talk) 12:08, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
Here's a change you made recently: your change
After reading the citation you added, I believe the quoted text is taken out of context - it refers to GDI applications running with DWM (i.e. Aero) as opposed to running Vista's UI without Aero - there is noticeable tearing in this mode - "Vista Basic" as it is not hardware accelerated, as previously stated in the same citation, as well as others.
If, for example, your machine is not capable of running Aero, you will experience a much worse desktop experience than running XP - as GDI+ is not hardware accelerated. I hope you consider this if you make any further revisions to this article.
|
The Copyeditor's Barnstar | |
...when you have cleaned up after my lack of any sensible grammatical sense :-P soum talk 20:10, 6 April 2008 (UTC) |
Im aware of that, however older versions of Windows 2000 without Service Pack 4 cannot upgrade. Certain versions of Vista cannot be upgraded to if the client has Windows 2000 and wants to upgrade. Thank you for correcting my edits. As you can see I am not a Vista fan :) // A Raider Like Indiana 23:08, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Windows 2000 was superseded by Server 2003 and XP not Vista and Server 2008. Server 2003 and XP were superseded by Server 2008 and Vista. I fixed that issue.// A Raider Like Indiana 23:15, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
A
proposed deletion template has been added to the article
List of Carbon applications, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Dougie WII ( talk) 00:26, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
I have nominated List of Carbon applications, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Carbon applications. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Dougie WII ( talk) 11:37, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, I had to nominate a couple of articles created by you for deletion. I hope you realize there is nothing personal in this. :-) Btw, I responded to your chat messages. -- soum talk 20:34, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
You once told me that you do not like Image:Visual Studio Editions.svg. Is Image:Visual Studio Editions Compact.svg any better? -- soum talk 08:01, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
![]() Hi, Xpclient/Talk archive 1. You are cordially invited to join the Genetics WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to genetics. We've noticed that you have an interest in the field, and may be interested in joining Wikipedia's dedicated collaborative effort. We look forward to working with you in the project! – Liveste ( talk • edits) 13:50, 10 May 2008 (UTC) |
You are receiving this automated message because your userpage appears in Category:Wikipedians interested in genetics.
Hi, Can you please share your opinion about this on the talk page. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:WorldWide_Telescope#Issues Mohit Agarwal ( talk) 21:09, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Nice sig you have created for yourself. :) -- soum talk 05:16, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your intelligent input to and good work on the Win2k article. Sorry but I've asked another little question, hidden within this. Could you take a look? Morenoodles ( talk) 04:45, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Thank you! And I've just now posted another. I'll probably post more, too, but I won't clutter up this page with notices about them. Meanwhile, thank you for your patience. Morenoodles ( talk) 06:42, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
They're called Security Support Providers, not Security Service Providers. Don't get confused with the term "Credential Security Service Provider"... they aren't the same thing. -/- Warren 19:02, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi, Some VCD records different languages in the two audio channels (say Cantonese in left channel and Mandarin in right channel), one can use that feature as a 'bilingual'. While in Windows XP, one can select left or right audio channel only while playing VCD with WMP. This function is gone in Vista.-- 218.102.95.31 ( talk) 12:52, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Yes that suggestion on my talk is sound. Ultra! 18:05, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Are you actually an XP client? Ultra! 18:07, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
What happenned to Taskbar now? I stopped following that ridiculuous debate long back. Can you get me up to speed on the current status? -- soum talk 08:03, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
This is my preferred way of contacting. I think I threw it out, and the reason for even being on that wikipedia page was because I was just wondering what it was. If I still have it did you want to buy it or something?-- WhereAmI ( talk) 21:33, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, I only got som old catalogues (paper) - not any MS Home CD-ROMs! Regards, Necessary Evil ( talk) 16:32, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Sorry I don't get a chance to try it, since I don't have access to Windows 2000 in a VM or real machine at present. But since the official resolution attempts to solve exactly the same problem (i.e. GDI+) as in that unofficial workaround, plus it was published by Microsoft themselves who had confirmed this is a problem in their products, I'd assume it will work.-- Wengier ( talk) 17:13, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Sorry for not including a proper summary with my edit - however I'm not a vandal or someone testing out Wikipedia. That sentence read like someone was just complaining about a bug they'd encountered with Hotmail; as it was unsourced and completely unessential to the article I figured my removal wouldn't be problematic. GrahameS ( talk) 15:23, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Vista Shutdown.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 05:12, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
Please do not add
defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to
Features removed from Windows Vista. If you would like to experiment please use the
sandbox. Please do not include incendiary edit summaries. Thank you.Bettering the Wiki 15:18, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, I did, and edited accordingly.Bettering the Wiki 00:51, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:ASPNETlogo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 05:04, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
PowerCalc, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
PowerCalc is a redirect page resulting from an implausible typo (
CSD R3).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
PowerCalc, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the
bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click
here
CSDWarnBot (
talk) 22:20, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
I understand now, but I don't see why keep emphasising that its the same application. Isn't it always the same apps that get grouped or combined? - Josh ( talk | contribs) 16:59, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I removed the section because:
Remember that WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS isn't a good reason to keep something. I don't doubt that the Office Assistant has many parodies, and a "popular culture" prose section based on that could probably be sourced to some reliable sources. (I say "probably" because I've been both pleasantly surprised and frustratingly disappointed by what I have and have not been able to source in the past.) But that section would need to limit itself to examples specifically mentioned in reliable sources, and, in my experience at least, the majority of one-off references in popular culture don't have reliably sourced analysis. Again, this is not always the case, but the signal-to-noise ratio tends to be low when it comes time to source everything.
If you feel strongly enough about the section, I won't contest a revert. However, do keep in mind that, left unchecked, such lists tend to grow over time; a list of trivial mentions isn't a good encyclopedic example to set for for new contributors. (On a lighter note, here's xkcd's take on these lists: [1].) — TKD:: {talk} 16:57, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated SSMS, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SSMS. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Fiddle Faddle ( talk) 08:11, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Regarding your deleting various sections of the MHTML article, I am curious as to your motivations. None of the content contravened WP policies in any way, all was relevant to the article topic and all benefited the article. On your reasons given for each deletion:
I take issue with that statement - a similar format change to the one found between 97/98 was also found between all versions prior to this (i.e. 1 - 2 - 3/95 - 97 - 98) - so there were 5 different formats and 4 different schisms. Additionally, in an age when most Office file formats remained compatible without the need to convert them (Word 97 - 2003, for example), Publisher's file formats remained incompatible between versions in the absence of the new version (which could downsave - no import filter for the older version though). It was only with Publisher 2002 that a forwards-compatible file format was adopted, 5 years after it was introduced in other Office apps. (Interestingly it was also Publisher 2002 where it finally started to look like the rest of Office, and adopted the Escher/Office Art 1.0 system used elsewhere since Office 97). Stannered ( talk) 09:11, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Hey, I restored the text I'd removed previously and changed the wording a bit... how does that look? Warren -talk- 02:43, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
If the RC does truncte long filenames, than 75 characters isn't long enough, unless the Name column is too short. - Josh ( talk | contribs) 14:29, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Regarding this entry you removed: All context menu items are not available when right clicking search results in the Start menu.. If you are running Windows 7 RTM, try right clicking a Start menu entry by going specifically from Start -> All Programs -> then right clicking on it. Now use Start search box to bring up the same item and try right clicking on it. "Run as admin" chiefly and some other context menu items are missing when right clicking on a search result. - xpclient Talk 21:18, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
I see. I wasn't aware of that. Thanks for telling me. --Josh ( Mephiles602) 14:56, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Xpclient Thanks for your editions in ICO (file format). The article looks much better now. (It is still a bit weasel-wordy and a bit confusing in some parts, but I think we're going to make it even better.)
By the way, you have add comment about MSDN suggesting a 72 pixel icon dimension cap. I don't know what you mean by "Later OS" but at least in Windows XP with Service Pack 3, there really is such a cap. Here is a screenshot: http://bayimg.com/GAEKpAACl. The field "Size" does not accept a value above 72.
Fleet Command ( talk) 19:35, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
.ICO files, .CUR files and icon library files can be edited or exported with a number of graphics programs and specialized free and commercial icon editors.
.ICO files, .CUR files and icon library files can be edited or exported with graphics programs and specialized free and commercial icon editors.
“ | Before this was registered, image/x-icon was the most common
MIME type used in the industry since it complied with the rules of using x- for unregistered tokens. Many other erroneous MIME types are also still used inconsistently, including image/ico , image/icon , text/ico , and application/ico .
Web servers which do not come configured with a MIME type setting for .ICO files, send their default MIME type, which might be text/html or text/plain .
|
” |
“ | IANA MIME type assignments, image/vnd.microsoft.icon | ” |
For your information the ATP rankings that i posted were the ranking that the website orginally posted, they were actually the one who made a mistake on the rankings, that was their original post, it didn't look that suspiscious compared tot he mistake that they made on the doubles rankings were they screwed it up badly and the when category is really stupid which means you are not a tennis supporter to not know that the changes are from week-to-week that was like started many years ago. ( Dencod16) 23:32, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
I appreciate your drive to improve the article, however you last edits like this and this only added trivial or even grossly misinterpreted information. Specifically,
Please look through relevant MSDN Library sections on Windows Device Driver Kit and Windows Graphics APIs before making broad conclusion based on simply-worded guidelines for support personnel. -- 83.167.100.36 ( talk) 20:03, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
I'm sorry that I reply to you late (I'm offline for a few months).
I removed tons of game publishers and developers in Casual game because I think they're not notable publishers (original search by myself).
Ʈuaηèsε™ (literally 俊的) 10:43, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles ( talk) 18:45, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
This cited source does not agree with you. It explicitly states that DVD-RAM support is new to IMAPI version 2. Fleet Command ( talk) 12:04, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
I'm afraid I don't understand you. What are you exactly talking about? Is it related to my recent edit to Office 2010 article? Fleet Command ( talk) 12:08, 20 June 2010 (UTC)