![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi there. Someone has mentioned your name as in a dispute at this page and I have volunteered to mediate the case as part of the Mediation Cabal. Please read the "mediator notes" section of the case page for further instructions. Thank you, GrooveDog ( talk) ( Review) 02:28, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi! You might be interested in the discussion at Talk:Chronology of events of the 2009 Honduran political crisis#SqueakBox unilaterally changed the name again, even as we were discussing the name change. Thank you. Rico 17:46, 24 July 2009 (UTC) (Using {{ Please see}})
Hi Xaliqen. Looking through the deleted edits, I can see what you mean. I see you applied a {{ fairuse}} tag to File:DRMN 01.jpg, but that in itself is not valid fair-use rationale per Wikipedia's standards (see WP:FUG and/or this example for instructions/ideas on how to write good fair-use rationale). I might also suggest that you read WP:NFC and WP:IUP. Once you have finished reading the relevant policy pages, please feel free to upload the file again. But remember to include thorough fair-use rationale and a licensing tag. Regards, FASTILY (TALK) 21:32, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
"A YouTube video shows blah <ref>YouTube video of blah</ref> is original research and not appropriate. There's nothing wrong with discussing independent coverage of something but on biographies especially we should not be talking about to the week's great viral vidoe sourced direct to the video. Guy ( Help!) 10:22, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi there. Someone has mentioned your name as in a dispute at this page and I have volunteered to mediate the case as part of the Mediation Cabal. Please read the "mediator notes" section of the case page for further instructions. Thank you, GrooveDog ( talk) ( Review) 02:28, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi! You might be interested in the discussion at Talk:Chronology of events of the 2009 Honduran political crisis#SqueakBox unilaterally changed the name again, even as we were discussing the name change. Thank you. Rico 17:46, 24 July 2009 (UTC) (Using {{ Please see}})
Hi Xaliqen. Looking through the deleted edits, I can see what you mean. I see you applied a {{ fairuse}} tag to File:DRMN 01.jpg, but that in itself is not valid fair-use rationale per Wikipedia's standards (see WP:FUG and/or this example for instructions/ideas on how to write good fair-use rationale). I might also suggest that you read WP:NFC and WP:IUP. Once you have finished reading the relevant policy pages, please feel free to upload the file again. But remember to include thorough fair-use rationale and a licensing tag. Regards, FASTILY (TALK) 21:32, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
"A YouTube video shows blah <ref>YouTube video of blah</ref> is original research and not appropriate. There's nothing wrong with discussing independent coverage of something but on biographies especially we should not be talking about to the week's great viral vidoe sourced direct to the video. Guy ( Help!) 10:22, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |