There is a separate article for the Anthony Weiner photo scandal, and adding additional information there is appropriate and more than welcome. The Anthony Weiner page itself does not need to include every tidbit, just the essentials. 03:22, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
|
In your undoing of my edit, you mentioned the Anthony Weiner article following "accepted form". Can you point me to any relevant Wikipedia policies that explain what you mean? I personally think this event is very relevant for his lead. Kansan ( talk) 04:14, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Anthony Weiner. Users are expected to
collaborate with others and avoid editing
disruptively.
In particular, the three-revert rule states that:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Grahamboat ( talk) 04:50, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by WriterIN ( talk • contribs) 04:56, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
There is a separate article for the Anthony Weiner photo scandal, and adding additional information there is appropriate and more than welcome. The Anthony Weiner page itself does not need to include every tidbit, just the essentials. 03:22, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
|
In your undoing of my edit, you mentioned the Anthony Weiner article following "accepted form". Can you point me to any relevant Wikipedia policies that explain what you mean? I personally think this event is very relevant for his lead. Kansan ( talk) 04:14, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Anthony Weiner. Users are expected to
collaborate with others and avoid editing
disruptively.
In particular, the three-revert rule states that:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Grahamboat ( talk) 04:50, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by WriterIN ( talk • contribs) 04:56, June 8, 2011 (UTC)