An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a
sockpuppet of
Usgeowiki (
talk ·
contribs ·
logs). Please refer to commons:Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Usgeowiki for evidence. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
|
Hi, Worldenc. Thanks for adding the demographic charts to various counties. I've noticed some typos in the charts themselves that you probably should fix;
Thanks! — hike395 ( talk) 13:27, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your comment, i will update all chart (fix typos) within 2 to 3 day and re-upload it. Worldenc ( talk) 15:59, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
{{ helpme}}
I want to create bar chart for population (for determine an annual trend), please advised me for starting point of bar chart.
example : if county has population
July 2000 Estimate 43874 July 2001 Estimate 44437 July 2002 Estimate 45160 July 2003 Estimate 45766 July 2004 Estimate 46941 July 2005 Estimate 47882 July 2006 Estimate 49039 July 2007 Estimate 49830 July 2008 Estimate 50364
for this chart what should i take starting point???
usually i take starting point 40000, its ok or not???
some one tell me that you must take starting point 0 (zero) is that correct???
Which is better example 1 or example 2 ???
Thanks Worldenc ( talk) 06:54, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks Letter7 Worldenc ( talk) 07:53, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Thank you very much Dark for your comment Worldenc ( talk) 07:59, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Fiscal Year Budget Graphs : http://www.genome.gov/27531706 : which start $450 Millions Effect on noise level : http://international.fhwa.dot.gov/pubs/pl07027/llcp_07_04.cfm : which start 76 DB History of Budget Authority : http://www.ninds.nih.gov/news_and_events/congressional_testimony/ninds_fy_2010_cj.htm : which start $1480 million
etc...
Once again thanks for your advised, i am looking for other editors review
Worldenc ( talk) 13:42, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
I really don't know for sure: although showing the total population (instead of from 0) seems like it would make more sense, the base of 40,000 is more readable, and including a note in the caption about how the base is 40,000 (or whatever other number) would clarify the actual situation. After all, if we don't read the caption, we won't know that it refers to population at all. Nyttend ( talk) 14:49, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
I have update all bar chart (start from zero) Worldenc ( talk) 22:44, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
I've noticed your awesome work making demographic charts for counties in Missouri. I'm currently working on trying to get the Columbia, Missouri article from GA to FA status. If you have the time, would you be able to make the same demographic charts for that page? Thanks in advance, if not thats ok too. Grey Wanderer ( talk) 20:43, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, currently i am working for county of US, after county i will work for all US city, so you have wait for atleast 1 week, after complete US county i will work for Columbia, Missouri.
Worldenc ( talk) 02:24, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for making those great bar charts. One request: can you increase the size of the font in the bars by a lot, and make them white? Then in the article, they'll stand out better. Relevant files:
You may want to consider doing that with all the ones you make in the future so they can be used effectively within an article (and won't require the user to go to the image page if they don't want to). upstate NYer 05:08, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your comment, i will increase font in chart and change color, just tell me what font size and color is better??, one another thing i will update after my current work is complete so it will take some time, if you want to chart show better in article you may increase width of chart (just increase chart width 200px to 300px or 400px).
Worldenc ( talk) 05:16, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
Although I think graphs add value, I'm bothered by several aspects of the graphs that you are uploading. Examples:
-- Orlady ( talk) 13:49, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
You may want to update the caption in the population graph to include an en dash rather than a hyphen between the years ("2000–2008"), per WP:DASH. I've updated it in a few county articles on my watch list. The character can be generated using "–", Alt-0150 on Microsoft Windows platforms, or option-dash in Mac OS. — ADavidB 13:37, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
I am reverting the charts you added to all or most of the pages I am watching because there is no consensus on their inclusion. Personally, I think they have been added to the pages without any attention being paid to the way the pages look and, judging from all the chatter above, it seems that they don't present the data very well either. Sincerely, GeorgeLouis ( talk) 14:42, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
A tiny settlement like Mettler, California, with a population of 157, is certainly not well served by this overwhelming attention to petty detail; viz.: this comparison. Yours, GeorgeLouis ( talk) 14:55, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
The Graphic Designer's Barnstar | ||
Worldenc received this barnstar for excellent contributions in graphic design, specifically, uploading countless demography graphics on counties and cities in the United States. Thank you. Grey Wanderer ( talk) 19:53, 25 November 2009 (UTC) |
You need to please go back and down size the pictures about demographics and what not, to all the city articles to at most 150 pix, nore. To made the pics 300, thats way to big, and you are destroying the article flow which was made by WikiProject IE and User:MissionInn.Jim some of the cities were Yucca Valley, California, Adelanto, California, ect you know which cities/article they were, again I am only worried about the cities in San Bernardino County and Riverside County. Please do it as soon as possible! Anyways have fun and any questions ask me, GO DOWNSIZE THOSE PICS....PLEASE (I WOULD DO IT MY SELF BUT i AM WORKING ON FIXING OTHER ARTICLES), - House1090 ( talk) 21:23, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
I would resize graph as soon as possible, sorry for inconvenience. Worldenc ( talk) 08:13, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
What is the purpose of adding the mapzones link to the articles? It's an aggregation site (i.e., collecting data from official sources). We've had problems with people spamming similar sites in the past. (Though the site currently does not contain advertising, that doesn't preclude future ads being added. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:09, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
I have taken some data from this site, which are not available from official site (census site), though data were available but in diferent format (in database format), so user can't verify it, and chart concept were taken from this site, so i will add both website as source. Worldenc ( talk) 15:15, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
I would just like to inform you that I've started a thread here about the charts you have been creating and adding to city/area articles. Feel free to chime in about it. I just wanted to create a thread somewhere so we could keep the discussion in one place. Killiondude ( talk) 20:54, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for help, i have taken few data from mapzones.org and create graph some graph data don't taken from mapzones.org like http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:US01A0130045_Age.png which are completely taken from cencus this age chart don't found in mapzones.org so i only sourced cencus site. i have linked both website where data and concept taken from census and mapzones.org.
Worldenc ( talk) 05:19, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of a banned or blocked user. Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text{{
unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first. |
-- Hu12 ( talk) 19:13, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Demographic of San Francisco. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - San Francisco#Demographic. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at San Francisco#Demographic - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the
article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions.
Pim Rijkee (
talk)
21:36, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a
sockpuppet of
Usgeowiki (
talk ·
contribs ·
logs). Please refer to commons:Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Usgeowiki for evidence. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
|
Hi, Worldenc. Thanks for adding the demographic charts to various counties. I've noticed some typos in the charts themselves that you probably should fix;
Thanks! — hike395 ( talk) 13:27, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your comment, i will update all chart (fix typos) within 2 to 3 day and re-upload it. Worldenc ( talk) 15:59, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
{{ helpme}}
I want to create bar chart for population (for determine an annual trend), please advised me for starting point of bar chart.
example : if county has population
July 2000 Estimate 43874 July 2001 Estimate 44437 July 2002 Estimate 45160 July 2003 Estimate 45766 July 2004 Estimate 46941 July 2005 Estimate 47882 July 2006 Estimate 49039 July 2007 Estimate 49830 July 2008 Estimate 50364
for this chart what should i take starting point???
usually i take starting point 40000, its ok or not???
some one tell me that you must take starting point 0 (zero) is that correct???
Which is better example 1 or example 2 ???
Thanks Worldenc ( talk) 06:54, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks Letter7 Worldenc ( talk) 07:53, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Thank you very much Dark for your comment Worldenc ( talk) 07:59, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Fiscal Year Budget Graphs : http://www.genome.gov/27531706 : which start $450 Millions Effect on noise level : http://international.fhwa.dot.gov/pubs/pl07027/llcp_07_04.cfm : which start 76 DB History of Budget Authority : http://www.ninds.nih.gov/news_and_events/congressional_testimony/ninds_fy_2010_cj.htm : which start $1480 million
etc...
Once again thanks for your advised, i am looking for other editors review
Worldenc ( talk) 13:42, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
I really don't know for sure: although showing the total population (instead of from 0) seems like it would make more sense, the base of 40,000 is more readable, and including a note in the caption about how the base is 40,000 (or whatever other number) would clarify the actual situation. After all, if we don't read the caption, we won't know that it refers to population at all. Nyttend ( talk) 14:49, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
I have update all bar chart (start from zero) Worldenc ( talk) 22:44, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
I've noticed your awesome work making demographic charts for counties in Missouri. I'm currently working on trying to get the Columbia, Missouri article from GA to FA status. If you have the time, would you be able to make the same demographic charts for that page? Thanks in advance, if not thats ok too. Grey Wanderer ( talk) 20:43, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, currently i am working for county of US, after county i will work for all US city, so you have wait for atleast 1 week, after complete US county i will work for Columbia, Missouri.
Worldenc ( talk) 02:24, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for making those great bar charts. One request: can you increase the size of the font in the bars by a lot, and make them white? Then in the article, they'll stand out better. Relevant files:
You may want to consider doing that with all the ones you make in the future so they can be used effectively within an article (and won't require the user to go to the image page if they don't want to). upstate NYer 05:08, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your comment, i will increase font in chart and change color, just tell me what font size and color is better??, one another thing i will update after my current work is complete so it will take some time, if you want to chart show better in article you may increase width of chart (just increase chart width 200px to 300px or 400px).
Worldenc ( talk) 05:16, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
Although I think graphs add value, I'm bothered by several aspects of the graphs that you are uploading. Examples:
-- Orlady ( talk) 13:49, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
You may want to update the caption in the population graph to include an en dash rather than a hyphen between the years ("2000–2008"), per WP:DASH. I've updated it in a few county articles on my watch list. The character can be generated using "–", Alt-0150 on Microsoft Windows platforms, or option-dash in Mac OS. — ADavidB 13:37, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
I am reverting the charts you added to all or most of the pages I am watching because there is no consensus on their inclusion. Personally, I think they have been added to the pages without any attention being paid to the way the pages look and, judging from all the chatter above, it seems that they don't present the data very well either. Sincerely, GeorgeLouis ( talk) 14:42, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
A tiny settlement like Mettler, California, with a population of 157, is certainly not well served by this overwhelming attention to petty detail; viz.: this comparison. Yours, GeorgeLouis ( talk) 14:55, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
The Graphic Designer's Barnstar | ||
Worldenc received this barnstar for excellent contributions in graphic design, specifically, uploading countless demography graphics on counties and cities in the United States. Thank you. Grey Wanderer ( talk) 19:53, 25 November 2009 (UTC) |
You need to please go back and down size the pictures about demographics and what not, to all the city articles to at most 150 pix, nore. To made the pics 300, thats way to big, and you are destroying the article flow which was made by WikiProject IE and User:MissionInn.Jim some of the cities were Yucca Valley, California, Adelanto, California, ect you know which cities/article they were, again I am only worried about the cities in San Bernardino County and Riverside County. Please do it as soon as possible! Anyways have fun and any questions ask me, GO DOWNSIZE THOSE PICS....PLEASE (I WOULD DO IT MY SELF BUT i AM WORKING ON FIXING OTHER ARTICLES), - House1090 ( talk) 21:23, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
I would resize graph as soon as possible, sorry for inconvenience. Worldenc ( talk) 08:13, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
What is the purpose of adding the mapzones link to the articles? It's an aggregation site (i.e., collecting data from official sources). We've had problems with people spamming similar sites in the past. (Though the site currently does not contain advertising, that doesn't preclude future ads being added. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:09, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
I have taken some data from this site, which are not available from official site (census site), though data were available but in diferent format (in database format), so user can't verify it, and chart concept were taken from this site, so i will add both website as source. Worldenc ( talk) 15:15, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
I would just like to inform you that I've started a thread here about the charts you have been creating and adding to city/area articles. Feel free to chime in about it. I just wanted to create a thread somewhere so we could keep the discussion in one place. Killiondude ( talk) 20:54, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for help, i have taken few data from mapzones.org and create graph some graph data don't taken from mapzones.org like http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:US01A0130045_Age.png which are completely taken from cencus this age chart don't found in mapzones.org so i only sourced cencus site. i have linked both website where data and concept taken from census and mapzones.org.
Worldenc ( talk) 05:19, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of a banned or blocked user. Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text{{
unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first. |
-- Hu12 ( talk) 19:13, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Demographic of San Francisco. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - San Francisco#Demographic. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at San Francisco#Demographic - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the
article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions.
Pim Rijkee (
talk)
21:36, 15 December 2009 (UTC)