Thanks so much for your very nice post. It seems to me that we have a lot in common, in more than one area. I am currently a student as well, in the United States. What is your field? I have 2 fields, Biology and Computer Science. Do you have any specific questions about evolution or any other aspect of your science club, by the way? If you can let me know what they are, then I'd be able to understand better how to help you. For example, do you want a list of evolution and other science topics to discuss at club meetings, or a few leads to possible articles for your science journal?
FYI, I have professional biology publications. I originally became involved with the Wikimedia Foundation because I was trying to get OR (Original Research) about evolution more active on Wikiversity, and help develop Wikiversity as a forum for OR. I'll have more time to do this after December 23, when I'm on break from University. I can keep you posted if you would like.
Regarding the Donmeh: That is so cool, that Freely is a professor at your University! He writes very well and seems to have an eye for interesting topics. Are you a Donmeh yourself? Does your Username have any connection with Shabbatai, because it looks so similar to me? Also, do you know whether Shabbatai was involved in any social justice activities, because this is a topic I'm very curious about? Thanks, AFriedman (talk) 19:52, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello! I'm about to email you some articles I think you might be interested in, in terms of what you said you wanted to see your science club discuss. The evolution of anaerobic respiration is not my main area of specialty, but I hope what I'm sending is helpful to you. I'm also sending you an article about a very different topic that I wrote. My other scientific publications have not come out yet.
Also, it's nice that you like people who try to reform religions. Judaism, my own religion, is actually changing a lot in the U.S.A. where I live. It's very exciting to see some of the changes, and to think about what else could be re-envisioned. Shabbetai, by the way, is one of my inspirations. I don't know how many practicing Jewish people you know, or what Jewish life is like in Turkey. In terms of modern Judaism, you may be interested in the articles about Reform Judaism and Conservative Judaism, which are very popular in the U.S.A. One of the main reasons they developed was that many people wanted branches of Judaism that gave more rights to women. There are also groups within Orthodox Judaism that are moving in the same direction, such as Modern Orthodox Judaism and the Jewish Orthodox Feminist Alliance. Karaite Judaism, which dates at least to medieval times, is a very egalitarian branch in general and has had not too many problems with women's participation for quite a long time, although there aren't too many Karaites in the U.S.A. There's a nice section on French Wikipedia about women in Karaite Judaism, which I hope will eventually be moved to English Wikipedia. What did Shabbetai specifically do for women's rights?
Also, I'm already in contact with Yalhak, who seems like he does a lot of very interesting things on behalf of Shabbetai's historical legacy. But I'd still appreciate your speaking with him about me. -- AFriedman (talk) 02:16, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, and interesting. Best of luck on your exams! When do they end? Also, since we're possibly going off topic for a User talk page I'm answering you by email. -- AFriedman (talk) 23:01, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
AFriedman
(talk) has given you a
bubble tea! Bubble teas promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a bubble tea, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy drinking!
Spread the awesomeness of bubble teas by adding {{ subst: User:Download/Bubble tea}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
Best of luck on exams! I was thinking of you, and felt that your Talk page deserved something nice. Great job starting the Donmeh West and Kirklareli Jewish Quarter articles, and I'm sure other nice articles as well! -- AFriedman (talk) 16:16, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
The article Donmeh West has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Glenfarclas (
talk)
07:36, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
Abbatai, thanks for reverting edits to the Halide Edip article. But I don't want to be involved in any edit wars. Please add your thoughts regarding the city's name to the talk page. The question is, What should people writing in English call the city when referring to events that happened 1453-1930? Sağ olun. DNYHCA ( talk) 16:38, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
What do you think about Mehmet Özdilek's nickname? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mehmet_%C3%96zdilek Kavas ( talk) 12:07, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
Welcome back to Wikipedia! Always nice to see you. -- La comadreja formerly AFriedman RESEARCH (talk) 02:38, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
I am new in editing articles on Wikipedia so I dont know how to approach this but I noticed your comments in the article Igdir so here I go: the article of the of Malazgirt is specifically only regarding the Armenian genocide & has absolutely no information regarding the town itself. It is in my opinion heavily POV & I dont know if I can or should just go ahead and modify it after having left a comment on the page nor do I know how to approach a higher wiki staff member regarding this. Any help/guidance you can offer me will be appreciated in advance. AussieSkeptic82 ( talk) 16:12, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for commenting on my page. I have also found discrepancies on the article regarding the Hagia Sophia. The article states that the Hagia Sophia was subject to 3 days of pillaging yet it also states that it was also converted instantly to a mosque. This is highly peculiar given the Ottoman respect to other religions and other sources of information (internationally circulated) that I have read regarding the subject is that Constantinople did not suffer the pillaging the article seems to suggest. Indeed the article contradicts itself given what is known about the respect Muslims have towards their centers of worship and the described actions the article states. AussieSkeptic82 ( talk) 03:41, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Did you know that you can get the articles you start or expand onto the main page? I've recently done that for several articles. See Template talk:Did you know. How are you? -- La comadreja formerly AFriedman RESEARCH (talk) 23:51, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
Abbatai has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, A record of your Day will always be kept here. |
For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, click here. Have a Great Day... Neutralhomer • Talk • 05:01, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
Abbatai, you are more than well-acquainted with the ArbCom 2 sanctions relating to Armenia and Azerbaijan. Please discuss all your edits on the talk page and resolve differences there instead of resorting to edit warring. The move on your part on the Turkish invasion of Armenia article was done without even looking at the talk page, where I outlined the reasons why it was moved in the first place. Please discuss and reach a consensus in your edits from now on. Thank you.-- Marshal Bagramyan ( talk) 21:13, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
21:16, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Solar ball. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Solarball. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Solarball - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact
one of these administrators to request that the administrator
userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the
article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions.
Nat Gertler (
talk)
20:34, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I checked your contributions to Wikipedia. Although your works are quite impressive, I noticed you are neither an anti-Turkish individual or a self orientalist tries to get admire from westerners by criticizing Turkey every means possible. What is the logic behind creating this [1] there is already an article covering the issue thanks. Abbatai 12:19, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
The article Sırrı Süreyya Önder has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{ prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. noq ( talk) 14:48, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi Takabeg, it is better for you check this pictures also [2] [3] Thanks.-- Abbatai 23:28, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
It was good of you to create the new article Nesli Çölgeçen. However, there are some holes that might need filling, such as adding more meaningful content to the article. As you know, there’s always room for more work to make your article even better. So thank you, Jipinghe ( talk) 19:56, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello, Abbatai, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!
I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Occupy Starbucks whether the article Occupy Starbucks should be in Wikipedia. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.
The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving Occupy Starbucks, which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk.
Thanks again for your contributions! That's me! Have doubt? Track me! 12:46, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Occupy Starbucks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Occupy Starbucks (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Purpleback pack 89≈≈≈≈ 20:53, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi Abbatai,
Back in December, you got either an AfD or PROD notification, which was part of the
template testing project's experiments. If you could go
here and leave us some feedback about what you think about the new versions of the templates we tested (there are links to the templates), that would be very useful. (You can also email me at mpinchukwikimedia.org if you want.) Thanks!
Maryana (WMF) (
talk)
20:01, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
The article Ufuk Çakmak has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
AllyD (
talk)
20:03, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to
attack other editors. Please comment on the content and not the contributors. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you.
This is wholly inappropriate (
talk→
BWilkins
←track)
12:30, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -- Kansas Bear ( talk) 20:28, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Étienne Dolet ( talk) 19:30, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
I have started a topic of discussion at the talk page. I hope you can join it, instead of edit-warring. Étienne Dolet ( talk) 19:32, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Étienne Dolet ( talk) 19:32, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you..
OptimusView (
talk)
18:39, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ergenekon (allegation), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Justice and Development Party. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:14, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
This message is meant to notify that there's an issue on request for enforcement (see [4]) regarding you. OptimusView ( talk) 18:36, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
This was really funny [5]. :) Yaḥyā ( talk) 23:44, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
The following sanction now applies to you:
You are hereby topic banned from all pages related to Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related ethnic conflicts, broadly interpreted, for 30 days.
You have been sanctioned for the reasons provided in response to this arbitration enforcement request.
This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.
You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 20:15, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the
guide to appealing blocks (specifically
this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{
unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}
. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the
arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (
by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
09:06, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."
The following sanction now applies to you:
Your topic ban from all pages related to Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related ethnic conflicts, broadly interpreted, is hereby extended for 6 months.
You have been sanctioned for this clear violation of the sanctions which were placed against you for the reasons provided in response to this arbitration enforcement request.
This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.
You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 10:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ergenekon (allegation), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Justice and Development Party. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:41, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Abbatai. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
here. Étienne Dolet ( talk) 04:11, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
Per this AE decision, both you and User:EtienneDolet are admonished and warned against battleground behaviour and failure to edit neutrally. Future examples of these behaviours are likely to result in a topic ban. This warning to both of you is being entered in WP:DSLOG and can be referred to if further problems occur. Thank you, EdJohnston ( talk) 15:26, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
Drmies So I should not edit the pages ED edits but it is ok if vice versa happens. Honestly, I couldn't get how it works. Thanks. ED there is not any misrepresentation of the source. It is you misunderstood the sentence. The long noun clause "Ermeni çetecilerinin gece yarısı kör ateşi" means "blind fire of Armenian guerrillas at night". It is not "gece yarısı körü ateşi". Thanks. And please stop accusing me with misrepresentation before seeing my explanation. Thanks. Abbatai 01:11, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
To clarify: my remark actually is not just some remark it's a Shakespeare quote, it has to do with the topic at hand. As in, whether he was a neocon or an imperialist, it's still the same but though the name has changed. Please don't remove it. Étienne Dolet ( talk) 18:00, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
It is nice of you use such a quote in that hot debate. However, all this neocon discussion does not belong to Khanasor talk page. That's why I removed your edit. Thanks. Abbatai 18:21, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tristan und Isolde, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transfiguration. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:08, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
Hello, Abbatai. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The article Donmeh West has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. -
GenoV84 (
talk)
15:55, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
The article Yakov Leib HaKohain has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. -
GenoV84 (
talk)
15:45, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Wleifbwilue~vanished. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kırklareli Jewish quarter until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Thanks so much for your very nice post. It seems to me that we have a lot in common, in more than one area. I am currently a student as well, in the United States. What is your field? I have 2 fields, Biology and Computer Science. Do you have any specific questions about evolution or any other aspect of your science club, by the way? If you can let me know what they are, then I'd be able to understand better how to help you. For example, do you want a list of evolution and other science topics to discuss at club meetings, or a few leads to possible articles for your science journal?
FYI, I have professional biology publications. I originally became involved with the Wikimedia Foundation because I was trying to get OR (Original Research) about evolution more active on Wikiversity, and help develop Wikiversity as a forum for OR. I'll have more time to do this after December 23, when I'm on break from University. I can keep you posted if you would like.
Regarding the Donmeh: That is so cool, that Freely is a professor at your University! He writes very well and seems to have an eye for interesting topics. Are you a Donmeh yourself? Does your Username have any connection with Shabbatai, because it looks so similar to me? Also, do you know whether Shabbatai was involved in any social justice activities, because this is a topic I'm very curious about? Thanks, AFriedman (talk) 19:52, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello! I'm about to email you some articles I think you might be interested in, in terms of what you said you wanted to see your science club discuss. The evolution of anaerobic respiration is not my main area of specialty, but I hope what I'm sending is helpful to you. I'm also sending you an article about a very different topic that I wrote. My other scientific publications have not come out yet.
Also, it's nice that you like people who try to reform religions. Judaism, my own religion, is actually changing a lot in the U.S.A. where I live. It's very exciting to see some of the changes, and to think about what else could be re-envisioned. Shabbetai, by the way, is one of my inspirations. I don't know how many practicing Jewish people you know, or what Jewish life is like in Turkey. In terms of modern Judaism, you may be interested in the articles about Reform Judaism and Conservative Judaism, which are very popular in the U.S.A. One of the main reasons they developed was that many people wanted branches of Judaism that gave more rights to women. There are also groups within Orthodox Judaism that are moving in the same direction, such as Modern Orthodox Judaism and the Jewish Orthodox Feminist Alliance. Karaite Judaism, which dates at least to medieval times, is a very egalitarian branch in general and has had not too many problems with women's participation for quite a long time, although there aren't too many Karaites in the U.S.A. There's a nice section on French Wikipedia about women in Karaite Judaism, which I hope will eventually be moved to English Wikipedia. What did Shabbetai specifically do for women's rights?
Also, I'm already in contact with Yalhak, who seems like he does a lot of very interesting things on behalf of Shabbetai's historical legacy. But I'd still appreciate your speaking with him about me. -- AFriedman (talk) 02:16, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, and interesting. Best of luck on your exams! When do they end? Also, since we're possibly going off topic for a User talk page I'm answering you by email. -- AFriedman (talk) 23:01, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
AFriedman
(talk) has given you a
bubble tea! Bubble teas promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a bubble tea, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy drinking!
Spread the awesomeness of bubble teas by adding {{ subst: User:Download/Bubble tea}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
Best of luck on exams! I was thinking of you, and felt that your Talk page deserved something nice. Great job starting the Donmeh West and Kirklareli Jewish Quarter articles, and I'm sure other nice articles as well! -- AFriedman (talk) 16:16, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
The article Donmeh West has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Glenfarclas (
talk)
07:36, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
Abbatai, thanks for reverting edits to the Halide Edip article. But I don't want to be involved in any edit wars. Please add your thoughts regarding the city's name to the talk page. The question is, What should people writing in English call the city when referring to events that happened 1453-1930? Sağ olun. DNYHCA ( talk) 16:38, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
What do you think about Mehmet Özdilek's nickname? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mehmet_%C3%96zdilek Kavas ( talk) 12:07, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
Welcome back to Wikipedia! Always nice to see you. -- La comadreja formerly AFriedman RESEARCH (talk) 02:38, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
I am new in editing articles on Wikipedia so I dont know how to approach this but I noticed your comments in the article Igdir so here I go: the article of the of Malazgirt is specifically only regarding the Armenian genocide & has absolutely no information regarding the town itself. It is in my opinion heavily POV & I dont know if I can or should just go ahead and modify it after having left a comment on the page nor do I know how to approach a higher wiki staff member regarding this. Any help/guidance you can offer me will be appreciated in advance. AussieSkeptic82 ( talk) 16:12, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for commenting on my page. I have also found discrepancies on the article regarding the Hagia Sophia. The article states that the Hagia Sophia was subject to 3 days of pillaging yet it also states that it was also converted instantly to a mosque. This is highly peculiar given the Ottoman respect to other religions and other sources of information (internationally circulated) that I have read regarding the subject is that Constantinople did not suffer the pillaging the article seems to suggest. Indeed the article contradicts itself given what is known about the respect Muslims have towards their centers of worship and the described actions the article states. AussieSkeptic82 ( talk) 03:41, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Did you know that you can get the articles you start or expand onto the main page? I've recently done that for several articles. See Template talk:Did you know. How are you? -- La comadreja formerly AFriedman RESEARCH (talk) 23:51, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
Abbatai has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, A record of your Day will always be kept here. |
For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, click here. Have a Great Day... Neutralhomer • Talk • 05:01, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
Abbatai, you are more than well-acquainted with the ArbCom 2 sanctions relating to Armenia and Azerbaijan. Please discuss all your edits on the talk page and resolve differences there instead of resorting to edit warring. The move on your part on the Turkish invasion of Armenia article was done without even looking at the talk page, where I outlined the reasons why it was moved in the first place. Please discuss and reach a consensus in your edits from now on. Thank you.-- Marshal Bagramyan ( talk) 21:13, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
21:16, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Solar ball. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Solarball. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Solarball - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact
one of these administrators to request that the administrator
userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the
article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions.
Nat Gertler (
talk)
20:34, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I checked your contributions to Wikipedia. Although your works are quite impressive, I noticed you are neither an anti-Turkish individual or a self orientalist tries to get admire from westerners by criticizing Turkey every means possible. What is the logic behind creating this [1] there is already an article covering the issue thanks. Abbatai 12:19, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
The article Sırrı Süreyya Önder has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{ prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. noq ( talk) 14:48, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi Takabeg, it is better for you check this pictures also [2] [3] Thanks.-- Abbatai 23:28, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
It was good of you to create the new article Nesli Çölgeçen. However, there are some holes that might need filling, such as adding more meaningful content to the article. As you know, there’s always room for more work to make your article even better. So thank you, Jipinghe ( talk) 19:56, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello, Abbatai, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!
I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Occupy Starbucks whether the article Occupy Starbucks should be in Wikipedia. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.
The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving Occupy Starbucks, which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk.
Thanks again for your contributions! That's me! Have doubt? Track me! 12:46, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Occupy Starbucks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Occupy Starbucks (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Purpleback pack 89≈≈≈≈ 20:53, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi Abbatai,
Back in December, you got either an AfD or PROD notification, which was part of the
template testing project's experiments. If you could go
here and leave us some feedback about what you think about the new versions of the templates we tested (there are links to the templates), that would be very useful. (You can also email me at mpinchukwikimedia.org if you want.) Thanks!
Maryana (WMF) (
talk)
20:01, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
The article Ufuk Çakmak has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
AllyD (
talk)
20:03, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to
attack other editors. Please comment on the content and not the contributors. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you.
This is wholly inappropriate (
talk→
BWilkins
←track)
12:30, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -- Kansas Bear ( talk) 20:28, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Étienne Dolet ( talk) 19:30, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
I have started a topic of discussion at the talk page. I hope you can join it, instead of edit-warring. Étienne Dolet ( talk) 19:32, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Étienne Dolet ( talk) 19:32, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you..
OptimusView (
talk)
18:39, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ergenekon (allegation), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Justice and Development Party. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:14, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
This message is meant to notify that there's an issue on request for enforcement (see [4]) regarding you. OptimusView ( talk) 18:36, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
This was really funny [5]. :) Yaḥyā ( talk) 23:44, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
The following sanction now applies to you:
You are hereby topic banned from all pages related to Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related ethnic conflicts, broadly interpreted, for 30 days.
You have been sanctioned for the reasons provided in response to this arbitration enforcement request.
This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.
You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 20:15, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the
guide to appealing blocks (specifically
this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{
unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}
. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the
arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (
by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
09:06, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."
The following sanction now applies to you:
Your topic ban from all pages related to Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related ethnic conflicts, broadly interpreted, is hereby extended for 6 months.
You have been sanctioned for this clear violation of the sanctions which were placed against you for the reasons provided in response to this arbitration enforcement request.
This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.
You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 10:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ergenekon (allegation), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Justice and Development Party. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:41, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Abbatai. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
here. Étienne Dolet ( talk) 04:11, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
Per this AE decision, both you and User:EtienneDolet are admonished and warned against battleground behaviour and failure to edit neutrally. Future examples of these behaviours are likely to result in a topic ban. This warning to both of you is being entered in WP:DSLOG and can be referred to if further problems occur. Thank you, EdJohnston ( talk) 15:26, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
Drmies So I should not edit the pages ED edits but it is ok if vice versa happens. Honestly, I couldn't get how it works. Thanks. ED there is not any misrepresentation of the source. It is you misunderstood the sentence. The long noun clause "Ermeni çetecilerinin gece yarısı kör ateşi" means "blind fire of Armenian guerrillas at night". It is not "gece yarısı körü ateşi". Thanks. And please stop accusing me with misrepresentation before seeing my explanation. Thanks. Abbatai 01:11, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
To clarify: my remark actually is not just some remark it's a Shakespeare quote, it has to do with the topic at hand. As in, whether he was a neocon or an imperialist, it's still the same but though the name has changed. Please don't remove it. Étienne Dolet ( talk) 18:00, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
It is nice of you use such a quote in that hot debate. However, all this neocon discussion does not belong to Khanasor talk page. That's why I removed your edit. Thanks. Abbatai 18:21, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tristan und Isolde, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transfiguration. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:08, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
Hello, Abbatai. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The article Donmeh West has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. -
GenoV84 (
talk)
15:55, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
The article Yakov Leib HaKohain has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. -
GenoV84 (
talk)
15:45, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Wleifbwilue~vanished. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kırklareli Jewish quarter until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.